-
Deep Learning Model Transfer in Forest Map** using Multi-source Satellite SAR and Optical Images
Authors:
Shaojia Ge,
Oleg Antropov,
Tuomas Häme,
Ronald E. McRoberts,
Jukka Miettinen
Abstract:
Deep learning (DL) models are gaining popularity in forest variable prediction using Earth Observation images. However, in practical forest inventories, reference datasets are often represented by plot- or stand-level measurements, while high-quality representative wall-to-wall reference data for end-to-end training of DL models are rarely available. Transfer learning facilitates expansion of the…
▽ More
Deep learning (DL) models are gaining popularity in forest variable prediction using Earth Observation images. However, in practical forest inventories, reference datasets are often represented by plot- or stand-level measurements, while high-quality representative wall-to-wall reference data for end-to-end training of DL models are rarely available. Transfer learning facilitates expansion of the use of deep learning models into areas with sub-optimal training data by allowing pretraining of the model in areas where high-quality teaching data are available. In this study, we perform a "model transfer" (or domain adaptation) of a pretrained DL model into a target area using plot-level measurements and compare performance versus other machine learning models. We use an earlier developed UNet based model (SeUNet) to demonstrate the approach on two distinct taiga sites with varying forest structure and composition. Multisource Earth Observation (EO) data are represented by a combination of Copernicus Sentinel-1 C-band SAR and Sentinel-2 multispectral images, JAXA ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 SAR mosaic and TanDEM-X bistatic interferometric radar data. The training study site is located in Finnish Lapland, while the target site is located in Southern Finland. By leveraging transfer learning, the prediction of SeUNet achieved root mean squared error (RMSE) of 2.70 m and R$^2$ of 0.882, considerably more accurate than traditional benchmark methods. We expect such forest-specific DL model transfer can be suitable also for other forest variables and other EO data sources that are sensitive to forest structure.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Graph Signal Processing Meets Blind Source Separation
Authors:
Jari Miettinen,
Eyal Nitzan,
Sergiy A. Vorobyov,
Esa Ollila
Abstract:
In graph signal processing (GSP), prior information on the dependencies in the signal is collected in a graph which is then used when processing or analyzing the signal. Blind source separation (BSS) techniques have been developed and analyzed in different domains, but for graph signals the research on BSS is still in its infancy. In this paper, this gap is filled with two contributions. First, a…
▽ More
In graph signal processing (GSP), prior information on the dependencies in the signal is collected in a graph which is then used when processing or analyzing the signal. Blind source separation (BSS) techniques have been developed and analyzed in different domains, but for graph signals the research on BSS is still in its infancy. In this paper, this gap is filled with two contributions. First, a nonparametric BSS method, which is relevant to the GSP framework, is refined, the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) for mixing and unmixing matrix estimators in the case of Gaussian moving average graph signals is derived, and for studying the achievability of the CRB, a new parametric method for BSS of Gaussian moving average graph signals is introduced. Second, we also consider BSS of non-Gaussian graph signals and two methods are proposed. Identifiability conditions show that utilizing both graph structure and non-Gaussianity provides a more robust approach than methods which are based on only either graph dependencies or non-Gaussianity. It is also demonstrated by numerical study that the proposed methods are more efficient in separating non-Gaussian graph signals.
△ Less
Submitted 24 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Modelling Graph Errors: Towards Robust Graph Signal Processing
Authors:
Jari Miettinen,
Sergiy A. Vorobyov,
Esa Ollila
Abstract:
The first step for any graph signal processing (GSP) procedure is to learn the graph signal representation, i.e., to capture the dependence structure of the data into an adjacency matrix. Indeed, the adjacency matrix is typically not known a priori and has to be learned. However, it is learned with errors. A little attention has been paid to modelling such errors in the adjacency matrix, and study…
▽ More
The first step for any graph signal processing (GSP) procedure is to learn the graph signal representation, i.e., to capture the dependence structure of the data into an adjacency matrix. Indeed, the adjacency matrix is typically not known a priori and has to be learned. However, it is learned with errors. A little attention has been paid to modelling such errors in the adjacency matrix, and studying their effects on GSP methods. However, modelling errors in the adjacency matrix will enable both to study the graph error effects in GSP and to develop robust GSP algorithms. In this paper, we therefore introduce practically justifiable graph error models. We also study, both analytically when possible and numerically, the graph error effect on the performance of GSP methods in different types of problems such as filtering of graph signals and independent component analysis of graph signals (graph decorrelation).
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2020; v1 submitted 20 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
