Guided Navigation from Multiple Viewpoints using Qualitative Spatial Reasoning
Authors:
Danilo Perico,
Paulo E. Santos,
Reinaldo Bianchi
Abstract:
Navigation is an essential ability for mobile agents to be completely autonomous and able to perform complex actions. However, the problem of navigation for agents with limited (or no) perception of the world, or devoid of a fully defined motion model, has received little attention from research in AI and Robotics. One way to tackle this problem is to use guided navigation, in which other autonomo…
▽ More
Navigation is an essential ability for mobile agents to be completely autonomous and able to perform complex actions. However, the problem of navigation for agents with limited (or no) perception of the world, or devoid of a fully defined motion model, has received little attention from research in AI and Robotics. One way to tackle this problem is to use guided navigation, in which other autonomous agents, endowed with perception, can combine their distinct viewpoints to infer the localisation and the appropriate commands to guide a sensory deprived agent through a particular path. Due to the limited knowledge about the physical and perceptual characteristics of the guided agent, this task should be conducted on a level of abstraction allowing the use of a generic motion model, and high-level commands, that can be applied by any type of autonomous agents, including humans. The main task considered in this work is, given a group of autonomous agents perceiving their common environment with their independent, egocentric and local vision sensors, the development and evaluation of algorithms capable of producing a set of high-level commands (involving qualitative directions: e.g. move left, go straight ahead) capable of guiding a sensory deprived robot to a goal location.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
Detecting soccer balls with reduced neural networks: a comparison of multiple architectures under constrained hardware scenarios
Authors:
Douglas De Rizzo Meneghetti,
Thiago Pedro Donadon Homem,
Jonas Henrique Renolfi de Oliveira,
Isaac Jesus da Silva,
Danilo Hernani Perico,
Reinaldo Augusto da Costa Bianchi
Abstract:
Object detection techniques that achieve state-of-the-art detection accuracy employ convolutional neural networks, implemented to have optimal performance in graphics processing units. Some hardware systems, such as mobile robots, operate under constrained hardware situations, but still benefit from object detection capabilities. Multiple network models have been proposed, achieving comparable acc…
▽ More
Object detection techniques that achieve state-of-the-art detection accuracy employ convolutional neural networks, implemented to have optimal performance in graphics processing units. Some hardware systems, such as mobile robots, operate under constrained hardware situations, but still benefit from object detection capabilities. Multiple network models have been proposed, achieving comparable accuracy with reduced architectures and leaner operations. Motivated by the need to create an object detection system for a soccer team of mobile robots, this work provides a comparative study of recent proposals of neural networks targeted towards constrained hardware environments, in the specific task of soccer ball detection. We train multiple open implementations of MobileNetV2 and MobileNetV3 models with different underlying architectures, as well as YOLOv3, TinyYOLOv3, YOLOv4 and TinyYOLOv4 in an annotated image data set captured using a mobile robot. We then report their mean average precision on a test data set and their inference times in videos of different resolutions, under constrained and unconstrained hardware configurations. Results show that MobileNetV3 models have a good trade-off between mAP and inference time in constrained scenarios only, while MobileNetV2 with high width multipliers are appropriate for server-side inference. YOLO models in their official implementations are not suitable for inference in CPUs.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2021; v1 submitted 28 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
