Showing 1–1 of 1 results for author: Narimanzadeh, H
-
Crowdsourcing subjective annotations using pairwise comparisons reduces bias and error compared to the majority-vote method
Authors:
Hasti Narimanzadeh,
Arash Badie-Modiri,
Iuliia Smirnova,
Ted Hsuan Yun Chen
Abstract:
How to better reduce measurement variability and bias introduced by subjectivity in crowdsourced labelling remains an open question. We introduce a theoretical framework for understanding how random error and measurement bias enter into crowdsourced annotations of subjective constructs. We then propose a pipeline that combines pairwise comparison labelling with Elo scoring, and demonstrate that it…
▽ More
How to better reduce measurement variability and bias introduced by subjectivity in crowdsourced labelling remains an open question. We introduce a theoretical framework for understanding how random error and measurement bias enter into crowdsourced annotations of subjective constructs. We then propose a pipeline that combines pairwise comparison labelling with Elo scoring, and demonstrate that it outperforms the ubiquitous majority-voting method in reducing both types of measurement error. To assess the performance of the labelling approaches, we constructed an agent-based model of crowdsourced labelling that lets us introduce different types of subjectivity into the tasks. We find that under most conditions with task subjectivity, the comparison approach produced higher $f_1$ scores. Further, the comparison approach is less susceptible to inflating bias, which majority voting tends to do. To facilitate applications, we show with simulated and real-world data that the number of required random comparisons for the same classification accuracy scales log-linearly $O(N \log N)$ with the number of labelled items. We also implemented the Elo system as an open-source Python package.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2023; v1 submitted 31 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
