-
To Spike or Not To Spike: A Digital Hardware Perspective on Deep Learning Acceleration
Authors:
Fabrizio Ottati,
Chang Gao,
Qinyu Chen,
Giovanni Brignone,
Mario R. Casu,
Jason K. Eshraghian,
Luciano Lavagno
Abstract:
As deep learning models scale, they become increasingly competitive from domains spanning from computer vision to natural language processing; however, this happens at the expense of efficiency since they require increasingly more memory and computing power. The power efficiency of the biological brain outperforms any large-scale deep learning ( DL ) model; thus, neuromorphic computing tries to mi…
▽ More
As deep learning models scale, they become increasingly competitive from domains spanning from computer vision to natural language processing; however, this happens at the expense of efficiency since they require increasingly more memory and computing power. The power efficiency of the biological brain outperforms any large-scale deep learning ( DL ) model; thus, neuromorphic computing tries to mimic the brain operations, such as spike-based information processing, to improve the efficiency of DL models. Despite the benefits of the brain, such as efficient information transmission, dense neuronal interconnects, and the co-location of computation and memory, the available biological substrate has severely constrained the evolution of biological brains. Electronic hardware does not have the same constraints; therefore, while modeling spiking neural networks ( SNNs) might uncover one piece of the puzzle, the design of efficient hardware backends for SNN s needs further investigation, potentially taking inspiration from the available work done on the artificial neural networks ( ANNs) side. As such, when is it wise to look at the brain while designing new hardware, and when should it be ignored? To answer this question, we quantitatively compare the digital hardware acceleration techniques and platforms of ANNs and SNN s. As a result, we provide the following insights: (i) ANNs currently process static data more efficiently, (ii) applications targeting data produced by neuromorphic sensors, such as event-based cameras and silicon cochleas, need more investigation since the behavior of these sensors might naturally fit the SNN paradigm, and (iii) hybrid approaches combining SNN s and ANNs might lead to the best solutions and should be investigated further at the hardware level, accounting for both efficiency and loss optimization.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2024; v1 submitted 27 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Custom Memory Design for Logic-in-Memory: Drawbacks and Improvements over Conventional Memories
Authors:
Fabrizio Ottati,
Giovanna Turvani,
Marco Vacca,
Guido Masera
Abstract:
The speed of modern digital systems is severely limited by memory latency (the ``Memory Wall'' problem). Data exchange between Logic and Memory is also responsible for a large part of the system energy consumption. Logic--In--Memory (LiM) represents an attractive solution to this problem. By performing part of the computations directly inside the memory the system speed can be improved while reduc…
▽ More
The speed of modern digital systems is severely limited by memory latency (the ``Memory Wall'' problem). Data exchange between Logic and Memory is also responsible for a large part of the system energy consumption. Logic--In--Memory (LiM) represents an attractive solution to this problem. By performing part of the computations directly inside the memory the system speed can be improved while reducing its energy consumption. LiM solutions that offer the major boost in performance are based on the modification of the memory cell. However, what is the cost of such modifications? How do these impact the memory array performance? In this work, this question is addressed by analysing a LiM memory array implementing an algorithm for the maximum/minimum value computation. The memory array is designed at physical level using the FreePDK $\SI{45}{\nano\meter}$ CMOS process, with three memory cell variants, and its performance is compared to SRAM and CAM memories. Results highlight that read and write operations performance is worsened but in--memory operations result to be very efficient: a 55.26\% reduction in the energy--delay product is measured for the AND operation with respect to the SRAM read one; therefore, the LiM approach represents a very promising solution for low--density and high--performance memories.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
NeuroBench: A Framework for Benchmarking Neuromorphic Computing Algorithms and Systems
Authors:
Jason Yik,
Korneel Van den Berghe,
Douwe den Blanken,
Younes Bouhadjar,
Maxime Fabre,
Paul Hueber,
Denis Kleyko,
Noah Pacik-Nelson,
Pao-Sheng Vincent Sun,
Guangzhi Tang,
Shenqi Wang,
Biyan Zhou,
Soikat Hasan Ahmed,
George Vathakkattil Joseph,
Benedetto Leto,
Aurora Micheli,
Anurag Kumar Mishra,
Gregor Lenz,
Tao Sun,
Zergham Ahmed,
Mahmoud Akl,
Brian Anderson,
Andreas G. Andreou,
Chiara Bartolozzi,
Arindam Basu
, et al. (73 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Neuromorphic computing shows promise for advancing computing efficiency and capabilities of AI applications using brain-inspired principles. However, the neuromorphic research field currently lacks standardized benchmarks, making it difficult to accurately measure technological advancements, compare performance with conventional methods, and identify promising future research directions. Prior neu…
▽ More
Neuromorphic computing shows promise for advancing computing efficiency and capabilities of AI applications using brain-inspired principles. However, the neuromorphic research field currently lacks standardized benchmarks, making it difficult to accurately measure technological advancements, compare performance with conventional methods, and identify promising future research directions. Prior neuromorphic computing benchmark efforts have not seen widespread adoption due to a lack of inclusive, actionable, and iterative benchmark design and guidelines. To address these shortcomings, we present NeuroBench: a benchmark framework for neuromorphic computing algorithms and systems. NeuroBench is a collaboratively-designed effort from an open community of nearly 100 co-authors across over 50 institutions in industry and academia, aiming to provide a representative structure for standardizing the evaluation of neuromorphic approaches. The NeuroBench framework introduces a common set of tools and systematic methodology for inclusive benchmark measurement, delivering an objective reference framework for quantifying neuromorphic approaches in both hardware-independent (algorithm track) and hardware-dependent (system track) settings. In this article, we present initial performance baselines across various model architectures on the algorithm track and outline the system track benchmark tasks and guidelines. NeuroBench is intended to continually expand its benchmarks and features to foster and track the progress made by the research community.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2024; v1 submitted 10 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
