-
Optimal Non-Adaptive Tolerant Junta Testing via Local Estimators
Authors:
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Shyamal Patel
Abstract:
We give a non-adaptive algorithm that makes $2^{\tilde{O}(\sqrt{k\log(1/\varepsilon_2 - \varepsilon_1)})}$ queries to a Boolean function $f:\{\pm 1\}^n \rightarrow \{\pm 1\}$ and distinguishes between $f$ being $\varepsilon_1$-close to some $k$-junta versus $\varepsilon_2$-far from every $k$-junta. At the heart of our algorithm is a local mean estimation procedure for Boolean functions that may be…
▽ More
We give a non-adaptive algorithm that makes $2^{\tilde{O}(\sqrt{k\log(1/\varepsilon_2 - \varepsilon_1)})}$ queries to a Boolean function $f:\{\pm 1\}^n \rightarrow \{\pm 1\}$ and distinguishes between $f$ being $\varepsilon_1$-close to some $k$-junta versus $\varepsilon_2$-far from every $k$-junta. At the heart of our algorithm is a local mean estimation procedure for Boolean functions that may be of independent interest. We complement our upper bound with a matching lower bound, improving a recent lower bound obtained by Chen et al. We thus obtain the first tight bounds for a natural property of Boolean functions in the tolerant testing model.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Detecting Low-Degree Truncation
Authors:
Anindya De,
Huan Li,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Rocco A. Servedio
Abstract:
We consider the following basic, and very broad, statistical problem: Given a known high-dimensional distribution ${\cal D}$ over $\mathbb{R}^n$ and a collection of data points in $\mathbb{R}^n$, distinguish between the two possibilities that (i) the data was drawn from ${\cal D}$, versus (ii) the data was drawn from ${\cal D}|_S$, i.e. from ${\cal D}$ subject to truncation by an unknown truncatio…
▽ More
We consider the following basic, and very broad, statistical problem: Given a known high-dimensional distribution ${\cal D}$ over $\mathbb{R}^n$ and a collection of data points in $\mathbb{R}^n$, distinguish between the two possibilities that (i) the data was drawn from ${\cal D}$, versus (ii) the data was drawn from ${\cal D}|_S$, i.e. from ${\cal D}$ subject to truncation by an unknown truncation set $S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$.
We study this problem in the setting where ${\cal D}$ is a high-dimensional i.i.d. product distribution and $S$ is an unknown degree-$d$ polynomial threshold function (one of the most well-studied types of Boolean-valued function over $\mathbb{R}^n$). Our main results are an efficient algorithm when ${\cal D}$ is a hypercontractive distribution, and a matching lower bound:
$\bullet$ For any constant $d$, we give a polynomial-time algorithm which successfully distinguishes ${\cal D}$ from ${\cal D}|_S$ using $O(n^{d/2})$ samples (subject to mild technical conditions on ${\cal D}$ and $S$);
$\bullet$ Even for the simplest case of ${\cal D}$ being the uniform distribution over $\{+1, -1\}^n$, we show that for any constant $d$, any distinguishing algorithm for degree-$d$ polynomial threshold functions must use $Ω(n^{d/2})$ samples.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Testing Sumsets is Hard
Authors:
Xi Chen,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Tim Randolph,
Rocco A. Servedio,
Or Zamir
Abstract:
A subset $S$ of the Boolean hypercube $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ is a sumset if $S = \{a + b : a, b\in A\}$ for some $A \subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^n$. Sumsets are central objects of study in additive combinatorics, featuring in several influential results. We prove a lower bound of $Ω(2^{n/2})$ for the number of queries needed to test whether a Boolean function $f:\mathbb{F}_2^n \to \{0,1\}$ is the indicator fu…
▽ More
A subset $S$ of the Boolean hypercube $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ is a sumset if $S = \{a + b : a, b\in A\}$ for some $A \subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^n$. Sumsets are central objects of study in additive combinatorics, featuring in several influential results. We prove a lower bound of $Ω(2^{n/2})$ for the number of queries needed to test whether a Boolean function $f:\mathbb{F}_2^n \to \{0,1\}$ is the indicator function of a sumset. Our lower bound for testing sumsets follows from sharp bounds on the related problem of shift testing, which may be of independent interest. We also give a near-optimal $2^{n/2} \cdot \mathrm{poly}(n)$-query algorithm for a smoothed analysis formulation of the sumset refutation problem.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2024; v1 submitted 14 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Testing Intersecting and Union-Closed Families
Authors:
Xi Chen,
Anindya De,
Yuhao Li,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Rocco A. Servedio
Abstract:
Inspired by the classic problem of Boolean function monotonicity testing, we investigate the testability of other well-studied properties of combinatorial finite set systems, specifically \emph{intersecting} families and \emph{union-closed} families. A function $f: \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ is intersecting (respectively, union-closed) if its set of satisfying assignments corresponds to an intersectin…
▽ More
Inspired by the classic problem of Boolean function monotonicity testing, we investigate the testability of other well-studied properties of combinatorial finite set systems, specifically \emph{intersecting} families and \emph{union-closed} families. A function $f: \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ is intersecting (respectively, union-closed) if its set of satisfying assignments corresponds to an intersecting family (respectively, a union-closed family) of subsets of $[n]$.
Our main results are that -- in sharp contrast with the property of being a monotone set system -- the property of being an intersecting set system, and the property of being a union-closed set system, both turn out to be information-theoretically difficult to test. We show that:
$\bullet$ For $ε\geq Ω(1/\sqrt{n})$, any non-adaptive two-sided $ε$-tester for intersectingness must make $2^{Ω(n^{1/4}/\sqrtε)}$ queries. We also give a $2^{Ω(\sqrt{n \log(1/ε)})}$-query lower bound for non-adaptive one-sided $ε$-testers for intersectingness.
$\bullet$ For $ε\geq 1/2^{Ω(n^{0.49})}$, any non-adaptive two-sided $ε$-tester for union-closedness must make $n^{Ω(\log(1/ε))}$ queries.
Thus, neither intersectingness nor union-closedness shares the $\mathrm{poly}(n,1/ε)$-query non-adaptive testability that is enjoyed by monotonicity.
To complement our lower bounds, we also give a simple $\mathrm{poly}(n^{\sqrt{n\log(1/ε)}},1/ε)$-query, one-sided, non-adaptive algorithm for $ε$-testing each of these properties (intersectingness and union-closedness). We thus achieve nearly tight upper and lower bounds for two-sided testing of intersectingness when $ε= Θ(1/\sqrt{n})$, and for one-sided testing of intersectingness when $ε=Θ(1).$
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
On the Pauli Spectrum of QAC0
Authors:
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Natalie Parham,
Francisca Vasconcelos,
Henry Yuen
Abstract:
The circuit class $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ was introduced by Moore (1999) as a model for constant depth quantum circuits where the gate set includes many-qubit Toffoli gates. Proving lower bounds against such circuits is a longstanding challenge in quantum circuit complexity; in particular, showing that polynomial-size $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ cannot compute the parity function has remained an open question for o…
▽ More
The circuit class $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ was introduced by Moore (1999) as a model for constant depth quantum circuits where the gate set includes many-qubit Toffoli gates. Proving lower bounds against such circuits is a longstanding challenge in quantum circuit complexity; in particular, showing that polynomial-size $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ cannot compute the parity function has remained an open question for over 20 years.
In this work, we identify a notion of the Pauli spectrum of $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits, which can be viewed as the quantum analogue of the Fourier spectrum of classical $\mathsf{AC}^0$ circuits. We conjecture that the Pauli spectrum of $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits satisfies low-degree concentration, in analogy to the famous Linial, Nisan, Mansour theorem on the low-degree Fourier concentration of $\mathsf{AC}^0$ circuits. If true, this conjecture immediately implies that polynomial-size $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits cannot compute parity.
We prove this conjecture for the class of depth-$d$, polynomial-size $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits with at most $n^{O(1/d)}$ auxiliary qubits. We obtain new circuit lower bounds and learning results as applications: this class of circuits cannot correctly compute
- the $n$-bit parity function on more than $(\frac{1}{2} + 2^{-Ω(n^{1/d})})$-fraction of inputs, and
- the $n$-bit majority function on more than $(\frac{1}{2} + O(n^{-1/4}))$-fraction of inputs.
Additionally we show that this class of $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits with limited auxiliary qubits can be learned with quasipolynomial sample complexity, giving the first learning result for $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits.
More broadly, our results add evidence that "Pauli-analytic" techniques can be a powerful tool in studying quantum circuits.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2024; v1 submitted 16 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Gaussian Approximation of Convex Sets by Intersections of Halfspaces
Authors:
Anindya De,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Rocco A. Servedio
Abstract:
We study the approximability of general convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ by intersections of halfspaces, where the approximation quality is measured with respect to the standard Gaussian distribution $N(0,I_n)$ and the complexity of an approximation is the number of halfspaces used. While a large body of research has considered the approximation of convex sets by intersections of halfspaces under dis…
▽ More
We study the approximability of general convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ by intersections of halfspaces, where the approximation quality is measured with respect to the standard Gaussian distribution $N(0,I_n)$ and the complexity of an approximation is the number of halfspaces used. While a large body of research has considered the approximation of convex sets by intersections of halfspaces under distance metrics such as the Lebesgue measure and Hausdorff distance, prior to our work there has not been a systematic study of convex approximation under the Gaussian distribution.
We establish a range of upper and lower bounds, both for general convex sets and for specific natural convex sets that are of particular interest. Our results demonstrate that the landscape of approximation is intriguingly different under the Gaussian distribution versus previously studied distance measures. For example, we show that $2^{Θ(\sqrt{n})}$ halfspaces are both necessary and sufficient to approximate the origin-centered $\ell_2$ ball of Gaussian volume 1/2 to any constant accuracy, and that for $1 \leq p < 2$, the origin-centered $\ell_p$ ball of Gaussian volume 1/2 can be approximated to any constant accuracy as an intersection of $2^{\widetilde{O}(n^{3/4})}$ many halfspaces. These bounds are quite different from known approximation results under more commonly studied distance measures.
Our results are proved using techniques from many different areas. These include classical results on convex polyhedral approximation, Cramér-type bounds on large deviations from probability theory, and -- perhaps surprisingly -- a range of topics from computational complexity, including computational learning theory, unconditional pseudorandomness, and the study of influences and noise sensitivity in the analysis of Boolean functions.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Mildly Exponential Lower Bounds on Tolerant Testers for Monotonicity, Unateness, and Juntas
Authors:
Xi Chen,
Anindya De,
Yuhao Li,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Rocco A. Servedio
Abstract:
We give the first super-polynomial (in fact, mildly exponential) lower bounds for tolerant testing (equivalently, distance estimation) of monotonicity, unateness, and juntas with a constant separation between the "yes" and "no" cases. Specifically, we give
$\bullet$ A $2^{Ω(n^{1/4}/\sqrt{\varepsilon})}$-query lower bound for non-adaptive, two-sided tolerant monotonicity testers and unateness tes…
▽ More
We give the first super-polynomial (in fact, mildly exponential) lower bounds for tolerant testing (equivalently, distance estimation) of monotonicity, unateness, and juntas with a constant separation between the "yes" and "no" cases. Specifically, we give
$\bullet$ A $2^{Ω(n^{1/4}/\sqrt{\varepsilon})}$-query lower bound for non-adaptive, two-sided tolerant monotonicity testers and unateness testers when the "gap" parameter $\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1$ is equal to $\varepsilon$, for any $\varepsilon \geq 1/\sqrt{n}$;
$\bullet$ A $2^{Ω(k^{1/2})}$-query lower bound for non-adaptive, two-sided tolerant junta testers when the gap parameter is an absolute constant.
In the constant-gap regime no non-trivial prior lower bound was known for monotonicity, the best prior lower bound known for unateness was $\tildeΩ(n^{3/2})$ queries, and the best prior lower bound known for juntas was $\mathrm{poly}(k)$ queries.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Testing Junta Truncation
Authors:
William He,
Shivam Nadimpalli
Abstract:
We consider the basic statistical problem of detecting truncation of the uniform distribution on the Boolean hypercube by juntas. More concretely, we give upper and lower bounds on the problem of distinguishing between i.i.d. sample access to either (a) the uniform distribution over $\{0,1\}^n$, or (b) the uniform distribution over $\{0,1\}^n$ conditioned on the satisfying assignments of a $k$-jun…
▽ More
We consider the basic statistical problem of detecting truncation of the uniform distribution on the Boolean hypercube by juntas. More concretely, we give upper and lower bounds on the problem of distinguishing between i.i.d. sample access to either (a) the uniform distribution over $\{0,1\}^n$, or (b) the uniform distribution over $\{0,1\}^n$ conditioned on the satisfying assignments of a $k$-junta $f: \{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$.
We show that (up to constant factors) $\min\{2^k + \log{n\choose k}, {2^{k/2}\log^{1/2}{n\choose k}}\}$ samples suffice for this task and also show that a $\log{n\choose k}$ dependence on sample complexity is unavoidable. Our results suggest that testing junta truncation requires learning the set of relevant variables of the junta.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2023; v1 submitted 26 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Testing Convex Truncation
Authors:
Anindya De,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Rocco A. Servedio
Abstract:
We study the basic statistical problem of testing whether normally distributed $n$-dimensional data has been truncated, i.e. altered by only retaining points that lie in some unknown truncation set $S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. As our main algorithmic results,
(1) We give a computationally efficient $O(n)$-sample algorithm that can distinguish the standard normal distribution $N(0,I_n)$ from…
▽ More
We study the basic statistical problem of testing whether normally distributed $n$-dimensional data has been truncated, i.e. altered by only retaining points that lie in some unknown truncation set $S \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. As our main algorithmic results,
(1) We give a computationally efficient $O(n)$-sample algorithm that can distinguish the standard normal distribution $N(0,I_n)$ from $N(0,I_n)$ conditioned on an unknown and arbitrary convex set $S$.
(2) We give a different computationally efficient $O(n)$-sample algorithm that can distinguish $N(0,I_n)$ from $N(0,I_n)$ conditioned on an unknown and arbitrary mixture of symmetric convex sets.
These results stand in sharp contrast with known results for learning or testing convex bodies with respect to the normal distribution or learning convex-truncated normal distributions, where state-of-the-art algorithms require essentially $n^{\sqrt{n}}$ samples. An easy argument shows that no finite number of samples suffices to distinguish $N(0,I_n)$ from an unknown and arbitrary mixture of general (not necessarily symmetric) convex sets, so no common generalization of results (1) and (2) above is possible.
We also prove that any algorithm (computationally efficient or otherwise) that can distinguish $N(0,I_n)$ from $N(0,I_n)$ conditioned on an unknown symmetric convex set must use $Ω(n)$ samples. This shows that the sample complexity of each of our algorithms is optimal up to a constant factor.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
A Counterexample to a Directed KKL Inequality
Authors:
Quentin Dubroff,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Bhargav Narayanan
Abstract:
We show that the natural directed analogues of the KKL theorem [KKL88] and the Eldan--Gross inequality [EG20] from the analysis of Boolean functions fail to hold. This is in contrast to several other isoperimetric inequalities on the Boolean hypercube (such as the Poincare inequality, Margulis's inequality [Mar74] and Talagrand's inequality [Tal93]) for which directed strengthenings have recently…
▽ More
We show that the natural directed analogues of the KKL theorem [KKL88] and the Eldan--Gross inequality [EG20] from the analysis of Boolean functions fail to hold. This is in contrast to several other isoperimetric inequalities on the Boolean hypercube (such as the Poincare inequality, Margulis's inequality [Mar74] and Talagrand's inequality [Tal93]) for which directed strengthenings have recently been established.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Testing and Learning Quantum Juntas Nearly Optimally
Authors:
Thomas Chen,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Henry Yuen
Abstract:
We consider the problem of testing and learning quantum $k$-juntas: $n$-qubit unitary matrices which act non-trivially on just $k$ of the $n$ qubits and as the identity on the rest. As our main algorithmic results, we give (a) a $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{k})$-query quantum algorithm that can distinguish quantum $k$-juntas from unitary matrices that are "far" from every quantum $k$-junta; and (b) a…
▽ More
We consider the problem of testing and learning quantum $k$-juntas: $n$-qubit unitary matrices which act non-trivially on just $k$ of the $n$ qubits and as the identity on the rest. As our main algorithmic results, we give (a) a $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{k})$-query quantum algorithm that can distinguish quantum $k$-juntas from unitary matrices that are "far" from every quantum $k$-junta; and (b) a $O(4^k)$-query algorithm to learn quantum $k$-juntas. We complement our upper bounds for testing quantum $k$-juntas and learning quantum $k$-juntas with near-matching lower bounds of $Ω(\sqrt{k})$ and $Ω(\frac{4^k}{k})$, respectively. Our techniques are Fourier-analytic and make use of a notion of influence of qubits on unitaries.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2023; v1 submitted 12 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Convex Influences
Authors:
Anindya De,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Rocco A. Servedio
Abstract:
We introduce a new notion of influence for symmetric convex sets over Gaussian space, which we term "convex influence". We show that this new notion of influence shares many of the familiar properties of influences of variables for monotone Boolean functions $f: \{\pm1\}^n \to \{\pm1\}.$
Our main results for convex influences give Gaussian space analogues of many important results on influences…
▽ More
We introduce a new notion of influence for symmetric convex sets over Gaussian space, which we term "convex influence". We show that this new notion of influence shares many of the familiar properties of influences of variables for monotone Boolean functions $f: \{\pm1\}^n \to \{\pm1\}.$
Our main results for convex influences give Gaussian space analogues of many important results on influences for monotone Boolean functions. These include (robust) characterizations of extremal functions, the Poincaré inequality, the Kahn-Kalai-Linial theorem, a sharp threshold theorem of Kalai, a stability version of the Kruskal-Katona theorem due to O'Donnell and Wimmer, and some partial results towards a Gaussian space analogue of Friedgut's junta theorem. The proofs of our results for convex influences use very different techniques than the analogous proofs for Boolean influences over $\{\pm1\}^n$. Taken as a whole, our results extend the emerging analogy between symmetric convex sets in Gaussian space and monotone Boolean functions from $\{\pm1\}^n$ to $\{\pm1\}$
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Approximating Sumset Size
Authors:
Anindya De,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Rocco A. Servedio
Abstract:
Given a subset $A$ of the $n$-dimensional Boolean hypercube $\mathbb{F}_2^n$, the sumset $A+A$ is the set $\{a+a': a, a' \in A\}$ where addition is in $\mathbb{F}_2^n$. Sumsets play an important role in additive combinatorics, where they feature in many central results of the field.
The main result of this paper is a sublinear-time algorithm for the problem of sumset size estimation. In more det…
▽ More
Given a subset $A$ of the $n$-dimensional Boolean hypercube $\mathbb{F}_2^n$, the sumset $A+A$ is the set $\{a+a': a, a' \in A\}$ where addition is in $\mathbb{F}_2^n$. Sumsets play an important role in additive combinatorics, where they feature in many central results of the field.
The main result of this paper is a sublinear-time algorithm for the problem of sumset size estimation. In more detail, our algorithm is given oracle access to (the indicator function of) an arbitrary $A \subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^n$ and an accuracy parameter $ε> 0$, and with high probability it outputs a value $0 \leq v \leq 1$ that is $\pm ε$-close to $\mathrm{Vol}(A' + A')$ for some perturbation $A' \subseteq A$ of $A$ satisfying $\mathrm{Vol}(A \setminus A') \leq ε.$ It is easy to see that without the relaxation of dealing with $A'$ rather than $A$, any algorithm for estimating $\mathrm{Vol}(A+A)$ to any nontrivial accuracy must make $2^{Ω(n)}$ queries. In contrast, we give an algorithm whose query complexity depends only on $ε$ and is completely independent of the ambient dimension $n$.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Quantitative Correlation Inequalities via Semigroup Interpolation
Authors:
Anindya De,
Shivam Nadimpalli,
Rocco A. Servedio
Abstract:
Most correlation inequalities for high-dimensional functions in the literature, such as the Fortuin-Kasteleyn-Ginibre (FKG) inequality and the celebrated Gaussian Correlation Inequality of Royen, are qualitative statements which establish that any two functions of a certain type have non-negative correlation. In this work we give a general approach that can be used to bootstrap many qualitative co…
▽ More
Most correlation inequalities for high-dimensional functions in the literature, such as the Fortuin-Kasteleyn-Ginibre (FKG) inequality and the celebrated Gaussian Correlation Inequality of Royen, are qualitative statements which establish that any two functions of a certain type have non-negative correlation. In this work we give a general approach that can be used to bootstrap many qualitative correlation inequalities for functions over product spaces into quantitative statements. The approach combines a new extremal result about power series, proved using complex analysis, with harmonic analysis of functions over product spaces. We instantiate this general approach in several different concrete settings to obtain a range of new and near-optimal quantitative correlation inequalities, including:
$\bullet$ A quantitative version of Royen's celebrated Gaussian Correlation Inequality. Royen (2014) confirmed a conjecture, open for 40 years, stating that any two symmetric, convex sets must be non-negatively correlated under any centered Gaussian distribution. We give a lower bound on the correlation in terms of the vector of degree-2 Hermite coefficients of the two convex sets, analogous to the correlation bound for monotone Boolean functions over $\{0,1\}^n$ obtained by Talagrand (1996).
$\bullet$ A quantitative version of the well-known FKG inequality for monotone functions over any finite product probability space, generalizing the quantitative correlation bound for monotone Boolean functions over $\{0,1\}^n$ obtained by Talagrand (1996). The only prior generalization of which we are aware is due to Keller (2008, 2009, 2012), which extended Talagrand's result to product distributions over $\{0,1\}^n$. We also give two different quantitative versions of the FKG inequality for monotone functions over the continuous domain $[0,1]^n$, answering a question of Keller (2009).
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
New Fusion Algorithm provides an alternative approach to Robotic Path planning
Authors:
Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari,
Sandeep Varma Nadimpalli
Abstract:
For rapid growth in technology and automation, human tasks are being taken over by robots as robots have proven to be better with both speed and precision. One of the major and widespread usages of these robots is in the industrial businesses, where they are employed to carry massive loads in and around work areas. As these working environments might not be completely localized and could be dynami…
▽ More
For rapid growth in technology and automation, human tasks are being taken over by robots as robots have proven to be better with both speed and precision. One of the major and widespread usages of these robots is in the industrial businesses, where they are employed to carry massive loads in and around work areas. As these working environments might not be completely localized and could be dynamically changing, new approaches must be evaluated to guarantee a crash-free way of performing duties. This paper presents a new and efficient fusion algorithm for solving the path planning problem in a custom 2D environment. This fusion algorithm integrates an improved and optimized version of both, A* algorithm and the Artificial potential field method. Firstly, an initial or preliminary path is planned in the environmental model by adopting the A* algorithm. The heuristic function of this A* algorithm is optimized and improved according to the environmental model. This is followed by selecting and saving the key nodes in the initial path. Lastly, on the basis of these saved key nodes, path smoothing is done by artificial potential field method. Our simulation results carried out using Python viz. libraries indicate that the new fusion algorithm is feasible and superior in smoothness performance and can satisfy as a time-efficient and cheaper alternative to conventional A* strategies of path planning.
△ Less
Submitted 6 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Augmented Random Search for Quadcopter Control: An alternative to Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari,
Sandeep Varma Nadimpalli
Abstract:
Model-based reinforcement learning strategies are believed to exhibit more significant sample complexity than model-free strategies to control dynamical systems,such as quadcopters.This belief that Model-based strategies that involve the use of well-trained neural networks for making such high-level decisions always give better performance can be dispelled by making use of Model-free policy search…
▽ More
Model-based reinforcement learning strategies are believed to exhibit more significant sample complexity than model-free strategies to control dynamical systems,such as quadcopters.This belief that Model-based strategies that involve the use of well-trained neural networks for making such high-level decisions always give better performance can be dispelled by making use of Model-free policy search methods.This paper proposes the use of a model-free random searching strategy,called Augmented Random Search(ARS),which is a better and faster approach of linear policy training for continuous control tasks like controlling a Quadcopters flight.The method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy by eliminating the use of too much data for the training of neural networks that are present in the previous approaches to the task of Quadcopter control.The paper also highlights the performance results of the searching strategy used for this task in a strategically designed task environment with the help of simulations.Reward collection performance over 1000 episodes and agents behavior in flight for augmented random search is compared with that of the behavior for reinforcement learning state-of-the-art algorithm,called Deep Deterministic policy gradient(DDPG).Our simulations and results manifest that a high variability in performance is observed in commonly used strategies for sample efficiency of such tasks but the built policy network of ARS-Quad can react relatively accurately to step response providing a better performing alternative to reinforcement learning strategies.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
