GraLMatch: Matching Groups of Entities with Graphs and Language Models
Authors:
Fernando De Meer Pardo,
Claude Lehmann,
Dennis Gehrig,
Andrea Nagy,
Stefano Nicoli,
Branka Hadji Misheva,
Martin Braschler,
Kurt Stockinger
Abstract:
In this paper, we present an end-to-end multi-source Entity Matching problem, which we call entity group matching, where the goal is to assign to the same group, records originating from multiple data sources but representing the same real-world entity. We focus on the effects of transitively matched records, i.e. the records connected by paths in the graph G = (V,E) whose nodes and edges represen…
▽ More
In this paper, we present an end-to-end multi-source Entity Matching problem, which we call entity group matching, where the goal is to assign to the same group, records originating from multiple data sources but representing the same real-world entity. We focus on the effects of transitively matched records, i.e. the records connected by paths in the graph G = (V,E) whose nodes and edges represent the records and whether they are a match or not. We present a real-world instance of this problem, where the challenge is to match records of companies and financial securities originating from different data providers. We also introduce two new multi-source benchmark datasets that present similar matching challenges as real-world records. A distinctive characteristic of these records is that they are regularly updated following real-world events, but updates are not applied uniformly across data sources. This phenomenon makes the matching of certain groups of records only possible through the use of transitive information.
In our experiments, we illustrate how considering transitively matched records is challenging since a limited amount of false positive pairwise match predictions can throw off the group assignment of large quantities of records. Thus, we propose GraLMatch, a method that can partially detect and remove false positive pairwise predictions through graph-based properties. Finally, we showcase how fine-tuning a Transformer-based model (DistilBERT) on a reduced number of labeled samples yields a better final entity group matching than training on more samples and/or incorporating fine-tuning optimizations, illustrating how precision becomes the deciding factor in the entity group matching of large volumes of records.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
A Modular Framework for Reinforcement Learning Optimal Execution
Authors:
Fernando de Meer Pardo,
Christoph Auth,
Florin Dascalu
Abstract:
In this article, we develop a modular framework for the application of Reinforcement Learning to the problem of Optimal Trade Execution. The framework is designed with flexibility in mind, in order to ease the implementation of different simulation setups. Rather than focusing on agents and optimization methods, we focus on the environment and break down the necessary requirements to simulate an O…
▽ More
In this article, we develop a modular framework for the application of Reinforcement Learning to the problem of Optimal Trade Execution. The framework is designed with flexibility in mind, in order to ease the implementation of different simulation setups. Rather than focusing on agents and optimization methods, we focus on the environment and break down the necessary requirements to simulate an Optimal Trade Execution under a Reinforcement Learning framework such as data pre-processing, construction of observations, action processing, child order execution, simulation of benchmarks, reward calculations etc. We give examples of each component, explore the difficulties their individual implementations \& the interactions between them entail, and discuss the different phenomena that each component induces in the simulation, highlighting the divergences between the simulation and the behavior of a real market. We showcase our modular implementation through a setup that, following a Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) order submission schedule, allows the agent to exclusively place limit orders, simulates their execution via iterating over snapshots of the Limit Order Book (LOB), and calculates rewards as the \$ improvement over the price achieved by a TWAP benchmark algorithm following the same schedule. We also develop evaluation procedures that incorporate iterative re-training and evaluation of a given agent over intervals of a training horizon, mimicking how an agent may behave when being continuously retrained as new market data becomes available and emulating the monitoring practices that algorithm providers are bound to perform under current regulatory frameworks.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
