Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Nitzan, S

Automated Prediction of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy from DWI Data

Authors: Shir Nitzan, Maya Gilad, Moti Freiman

Abstract: Effective surgical planning for breast cancer hinges on accurately predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and machine learning offer a non-invasive approach for early pCR assessment. However, most machine-learning models require manual tumor segmentation, a cumbersome and error-prone task. We propose a deep learning model emp… ▽ More Effective surgical planning for breast cancer hinges on accurately predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and machine learning offer a non-invasive approach for early pCR assessment. However, most machine-learning models require manual tumor segmentation, a cumbersome and error-prone task. We propose a deep learning model employing "Size-Adaptive Lesion Weighting" for automatic DWI tumor segmentation to enhance pCR prediction accuracy. Despite histopathological changes during NAC complicating DWI image segmentation, our model demonstrates robust performance. Utilizing the BMMR2 challenge dataset, it matches human experts in pCR prediction pre-NAC with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 vs. 0.796, and surpasses standard automated methods mid-NAC, with an AUC of 0.729 vs. 0.654 and 0.576. Our approach represents a significant advancement in automating breast cancer treatment planning, enabling more reliable pCR predictions without manual segmentation. △ Less

Submitted 7 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: Accepted for presentation at the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)

Flexible Level-1 Consensus Ensuring Stable Social Choice: Analysis and Algorithms

Authors: Mor Nitzan, Shmuel Nitzan, Erel Segal-Halevi

Abstract: Level-1 Consensus is a property of a preference-profile. Intuitively, it means that there exists a preference relation which induces an ordering of all other preferences such that frequent preferences are those that are more similar to it. This is a desirable property, since it enhances the stability of social choice by guaranteeing that there exists a Condorcet winner and it is elected by all sco… ▽ More Level-1 Consensus is a property of a preference-profile. Intuitively, it means that there exists a preference relation which induces an ordering of all other preferences such that frequent preferences are those that are more similar to it. This is a desirable property, since it enhances the stability of social choice by guaranteeing that there exists a Condorcet winner and it is elected by all scoring rules. In this paper, we present an algorithm for checking whether a given preference profile exhibits level-1 consensus. We apply this algorithm to a large number of preference profiles, both real and randomly-generated, and find that level-1 consensus is very improbable. We support these empirical findings theoretically, by showing that, under the impartial culture assumption, the probability of level-1 consensus approaches zero when the number of individuals approaches infinity. Motivated by these observations, we show that the level-1 consensus property can be weakened while retaining its stability implications. We call this weaker property Flexible Consensus. We show, both empirically and theoretically, that it is considerably more probable than the original level-1 consensus. In particular, under the impartial culture assumption, the probability for Flexible Consensus converges to a positive number when the number of individuals approaches infinity. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2017; v1 submitted 20 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Journal ref: Social Choice and Welfare, 2/11/2017, pages 1-23

Envy-Free Division of Land

Authors: Erel Segal-Halevi, Shmuel Nitzan, Avinatan Hassidim, Yonatan Aumann

Abstract: Classic cake-cutting algorithms enable people with different preferences to divide among them a heterogeneous resource (``cake''), such that the resulting division is fair according to each agent's individual preferences. However, these algorithms either ignore the geometry of the resource altogether, or assume it is one-dimensional. In practice, it is often required to divide multi-dimensional re… ▽ More Classic cake-cutting algorithms enable people with different preferences to divide among them a heterogeneous resource (``cake''), such that the resulting division is fair according to each agent's individual preferences. However, these algorithms either ignore the geometry of the resource altogether, or assume it is one-dimensional. In practice, it is often required to divide multi-dimensional resources, such as land-estates or advertisement spaces in print or electronic media. In such cases, the geometric shape of the allotted piece is of crucial importance. For example, when building houses or designing advertisements, in order to be useful, the allotments should be squares or rectangles with bounded aspect-ratio. We thus introduce the problem of fair land division --- fair division of a multi-dimensional resource wherein the allocated piece must have a pre-specified geometric shape. We present constructive division algorithms that satisfy the two most prominent fairness criteria, namely envy-freeness and proportionality. In settings where proportionality cannot be achieved due to the geometric constraints, our algorithms provide a partially-proportional division, guaranteeing that the fraction allocated to each agent be at least a certain positive constant. We prove that in many natural settings the envy-freeness requirement is compatible with the best attainable partial-proportionality. △ Less

Submitted 9 March, 2019; v1 submitted 13 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

Comments: A preliminary version named 'Envy-free cake-cutting in two dimensions' appeared in the proceedings of AAAI 2015 (https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI15/paper/viewPaper/9656). The main additions here are: (a) handling multi-dimensional resources of arbitrary shape rather than just rectangles, (b) handling an arbitrary number n of agents rather than just 2 or 3, (c) rewriting most proofs

Envy-Free Cake-Cutting among Families

Authors: Erel Segal-Halevi, Shmuel Nitzan

Abstract: This paper extends the classic cake-cutting problem to a situation in which the "cake" is divided among families. Each piece of cake is owned and used simultaneously by all members of the family. A typical example of such a cake is land. We examine three ways to assess the fairness of such a division, based on the classic no-envy criterion: (a) Average envy-freeness means that for each family, the… ▽ More This paper extends the classic cake-cutting problem to a situation in which the "cake" is divided among families. Each piece of cake is owned and used simultaneously by all members of the family. A typical example of such a cake is land. We examine three ways to assess the fairness of such a division, based on the classic no-envy criterion: (a) Average envy-freeness means that for each family, the average value of its share (averaged over all family members) is weakly larger than the average value of any other share; (b) Unanimous envy-freeness means that in each family, each member values the family's share weakly more than any other share; (c) Democratic envy-freeness means that in each family, at least half the members value the family's share weakly more than any other share. We study each of these definitions from both an existential and a computational perspective. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2019; v1 submitted 6 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Comments: The paper is obsolete - it is subsumed by the paper "Fair Cake-Cutting among Families", arXiv:1510.03903

Fair Cake-Cutting among Families

Authors: Erel Segal-Halevi, Shmuel Nitzan

Abstract: We study the fair division of a continuous resource, such as a land-estate or a time-interval, among pre-specified groups of agents, such as families. Each family is given a piece of the resource and this piece is used simultaneously by all family members, while different members may have different value functions. Three ways to assess the fairness of such a division are examined. (a) Average Fair… ▽ More We study the fair division of a continuous resource, such as a land-estate or a time-interval, among pre-specified groups of agents, such as families. Each family is given a piece of the resource and this piece is used simultaneously by all family members, while different members may have different value functions. Three ways to assess the fairness of such a division are examined. (a) Average Fairness means that each family's share is fair according to the "family value function", defined as the arithmetic mean of the value functions of the family members. (b) Unanimous Fairness means that all members in all families feel that their family's share is fair according to their personal value function. (c) Democratic Fairness means that in each family, at least a fixed fraction (e.g. a half) of the members feel that their family's share is fair. We compare these criteria based on the number of connected components in the resulting division and on their compatibility with Pareto-efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2019; v1 submitted 13 October, 2015; originally announced October 2015.

Comments: Add a cool reduction from equitable division among individuals to average-proportional division among families

Journal ref: Social Choice and Welfare 2019, 53, 709-740

Fair and Square: Cake-Cutting in Two Dimensions

Authors: Erel Segal-Halevi, Shmuel Nitzan, Avinatan Hassidim, Yonatan Aumann

Abstract: We consider the classic problem of fairly dividing a heterogeneous good ("cake") among several agents with different valuations. Classic cake-cutting procedures either allocate each agent a collection of disconnected pieces, or assume that the cake is a one-dimensional interval. In practice, however, the two-dimensional shape of the allotted pieces is important. In particular, when building a hous… ▽ More We consider the classic problem of fairly dividing a heterogeneous good ("cake") among several agents with different valuations. Classic cake-cutting procedures either allocate each agent a collection of disconnected pieces, or assume that the cake is a one-dimensional interval. In practice, however, the two-dimensional shape of the allotted pieces is important. In particular, when building a house or designing an advertisement in printed or electronic media, squares are more usable than long and narrow rectangles. We thus introduce and study the problem of fair two-dimensional division wherein the allotted pieces must be of some restricted two-dimensional geometric shape(s), particularly squares and fat rectangles. Adding such geometric constraints re-opens most questions and challenges related to cake-cutting. Indeed, even the most elementary fairness criterion --- proportionality --- can no longer be guaranteed. In this paper we thus examine the level of proportionality that can be guaranteed, providing both impossibility results and constructive division procedures. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2018; v1 submitted 12 October, 2015; originally announced October 2015.

Comments: Journal version