-
Quantum Algorithm for Path-Edge Sampling
Authors:
Stacey Jeffery,
Shelby Kimmel,
Alvaro Piedrafita
Abstract:
We present a quantum algorithm for sampling an edge on a path between two nodes s and t in an undirected graph given as an adjacency matrix, and show that this can be done in query complexity that is asymptotically the same, up to log factors, as the query complexity of detecting a path between s and t. We use this path sampling algorithm as a subroutine for st-path finding and st-cut-set finding…
▽ More
We present a quantum algorithm for sampling an edge on a path between two nodes s and t in an undirected graph given as an adjacency matrix, and show that this can be done in query complexity that is asymptotically the same, up to log factors, as the query complexity of detecting a path between s and t. We use this path sampling algorithm as a subroutine for st-path finding and st-cut-set finding algorithms in some specific cases. Our main technical contribution is an algorithm for generating a quantum state that is proportional to the positive witness vector of a span program.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Span programs and quantum time complexity
Authors:
Arjan Cornelissen,
Stacey Jeffery,
Maris Ozols,
Alvaro Piedrafita
Abstract:
Span programs are an important model of quantum computation due to their tight correspondence with quantum query complexity. For any decision problem $f$, the minimum complexity of a span program for $f$ is equal, up to a constant factor, to the quantum query complexity of $f$. Moreover, this correspondence is constructive. A span program for $f$ with complexity $C$ can be compiled into a bounded…
▽ More
Span programs are an important model of quantum computation due to their tight correspondence with quantum query complexity. For any decision problem $f$, the minimum complexity of a span program for $f$ is equal, up to a constant factor, to the quantum query complexity of $f$. Moreover, this correspondence is constructive. A span program for $f$ with complexity $C$ can be compiled into a bounded error quantum algorithm for $f$ with query complexity $O(C)$, and vice versa.
In this work, we prove an analogous connection for quantum time complexity. In particular, we show how to convert a quantum algorithm for $f$ with time complexity $T$ into a span program for $f$ such that it compiles back into a quantum algorithm for $f$ with time complexity $\widetilde{O}(T)$. While the query complexity of quantum algorithms obtained from span programs is well-understood, it is not generally clear how to implement certain query-independent operations in a time-efficient manner. We show that for span programs derived from algorithms with a time-efficient implementation, we can preserve the time efficiency when implementing the span program. This means in particular that span programs not only fully capture quantum query complexity, but also quantum time complexity.
One practical advantage of being able to convert quantum algorithms to span programs in a way that preserves time complexity is that span programs compose very nicely. We demonstrate this by improving Ambainis's variable-time quantum search result using our construction through a span program composition for the OR function.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Quantum Algorithms for Connectivity and Related Problems
Authors:
Michael Jarret,
Stacey Jeffery,
Shelby Kimmel,
Alvaro Piedrafita
Abstract:
An important family of span programs, st-connectivity span programs, have been used to design quantum algorithms in various contexts, including a number of graph problems and formula evaluation problems. The complexity of the resulting algorithms depends on the largest positive witness size of any 1-input, and the largest negative witness size of any 0-input. Belovs and Reichardt first showed that…
▽ More
An important family of span programs, st-connectivity span programs, have been used to design quantum algorithms in various contexts, including a number of graph problems and formula evaluation problems. The complexity of the resulting algorithms depends on the largest positive witness size of any 1-input, and the largest negative witness size of any 0-input. Belovs and Reichardt first showed that the positive witness size is exactly characterized by the effective resistance of the input graph, but only rough upper bounds were known previously on the negative witness size. We show that the negative witness size in an st-connectivity span program is exactly characterized by the capacitance of the input graph. This gives a tight analysis for algorithms based on st-connectivity span programs on any set of inputs.
We use this analysis to give a new quantum algorithm for estimating the capacitance of a graph. We also describe a new quantum algorithm for deciding if a graph is connected, which improves the previous best quantum algorithm for this problem if we're promised that either the graph has at least kappa > 1 components, or the graph is connected and has small average resistance, which is upper bounded by the diameter. We also give an alternative algorithm for deciding if a graph is connected that can be better than our first algorithm when the maximum degree is small. Finally, using ideas from our second connectivity algorithm, we give an algorithm for estimating the algebraic connectivity of a graph, the second largest eigenvalue of the Laplacian.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
