-
Latent Dirichlet Allocation Models for World Trade Analysis
Authors:
Diego Kozlowski,
Viktoriya Semeshenko,
Andrea Molinari
Abstract:
The international trade is one of the classic areas of study in economics. Nowadays, given the availability of data, the tools used for the analysis can be complemented and enriched with new methodologies and techniques that go beyond the traditional approach. The present paper shows the application of the Latent Dirichlet Allocation Models, a well known technique from the area of Natural Language…
▽ More
The international trade is one of the classic areas of study in economics. Nowadays, given the availability of data, the tools used for the analysis can be complemented and enriched with new methodologies and techniques that go beyond the traditional approach. The present paper shows the application of the Latent Dirichlet Allocation Models, a well known technique from the area of Natural Language Processing, to search for latent dimensions in the product space of international trade, and their distribution across countries over time. We apply this technique to a dataset of countries' exports of goods from 1962 to 2016. The findings show the possibility to generate higher level classifications of goods based on the empirical evidence, and also allow to study the distribution of those classifications within countries. The latter show interesting insights about countries' trade specialisation.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Satisfiability and Model Checking for the Logic of Sub-Intervals under the Homogeneity Assumption
Authors:
Laura Bozzelli,
Alberto Molinari,
Angelo Montanari,
Adriano Peron,
Pietro Sala
Abstract:
The expressive power of interval temporal logics (ITLs) makes them one of the most natural choices in a number of application domains, ranging from the specification and verification of complex reactive systems to automated planning. However, for a long time, because of their high computational complexity, they were considered not suitable for practical purposes. The recent discovery of several co…
▽ More
The expressive power of interval temporal logics (ITLs) makes them one of the most natural choices in a number of application domains, ranging from the specification and verification of complex reactive systems to automated planning. However, for a long time, because of their high computational complexity, they were considered not suitable for practical purposes. The recent discovery of several computationally well-behaved ITLs has finally changed the scenario.
In this paper, we investigate the finite satisfiability and model checking problems for the ITL D, that has a single modality for the sub-interval relation, under the homogeneity assumption (that constrains a proposition letter to hold over an interval if and only if it holds over all its points). We first prove that the satisfiability problem for D, over finite linear orders, is PSPACE-complete, and then we show that the same holds for its model checking problem, over finite Kripke structures. In such a way, we enrich the set of tractable interval temporal logics with a new meaningful representative.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2022; v1 submitted 8 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Undecidability of future timeline-based planning over dense temporal domains
Authors:
Laura Bozzelli,
Alberto Molinari,
Angelo Montanari,
Adriano Peron
Abstract:
Planning is one of the most studied problems in computer science. In this paper, we consider the timeline-based approach, where the domain is modeled by a set of independent, but interacting, components, identified by a set of state variables, whose behavior over time (timelines) is governed by a set of temporal constraints (synchronization rules). Timeline-based planning in the dense-time setting…
▽ More
Planning is one of the most studied problems in computer science. In this paper, we consider the timeline-based approach, where the domain is modeled by a set of independent, but interacting, components, identified by a set of state variables, whose behavior over time (timelines) is governed by a set of temporal constraints (synchronization rules). Timeline-based planning in the dense-time setting has been recently shown to be undecidable in the general case, and undecidability relies on the high expressiveness of the trigger synchronization rules. In this paper, we strengthen the previous negative result by showing that undecidability already holds under the future semantics of the trigger rules which limits the comparison to temporal contexts in the future with respect to the trigger.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Model checking: the interval way
Authors:
Alberto Molinari
Abstract:
[...] The most famous model checking (MC) techniques were developed from the late 80s, bearing in mind the well-known "point-based" temporal logics LTL and CTL. However, while the expressiveness of such logics is beyond doubt, there are some properties we may want to check over system models that are inherently "interval-based" and thus cannot be expressed by point-based temporal logics, e.g., "th…
▽ More
[...] The most famous model checking (MC) techniques were developed from the late 80s, bearing in mind the well-known "point-based" temporal logics LTL and CTL. However, while the expressiveness of such logics is beyond doubt, there are some properties we may want to check over system models that are inherently "interval-based" and thus cannot be expressed by point-based temporal logics, e.g., "the proposition p has to hold in at least an average number of system states in a given computation sector". Here interval temporal logics (ITLs) come into play, providing an alternative setting for reasoning about time. Such logics deal with intervals, instead of points, as their primitive entities: this feature gives them the ability of expressing temporal properties, such as actions with duration, accomplishments, and temporal aggregations, which cannot be dealt with in standard point-based logics. The Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of time intervals (HS) is one of the most famous ITLs: it features one modality for each of the 13 possible ordering relations between pairs of intervals, apart from equality. In this thesis we focus our attention on MC based on HS, in the role of property specification language, for which a little work has been done if compared to MC for point-based temporal logics. We study the complexity of such problem considering different system models, and we also compare the expressive power of HS to that of LTL, CTL and CTL* in MC. [...]
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2019; v1 submitted 12 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Complexity of Timeline-Based Planning over Dense Temporal Domains: Exploring the Middle Ground
Authors:
Laura Bozzelli,
Alberto Molinari,
Angelo Montanari,
Adriano Peron
Abstract:
In this paper, we address complexity issues for timeline-based planning over dense temporal domains. The planning problem is modeled by means of a set of independent, but interacting, components, each one represented by a number of state variables, whose behavior over time (timelines) is governed by a set of temporal constraints (synchronization rules). While the temporal domain is usually assumed…
▽ More
In this paper, we address complexity issues for timeline-based planning over dense temporal domains. The planning problem is modeled by means of a set of independent, but interacting, components, each one represented by a number of state variables, whose behavior over time (timelines) is governed by a set of temporal constraints (synchronization rules). While the temporal domain is usually assumed to be discrete, here we consider the dense case. Dense timeline-based planning has been recently shown to be undecidable in the general case; decidability (NP-completeness) can be recovered by restricting to purely existential synchronization rules (trigger-less rules). In this paper, we investigate the unexplored area of intermediate cases in between these two extremes. We first show that decidability and non-primitive recursive-hardness can be proved by admitting synchronization rules with a trigger, but forcing them to suitably check constraints only in the future with respect to the trigger (future simple rules). More "tractable" results can be obtained by additionally constraining the form of intervals in future simple rules: EXPSPACE-completeness is guaranteed by avoiding singular intervals, PSPACE-completeness by admitting only intervals of the forms [0,a] and [b,$\infty$[.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Interval vs. Point Temporal Logic Model Checking: an Expressiveness Comparison
Authors:
Laura Bozzelli,
Alberto Molinari,
Angelo Montanari,
Adriano Peron,
Pietro Sala
Abstract:
In the last years, model checking with interval temporal logics is emerging as a viable alternative to model checking with standard point-based temporal logics, such as LTL, CTL, CTL*, and the like. The behavior of the system is modeled by means of (finite) Kripke structures, as usual. However, while temporal logics which are interpreted "point-wise" describe how the system evolves state-by-state,…
▽ More
In the last years, model checking with interval temporal logics is emerging as a viable alternative to model checking with standard point-based temporal logics, such as LTL, CTL, CTL*, and the like. The behavior of the system is modeled by means of (finite) Kripke structures, as usual. However, while temporal logics which are interpreted "point-wise" describe how the system evolves state-by-state, and predicate properties of system states, those which are interpreted "interval-wise" express properties of computation stretches, spanning a sequence of states. A proposition letter is assumed to hold over a computation stretch (interval) if and only if it holds over each component state (homogeneity assumption). A natural question arises: is there any advantage in replacing points by intervals as the primary temporal entities, or is it just a matter of taste?
In this paper, we study the expressiveness of Halpern and Shoham's interval temporal logic (HS) in model checking, in comparison with those of LTL, CTL, and CTL*. To this end, we consider three semantic variants of HS: the state-based one, introduced by Montanari et al., that allows time to branch both in the past and in the future, the computation-tree-based one, that allows time to branch in the future only, and the trace-based variant, that disallows time to branch. These variants are compared among themselves and to the aforementioned standard logics, getting a complete picture. In particular, we show that HS with trace-based semantics is equivalent to LTL (but at least exponentially more succinct), HS with computation-tree-based semantics is equivalent to finitary CTL*, and HS with state-based semantics is incomparable with all of them (LTL, CTL, and CTL*).
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2018; v1 submitted 22 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
On the Complexity of Model Checking for Syntactically Maximal Fragments of the Interval Temporal Logic HS with Regular Expressions
Authors:
Laura Bozzelli,
Alberto Molinari,
Angelo Montanari,
Adriano Peron
Abstract:
In this paper, we investigate the model checking (MC) problem for Halpern and Shoham's interval temporal logic HS. In the last years, interval temporal logic MC has received an increasing attention as a viable alternative to the traditional (point-based) temporal logic MC, which can be recovered as a special case. Most results have been obtained under the homogeneity assumption, that constrains a…
▽ More
In this paper, we investigate the model checking (MC) problem for Halpern and Shoham's interval temporal logic HS. In the last years, interval temporal logic MC has received an increasing attention as a viable alternative to the traditional (point-based) temporal logic MC, which can be recovered as a special case. Most results have been obtained under the homogeneity assumption, that constrains a proposition letter to hold over an interval if and only if it holds over each component state. Recently, Lomuscio and Michaliszyn proposed a way to relax such an assumption by exploiting regular expressions to define the behaviour of proposition letters over intervals in terms of their component states. When homogeneity is assumed, the exact complexity of MC is a difficult open question for full HS and for its two syntactically maximal fragments AA'BB'E' and AA'EB'E'. In this paper, we provide an asymptotically optimal bound to the complexity of these two fragments under the more expressive semantic variant based on regular expressions by showing that their MC problem is AEXP_pol-complete, where AEXP_pol denotes the complexity class of problems decided by exponential-time bounded alternating Turing Machines making a polynomially bounded number of alternations.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Model Checking for Fragments of Halpern and Shoham's Interval Temporal Logic Based on Track Representatives
Authors:
Alberto Molinari,
Angelo Montanari,
Adriano Peron
Abstract:
Model checking allows one to automatically verify a specification of the expected properties of a system against a formal model of its behaviour (generally, a Kripke structure). Point-based temporal logics, such as LTL, CTL, and CTL*, that describe how the system evolves state-by-state, are commonly used as specification languages. They proved themselves quite successful in a variety of applicatio…
▽ More
Model checking allows one to automatically verify a specification of the expected properties of a system against a formal model of its behaviour (generally, a Kripke structure). Point-based temporal logics, such as LTL, CTL, and CTL*, that describe how the system evolves state-by-state, are commonly used as specification languages. They proved themselves quite successful in a variety of application domains. However, properties constraining the temporal ordering of temporally extended events as well as properties involving temporal aggregations, which are inherently interval-based, can not be properly dealt with by them. Interval temporal logics (ITLs), that take intervals as their primitive temporal entities, turn out to be well-suited for the specification and verification of interval properties of computations (we interpret all the tracks of a Kripke structure as computation intervals).
We study the model checking problem for some fragments of Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of time intervals (HS). HS features one modality for each possible ordering relation between pairs of intervals (the so-called Allen's relations). First, we describe an EXPSPACE model checking algorithm for the HS fragment of Allen's relations meets, met-by, starts, started-by, and finishes, which exploits the possibility of finding, for each track (of unbounded length), an equivalent bounded-length track representative. While checking a property, it only needs to consider tracks whose length does not exceed the given bound. We prove the model checking problem for such a fragment to be PSPACE-hard. Finally, we identify other well-behaved HS fragments which are expressive enough to capture meaningful interval properties of systems, such as mutual exclusion, state reachability, and non-starvation, and whose complexity is less than or equal to that of LTL.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Model Checking the Logic of Allen's Relations Meets and Started-by is $P^NP$-Complete
Authors:
Laura Bozzelli,
Alberto Molinari,
Angelo Montanari,
Adriano Peron,
Pietro Sala
Abstract:
In the plethora of fragments of Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of time intervals (HS), the logic AB of Allen's relations Meets and Started-by is at a central position. Statements that may be true at certain intervals, but at no sub-interval of them, such as accomplishments, as well as metric constraints about the length of intervals, that force, for instance, an interval to be at least (resp., a…
▽ More
In the plethora of fragments of Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of time intervals (HS), the logic AB of Allen's relations Meets and Started-by is at a central position. Statements that may be true at certain intervals, but at no sub-interval of them, such as accomplishments, as well as metric constraints about the length of intervals, that force, for instance, an interval to be at least (resp., at most, exactly) k points long, can be expressed in AB. Moreover, over the linear order of the natural numbers N, it subsumes the (point-based) logic LTL, as it can easily encode the next and until modalities. Finally, it is expressive enough to capture the ω-regular languages, that is, for each ω-regular expression R there exists an AB formula φ such that the language defined by R coincides with the set of models of φ over N. It has been shown that the satisfiability problem for AB over N is EXPSPACE-complete. Here we prove that, under the homogeneity assumption, its model checking problem is Δ^p_2 = P^NP-complete (for the sake of comparison, the model checking problem for full HS is EXPSPACE-hard, and the only known decision procedure is nonelementary). Moreover, we show that the modality for the Allen relation Met-by can be added to AB at no extra cost (AA'B is P^NP-complete as well).
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Complexity of ITL model checking: some well-behaved fragments of the interval logic HS
Authors:
A. Molinari,
A. Montanari,
A. Peron
Abstract:
Model checking has been successfully used in many computer science fields, including artificial intelligence, theoretical computer science, and databases. Most of the proposed solutions make use of classical, point-based temporal logics, while little work has been done in the interval temporal logic setting. Recently, a non-elementary model checking algorithm for Halpern and Shoham's modal logic o…
▽ More
Model checking has been successfully used in many computer science fields, including artificial intelligence, theoretical computer science, and databases. Most of the proposed solutions make use of classical, point-based temporal logics, while little work has been done in the interval temporal logic setting. Recently, a non-elementary model checking algorithm for Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of time intervals HS over finite Kripke structures (under the homogeneity assumption) and an EXPSPACE model checking procedure for two meaningful fragments of it have been proposed. In this paper, we show that more efficient model checking procedures can be developed for some expressive enough fragments of HS.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
-
Checking Interval Properties of Computations
Authors:
A. Molinari,
A. Montanari,
A. Murano,
G. Perelli,
A. Peron
Abstract:
Model checking is a powerful method widely explored in formal verification. Given a model of a system, e.g., a Kripke structure, and a formula specifying its expected behaviour, one can verify whether the system meets the behaviour by checking the formula against the model.
Classically, system behaviour is expressed by a formula of a temporal logic, such as LTL and the like. These logics are "po…
▽ More
Model checking is a powerful method widely explored in formal verification. Given a model of a system, e.g., a Kripke structure, and a formula specifying its expected behaviour, one can verify whether the system meets the behaviour by checking the formula against the model.
Classically, system behaviour is expressed by a formula of a temporal logic, such as LTL and the like. These logics are "point-wise" interpreted, as they describe how the system evolves state-by-state. However, there are relevant properties, such as those constraining the temporal relations between pairs of temporally extended events or involving temporal aggregations, which are inherently "interval-based", and thus asking for an interval temporal logic.
In this paper, we give a formalization of the model checking problem in an interval logic setting. First, we provide an interpretation of formulas of Halpern and Shoham's interval temporal logic HS over finite Kripke structures, which allows one to check interval properties of computations. Then, we prove that the model checking problem for HS against finite Kripke structures is decidable by a suitable small model theorem, and we provide a lower bound to its computational complexity.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
