-
Bandit-Feedback Online Multiclass Classification: Variants and Tradeoffs
Authors:
Yuval Filmus,
Steve Hanneke,
Idan Mehalel,
Shay Moran
Abstract:
Consider the domain of multiclass classification within the adversarial online setting. What is the price of relying on bandit feedback as opposed to full information? To what extent can an adaptive adversary amplify the loss compared to an oblivious one? To what extent can a randomized learner reduce the loss compared to a deterministic one? We study these questions in the mistake bound model and…
▽ More
Consider the domain of multiclass classification within the adversarial online setting. What is the price of relying on bandit feedback as opposed to full information? To what extent can an adaptive adversary amplify the loss compared to an oblivious one? To what extent can a randomized learner reduce the loss compared to a deterministic one? We study these questions in the mistake bound model and provide nearly tight answers.
We demonstrate that the optimal mistake bound under bandit feedback is at most $O(k)$ times higher than the optimal mistake bound in the full information case, where $k$ represents the number of labels. This bound is tight and provides an answer to an open question previously posed and studied by Daniely and Helbertal ['13] and by Long ['17, '20], who focused on deterministic learners.
Moreover, we present nearly optimal bounds of $\tildeΘ(k)$ on the gap between randomized and deterministic learners, as well as between adaptive and oblivious adversaries in the bandit feedback setting. This stands in contrast to the full information scenario, where adaptive and oblivious adversaries are equivalent, and the gap in mistake bounds between randomized and deterministic learners is a constant multiplicative factor of $2$.
In addition, our results imply that in some cases the optimal randomized mistake bound is approximately the square-root of its deterministic parallel. Previous results show that this is essentially the smallest it can get.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Multiclass Online Learnability under Bandit Feedback
Authors:
Ananth Raman,
Vinod Raman,
Unique Subedi,
Idan Mehalel,
Ambuj Tewari
Abstract:
We study online multiclass classification under bandit feedback. We extend the results of Daniely and Helbertal [2013] by showing that the finiteness of the Bandit Littlestone dimension is necessary and sufficient for bandit online learnability even when the label space is unbounded. Moreover, we show that, unlike the full-information setting, sequential uniform convergence is necessary but not su…
▽ More
We study online multiclass classification under bandit feedback. We extend the results of Daniely and Helbertal [2013] by showing that the finiteness of the Bandit Littlestone dimension is necessary and sufficient for bandit online learnability even when the label space is unbounded. Moreover, we show that, unlike the full-information setting, sequential uniform convergence is necessary but not sufficient for bandit online learnability. Our result complements the recent work by Hanneke, Moran, Raman, Subedi, and Tewari [2023] who show that the Littlestone dimension characterizes online multiclass learnability in the full-information setting even when the label space is unbounded.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2024; v1 submitted 8 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Optimal Prediction Using Expert Advice and Randomized Littlestone Dimension
Authors:
Yuval Filmus,
Steve Hanneke,
Idan Mehalel,
Shay Moran
Abstract:
A classical result in online learning characterizes the optimal mistake bound achievable by deterministic learners using the Littlestone dimension (Littlestone '88). We prove an analogous result for randomized learners: we show that the optimal expected mistake bound in learning a class $\mathcal{H}$ equals its randomized Littlestone dimension, which is the largest $d$ for which there exists a tre…
▽ More
A classical result in online learning characterizes the optimal mistake bound achievable by deterministic learners using the Littlestone dimension (Littlestone '88). We prove an analogous result for randomized learners: we show that the optimal expected mistake bound in learning a class $\mathcal{H}$ equals its randomized Littlestone dimension, which is the largest $d$ for which there exists a tree shattered by $\mathcal{H}$ whose average depth is $2d$. We further study optimal mistake bounds in the agnostic case, as a function of the number of mistakes made by the best function in $\mathcal{H}$, denoted by $k$. We show that the optimal randomized mistake bound for learning a class with Littlestone dimension $d$ is $k + Θ(\sqrt{k d} + d )$. This also implies an optimal deterministic mistake bound of $2k + Θ(d) + O(\sqrt{k d})$, thus resolving an open question which was studied by Auer and Long ['99].
As an application of our theory, we revisit the classical problem of prediction using expert advice: about 30 years ago Cesa-Bianchi, Freund, Haussler, Helmbold, Schapire and Warmuth studied prediction using expert advice, provided that the best among the $n$ experts makes at most $k$ mistakes, and asked what are the optimal mistake bounds. Cesa-Bianchi, Freund, Helmbold, and Warmuth ['93, '96] provided a nearly optimal bound for deterministic learners, and left the randomized case as an open problem. We resolve this question by providing an optimal learning rule in the randomized case, and showing that its expected mistake bound equals half of the deterministic bound of Cesa-Bianchi et al. ['93,'96], up to negligible additive terms. In contrast with previous works by Abernethy, Langford, and Warmuth ['06], and by Brânzei and Peres ['19], our result applies to all pairs $n,k$.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2023; v1 submitted 27 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
On Optimal Learning Under Targeted Data Poisoning
Authors:
Steve Hanneke,
Amin Karbasi,
Mohammad Mahmoody,
Idan Mehalel,
Shay Moran
Abstract:
Consider the task of learning a hypothesis class $\mathcal{H}$ in the presence of an adversary that can replace up to an $η$ fraction of the examples in the training set with arbitrary adversarial examples. The adversary aims to fail the learner on a particular target test point $x$ which is known to the adversary but not to the learner. In this work we aim to characterize the smallest achievable…
▽ More
Consider the task of learning a hypothesis class $\mathcal{H}$ in the presence of an adversary that can replace up to an $η$ fraction of the examples in the training set with arbitrary adversarial examples. The adversary aims to fail the learner on a particular target test point $x$ which is known to the adversary but not to the learner. In this work we aim to characterize the smallest achievable error $ε=ε(η)$ by the learner in the presence of such an adversary in both realizable and agnostic settings. We fully achieve this in the realizable setting, proving that $ε=Θ(\mathtt{VC}(\mathcal{H})\cdot η)$, where $\mathtt{VC}(\mathcal{H})$ is the VC dimension of $\mathcal{H}$. Remarkably, we show that the upper bound can be attained by a deterministic learner. In the agnostic setting we reveal a more elaborate landscape: we devise a deterministic learner with a multiplicative regret guarantee of $ε\leq C\cdot\mathtt{OPT} + O(\mathtt{VC}(\mathcal{H})\cdot η)$, where $C > 1$ is a universal numerical constant. We complement this by showing that for any deterministic learner there is an attack which worsens its error to at least $2\cdot \mathtt{OPT}$. This implies that a multiplicative deterioration in the regret is unavoidable in this case. Finally, the algorithms we develop for achieving the optimal rates are inherently improper. Nevertheless, we show that for a variety of natural concept classes, such as linear classifiers, it is possible to retain the dependence $ε=Θ_{\mathcal{H}}(η)$ by a proper algorithm in the realizable setting. Here $Θ_{\mathcal{H}}$ conceals a polynomial dependence on $\mathtt{VC}(\mathcal{H})$.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2022; v1 submitted 6 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
A Resilient Distributed Boosting Algorithm
Authors:
Yuval Filmus,
Idan Mehalel,
Shay Moran
Abstract:
Given a learning task where the data is distributed among several parties, communication is one of the fundamental resources which the parties would like to minimize. We present a distributed boosting algorithm which is resilient to a limited amount of noise. Our algorithm is similar to classical boosting algorithms, although it is equipped with a new component, inspired by Impagliazzo's hard-core…
▽ More
Given a learning task where the data is distributed among several parties, communication is one of the fundamental resources which the parties would like to minimize. We present a distributed boosting algorithm which is resilient to a limited amount of noise. Our algorithm is similar to classical boosting algorithms, although it is equipped with a new component, inspired by Impagliazzo's hard-core lemma [Impagliazzo95], adding a robustness quality to the algorithm. We also complement this result by showing that resilience to any asymptotically larger noise is not achievable by a communication-efficient algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2022; v1 submitted 9 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Optimal sets of questions for Twenty Questions
Authors:
Yuval Filmus,
Idan Mehalel
Abstract:
In the distributional Twenty Questions game, Bob chooses a number $x$ from $1$ to $n$ according to a distribution $μ$, and Alice (who knows $μ$) attempts to identify $x$ using Yes/No questions, which Bob answers truthfully. Her goal is to minimize the expected number of questions.
The optimal strategy for the Twenty Questions game corresponds to a Huffman code for $μ$, yet this strategy could po…
▽ More
In the distributional Twenty Questions game, Bob chooses a number $x$ from $1$ to $n$ according to a distribution $μ$, and Alice (who knows $μ$) attempts to identify $x$ using Yes/No questions, which Bob answers truthfully. Her goal is to minimize the expected number of questions.
The optimal strategy for the Twenty Questions game corresponds to a Huffman code for $μ$, yet this strategy could potentially uses all $2^n$ possible questions. Dagan et al. constructed a set of $1.25^{n+o(n)}$ questions which suffice to construct an optimal strategy for all $μ$, and showed that this number is optimal (up to sub-exponential factors) for infinitely many $n$.
We determine the optimal size of such a set of questions for all $n$ (up to sub-exponential factors), answering an open question of Dagan et al. In addition, we generalize the results of Dagan et al. to the $d$-ary setting, obtaining similar results with $1.25$ replaced by $1 + (d-1)/d^{d/(d-1)}$.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2024; v1 submitted 3 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
