Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Modanese, A

Shared Randomness Helps with Local Distributed Problems

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Mohsen Ghaffari, Fabian Kuhn, Augusto Modanese, Dennis Olivetti, Mikaël Rabie, Jukka Suomela, Jara Uitto

Abstract: By prior work, we have many results related to distributed graph algorithms for problems that can be defined with local constraints; the formal framework used in prior work is locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs), introduced by Naor and Stockmeyer in the 1990s. It is known, for example, that if we have a deterministic algorithm that solves an LCL in $o(\log n)$ rounds, we can speed it up to… ▽ More By prior work, we have many results related to distributed graph algorithms for problems that can be defined with local constraints; the formal framework used in prior work is locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs), introduced by Naor and Stockmeyer in the 1990s. It is known, for example, that if we have a deterministic algorithm that solves an LCL in $o(\log n)$ rounds, we can speed it up to $O(\log^*n)$ rounds, and if we have a randomized $O(\log^*n)$ rounds algorithm, we can derandomize it for free. It is also known that randomness helps with some LCL problems: there are LCL problems with randomized complexity $Θ(\log\log n)$ and deterministic complexity $Θ(\log n)$. However, so far there have not been any LCL problems in which the use of shared randomness has been necessary; in all prior algorithms it has been enough that the nodes have access to their own private sources of randomness. Could it be the case that shared randomness never helps with LCLs? Could we have a general technique that takes any distributed graph algorithm for any LCL that uses shared randomness, and turns it into an equally fast algorithm where private randomness is enough? In this work we show that the answer is no. We present an LCL problem $Π$ such that the round complexity of $Π$ is $Ω(\sqrt n)$ in the usual randomized \local model with private randomness, but if the nodes have access to a source of shared randomness, then the complexity drops to $O(\log n)$. As corollaries, we also resolve several other open questions related to the landscape of distributed computing in the context of LCL problems. In particular, problem $Π$ demonstrates that distributed quantum algorithms for LCL problems strictly benefit from a shared quantum state. Problem $Π$ also gives a separation between finitely dependent distributions and non-signaling distributions. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Online Locality Meets Distributed Quantum Computing

Authors: Amirreza Akbari, Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Francesco d'Amore, François Le Gall, Henrik Lievonen, Darya Melnyk, Augusto Modanese, Shreyas Pai, Marc-Olivier Renou, Václav Rozhoň, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We extend the theory of locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) from the classical LOCAL model to a number of other models that have been studied recently, including the quantum-LOCAL model, finitely-dependent processes, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL model, and online-LOCAL model [e.g. STOC 2024, ICALP 2023]. First, we demonstrate the advantage that finitely-dependent processes have over… ▽ More We extend the theory of locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) from the classical LOCAL model to a number of other models that have been studied recently, including the quantum-LOCAL model, finitely-dependent processes, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL model, and online-LOCAL model [e.g. STOC 2024, ICALP 2023]. First, we demonstrate the advantage that finitely-dependent processes have over the classical LOCAL model. We show that all LCL problems solvable with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ in the LOCAL model admit a finitely-dependent distribution (with constant locality). In particular, this gives a finitely-dependent coloring for regular trees, answering an open question by Holroyd [2023]. This also introduces a new formal barrier for understanding the distributed quantum advantage: it is not possible to exclude quantum advantage for any LCL in the $Θ(\log^\star n)$ complexity class by using non-signaling arguments. Second, we put limits on the capabilities of all of these models. To this end, we introduce a model called randomized online-LOCAL, which is strong enough to simulate e.g. SLOCAL and dynamic-LOCAL, and we show that it is also strong enough to simulate any non-signaling distribution and hence any quantum-LOCAL algorithm. We prove the following result for rooted trees: if we can solve an LCL problem with locality $o(\log \log n)$ in the randomized online-LOCAL model, we can solve it with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ in the classical deterministic LOCAL model. Put together, these results show that in rooted trees the set of LCLs that can be solved with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ is the same across all these models: classical deterministic and randomized LOCAL, quantum-LOCAL, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL, and deterministic and randomized online-LOCAL. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2024; v1 submitted 4 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: 60 pages, 10 figures. This version corrects a mistake in v1

Testing Spreading Behavior in Networks with Arbitrary Topologies

Authors: Augusto Modanese, Yuichi Yoshida

Abstract: Inspired by the works of Goldreich and Ron (J. ACM, 2017) and Nakar and Ron (ICALP, 2021), we initiate the study of property testing in dynamic environments with arbitrary topologies. Our focus is on the simplest non-trivial rule that can be tested, which corresponds to the 1-BP rule of bootstrap percolation and models a simple spreading behavior: Every "infected" node stays infected forever, and… ▽ More Inspired by the works of Goldreich and Ron (J. ACM, 2017) and Nakar and Ron (ICALP, 2021), we initiate the study of property testing in dynamic environments with arbitrary topologies. Our focus is on the simplest non-trivial rule that can be tested, which corresponds to the 1-BP rule of bootstrap percolation and models a simple spreading behavior: Every "infected" node stays infected forever, and each "healthy" node becomes infected if and only if it has at least one infected neighbor. We show various results for both the case where we test a single time step of evolution and where the evolution spans several time steps. In the first, we show that the worst-case query complexity is $O(Δ/\varepsilon)$ or $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n}/\varepsilon)$ (whichever is smaller), where $Δ$ and $n$ are the maximum degree of a node and number of vertices, respectively, in the underlying graph, and we also show lower bounds for both one- and two-sided error testers that match our upper bounds up to $Δ= o(\sqrt{n})$ and $Δ= O(n^{1/3})$, respectively. In the second setting of testing the environment over $T$ time steps, we show upper bounds of $O(Δ^{T-1}/\varepsilon T)$ and $\tilde{O}(|E|/\varepsilon T)$, where $E$ is the set of edges of the underlying graph. All of our algorithms are one-sided error, and all of them are also time-conforming and non-adaptive, with the single exception of the more complex $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n}/\varepsilon)$-query tester for the case $T = 2$. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2024; v1 submitted 11 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: 36 pages, 4 figures, revised a few inaccuracies. To appear in ICALP 2024

No distributed quantum advantage for approximate graph coloring

Authors: Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Francesco d'Amore, Rishikesh Gajjala, Fabian Kuhn, François Le Gall, Henrik Lievonen, Augusto Modanese, Marc-Olivier Renou, Gustav Schmid, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We give an almost complete characterization of the hardness of $c$-coloring $χ$-chromatic graphs with distributed algorithms, for a wide range of models of distributed computing. In particular, we show that these problems do not admit any distributed quantum advantage. To do that: 1) We give a new distributed algorithm that finds a $c$-coloring in $χ$-chromatic graphs in… ▽ More We give an almost complete characterization of the hardness of $c$-coloring $χ$-chromatic graphs with distributed algorithms, for a wide range of models of distributed computing. In particular, we show that these problems do not admit any distributed quantum advantage. To do that: 1) We give a new distributed algorithm that finds a $c$-coloring in $χ$-chromatic graphs in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{\frac{1}α})$ rounds, with $α= \bigl\lfloor\frac{c-1}{χ- 1}\bigr\rfloor$. 2) We prove that any distributed algorithm for this problem requires $Ω(n^{\frac{1}α})$ rounds. Our upper bound holds in the classical, deterministic LOCAL model, while the near-matching lower bound holds in the non-signaling model. This model, introduced by Arfaoui and Fraigniaud in 2014, captures all models of distributed graph algorithms that obey physical causality; this includes not only classical deterministic LOCAL and randomized LOCAL but also quantum-LOCAL, even with a pre-shared quantum state. We also show that similar arguments can be used to prove that, e.g., 3-coloring 2-dimensional grids or $c$-coloring trees remain hard problems even for the non-signaling model, and in particular do not admit any quantum advantage. Our lower-bound arguments are purely graph-theoretic at heart; no background on quantum information theory is needed to establish the proofs. △ Less

Submitted 22 March, 2024; v1 submitted 18 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: Accepted to STOC 2024

Pseudorandom Generators for Sliding-Window Algorithms

Authors: Augusto Modanese

Abstract: A sliding-window algorithm of window size $t$ is an algorithm whose current operation depends solely on the last $t$ symbols read. We construct pseudorandom generators (PRGs) for low-space randomized sliding-window algorithms that have access to a binary randomness source. More specifically, we lift these algorithms to the non-uniform setting of branching programs and study them as a subclass ther… ▽ More A sliding-window algorithm of window size $t$ is an algorithm whose current operation depends solely on the last $t$ symbols read. We construct pseudorandom generators (PRGs) for low-space randomized sliding-window algorithms that have access to a binary randomness source. More specifically, we lift these algorithms to the non-uniform setting of branching programs and study them as a subclass thereof that we call sliding-window branching programs (SWBPs), accordingly. For general SWBPs, given a base PRG $G_\mathrm{base}$ with seed length $d_\mathrm{base}$ that $\varepsilon_\mathrm{base}$-fools width-$w$, length-$t$ (general) branching programs, we give two PRG constructions for fooling any same-width SWBP of length $n$ and window size $t$ (where we assume $w \ge n$). The first uses an additional $d_\mathrm{base} + O(\log(n/t) \log(1/\varepsilon_\mathrm{base}))$ random bits, whereas the second has a seed length of $O((d_\mathrm{base} + \log\log(n/t) + \log(1/\varepsilon_\mathrm{base})) \log(d_\mathrm{base} + \log(1/\varepsilon_\mathrm{base})))$. Both PRGs incur only a $(n/2t)^{O(1)}$ multiplicative loss in the error parameter. As an application, we show how to decide the language of a sublinear-time probabilistic cellular automaton using small space. More specifically, these results target the model of PACAs, which are probabilistic cellular automata that accept if and only if all cells are simultaneously accepting. For (sublinear) $T(n) = Ω(\log n)^{1.01}$, we prove that every language accepted by a $T$-time one-sided error PACA (the PACA equivalent of $\mathsf{RP}$) can be decided using only $O(T)$ space. Meanwhile, forgoing the previous requirement on $T$, we show the same holds for $T$-time two-sided error PACA (the PACA equivalent of $\mathsf{BPP}$) if we use $\tilde{O}(T) + O(\log n)$ space instead (where the $\tilde{O}$ notation hides only $\mathsf{polylog}(T)$ factors). △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: 28 pages, 1 figure

Embedding arbitrary Boolean circuits into fungal automata

Authors: Augusto Modanese, Thomas Worsch

Abstract: Fungal automata are a variation of the two-dimensional sandpile automaton of Bak, Tang, and Wiesenfeld (Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987). In each step toppling cells emit grains only to some of their neighbors chosen according to a specific update sequence. We show how to embed any Boolean circuit into the initial configuration of a fungal automaton with update sequence $HV$. In particular we give a constru… ▽ More Fungal automata are a variation of the two-dimensional sandpile automaton of Bak, Tang, and Wiesenfeld (Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987). In each step toppling cells emit grains only to some of their neighbors chosen according to a specific update sequence. We show how to embed any Boolean circuit into the initial configuration of a fungal automaton with update sequence $HV$. In particular we give a constructor that, given the description $B$ of a circuit, computes the states of all cells in the finite support of the embedding configuration in $O(\log |B|)$ space. As a consequence the prediction problem for fungal automata with update sequence $HV$ is $\mathsf{P}$-complete. This solves an open problem of Goles et al. (Phys. Lett. A, 2020). △ Less

Submitted 18 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 19 pages, 17 figures. To appear in LATIN 2022

Sublinear-Time Probabilistic Cellular Automata

Authors: Augusto Modanese

Abstract: We propose and investigate a probabilistic model of sublinear-time one-dimensional cellular automata. In particular, we modify the model of ACA (which are cellular automata that accept if and only if all cells simultaneously accept) so that every cell changes its state not only dependent on the states it sees in its neighborhood but also on an unbiased coin toss of its own. The resulting model is… ▽ More We propose and investigate a probabilistic model of sublinear-time one-dimensional cellular automata. In particular, we modify the model of ACA (which are cellular automata that accept if and only if all cells simultaneously accept) so that every cell changes its state not only dependent on the states it sees in its neighborhood but also on an unbiased coin toss of its own. The resulting model is dubbed probabilistic ACA (PACA). We consider one- and two-sided error versions of the model (in the same spirit as the classes $\mathsf{RP}$ and $\mathsf{BPP}$) and establish a separation between the classes of languages they can recognize all the way up to $o(\sqrt{n})$ time. As a consequence, we have a $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ lower bound for derandomizing constant-time two-sided error PACAs (using deterministic ACAs). We also prove that derandomization of $T(n)$-time PACAs (to polynomial-time deterministic cellular automata) for various regimes of $T(n) = ω(\log n)$ implies non-trivial derandomization results for the class $\mathsf{RP}$ (e.g., $\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{RP}$). The main contribution is an almost full characterization of the constant-time PACA classes: For one-sided error, the class equals that of the deterministic model; that is, constant-time one-sided error PACAs can be fully derandomized with only a constant multiplicative overhead in time complexity. As for two-sided error, we identify a natural class we call the linearly testable languages ($\mathsf{LLT}$) and prove that the languages decidable by constant-time two-sided error PACAs are "sandwiched" in-between the closure of $\mathsf{LLT}$ under union and intersection and the class of locally threshold testable languages ($\mathsf{LTT}$). △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2023; v1 submitted 28 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: 27 pages, 4 figures. Appeared in STACS 2023 (corrected typo in abstract)

Lower Bounds and Hardness Magnification for Sublinear-Time Shrinking Cellular Automata

Authors: Augusto Modanese

Abstract: The minimum circuit size problem (MCSP) is a string compression problem with a parameter $s$ in which, given the truth table of a Boolean function over inputs of length $n$, one must answer whether it can be computed by a Boolean circuit of size at most $s(n) \ge n$. Recently, McKay, Murray, and Williams (STOC, 2019) proved a hardness magnification result for MCSP involving (one-pass) streaming al… ▽ More The minimum circuit size problem (MCSP) is a string compression problem with a parameter $s$ in which, given the truth table of a Boolean function over inputs of length $n$, one must answer whether it can be computed by a Boolean circuit of size at most $s(n) \ge n$. Recently, McKay, Murray, and Williams (STOC, 2019) proved a hardness magnification result for MCSP involving (one-pass) streaming algorithms: For any reasonable $s$, if there is no $\mathsf{poly}(s(n))$-space streaming algorithm with $\mathsf{poly}(s(n))$ update time for $\mathsf{MCSP}[s]$, then $\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$. We prove an analogous result for the (provably) strictly less capable model of shrinking cellular automata (SCAs), which are cellular automata whose cells can spontaneously delete themselves. We show every language accepted by an SCA can also be accepted by a streaming algorithm of similar complexity, and we identify two different aspects in which SCAs are more restricted than streaming algorithms. We also show there is a language which cannot be accepted by any SCA in $o(n / \log n)$ time, even though it admits an $O(\log n)$-space streaming algorithm with $O(\log n)$ update time. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2021; v1 submitted 23 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: 22 pages, 2 figures

Sublinear-Time Language Recognition and Decision by One-Dimensional Cellular Automata

Authors: Augusto Modanese

Abstract: After an apparent hiatus of roughly 30 years, we revisit a seemingly neglected subject in the theory of (one-dimensional) cellular automata: sublinear-time computation. The model considered is that of ACAs, which are language acceptors whose acceptance condition depends on the states of all cells in the automaton. We prove a time hierarchy theorem for sublinear-time ACA classes, analyze their inte… ▽ More After an apparent hiatus of roughly 30 years, we revisit a seemingly neglected subject in the theory of (one-dimensional) cellular automata: sublinear-time computation. The model considered is that of ACAs, which are language acceptors whose acceptance condition depends on the states of all cells in the automaton. We prove a time hierarchy theorem for sublinear-time ACA classes, analyze their intersection with the regular languages, and, finally, establish strict inclusions in the parallel computation classes $\mathsf{SC}$ and (uniform) $\mathsf{AC}$. As an addendum, we introduce and investigate the concept of a decider ACA (DACA) as a candidate for a decider counterpart to (acceptor) ACAs. We show the class of languages decidable in constant time by DACAs equals the locally testable languages, and we also determine $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ as the (tight) time complexity threshold for DACAs up to which no advantage compared to constant time is possible. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2020; v1 submitted 12 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: 16 pages, 2 figures, to appear at DLT 2020

Complexity-Theoretic Aspects of Expanding Cellular Automata

Authors: Augusto Modanese

Abstract: The expanding cellular automata (XCA) variant of cellular automata is investigated and characterized from a complexity-theoretical standpoint. An XCA is a one-dimensional cellular automaton which can dynamically create new cells between existing ones. The respective polynomial-time complexity class is shown to coincide with ${\le_{tt}^p}(\mathsf{NP})$, that is, the class of decision problems polyn… ▽ More The expanding cellular automata (XCA) variant of cellular automata is investigated and characterized from a complexity-theoretical standpoint. An XCA is a one-dimensional cellular automaton which can dynamically create new cells between existing ones. The respective polynomial-time complexity class is shown to coincide with ${\le_{tt}^p}(\mathsf{NP})$, that is, the class of decision problems polynomial-time truth-table reducible to problems in $\mathsf{NP}$. An alternative characterization based on a variant of non-deterministic Turing machines is also given. In addition, corollaries on select XCA variants are proven: XCAs with multiple accept and reject states are shown to be polynomial-time equivalent to the original XCA model. Finally, XCAs with alternative acceptance conditions are considered and classified in terms of ${\le_{tt}^p}(\mathsf{NP})$ and the Turing machine polynomial-time class $\mathsf{P}$. △ Less

Submitted 4 February, 2021; v1 submitted 14 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Comments: 19 pages, 3 figures

Journal ref: Nat Comput (2020)