-
Giving each task what it needs -- leveraging structured sparsity for tailored multi-task learning
Authors:
Richa Upadhyay,
Ronald Phlypo,
Rajkumar Saini,
Marcus Liwicki
Abstract:
Every task demands distinct feature representations, ranging from low-level to high-level attributes, so it is vital to address the specific needs of each task, especially in the Multi-task Learning (MTL) framework. This work, therefore, introduces Layer-Optimized Multi-Task (LOMT) models that utilize structured sparsity to refine feature selection for individual tasks and enhance the performance…
▽ More
Every task demands distinct feature representations, ranging from low-level to high-level attributes, so it is vital to address the specific needs of each task, especially in the Multi-task Learning (MTL) framework. This work, therefore, introduces Layer-Optimized Multi-Task (LOMT) models that utilize structured sparsity to refine feature selection for individual tasks and enhance the performance of all tasks in a multi-task scenario. Structured or group sparsity systematically eliminates parameters from trivial channels and, eventually, entire layers within a convolution neural network during training. Consequently, the remaining layers provide the most optimal features for a given task. In this two-step approach, we subsequently leverage this sparsity-induced optimal layer information to build the LOMT models by connecting task-specific decoders to these strategically identified layers, deviating from conventional approaches that uniformly connect decoders at the end of the network. This tailored architecture optimizes the network, focusing on essential features while reducing redundancy. We validate the efficacy of the proposed approach on two datasets, ie NYU-v2 and CelebAMask-HD datasets, for multiple heterogeneous tasks. A detailed performance analysis of the LOMT models, in contrast to the conventional MTL models, reveals that the LOMT models outperform for most task combinations. The excellent qualitative and quantitative outcomes highlight the effectiveness of employing structured sparsity for optimal layer (or feature) selection.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Less is More -- Towards parsimonious multi-task models using structured sparsity
Authors:
Richa Upadhyay,
Ronald Phlypo,
Rajkumar Saini,
Marcus Liwicki
Abstract:
Model sparsification in deep learning promotes simpler, more interpretable models with fewer parameters. This not only reduces the model's memory footprint and computational needs but also shortens inference time. This work focuses on creating sparse models optimized for multiple tasks with fewer parameters. These parsimonious models also possess the potential to match or outperform dense models i…
▽ More
Model sparsification in deep learning promotes simpler, more interpretable models with fewer parameters. This not only reduces the model's memory footprint and computational needs but also shortens inference time. This work focuses on creating sparse models optimized for multiple tasks with fewer parameters. These parsimonious models also possess the potential to match or outperform dense models in terms of performance. In this work, we introduce channel-wise l1/l2 group sparsity in the shared convolutional layers parameters (or weights) of the multi-task learning model. This approach facilitates the removal of extraneous groups i.e., channels (due to l1 regularization) and also imposes a penalty on the weights, further enhancing the learning efficiency for all tasks (due to l2 regularization). We analyzed the results of group sparsity in both single-task and multi-task settings on two widely-used Multi-Task Learning (MTL) datasets: NYU-v2 and CelebAMask-HQ. On both datasets, which consist of three different computer vision tasks each, multi-task models with approximately 70% sparsity outperform their dense equivalents. We also investigate how changing the degree of sparsification influences the model's performance, the overall sparsity percentage, the patterns of sparsity, and the inference time.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2023; v1 submitted 23 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Multi-Task Meta Learning: learn how to adapt to unseen tasks
Authors:
Richa Upadhyay,
Prakash Chandra Chhipa,
Ronald Phlypo,
Rajkumar Saini,
Marcus Liwicki
Abstract:
This work proposes Multi-task Meta Learning (MTML), integrating two learning paradigms Multi-Task Learning (MTL) and meta learning, to bring together the best of both worlds. In particular, it focuses simultaneous learning of multiple tasks, an element of MTL and promptly adapting to new tasks, a quality of meta learning. It is important to highlight that we focus on heterogeneous tasks, which are…
▽ More
This work proposes Multi-task Meta Learning (MTML), integrating two learning paradigms Multi-Task Learning (MTL) and meta learning, to bring together the best of both worlds. In particular, it focuses simultaneous learning of multiple tasks, an element of MTL and promptly adapting to new tasks, a quality of meta learning. It is important to highlight that we focus on heterogeneous tasks, which are of distinct kind, in contrast to typically considered homogeneous tasks (e.g., if all tasks are classification or if all tasks are regression tasks). The fundamental idea is to train a multi-task model, such that when an unseen task is introduced, it can learn in fewer steps whilst offering a performance at least as good as conventional single task learning on the new task or inclusion within the MTL. By conducting various experiments, we demonstrate this paradigm on two datasets and four tasks: NYU-v2 and the taskonomy dataset for which we perform semantic segmentation, depth estimation, surface normal estimation, and edge detection. MTML achieves state-of-the-art results for three out of four tasks for the NYU-v2 dataset and two out of four for the taskonomy dataset. In the taskonomy dataset, it was discovered that many pseudo-labeled segmentation masks lacked classes that were expected to be present in the ground truth; however, our MTML approach was found to be effective in detecting these missing classes, delivering good qualitative results. While, quantitatively its performance was affected due to the presence of incorrect ground truth labels. The the source code for reproducibility can be found at https://github.com/ricupa/MTML-learn-how-to-adapt-to-unseen-tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2023; v1 submitted 13 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Sharing to learn and learning to share; Fitting together Meta-Learning, Multi-Task Learning, and Transfer Learning: A meta review
Authors:
Richa Upadhyay,
Ronald Phlypo,
Rajkumar Saini,
Marcus Liwicki
Abstract:
Integrating knowledge across different domains is an essential feature of human learning. Learning paradigms such as transfer learning, meta learning, and multi-task learning reflect the human learning process by exploiting the prior knowledge for new tasks, encouraging faster learning and good generalization for new tasks. This article gives a detailed view of these learning paradigms and their c…
▽ More
Integrating knowledge across different domains is an essential feature of human learning. Learning paradigms such as transfer learning, meta learning, and multi-task learning reflect the human learning process by exploiting the prior knowledge for new tasks, encouraging faster learning and good generalization for new tasks. This article gives a detailed view of these learning paradigms and their comparative analysis. The weakness of one learning algorithm turns out to be a strength of another, and thus, merging them is a prevalent trait in the literature. Numerous research papers focus on each of these learning paradigms separately and provide a comprehensive overview of them. However, this article reviews research studies that combine (two of) these learning algorithms. This survey describes how these techniques are combined to solve problems in many different fields of research, including computer vision, natural language processing, hyper-spectral imaging, and many more, in a supervised setting only. Based on the knowledge accumulated from the literature, we hypothesize a generic task-agnostic and model-agnostic learning network - an ensemble of meta learning, transfer learning, and multi-task learning, termed Multi-modal Multi-task Meta Transfer Learning. We also present some open research questions, limitations, and future research directions for this proposed network. The aim of this article is to spark interest among scholars in effectively merging existing learning algorithms with the intention of advancing research in this field. Instead of presenting experimental results, we invite readers to explore and contemplate techniques for merging algorithms while navigating through their limitations.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Mixed-norm Regularization for Brain Decoding
Authors:
Rémi Flamary,
Nisrine Jrad,
Ronald Phlypo,
Marco Congedo,
Alain Rakotomamonjy
Abstract:
This work investigates the use of mixed-norm regularization for sensor selection in Event-Related Potential (ERP) based Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI). The classification problem is cast as a discriminative optimization framework where sensor selection is induced through the use of mixed-norms. This framework is extended to the multi-task learning situation where several similar classification ta…
▽ More
This work investigates the use of mixed-norm regularization for sensor selection in Event-Related Potential (ERP) based Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI). The classification problem is cast as a discriminative optimization framework where sensor selection is induced through the use of mixed-norms. This framework is extended to the multi-task learning situation where several similar classification tasks related to different subjects are learned simultaneously. In this case, multi-task learning helps in leveraging data scarcity issue yielding to more robust classifiers. For this purpose, we have introduced a regularizer that induces both sensor selection and classifier similarities. The different regularization approaches are compared on three ERP datasets showing the interest of mixed-norm regularization in terms of sensor selection. The multi-task approaches are evaluated when a small number of learning examples are available yielding to significant performance improvements especially for subjects performing poorly.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Independent Vector Analysis: Identification Conditions and Performance Bounds
Authors:
Matthew Anderson,
Geng-Shen Fu,
Ronald Phlypo,
Tülay Adalı
Abstract:
Recently, an extension of independent component analysis (ICA) from one to multiple datasets, termed independent vector analysis (IVA), has been the subject of significant research interest. IVA has also been shown to be a generalization of Hotelling's canonical correlation analysis. In this paper, we provide the identification conditions for a general IVA formulation, which accounts for linear, n…
▽ More
Recently, an extension of independent component analysis (ICA) from one to multiple datasets, termed independent vector analysis (IVA), has been the subject of significant research interest. IVA has also been shown to be a generalization of Hotelling's canonical correlation analysis. In this paper, we provide the identification conditions for a general IVA formulation, which accounts for linear, nonlinear, and sample-to-sample dependencies. The identification conditions are a generalization of previous results for ICA and for IVA when samples are independently and identically distributed. Furthermore, a principal aim of IVA is the identification of dependent sources between datasets. Thus, we provide the additional conditions for when the arbitrary ordering of the sources within each dataset is common. Performance bounds in terms of the Cramer-Rao lower bound are also provided for the demixing matrices and interference to source ratio. The performance of two IVA algorithms are compared to the theoretical bounds.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
