Improving image quality of sparse-view lung tumor CT images with U-Net
Authors:
Annika Ries,
Tina Dorosti,
Johannes Thalhammer,
Daniel Sasse,
Andreas Sauter,
Felix Meurer,
Ashley Benne,
Tobias Lasser,
Franz Pfeiffer,
Florian Schaff,
Daniela Pfeiffer
Abstract:
Background: We aimed at improving image quality (IQ) of sparse-view computed tomography (CT) images using a U-Net for lung metastasis detection and determining the best tradeoff between number of views, IQ, and diagnostic confidence.
Methods: CT images from 41 subjects aged 62.8 $\pm$ 10.6 years (mean $\pm$ standard deviation), 23 men, 34 with lung metastasis, 7 healthy, were retrospectively sel…
▽ More
Background: We aimed at improving image quality (IQ) of sparse-view computed tomography (CT) images using a U-Net for lung metastasis detection and determining the best tradeoff between number of views, IQ, and diagnostic confidence.
Methods: CT images from 41 subjects aged 62.8 $\pm$ 10.6 years (mean $\pm$ standard deviation), 23 men, 34 with lung metastasis, 7 healthy, were retrospectively selected (2016-2018) and forward projected onto 2,048-view sinograms. Six corresponding sparse-view CT data subsets at varying levels of undersampling were reconstructed from sinograms using filtered backprojection with 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512 views. A dual-frame U-Net was trained and evaluated for each subsampling level on 8,658 images from 22 diseased subjects. A representative image per scan was selected from 19 subjects (12 diseased, 7 healthy) for a single-blinded multireader study. These slices, for all levels of subsampling, with and without U-Net postprocessing, were presented to three readers. IQ and diagnostic confidence were ranked using predefined scales. Subjective nodule segmentation was evaluated using sensitivity and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC); clustered Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used.
Results: The 64-projection sparse-view images resulted in 0.89 sensitivity and 0.81 DSC, while their counterparts, postprocessed with the U-Net, had improved metrics (0.94 sensitivity and 0.85 DSC) (p = 0.400). Fewer views led to insufficient IQ for diagnosis. For increased views, no substantial discrepancies were noted between sparse-view and postprocessed images.
Conclusions: Projection views can be reduced from 2,048 to 64 while maintaining IQ and the confidence of the radiologists on a satisfactory level.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2024; v1 submitted 28 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
