Skip to main content

Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Origgi, D

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2209.12027  [pdf

    eess.IV cs.CV

    Application of the nnU-Net for automatic segmentation of lung lesion on CT images, and implication on radiomic models

    Authors: Matteo Ferrante, Lisa Rinaldi, Francesca Botta, Xiaobin Hu, Andreas Dolp, Marta Minotti, Francesca De Piano, Gianluigi Funicelli, Stefania Volpe, Federica Bellerba, Paolo De Marco, Sara Raimondi, Stefania Rizzo, Kuangyu Shi, Marta Cremonesi, Barbara A. Jereczek-Fossa, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Filippo De Marinis, Roberto Orecchia, Daniela Origgi

    Abstract: Lesion segmentation is a crucial step of the radiomic workflow. Manual segmentation requires long execution time and is prone to variability, impairing the realisation of radiomic studies and their robustness. In this study, a deep-learning automatic segmentation method was applied on computed tomography images of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. The use of manual vs automatic segmentation in… ▽ More

    Submitted 24 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

  2. arXiv:2005.06833  [pdf

    eess.IV cs.CV

    A multicenter study on radiomic features from T$_2$-weighted images of a customized MR pelvic phantom setting the basis for robust radiomic models in clinics

    Authors: Linda Bianchini, Joao Santinha, Nuno Loução, Mario Figueiredo, Francesca Botta, Daniela Origgi, Marta Cremonesi, Enrico Cassano, Nikolaos Papanikolaou, Alessandro Lascialfari

    Abstract: In this study we investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from MRI images and provide a workflow to identify robust features. 2D and 3D T$_2$-weighted images of a pelvic phantom were acquired on three scanners of two manufacturers and two magnetic field strengths. The repeatability and reproducibility of the radiomic features were assessed respectively by i… ▽ More

    Submitted 18 May, 2020; v1 submitted 14 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

    Comments: 32 pages, 8 figures (7 + 1 supplemental), 8 tables (5 + 3 supplemental); Submitted to Magnetic Resonance in Medicine