-
A Survey of the Metrics, Uses, and Subjects of Diversity-Based Techniques in Software Testing
Authors:
Islam T. Elgendy,
Robert M. Hierons,
Phil McMinn
Abstract:
There has been a significant amount of interest regarding the use of diversity-based testing techniques in software testing over the past two decades. Diversity-based testing (DBT) technique uses similarity metrics to leverage the dissimilarity between software artefacts - such as requirements, abstract models, program structures, or inputs - in order to address a software testing problem. DBT tec…
▽ More
There has been a significant amount of interest regarding the use of diversity-based testing techniques in software testing over the past two decades. Diversity-based testing (DBT) technique uses similarity metrics to leverage the dissimilarity between software artefacts - such as requirements, abstract models, program structures, or inputs - in order to address a software testing problem. DBT techniques have been used to assist in finding solutions to several different types of problems including generating test cases, prioritising them, and reducing very large test suites. This paper is a systematic survey of DBT techniques that summarises the key aspects and trends of 144 papers that report the use of 70 different similarity metrics with 24 different types of software artefacts, which have been used by researchers to tackle 11 different types of software testing problems. We further present an analysis of the recent trends in DBT techniques and review the different application domains to which the techniques have been applied, giving an overview of the tools developed by researchers to do so. Finally, the paper identifies some DBT challenges that are potential topics for future work.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Do Automatic Test Generation Tools Generate Flaky Tests?
Authors:
Martin Gruber,
Muhammad Firhard Roslan,
Owain Parry,
Fabian Scharnböck,
Phil McMinn,
Gordon Fraser
Abstract:
Non-deterministic test behavior, or flakiness, is common and dreaded among developers. Researchers have studied the issue and proposed approaches to mitigate it. However, the vast majority of previous work has only considered developer-written tests. The prevalence and nature of flaky tests produced by test generation tools remain largely unknown. We ask whether such tools also produce flaky tests…
▽ More
Non-deterministic test behavior, or flakiness, is common and dreaded among developers. Researchers have studied the issue and proposed approaches to mitigate it. However, the vast majority of previous work has only considered developer-written tests. The prevalence and nature of flaky tests produced by test generation tools remain largely unknown. We ask whether such tools also produce flaky tests and how these differ from developer-written ones. Furthermore, we evaluate mechanisms that suppress flaky test generation. We sample 6 356 projects written in Java or Python. For each project, we generate tests using EvoSuite (Java) and Pynguin (Python), and execute each test 200 times, looking for inconsistent outcomes. Our results show that flakiness is at least as common in generated tests as in developer-written tests. Nevertheless, existing flakiness suppression mechanisms implemented in EvoSuite are effective in alleviating this issue (71.7 % fewer flaky tests). Compared to developer-written flaky tests, the causes of generated flaky tests are distributed differently. Their non-deterministic behavior is more frequently caused by randomness, rather than by networking and concurrency. Using flakiness suppression, the remaining flaky tests differ significantly from any flakiness previously reported, where most are attributable to runtime optimizations and EvoSuite-internal resource thresholds. These insights, with the accompanying dataset, can help maintainers to improve test generation tools, give recommendations for developers using these tools, and serve as a foundation for future research in test flakiness or test generation.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Gradeer: An Open-Source Modular Hybrid Grader
Authors:
Benjamin Clegg,
Maria-Cruz Villa-Uriol,
Phil McMinn,
Gordon Fraser
Abstract:
Automated assessment has been shown to greatly simplify the process of assessing students' programs. However, manual assessment still offers benefits to both students and tutors. We introduce Gradeer, a hybrid assessment tool, which allows tutors to leverage the advantages of both automated and manual assessment. The tool features a modular design, allowing new grading functionality to be added. G…
▽ More
Automated assessment has been shown to greatly simplify the process of assessing students' programs. However, manual assessment still offers benefits to both students and tutors. We introduce Gradeer, a hybrid assessment tool, which allows tutors to leverage the advantages of both automated and manual assessment. The tool features a modular design, allowing new grading functionality to be added. Gradeer directly assists manual grading, by automatically loading code inspectors, running students' programs, and allowing grading to be stopped and resumed in place at a later time. We used Gradeer to assess an end of year assignment for an introductory Java programming course, and found that its hybrid approach offers several benefits.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
