-
Signature Kernel Conditional Independence Tests in Causal Discovery for Stochastic Processes
Authors:
Georg Manten,
Cecilia Casolo,
Emilio Ferrucci,
Søren Wengel Mogensen,
Cristopher Salvi,
Niki Kilbertus
Abstract:
Inferring the causal structure underlying stochastic dynamical systems from observational data holds great promise in domains ranging from science and health to finance. Such processes can often be accurately modeled via stochastic differential equations (SDEs), which naturally imply causal relationships via "which variables enter the differential of which other variables". In this paper, we devel…
▽ More
Inferring the causal structure underlying stochastic dynamical systems from observational data holds great promise in domains ranging from science and health to finance. Such processes can often be accurately modeled via stochastic differential equations (SDEs), which naturally imply causal relationships via "which variables enter the differential of which other variables". In this paper, we develop a kernel-based test of conditional independence (CI) on "path-space" -- e.g., solutions to SDEs, but applicable beyond that -- by leveraging recent advances in signature kernels. We demonstrate strictly superior performance of our proposed CI test compared to existing approaches on path-space and provide theoretical consistency results. Then, we develop constraint-based causal discovery algorithms for acyclic stochastic dynamical systems (allowing for self-loops) that leverage temporal information to recover the entire directed acyclic graph. Assuming faithfulness and a CI oracle, we show that our algorithms are sound and complete. We empirically verify that our developed CI test in conjunction with the causal discovery algorithms outperform baselines across a range of settings.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2024; v1 submitted 28 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Causal discovery in a complex industrial system: A time series benchmark
Authors:
Søren Wengel Mogensen,
Karin Rathsman,
Per Nilsson
Abstract:
Causal discovery outputs a causal structure, represented by a graph, from observed data. For time series data, there is a variety of methods, however, it is difficult to evaluate these on real data as realistic use cases very rarely come with a known causal graph to which output can be compared. In this paper, we present a dataset from an industrial subsystem at the European Spallation Source alon…
▽ More
Causal discovery outputs a causal structure, represented by a graph, from observed data. For time series data, there is a variety of methods, however, it is difficult to evaluate these on real data as realistic use cases very rarely come with a known causal graph to which output can be compared. In this paper, we present a dataset from an industrial subsystem at the European Spallation Source along with its causal graph which has been constructed from expert knowledge. This provides a testbed for causal discovery from time series observations of complex systems, and we believe this can help inform the development of causal discovery methodology.
△ Less
Submitted 28 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Analyzing Complex Systems with Cascades Using Continuous-Time Bayesian Networks
Authors:
Alessandro Bregoli,
Karin Rathsman,
Marco Scutari,
Fabio Stella,
Søren Wengel Mogensen
Abstract:
Interacting systems of events may exhibit cascading behavior where events tend to be temporally clustered. While the cascades themselves may be obvious from the data, it is important to understand which states of the system trigger them. For this purpose, we propose a modeling framework based on continuous-time Bayesian networks (CTBNs) to analyze cascading behavior in complex systems. This framew…
▽ More
Interacting systems of events may exhibit cascading behavior where events tend to be temporally clustered. While the cascades themselves may be obvious from the data, it is important to understand which states of the system trigger them. For this purpose, we propose a modeling framework based on continuous-time Bayesian networks (CTBNs) to analyze cascading behavior in complex systems. This framework allows us to describe how events propagate through the system and to identify likely sentry states, that is, system states that may lead to imminent cascading behavior. Moreover, CTBNs have a simple graphical representation and provide interpretable outputs, both of which are important when communicating with domain experts. We also develop new methods for knowledge extraction from CTBNs and we apply the proposed methodology to a data set of alarms in a large industrial system.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Learning by Doing: Controlling a Dynamical System using Causality, Control, and Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Sebastian Weichwald,
Søren Wengel Mogensen,
Tabitha Edith Lee,
Dominik Baumann,
Oliver Kroemer,
Isabelle Guyon,
Sebastian Trimpe,
Jonas Peters,
Niklas Pfister
Abstract:
Questions in causality, control, and reinforcement learning go beyond the classical machine learning task of prediction under i.i.d. observations. Instead, these fields consider the problem of learning how to actively perturb a system to achieve a certain effect on a response variable. Arguably, they have complementary views on the problem: In control, one usually aims to first identify the system…
▽ More
Questions in causality, control, and reinforcement learning go beyond the classical machine learning task of prediction under i.i.d. observations. Instead, these fields consider the problem of learning how to actively perturb a system to achieve a certain effect on a response variable. Arguably, they have complementary views on the problem: In control, one usually aims to first identify the system by excitation strategies to then apply model-based design techniques to control the system. In (non-model-based) reinforcement learning, one directly optimizes a reward. In causality, one focus is on identifiability of causal structure. We believe that combining the different views might create synergies and this competition is meant as a first step toward such synergies. The participants had access to observational and (offline) interventional data generated by dynamical systems. Track CHEM considers an open-loop problem in which a single impulse at the beginning of the dynamics can be set, while Track ROBO considers a closed-loop problem in which control variables can be set at each time step. The goal in both tracks is to infer controls that drive the system to a desired state. Code is open-sourced ( https://github.com/LearningByDoingCompetition/learningbydoing-comp ) to reproduce the winning solutions of the competition and to facilitate trying out new methods on the competition tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
