PathAlign: A vision-language model for whole slide images in histopathology
Authors:
Faruk Ahmed,
Andrew Sellergren,
Lin Yang,
Shawn Xu,
Boris Babenko,
Abbi Ward,
Niels Olson,
Arash Mohtashamian,
Yossi Matias,
Greg S. Corrado,
Quang Duong,
Dale R. Webster,
Shravya Shetty,
Daniel Golden,
Yun Liu,
David F. Steiner,
Ellery Wulczyn
Abstract:
Microscopic interpretation of histopathology images underlies many important diagnostic and treatment decisions. While advances in vision-language modeling raise new opportunities for analysis of such images, the gigapixel-scale size of whole slide images (WSIs) introduces unique challenges. Additionally, pathology reports simultaneously highlight key findings from small regions while also aggrega…
▽ More
Microscopic interpretation of histopathology images underlies many important diagnostic and treatment decisions. While advances in vision-language modeling raise new opportunities for analysis of such images, the gigapixel-scale size of whole slide images (WSIs) introduces unique challenges. Additionally, pathology reports simultaneously highlight key findings from small regions while also aggregating interpretation across multiple slides, often making it difficult to create robust image-text pairs. As such, pathology reports remain a largely untapped source of supervision in computational pathology, with most efforts relying on region-of-interest annotations or self-supervision at the patch-level. In this work, we develop a vision-language model based on the BLIP-2 framework using WSIs paired with curated text from pathology reports. This enables applications utilizing a shared image-text embedding space, such as text or image retrieval for finding cases of interest, as well as integration of the WSI encoder with a frozen large language model (LLM) for WSI-based generative text capabilities such as report generation or AI-in-the-loop interactions. We utilize a de-identified dataset of over 350,000 WSIs and diagnostic text pairs, spanning a wide range of diagnoses, procedure types, and tissue types. We present pathologist evaluation of text generation and text retrieval using WSI embeddings, as well as results for WSI classification and workflow prioritization (slide-level triaging). Model-generated text for WSIs was rated by pathologists as accurate, without clinically significant error or omission, for 78% of WSIs on average. This work demonstrates exciting potential capabilities for language-aligned WSI embeddings.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Improving Gleason Scoring of Prostate Cancer
Authors:
Kunal Nagpal,
Davis Foote,
Yun Liu,
Po-Hsuan,
Chen,
Ellery Wulczyn,
Fraser Tan,
Niels Olson,
Jenny L. Smith,
Arash Mohtashamian,
James H. Wren,
Greg S. Corrado,
Robert MacDonald,
Lily H. Peng,
Mahul B. Amin,
Andrew J. Evans,
Ankur R. Sangoi,
Craig H. Mermel,
Jason D. Hipp,
Martin C. Stumpe
Abstract:
For prostate cancer patients, the Gleason score is one of the most important prognostic factors, potentially determining treatment independent of the stage. However, Gleason scoring is based on subjective microscopic examination of tumor morphology and suffers from poor reproducibility. Here we present a deep learning system (DLS) for Gleason scoring whole-slide images of prostatectomies. Our syst…
▽ More
For prostate cancer patients, the Gleason score is one of the most important prognostic factors, potentially determining treatment independent of the stage. However, Gleason scoring is based on subjective microscopic examination of tumor morphology and suffers from poor reproducibility. Here we present a deep learning system (DLS) for Gleason scoring whole-slide images of prostatectomies. Our system was developed using 112 million pathologist-annotated image patches from 1,226 slides, and evaluated on an independent validation dataset of 331 slides, where the reference standard was established by genitourinary specialist pathologists. On the validation dataset, the mean accuracy among 29 general pathologists was 0.61. The DLS achieved a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy of 0.70 (p=0.002) and trended towards better patient risk stratification in correlations to clinical follow-up data. Our approach could improve the accuracy of Gleason scoring and subsequent therapy decisions, particularly where specialist expertise is unavailable. The DLS also goes beyond the current Gleason system to more finely characterize and quantitate tumor morphology, providing opportunities for refinement of the Gleason system itself.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
