Demystifying Object-based Big Data Storage Systems
Authors:
Anindita Sarkar Mondal,
Madhupa Sanyal,
Ari Kusumastuti,
Hrishav Bakul Barua,
Kartick Chandra Mondal
Abstract:
Today's era is the digitized era. Managing such generated big data is an important factor for data scientists. Day by day, it increases the demand for big data storage systems. Different organizations are involved in providing storage-related services. They follow the different architectures or storage models for storing big data. In this survey paper, our target is to highlight such storage archi…
▽ More
Today's era is the digitized era. Managing such generated big data is an important factor for data scientists. Day by day, it increases the demand for big data storage systems. Different organizations are involved in providing storage-related services. They follow the different architectures or storage models for storing big data. In this survey paper, our target is to highlight such storage architectures which provided by different renowned storage service providers. On an architectural basis, we divide the big data storage systems into five parts, Distributed file systems (DFS), Clustered File Systems (CFS), Cloud Storage, Archive Storage, and Object Storage Systems (OSS). Also, we reveal a detailed architectural view of the big data storage systems provided by the different organizations under these parts.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Two-Sided Fairness in Non-Personalised Recommendations
Authors:
Aadi Swadipto Mondal,
Rakesh Bal,
Sayan Sinha,
Gourab K Patro
Abstract:
Recommender systems are one of the most widely used services on several online platforms to suggest potential items to the end-users. These services often use different machine learning techniques for which fairness is a concerning factor, especially when the downstream services have the ability to cause social ramifications. Thus, focusing on the non-personalised (global) recommendations in news…
▽ More
Recommender systems are one of the most widely used services on several online platforms to suggest potential items to the end-users. These services often use different machine learning techniques for which fairness is a concerning factor, especially when the downstream services have the ability to cause social ramifications. Thus, focusing on the non-personalised (global) recommendations in news media platforms (e.g., top-k trending topics on Twitter, top-k news on a news platform, etc.), we discuss on two specific fairness concerns together (traditionally studied separately)---user fairness and organisational fairness. While user fairness captures the idea of representing the choices of all the individual users in the case of global recommendations, organisational fairness tries to ensure politically/ideologically balanced recommendation sets. This makes user fairness a user-side requirement and organisational fairness a platform-side requirement. For user fairness, we test with methods from social choice theory, i.e., various voting rules known to better represent user choices in their results. Even in our application of voting rules to the recommendation setup, we observe high user satisfaction scores. Now for organisational fairness, we propose a bias metric which measures the aggregate ideological bias of a recommended set of items (articles). Analysing the results obtained from voting rule-based recommendation, we find that while the well-known voting rules are better from the user side, they show high bias values and clearly not suitable for organisational requirements of the platforms. Thus, there is a need to build an encompassing mechanism by cohesively bridging ideas of user fairness and organisational fairness. In this abstract paper, we intend to frame the elementary ideas along with the clear motivation behind the requirement of such a mechanism.
△ Less
Submitted 10 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
