Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Moustafa, M A
-
Predicting Nonlinear Seismic Response of Structural Braces Using Machine Learning
Authors:
Elif Ecem Bas,
Denis Aslangil,
Mohamed A. Moustafa
Abstract:
Numerical modeling of different structural materials that have highly nonlinear behaviors has always been a challenging problem in engineering disciplines. Experimental data is commonly used to characterize this behavior. This study aims to improve the modeling capabilities by using state of the art Machine Learning techniques, and attempts to answer several scientific questions: (i) Which ML algo…
▽ More
Numerical modeling of different structural materials that have highly nonlinear behaviors has always been a challenging problem in engineering disciplines. Experimental data is commonly used to characterize this behavior. This study aims to improve the modeling capabilities by using state of the art Machine Learning techniques, and attempts to answer several scientific questions: (i) Which ML algorithm is capable and is more efficient to learn such a complex and nonlinear problem? (ii) Is it possible to artificially reproduce structural brace seismic behavior that can represent real physics? (iii) How can our findings be extended to the different engineering problems that are driven by similar nonlinear dynamics? To answer these questions, the presented methods are validated by using experimental brace data. The paper shows that after proper data preparation, the long-short term memory (LSTM) method is highly capable of capturing the nonlinear behavior of braces. Additionally, the effects of tuning the hyperparameters on the models, such as layer numbers, neuron numbers, and the activation functions, are presented. Finally, the ability to learn nonlinear dynamics by using deep neural network algorithms and their advantages are briefly discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Using Machine Learning Approach for Computational Substructure in Real-Time Hybrid Simulation
Authors:
Elif Ecem Bas,
Mohamed A. Moustafa,
David Feil-Seifer,
Janelle Blankenburg
Abstract:
Hybrid simulation (HS) is a widely used structural testing method that combines a computational substructure with a numerical model for well-understood components and an experimental substructure for other parts of the structure that are physically tested. One challenge for fast HS or real-time HS (RTHS) is associated with the analytical substructures of relatively complex structures, which could…
▽ More
Hybrid simulation (HS) is a widely used structural testing method that combines a computational substructure with a numerical model for well-understood components and an experimental substructure for other parts of the structure that are physically tested. One challenge for fast HS or real-time HS (RTHS) is associated with the analytical substructures of relatively complex structures, which could have large number of degrees of freedoms (DOFs), for instance. These large DOFs computations could be hard to perform in real-time, even with the all current hardware capacities. In this study, a metamodeling technique is proposed to represent the structural dynamic behavior of the analytical substructure. A preliminary study is conducted where a one-bay one-story concentrically braced frame (CBF) is tested under earthquake loading by using a compact HS setup at the University of Nevada, Reno. The experimental setup allows for using a small-scale brace as the experimental substructure combined with a steel frame at the prototype full-scale for the analytical substructure. Two different machine learning algorithms are evaluated to provide a valid and useful metamodeling solution for analytical substructure. The metamodels are trained with the available data that is obtained from the pure analytical solution of the prototype steel frame. The two algorithms used for develo** the metamodels are: (1) linear regression (LR) model, and (2) basic recurrent neural network (RNN). The metamodels are first validated against the pure analytical response of the structure. Next, RTHS experiments are conducted by using metamodels. RTHS test results using both LR and RNN models are evaluated, and the advantages and disadvantages of these models are discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
