-
Uncertainty-Based Non-Parametric Active Peak Detection
Authors:
Praneeth Narayanamurthy,
Urbashi Mitra
Abstract:
Active, non-parametric peak detection is considered. As a use case, active source localization is examined and an uncertainty-based sampling scheme algorithm to effectively localize the peak from a few energy measurements is designed. It is shown that under very mild conditions, the source localization error with $m$ actively chosen energy measurements scales as $O(\log^2 m/m)$. Numerically, it is…
▽ More
Active, non-parametric peak detection is considered. As a use case, active source localization is examined and an uncertainty-based sampling scheme algorithm to effectively localize the peak from a few energy measurements is designed. It is shown that under very mild conditions, the source localization error with $m$ actively chosen energy measurements scales as $O(\log^2 m/m)$. Numerically, it is shown that in low-sample regimes, the proposed method enjoys superior performance on several types of data and outperforms the state-of-the-art passive source localization approaches and in the low sample regime, can outperform greedy methods as well.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Fast Robust Subspace Tracking via PCA in Sparse Data-Dependent Noise
Authors:
Praneeth Narayanamurthy,
Namrata Vaswani
Abstract:
This work studies the robust subspace tracking (ST) problem. Robust ST can be simply understood as a (slow) time-varying subspace extension of robust PCA. It assumes that the true data lies in a low-dimensional subspace that is either fixed or changes slowly with time. The goal is to track the changing subspaces over time in the presence of additive sparse outliers and to do this quickly (with a s…
▽ More
This work studies the robust subspace tracking (ST) problem. Robust ST can be simply understood as a (slow) time-varying subspace extension of robust PCA. It assumes that the true data lies in a low-dimensional subspace that is either fixed or changes slowly with time. The goal is to track the changing subspaces over time in the presence of additive sparse outliers and to do this quickly (with a short delay). We introduce a "fast" mini-batch robust ST solution that is provably correct under mild assumptions. Here "fast" means two things: (i) the subspace changes can be detected and the subspaces can be tracked with near-optimal delay, and (ii) the time complexity of doing this is the same as that of simple (non-robust) PCA. Our main result assumes piecewise constant subspaces (needed for identifiability), but we also provide a corollary for the case when there is a little change at each time.
A second contribution is a novel non-asymptotic guarantee for PCA in linearly data-dependent noise. An important setting where this is useful is for linearly data dependent noise that is sparse with support that changes enough over time. The analysis of the subspace update step of our proposed robust ST solution uses this result.
△ Less
Submitted 4 December, 2020; v1 submitted 14 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Federated Over-Air Subspace Tracking from Incomplete and Corrupted Data
Authors:
Praneeth Narayanamurthy,
Namrata Vaswani,
Aditya Ramamoorthy
Abstract:
In this work we study the problem of Subspace Tracking with missing data (ST-miss) and outliers (Robust ST-miss). We propose a novel algorithm, and provide a guarantee for both these problems. Unlike past work on this topic, the current work does not impose the piecewise constant subspace change assumption. Additionally, the proposed algorithm is much simpler (uses fewer parameters) than our previ…
▽ More
In this work we study the problem of Subspace Tracking with missing data (ST-miss) and outliers (Robust ST-miss). We propose a novel algorithm, and provide a guarantee for both these problems. Unlike past work on this topic, the current work does not impose the piecewise constant subspace change assumption. Additionally, the proposed algorithm is much simpler (uses fewer parameters) than our previous work. Secondly, we extend our approach and its analysis to provably solving these problems when the data is federated and when the over-air data communication modality is used for information exchange between the $K$ peer nodes and the center. We validate our theoretical claims with extensive numerical experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2022; v1 submitted 28 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Provable Low Rank Phase Retrieval
Authors:
Seyedehsara Nayer,
Praneeth Narayanamurthy,
Namrata Vaswani
Abstract:
We study the Low Rank Phase Retrieval (LRPR) problem defined as follows: recover an $n \times q$ matrix $X^*$ of rank $r$ from a different and independent set of $m$ phaseless (magnitude-only) linear projections of each of its columns. To be precise, we need to recover $X^*$ from $y_k := |A_k{}' x^*_k|, k=1,2,\dots, q$ when the measurement matrices $A_k$ are mutually independent. Here $y_k$ is an…
▽ More
We study the Low Rank Phase Retrieval (LRPR) problem defined as follows: recover an $n \times q$ matrix $X^*$ of rank $r$ from a different and independent set of $m$ phaseless (magnitude-only) linear projections of each of its columns. To be precise, we need to recover $X^*$ from $y_k := |A_k{}' x^*_k|, k=1,2,\dots, q$ when the measurement matrices $A_k$ are mutually independent. Here $y_k$ is an $m$ length vector, $A_k$ is an $n \times m$ matrix, and $'$ denotes matrix transpose. The question is when can we solve LRPR with $m \ll n$? A reliable solution can enable fast and low-cost phaseless dynamic imaging, e.g., Fourier ptychographic imaging of live biological specimens. In this work, we develop the first provably correct approach for solving this LRPR problem. Our proposed algorithm, Alternating Minimization for Low-Rank Phase Retrieval (AltMinLowRaP), is an AltMin based solution and hence is also provably fast (converges geometrically). Our guarantee shows that AltMinLowRaP solves LRPR to $ε$ accuracy, with high probability, as long as $m q \ge C n r^4 \log(1/ε)$, the matrices $A_k$ contain i.i.d. standard Gaussian entries, and the right singular vectors of $X^*$ satisfy the incoherence assumption from matrix completion literature. Here $C$ is a numerical constant that only depends on the condition number of $X^*$ and on its incoherence parameter. Its time complexity is only $ C mq nr \log^2(1/ε)$. Since even the linear (with phase) version of the above problem is not fully solved, the above result is also the first complete solution and guarantee for the linear case. Finally, we also develop a simple extension of our results for the dynamic LRPR setting.
△ Less
Submitted 25 November, 2020; v1 submitted 13 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Provable Subspace Tracking from Missing Data and Matrix Completion
Authors:
Praneeth Narayanamurthy,
Vahid Daneshpajooh,
Namrata Vaswani
Abstract:
We study the problem of subspace tracking in the presence of missing data (ST-miss). In recent work, we studied a related problem called robust ST. In this work, we show that a simple modification of our robust ST solution also provably solves ST-miss and robust ST-miss. To our knowledge, our result is the first `complete' guarantee for ST-miss. This means that we can prove that under assumptions…
▽ More
We study the problem of subspace tracking in the presence of missing data (ST-miss). In recent work, we studied a related problem called robust ST. In this work, we show that a simple modification of our robust ST solution also provably solves ST-miss and robust ST-miss. To our knowledge, our result is the first `complete' guarantee for ST-miss. This means that we can prove that under assumptions on only the algorithm inputs, the output subspace estimates are close to the true data subspaces at all times. Our guarantees hold under mild and easily interpretable assumptions, and allow the underlying subspace to change with time in a piecewise constant fashion. In contrast, all existing guarantees for ST are partial results and assume a fixed unknown subspace. Extensive numerical experiments are shown to back up our theoretical claims. Finally, our solution can be interpreted as a provably correct mini-batch and memory-efficient solution to low-rank Matrix Completion (MC).
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2019; v1 submitted 6 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Static and Dynamic Robust PCA and Matrix Completion: A Review
Authors:
Namrata Vaswani,
Praneeth Narayanamurthy
Abstract:
Principal Components Analysis (PCA) is one of the most widely used dimension reduction techniques. Robust PCA (RPCA) refers to the problem of PCA when the data may be corrupted by outliers. Recent work by Cand{è}s, Wright, Li, and Ma defined RPCA as a problem of decomposing a given data matrix into the sum of a low-rank matrix (true data) and a sparse matrix (outliers). The column space of the low…
▽ More
Principal Components Analysis (PCA) is one of the most widely used dimension reduction techniques. Robust PCA (RPCA) refers to the problem of PCA when the data may be corrupted by outliers. Recent work by Cand{è}s, Wright, Li, and Ma defined RPCA as a problem of decomposing a given data matrix into the sum of a low-rank matrix (true data) and a sparse matrix (outliers). The column space of the low-rank matrix then gives the PCA solution. This simple definition has lead to a large amount of interesting new work on provably correct, fast, and practical solutions to RPCA. More recently, the dynamic (time-varying) version of the RPCA problem has been studied and a series of provably correct, fast, and memory efficient tracking solutions have been proposed. Dynamic RPCA (or robust subspace tracking) is the problem of tracking data lying in a (slowly) changing subspace while being robust to sparse outliers. This article provides an exhaustive review of the last decade of literature on RPCA and its dynamic counterpart (robust subspace tracking), along with describing their theoretical guarantees, discussing the pros and cons of various approaches, and providing empirical comparisons of performance and speed.
A brief overview of the (low-rank) matrix completion literature is also provided (the focus is on works not discussed in other recent reviews). This refers to the problem of completing a low-rank matrix when only a subset of its entries are observed. It can be interpreted as a simpler special case of RPCA in which the indices of the outlier corrupted entries are known.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2018; v1 submitted 1 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Nearly Optimal Robust Subspace Tracking
Authors:
Praneeth Narayanamurthy,
Namrata Vaswani
Abstract:
In this work, we study the robust subspace tracking (RST) problem and obtain one of the first two provable guarantees for it. The goal of RST is to track sequentially arriving data vectors that lie in a slowly changing low-dimensional subspace, while being robust to corruption by additive sparse outliers. It can also be interpreted as a dynamic (time-varying) extension of robust PCA (RPCA), with t…
▽ More
In this work, we study the robust subspace tracking (RST) problem and obtain one of the first two provable guarantees for it. The goal of RST is to track sequentially arriving data vectors that lie in a slowly changing low-dimensional subspace, while being robust to corruption by additive sparse outliers. It can also be interpreted as a dynamic (time-varying) extension of robust PCA (RPCA), with the minor difference that RST also requires a short tracking delay. We develop a recursive projected compressive sensing algorithm that we call Nearly Optimal RST via ReProCS (ReProCS-NORST) because its tracking delay is nearly optimal. We prove that NORST solves both the RST and the dynamic RPCA problems under weakened standard RPCA assumptions, two simple extra assumptions (slow subspace change and most outlier magnitudes lower bounded), and a few minor assumptions.
Our guarantee shows that NORST enjoys a near optimal tracking delay of $O(r \log n \log(1/ε))$. Its required delay between subspace change times is the same, and its memory complexity is $n$ times this value. Thus both these are also nearly optimal. Here $n$ is the ambient space dimension, $r$ is the subspaces' dimension, and $ε$ is the tracking accuracy. NORST also has the best outlier tolerance compared with all previous RPCA or RST methods, both theoretically and empirically (including for real videos), without requiring any model on how the outlier support is generated. This is possible because of the extra assumptions it uses.
△ Less
Submitted 6 July, 2018; v1 submitted 17 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Robust Subspace Learning: Robust PCA, Robust Subspace Tracking, and Robust Subspace Recovery
Authors:
Namrata Vaswani,
Thierry Bouwmans,
Sajid Javed,
Praneeth Narayanamurthy
Abstract:
PCA is one of the most widely used dimension reduction techniques. A related easier problem is "subspace learning" or "subspace estimation". Given relatively clean data, both are easily solved via singular value decomposition (SVD). The problem of subspace learning or PCA in the presence of outliers is called robust subspace learning or robust PCA (RPCA). For long data sequences, if one tries to u…
▽ More
PCA is one of the most widely used dimension reduction techniques. A related easier problem is "subspace learning" or "subspace estimation". Given relatively clean data, both are easily solved via singular value decomposition (SVD). The problem of subspace learning or PCA in the presence of outliers is called robust subspace learning or robust PCA (RPCA). For long data sequences, if one tries to use a single lower dimensional subspace to represent the data, the required subspace dimension may end up being quite large. For such data, a better model is to assume that it lies in a low-dimensional subspace that can change over time, albeit gradually. The problem of tracking such data (and the subspaces) while being robust to outliers is called robust subspace tracking (RST). This article provides a magazine-style overview of the entire field of robust subspace learning and tracking. In particular solutions for three problems are discussed in detail: RPCA via sparse+low-rank matrix decomposition (S+LR), RST via S+LR, and "robust subspace recovery (RSR)". RSR assumes that an entire data vector is either an outlier or an inlier. The S+LR formulation instead assumes that outliers occur on only a few data vector indices and hence are well modeled as sparse corruptions.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2018; v1 submitted 26 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
Finite Sample Guarantees for PCA in Non-Isotropic and Data-Dependent Noise
Authors:
Namrata Vaswani,
Praneeth Narayanamurthy
Abstract:
This work obtains novel finite sample guarantees for Principal Component Analysis (PCA). These hold even when the corrupting noise is non-isotropic, and a part (or all of it) is data-dependent. Because of the latter, in general, the noise and the true data are correlated. The results in this work are a significant improvement over those given in our earlier work where this "correlated-PCA" problem…
▽ More
This work obtains novel finite sample guarantees for Principal Component Analysis (PCA). These hold even when the corrupting noise is non-isotropic, and a part (or all of it) is data-dependent. Because of the latter, in general, the noise and the true data are correlated. The results in this work are a significant improvement over those given in our earlier work where this "correlated-PCA" problem was first studied. In fact, in certain regimes, our results imply that the sample complexity required to achieve subspace recovery error that is a constant fraction of the noise level is near-optimal. Useful corollaries of our result include guarantees for PCA in sparse data-dependent noise and for PCA with missing data. An important application of the former is in proving correctness of the subspace update step of a popular online algorithm for dynamic robust PCA.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Provable Dynamic Robust PCA or Robust Subspace Tracking
Authors:
Praneeth Narayanamurthy,
Namrata Vaswani
Abstract:
Dynamic robust PCA refers to the dynamic (time-varying) extension of robust PCA (RPCA). It assumes that the true (uncorrupted) data lies in a low-dimensional subspace that can change with time, albeit slowly. The goal is to track this changing subspace over time in the presence of sparse outliers. We develop and study a novel algorithm, that we call simple-ReProCS, based on the recently introduced…
▽ More
Dynamic robust PCA refers to the dynamic (time-varying) extension of robust PCA (RPCA). It assumes that the true (uncorrupted) data lies in a low-dimensional subspace that can change with time, albeit slowly. The goal is to track this changing subspace over time in the presence of sparse outliers. We develop and study a novel algorithm, that we call simple-ReProCS, based on the recently introduced Recursive Projected Compressive Sensing (ReProCS) framework. Our work provides the first guarantee for dynamic RPCA that holds under weakened versions of standard RPCA assumptions, slow subspace change and a lower bound assumption on most outlier magnitudes. Our result is significant because (i) it removes the strong assumptions needed by the two previous complete guarantees for ReProCS-based algorithms; (ii) it shows that it is possible to achieve significantly improved outlier tolerance, compared with all existing RPCA or dynamic RPCA solutions by exploiting the above two simple extra assumptions; and (iii) it proves that simple-ReProCS is online (after initialization), fast, and, has near-optimal memory complexity.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2018; v1 submitted 24 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
PCA in Data-Dependent Noise (Correlated-PCA): Nearly Optimal Finite Sample Guarantees
Authors:
Namrata Vaswani,
Praneeth Narayanamurthy
Abstract:
We study Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in a setting where a part of the corrupting noise is data-dependent and, as a result, the noise and the true data are correlated. Under a bounded-ness assumption on the true data and the noise, and a simple assumption on data-noise correlation, we obtain a nearly optimal sample complexity bound for the most commonly used PCA solution, singular value deco…
▽ More
We study Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in a setting where a part of the corrupting noise is data-dependent and, as a result, the noise and the true data are correlated. Under a bounded-ness assumption on the true data and the noise, and a simple assumption on data-noise correlation, we obtain a nearly optimal sample complexity bound for the most commonly used PCA solution, singular value decomposition (SVD). This bound is a significant improvement over the bound obtained by Vaswani and Guo in recent work (NIPS 2016) where this "correlated-PCA" problem was first studied; and it holds under a significantly weaker data-noise correlation assumption than the one used for this earlier result.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2017; v1 submitted 10 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
