-
AI for Extreme Event Modeling and Understanding: Methodologies and Challenges
Authors:
Gustau Camps-Valls,
Miguel-Ángel Fernández-Torres,
Kai-Hendrik Cohrs,
Adrian Höhl,
Andrea Castelletti,
Aytac Pacal,
Claire Robin,
Francesco Martinuzzi,
Ioannis Papoutsis,
Ioannis Prapas,
Jorge Pérez-Aracil,
Katja Weigel,
Maria Gonzalez-Calabuig,
Markus Reichstein,
Martin Rabel,
Matteo Giuliani,
Miguel Mahecha,
Oana-Iuliana Popescu,
Oscar J. Pellicer-Valero,
Said Ouala,
Sancho Salcedo-Sanz,
Sebastian Sippel,
Spyros Kondylatos,
Tamara Happé,
Tristan Williams
Abstract:
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has deeply impacted various fields, including Earth system sciences. Here, AI improved weather forecasting, model emulation, parameter estimation, and the prediction of extreme events. However, the latter comes with specific challenges, such as develo** accurate predictors from noisy, heterogeneous and limited annotated data. This paper reviews how A…
▽ More
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has deeply impacted various fields, including Earth system sciences. Here, AI improved weather forecasting, model emulation, parameter estimation, and the prediction of extreme events. However, the latter comes with specific challenges, such as develo** accurate predictors from noisy, heterogeneous and limited annotated data. This paper reviews how AI is being used to analyze extreme events (like floods, droughts, wildfires and heatwaves), highlighting the importance of creating accurate, transparent, and reliable AI models. We discuss the hurdles of dealing with limited data, integrating information in real-time, deploying models, and making them understandable, all crucial for gaining the trust of stakeholders and meeting regulatory needs. We provide an overview of how AI can help identify and explain extreme events more effectively, improving disaster response and communication. We emphasize the need for collaboration across different fields to create AI solutions that are practical, understandable, and trustworthy for analyzing and predicting extreme events. Such collaborative efforts aim to enhance disaster readiness and disaster risk reduction.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
DeepExtremeCubes: Integrating Earth system spatio-temporal data for impact assessment of climate extremes
Authors:
Chaonan Ji,
Tonio Fincke,
Vitus Benson,
Gustau Camps-Valls,
Miguel-Angel Fernandez-Torres,
Fabian Gans,
Guido Kraemer,
Francesco Martinuzzi,
David Montero,
Karin Mora,
Oscar J. Pellicer-Valero,
Claire Robin,
Maximilian Soechting,
Melanie Weynants,
Miguel D. Mahecha
Abstract:
With climate extremes' rising frequency and intensity, robust analytical tools are crucial to predict their impacts on terrestrial ecosystems. Machine learning techniques show promise but require well-structured, high-quality, and curated analysis-ready datasets. Earth observation datasets comprehensively monitor ecosystem dynamics and responses to climatic extremes, yet the data complexity can ch…
▽ More
With climate extremes' rising frequency and intensity, robust analytical tools are crucial to predict their impacts on terrestrial ecosystems. Machine learning techniques show promise but require well-structured, high-quality, and curated analysis-ready datasets. Earth observation datasets comprehensively monitor ecosystem dynamics and responses to climatic extremes, yet the data complexity can challenge the effectiveness of machine learning models. Despite recent progress in deep learning to ecosystem monitoring, there is a need for datasets specifically designed to analyse compound heatwave and drought extreme impact. Here, we introduce the DeepExtremeCubes database, tailored to map around these extremes, focusing on persistent natural vegetation. It comprises over 40,000 spatially sampled small data cubes (i.e. minicubes) globally, with a spatial coverage of 2.5 by 2.5 km. Each minicube includes (i) Sentinel-2 L2A images, (ii) ERA5-Land variables and generated extreme event cube covering 2016 to 2022, and (iii) ancillary land cover and topography maps. The paper aims to (1) streamline data accessibility, structuring, pre-processing, and enhance scientific reproducibility, and (2) facilitate biosphere dynamics forecasting in response to compound extremes.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Deep Learning for fully automatic detection, segmentation, and Gleason Grade estimation of prostate cancer in multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Images
Authors:
Oscar J. Pellicer-Valero,
José L. Marenco Jiménez,
Victor Gonzalez-Perez,
Juan Luis Casanova Ramón-Borja,
Isabel Martín García,
María Barrios Benito,
Paula Pelechano Gómez,
José Rubio-Briones,
María José Rupérez,
José D. Martín-Guerrero
Abstract:
The emergence of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has had a profound impact on the diagnosis of prostate cancers (PCa), which is the most prevalent malignancy in males in the western world, enabling a better selection of patients for confirmation biopsy. However, analyzing these images is complex even for experts, hence opening an opportunity for computer-aided diagnosis systems…
▽ More
The emergence of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has had a profound impact on the diagnosis of prostate cancers (PCa), which is the most prevalent malignancy in males in the western world, enabling a better selection of patients for confirmation biopsy. However, analyzing these images is complex even for experts, hence opening an opportunity for computer-aided diagnosis systems to seize. This paper proposes a fully automatic system based on Deep Learning that takes a prostate mpMRI from a PCa-suspect patient and, by leveraging the Retina U-Net detection framework, locates PCa lesions, segments them, and predicts their most likely Gleason grade group (GGG). It uses 490 mpMRIs for training/validation, and 75 patients for testing from two different datasets: ProstateX and IVO (Valencia Oncology Institute Foundation). In the test set, it achieves an excellent lesion-level AUC/sensitivity/specificity for the GGG$\geq$2 significance criterion of 0.96/1.00/0.79 for the ProstateX dataset, and 0.95/1.00/0.80 for the IVO dataset. Evaluated at a patient level, the results are 0.87/1.00/0.375 in ProstateX, and 0.91/1.00/0.762 in IVO. Furthermore, on the online ProstateX grand challenge, the model obtained an AUC of 0.85 (0.87 when trained only on the ProstateX data, tying up with the original winner of the challenge). For expert comparison, IVO radiologist's PI-RADS 4 sensitivity/specificity were 0.88/0.56 at a lesion level, and 0.85/0.58 at a patient level. Additional subsystems for automatic prostate zonal segmentation and mpMRI non-rigid sequence registration were also employed to produce the final fully automated system. The code for the ProstateX-trained system has been made openly available at https://github.com/OscarPellicer/prostate_lesion_detection. We hope that this will represent a landmark for future research to use, compare and improve upon.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2022; v1 submitted 23 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.