-
BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languages
Authors:
Junho Myung,
Nayeon Lee,
Yi Zhou,
Jiho **,
Rifki Afina Putri,
Dimosthenis Antypas,
Hsuvas Borkakoty,
Eunsu Kim,
Carla Perez-Almendros,
Abinew Ali Ayele,
Víctor Gutiérrez-Basulto,
Yazmín Ibáñez-García,
Hwaran Lee,
Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad,
Kiwoong Park,
Anar Sabuhi Rzayev,
Nina White,
Seid Muhie Yimam,
Mohammad Taher Pilehvar,
Nedjma Ousidhoum,
Jose Camacho-Collados,
Alice Oh
Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often lack culture-specific knowledge of daily life, especially across diverse regions and non-English languages. Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs' cultural sensitivities are limited to a single language or collected from online sources such as Wikipedia, which do not reflect the mundane everyday lifestyles of diverse regions. That is, information about the food…
▽ More
Large language models (LLMs) often lack culture-specific knowledge of daily life, especially across diverse regions and non-English languages. Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs' cultural sensitivities are limited to a single language or collected from online sources such as Wikipedia, which do not reflect the mundane everyday lifestyles of diverse regions. That is, information about the food people eat for their birthday celebrations, spices they typically use, musical instruments youngsters play, or the sports they practice in school is common cultural knowledge but uncommon in easily collected online sources, especially for underrepresented cultures. To address this issue, we introduce BLEnD, a hand-crafted benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' everyday knowledge across diverse cultures and languages. BLEnD comprises 52.6k question-answer pairs from 16 countries/regions, in 13 different languages, including low-resource ones such as Amharic, Assamese, Azerbaijani, Hausa, and Sundanese. We construct the benchmark to include two formats of questions: short-answer and multiple-choice. We show that LLMs perform better for cultures that are highly represented online, with a maximum 57.34% difference in GPT-4, the best-performing model, in the short-answer format. For cultures represented by mid-to-high-resource languages, LLMs perform better in their local languages, but for cultures represented by low-resource languages, LLMs perform better in English than the local languages. We make our dataset publicly available at: https://github.com/nlee0212/BLEnD.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Designing Prompt Analytics Dashboards to Analyze Student-ChatGPT Interactions in EFL Writing
Authors:
Minsun Kim,
SeonGyeom Kim,
Suyoun Lee,
Yoosang Yoon,
Junho Myung,
Haneul Yoo,
Hyungseung Lim,
Jieun Han,
Yoonsu Kim,
So-Yeon Ahn,
Juho Kim,
Alice Oh,
Hwajung Hong,
Tak Yeon Lee
Abstract:
While ChatGPT has significantly impacted education by offering personalized resources for students, its integration into educational settings poses unprecedented risks, such as inaccuracies and biases in AI-generated content, plagiarism and over-reliance on AI, and privacy and security issues. To help teachers address such risks, we conducted a two-phase iterative design process that comprises sur…
▽ More
While ChatGPT has significantly impacted education by offering personalized resources for students, its integration into educational settings poses unprecedented risks, such as inaccuracies and biases in AI-generated content, plagiarism and over-reliance on AI, and privacy and security issues. To help teachers address such risks, we conducted a two-phase iterative design process that comprises surveys, interviews, and prototype demonstration involving six EFL (English as a Foreign Language) teachers, who integrated ChatGPT into semester-long English essay writing classes. Based on the needs identified during the initial survey and interviews, we developed a prototype of Prompt Analytics Dashboard (PAD) that integrates the essay editing history and chat logs between students and ChatGPT. Teacher's feedback on the prototype informs additional features and unmet needs for designing future PAD, which helps them (1) analyze contextual analysis of student behaviors, (2) design an overall learning loop, and (3) develop their teaching skills.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Inpaint Biases: A Pathway to Accurate and Unbiased Image Generation
Authors:
Jiyoon Myung,
Jihyeon Park
Abstract:
This paper examines the limitations of advanced text-to-image models in accurately rendering unconventional concepts which are scarcely represented or absent in their training datasets. We identify how these limitations not only confine the creative potential of these models but also pose risks of reinforcing stereotypes. To address these challenges, we introduce the Inpaint Biases framework, whic…
▽ More
This paper examines the limitations of advanced text-to-image models in accurately rendering unconventional concepts which are scarcely represented or absent in their training datasets. We identify how these limitations not only confine the creative potential of these models but also pose risks of reinforcing stereotypes. To address these challenges, we introduce the Inpaint Biases framework, which employs user-defined masks and inpainting techniques to enhance the accuracy of image generation, particularly for novel or inaccurately rendered objects. Through experimental validation, we demonstrate how this framework significantly improves the fidelity of generated images to the user's intent, thereby expanding the models' creative capabilities and mitigating the risk of perpetuating biases. Our study contributes to the advancement of text-to-image models as unbiased, versatile tools for creative expression.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2024; v1 submitted 29 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
RECIPE4U: Student-ChatGPT Interaction Dataset in EFL Writing Education
Authors:
Jieun Han,
Haneul Yoo,
Junho Myung,
Minsun Kim,
Tak Yeon Lee,
So-Yeon Ahn,
Alice Oh
Abstract:
The integration of generative AI in education is expanding, yet empirical analyses of large-scale and real-world interactions between students and AI systems still remain limited. Addressing this gap, we present RECIPE4U (RECIPE for University), a dataset sourced from a semester-long experiment with 212 college students in English as Foreign Language (EFL) writing courses. During the study, studen…
▽ More
The integration of generative AI in education is expanding, yet empirical analyses of large-scale and real-world interactions between students and AI systems still remain limited. Addressing this gap, we present RECIPE4U (RECIPE for University), a dataset sourced from a semester-long experiment with 212 college students in English as Foreign Language (EFL) writing courses. During the study, students engaged in dialogues with ChatGPT to revise their essays. RECIPE4U includes comprehensive records of these interactions, including conversation logs, students' intent, students' self-rated satisfaction, and students' essay edit histories. In particular, we annotate the students' utterances in RECIPE4U with 13 intention labels based on our coding schemes. We establish baseline results for two subtasks in task-oriented dialogue systems within educational contexts: intent detection and satisfaction estimation. As a foundational step, we explore student-ChatGPT interaction patterns through RECIPE4U and analyze them by focusing on students' dialogue, essay data statistics, and students' essay edits. We further illustrate potential applications of RECIPE4U dataset for enhancing the incorporation of LLMs in educational frameworks. RECIPE4U is publicly available at https://zeunie.github.io/RECIPE4U/.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
FABRIC: Automated Scoring and Feedback Generation for Essays
Authors:
Jieun Han,
Haneul Yoo,
Junho Myung,
Minsun Kim,
Hyunseung Lim,
Yoonsu Kim,
Tak Yeon Lee,
Hwajung Hong,
Juho Kim,
So-Yeon Ahn,
Alice Oh
Abstract:
Automated essay scoring (AES) provides a useful tool for students and instructors in writing classes by generating essay scores in real-time. However, previous AES models do not provide more specific rubric-based scores nor feedback on how to improve the essays, which can be even more important than the overall scores for learning. We present FABRIC, a pipeline to help students and instructors in…
▽ More
Automated essay scoring (AES) provides a useful tool for students and instructors in writing classes by generating essay scores in real-time. However, previous AES models do not provide more specific rubric-based scores nor feedback on how to improve the essays, which can be even more important than the overall scores for learning. We present FABRIC, a pipeline to help students and instructors in English writing classes by automatically generating 1) the overall scores, 2) specific rubric-based scores, and 3) detailed feedback on how to improve the essays. Under the guidance of English education experts, we chose the rubrics for the specific scores as content, organization, and language. The first component of the FABRIC pipeline is DREsS, a real-world Dataset for Rubric-based Essay Scoring (DREsS). The second component is CASE, a Corruption-based Augmentation Strategy for Essays, with which we can improve the accuracy of the baseline model by 45.44%. The third component is EssayCoT, the Essay Chain-of-Thought prompting strategy which uses scores predicted from the AES model to generate better feedback. We evaluate the effectiveness of the new dataset DREsS and the augmentation strategy CASE quantitatively and show significant improvements over the models trained with existing datasets. We evaluate the feedback generated by EssayCoT with English education experts to show significant improvements in the helpfulness of the feedback across all rubrics. Lastly, we evaluate the FABRIC pipeline with students in a college English writing class who rated the generated scores and feedback with an average of 6 on the Likert scale from 1 to 7.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
ChEDDAR: Student-ChatGPT Dialogue in EFL Writing Education
Authors:
Jieun Han,
Haneul Yoo,
Junho Myung,
Minsun Kim,
Tak Yeon Lee,
So-Yeon Ahn,
Alice Oh
Abstract:
The integration of generative AI in education is expanding, yet empirical analyses of large-scale, real-world interactions between students and AI systems still remain limited. In this study, we present ChEDDAR, ChatGPT & EFL Learner's Dialogue Dataset As Revising an essay, which is collected from a semester-long longitudinal experiment involving 212 college students enrolled in English as Foreign…
▽ More
The integration of generative AI in education is expanding, yet empirical analyses of large-scale, real-world interactions between students and AI systems still remain limited. In this study, we present ChEDDAR, ChatGPT & EFL Learner's Dialogue Dataset As Revising an essay, which is collected from a semester-long longitudinal experiment involving 212 college students enrolled in English as Foreign Langauge (EFL) writing courses. The students were asked to revise their essays through dialogues with ChatGPT. ChEDDAR includes a conversation log, utterance-level essay edit history, self-rated satisfaction, and students' intent, in addition to session-level pre-and-post surveys documenting their objectives and overall experiences. We analyze students' usage patterns and perceptions regarding generative AI with respect to their intent and satisfaction. As a foundational step, we establish baseline results for two pivotal tasks in task-oriented dialogue systems within educational contexts: intent detection and satisfaction estimation. We finally suggest further research to refine the integration of generative AI into education settings, outlining potential scenarios utilizing ChEDDAR. ChEDDAR is publicly available at https://github.com/zeunie/ChEDDAR.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2024; v1 submitted 22 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Learning from Teaching Assistants to Program with Subgoals: Exploring the Potential for AI Teaching Assistants
Authors:
Changyoon Lee,
Junho Myung,
Jieun Han,
Jiho **,
Alice Oh
Abstract:
With recent advances in generative AI, conversational models like ChatGPT have become feasible candidates for TAs. We investigate the practicality of using generative AI as TAs in introductory programming education by examining novice learners' interaction with TAs in a subgoal learning environment. To compare the learners' interaction and perception of the AI and human TAs, we conducted a between…
▽ More
With recent advances in generative AI, conversational models like ChatGPT have become feasible candidates for TAs. We investigate the practicality of using generative AI as TAs in introductory programming education by examining novice learners' interaction with TAs in a subgoal learning environment. To compare the learners' interaction and perception of the AI and human TAs, we conducted a between-subject study with 20 novice programming learners. Learners solve programming tasks by producing subgoals and subsolutions with the guidance of a TA. Our study shows that learners can solve tasks faster with comparable scores with AI TAs. Learners' perception of the AI TA is on par with that of human TAs in terms of speed and comprehensiveness of the replies and helpfulness, difficulty, and satisfaction of the conversation. Finally, we suggest guidelines to better design and utilize generative AI as TAs in programming education from the result of our chat log analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Exploring Cross-Cultural Differences in English Hate Speech Annotations: From Dataset Construction to Analysis
Authors:
Nayeon Lee,
Chani Jung,
Junho Myung,
Jiho **,
Jose Camacho-Collados,
Juho Kim,
Alice Oh
Abstract:
Warning: this paper contains content that may be offensive or upsetting.
Most hate speech datasets neglect the cultural diversity within a single language, resulting in a critical shortcoming in hate speech detection. To address this, we introduce CREHate, a CRoss-cultural English Hate speech dataset. To construct CREHate, we follow a two-step procedure: 1) cultural post collection and 2) cross-…
▽ More
Warning: this paper contains content that may be offensive or upsetting.
Most hate speech datasets neglect the cultural diversity within a single language, resulting in a critical shortcoming in hate speech detection. To address this, we introduce CREHate, a CRoss-cultural English Hate speech dataset. To construct CREHate, we follow a two-step procedure: 1) cultural post collection and 2) cross-cultural annotation. We sample posts from the SBIC dataset, which predominantly represents North America, and collect posts from four geographically diverse English-speaking countries (Australia, United Kingdom, Singapore, and South Africa) using culturally hateful keywords we retrieve from our survey. Annotations are collected from the four countries plus the United States to establish representative labels for each country. Our analysis highlights statistically significant disparities across countries in hate speech annotations. Only 56.2% of the posts in CREHate achieve consensus among all countries, with the highest pairwise label difference rate of 26%. Qualitative analysis shows that label disagreement occurs mostly due to different interpretations of sarcasm and the personal bias of annotators on divisive topics. Lastly, we evaluate large language models (LLMs) under a zero-shot setting and show that current LLMs tend to show higher accuracies on Anglosphere country labels in CREHate. Our dataset and codes are available at: https://github.com/nlee0212/CREHate
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2024; v1 submitted 31 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
RECIPE: How to Integrate ChatGPT into EFL Writing Education
Authors:
Jieun Han,
Haneul Yoo,
Yoonsu Kim,
Junho Myung,
Minsun Kim,
Hyunseung Lim,
Juho Kim,
Tak Yeon Lee,
Hwajung Hong,
So-Yeon Ahn,
Alice Oh
Abstract:
The integration of generative AI in the field of education is actively being explored. In particular, ChatGPT has garnered significant interest, offering an opportunity to examine its effectiveness in English as a foreign language (EFL) education. To address this need, we present a novel learning platform called RECIPE (Revising an Essay with ChatGPT on an Interactive Platform for EFL learners). O…
▽ More
The integration of generative AI in the field of education is actively being explored. In particular, ChatGPT has garnered significant interest, offering an opportunity to examine its effectiveness in English as a foreign language (EFL) education. To address this need, we present a novel learning platform called RECIPE (Revising an Essay with ChatGPT on an Interactive Platform for EFL learners). Our platform features two types of prompts that facilitate conversations between ChatGPT and students: (1) a hidden prompt for ChatGPT to take an EFL teacher role and (2) an open prompt for students to initiate a dialogue with a self-written summary of what they have learned. We deployed this platform for 213 undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in EFL writing courses and seven instructors. For this study, we collect students' interaction data from RECIPE, including students' perceptions and usage of the platform, and user scenarios are examined with the data. We also conduct a focus group interview with six students and an individual interview with one EFL instructor to explore design opportunities for leveraging generative AI models in the field of EFL education.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Longitudinal Assessment of Reference Quality on Wikipedia
Authors:
Aitolkyn Baigutanova,
Jaehyeon Myung,
Diego Saez-Trumper,
Ai-Jou Chou,
Miriam Redi,
Changwook Jung,
Meeyoung Cha
Abstract:
Wikipedia plays a crucial role in the integrity of the Web. This work analyzes the reliability of this global encyclopedia through the lens of its references. We operationalize the notion of reference quality by defining reference need (RN), i.e., the percentage of sentences missing a citation, and reference risk (RR), i.e., the proportion of non-authoritative references. We release Citation Detec…
▽ More
Wikipedia plays a crucial role in the integrity of the Web. This work analyzes the reliability of this global encyclopedia through the lens of its references. We operationalize the notion of reference quality by defining reference need (RN), i.e., the percentage of sentences missing a citation, and reference risk (RR), i.e., the proportion of non-authoritative references. We release Citation Detective, a tool for automatically calculating the RN score, and discover that the RN score has dropped by 20 percent point in the last decade, with more than half of verifiable statements now accompanying references. The RR score has remained below 1% over the years as a result of the efforts of the community to eliminate unreliable references. We propose pairing novice and experienced editors on the same Wikipedia article as a strategy to enhance reference quality. Our quasi-experiment indicates that such a co-editing experience can result in a lasting advantage in identifying unreliable sources in future edits. As Wikipedia is frequently used as the ground truth for numerous Web applications, our findings and suggestions on its reliability can have a far-reaching impact. We discuss the possibility of other Web services adopting Wiki-style user collaboration to eliminate unreliable content.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.