-
Toward Enabling Reproducibility for Data-Intensive Research using the Whole Tale Platform
Authors:
Kyle Chard,
Niall Gaffney,
Mihael Hategan,
Kacper Kowalik,
Bertram Ludaescher,
Timothy McPhillips,
Jarek Nabrzyski,
Victoria Stodden,
Ian Taylor,
Thomas Thelen,
Matthew J. Turk,
Craig Willis
Abstract:
Whole Tale http://wholetale.org is a web-based, open-source platform for reproducible research supporting the creation, sharing, execution, and verification of "Tales" for the scientific research community. Tales are executable research objects that capture the code, data, and environment along with narrative and workflow information needed to re-create computational results from scientific studie…
▽ More
Whole Tale http://wholetale.org is a web-based, open-source platform for reproducible research supporting the creation, sharing, execution, and verification of "Tales" for the scientific research community. Tales are executable research objects that capture the code, data, and environment along with narrative and workflow information needed to re-create computational results from scientific studies. Creating reproducible research objects that enable reproducibility, transparency, and re-execution for computational experiments requiring significant compute resources or utilizing massive data is an especially challenging open problem. We describe opportunities, challenges, and solutions to facilitating reproducibility for data- and compute-intensive research, that we call "Tales at Scale," using the Whole Tale computing platform. We highlight challenges and solutions in frontend responsiveness needs, gaps in current middleware design and implementation, network restrictions, containerization, and data access. Finally, we discuss challenges in packaging computational experiment implementations for portable data-intensive Tales and outline future work.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Validation and Inference of Schema-Level Workflow Data-Dependency Annotations
Authors:
Shawn Bowers,
Timothy McPhillips,
Bertram Ludäscher
Abstract:
An advantage of scientific workflow systems is their ability to collect runtime provenance information as an execution trace. Traces include the computation steps invoked as part of the workflow run along with the corresponding data consumed and produced by each workflow step. The information captured by a trace is used to infer "lineage" relationships among data items, which can help answer prove…
▽ More
An advantage of scientific workflow systems is their ability to collect runtime provenance information as an execution trace. Traces include the computation steps invoked as part of the workflow run along with the corresponding data consumed and produced by each workflow step. The information captured by a trace is used to infer "lineage" relationships among data items, which can help answer provenance queries to find workflow inputs that were involved in producing specific workflow outputs. Determining lineage relationships, however, requires an understanding of the dependency patterns that exist between each workflow step's inputs and outputs, and this information is often under-specified or generally assumed by workflow systems. For instance, most approaches assume all outputs depend on all inputs, which can lead to lineage "false positives". In prior work, we defined annotations for specifying detailed dependency relationships between inputs and outputs of computation steps. These annotations are used to define corresponding rules for inferring fine-grained data dependencies from a trace. In this paper, we extend our previous work by considering the impact of dependency annotations on workflow specifications. In particular, we provide a reasoning framework to ensure the set of dependency annotations on a workflow specification is consistent. The framework can also infer a complete set of annotations given a partially annotated workflow. Finally, we describe an implementation of the reasoning framework using answer-set programming.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
YesWorkflow: A User-Oriented, Language-Independent Tool for Recovering Workflow Information from Scripts
Authors:
Timothy McPhillips,
Tianhong Song,
Tyler Kolisnik,
Steve Aulenbach,
Khalid Belhajjame,
Kyle Bocinsky,
Yang Cao,
Fernando Chirigati,
Saumen Dey,
Juliana Freire,
Deborah Huntzinger,
Christopher Jones,
David Koop,
Paolo Missier,
Mark Schildhauer,
Christopher Schwalm,
Yaxing Wei,
James Cheney,
Mark Bieda,
Bertram Ludaescher
Abstract:
Scientific workflow management systems offer features for composing complex computational pipelines from modular building blocks, for executing the resulting automated workflows, and for recording the provenance of data products resulting from workflow runs. Despite the advantages such features provide, many automated workflows continue to be implemented and executed outside of scientific workflow…
▽ More
Scientific workflow management systems offer features for composing complex computational pipelines from modular building blocks, for executing the resulting automated workflows, and for recording the provenance of data products resulting from workflow runs. Despite the advantages such features provide, many automated workflows continue to be implemented and executed outside of scientific workflow systems due to the convenience and familiarity of scripting languages (such as Perl, Python, R, and MATLAB), and to the high productivity many scientists experience when using these languages. YesWorkflow is a set of software tools that aim to provide such users of scripting languages with many of the benefits of scientific workflow systems. YesWorkflow requires neither the use of a workflow engine nor the overhead of adapting code to run effectively in such a system. Instead, YesWorkflow enables scientists to annotate existing scripts with special comments that reveal the computational modules and dataflows otherwise implicit in these scripts. YesWorkflow tools extract and analyze these comments, represent the scripts in terms of entities based on the typical scientific workflow model, and provide graphical renderings of this workflow-like view of the scripts. Future versions of YesWorkflow also will allow the prospective provenance of the data products of these scripts to be queried in ways similar to those available to users of scientific workflow systems.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
