Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Oliveira, D F M

Scaling laws and dynamics of hashtags on Twitter

Authors: Hongjia H. Chen, Tristram J. Alexander, Diego F. M. Oliveira, Eduardo G. Altmann

Abstract: In this paper we quantify the statistical properties and dynamics of the frequency of hashtag use on Twitter. Hashtags are special words used in social media to attract attention and to organize content. Looking at the collection of all hashtags used in a period of time, we identify the scaling laws underpinning the hashtag frequency distribution (Zipf's law), the number of unique hashtags as a fu… ▽ More In this paper we quantify the statistical properties and dynamics of the frequency of hashtag use on Twitter. Hashtags are special words used in social media to attract attention and to organize content. Looking at the collection of all hashtags used in a period of time, we identify the scaling laws underpinning the hashtag frequency distribution (Zipf's law), the number of unique hashtags as a function of sample size (Heaps' law), and the fluctuations around expected values (Taylor's law). While these scaling laws appear to be universal, in the sense that similar exponents are observed irrespective of when the sample is gathered, the volume and nature of the hashtags depends strongly on time, with the appearance of bursts at the minute scale, fat-tailed noise, and long-range correlations. We quantify this dynamics by computing the Jensen-Shannon divergence between hashtag distributions obtained $τ$ times apart and we find that the speed of change decays roughly as $1/τ$. Our findings are based on the analysis of 3.5 billion hashtags used between 2015 and 2016. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: 8 pages and 4 figures. Submitted to the journal "Chaos", special edition on "Dynamics of Social Systems". Data available at https://zenodo.org/record/3673744#.Xqa5t_GhSv4

Journal ref: Chaos 30, 063112 (2020); Codes available at: https://github.com/edugalt/TwitterHashtags

Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information

Authors: Xiaoyan Qiu, Diego F. M. Oliveira, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer

Abstract: Social media are massive marketplaces where ideas and news compete for our attention. Previous studies have shown that quality is not a necessary condition for online virality and that knowledge about peer choices can distort the relationship between quality and popularity. However, these results do not explain the viral spread of low-quality information, such as the digital misinformation that th… ▽ More Social media are massive marketplaces where ideas and news compete for our attention. Previous studies have shown that quality is not a necessary condition for online virality and that knowledge about peer choices can distort the relationship between quality and popularity. However, these results do not explain the viral spread of low-quality information, such as the digital misinformation that threatens our democracy. We investigate quality discrimination in a stylized model of online social network, where individual agents prefer quality information, but have behavioral limitations in managing a heavy flow of information. We measure the relationship between the quality of an idea and its likelihood to become prevalent at the system level. We find that both information overload and limited attention contribute to a degradation in the market's discriminative power. A good tradeoff between discriminative power and diversity of information is possible according to the model. However, calibration with empirical data characterizing information load and finite attention in real social media reveals a weak correlation between quality and popularity of information. In these realistic conditions, the model predicts that high-quality information has little advantage over low-quality information. △ Less

Submitted 10 January, 2019; v1 submitted 10 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: The original paper was retracted (see http://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0132). This is a corrected version of the preprint

Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact checking

Authors: Marcella Tambuscio, Diego F. M. Oliveira, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Giancarlo Ruffo

Abstract: Misinformation under the form of rumor, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories spreads on social media at alarming rates. One hypothesis is that, since social media are shaped by homophily, belief in misinformation may be more likely to thrive on those social circles that are segregated from the rest of the network. One possible antidote is fact checking which, in some cases, is known to stop rumors from… ▽ More Misinformation under the form of rumor, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories spreads on social media at alarming rates. One hypothesis is that, since social media are shaped by homophily, belief in misinformation may be more likely to thrive on those social circles that are segregated from the rest of the network. One possible antidote is fact checking which, in some cases, is known to stop rumors from spreading further. However, fact checking may also backfire and reinforce the belief in a hoax. Here we take into account the combination of network segregation, finite memory and attention, and fact-checking efforts. We consider a compartmental model of two interacting epidemic processes over a network that is segregated between gullible and skeptic users. Extensive simulation and mean-field analysis show that a more segregated network facilitates the spread of a hoax only at low forgetting rates, but has no effect when agents forget at faster rates. This finding may inform the development of mitigation techniques and overall inform on the risks of uncontrolled misinformation online. △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2018; v1 submitted 13 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Journal ref: J Comput Soc Sc (2018) 1: 261

Measuring Online Social Bubbles

Authors: Dimitar Nikolov, Diego F. M. Oliveira, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer

Abstract: Social media have quickly become a prevalent channel to access information, spread ideas, and influence opinions. However, it has been suggested that social and algorithmic filtering may cause exposure to less diverse points of view, and even foster polarization and misinformation. Here we explore and validate this hypothesis quantitatively for the first time, at the collective and individual leve… ▽ More Social media have quickly become a prevalent channel to access information, spread ideas, and influence opinions. However, it has been suggested that social and algorithmic filtering may cause exposure to less diverse points of view, and even foster polarization and misinformation. Here we explore and validate this hypothesis quantitatively for the first time, at the collective and individual levels, by mining three massive datasets of web traffic, search logs, and Twitter posts. Our analysis shows that collectively, people access information from a significantly narrower spectrum of sources through social media and email, compared to search. The significance of this finding for individual exposure is revealed by investigating the relationship between the diversity of information sources experienced by users at the collective and individual level. There is a strong correlation between collective and individual diversity, supporting the notion that when we use social media we find ourselves inside "social bubbles". Our results could lead to a deeper understanding of how technology biases our exposure to new information. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2015; v1 submitted 25 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.