-
Evaluating Point-Prediction Uncertainties in Neural Networks for Drug Discovery
Authors:
Ya Ju Fan,
Jonathan E. Allen,
Kevin S. McLoughlin,
Da Shi,
Brian J. Bennion,
Xiaohua Zhang,
Felice C. Lightstone
Abstract:
Neural Network (NN) models provide potential to speed up the drug discovery process and reduce its failure rates. The success of NN models require uncertainty quantification (UQ) as drug discovery explores chemical space beyond the training data distribution. Standard NN models do not provide uncertainty information. Methods that combine Bayesian models with NN models address this issue, but are d…
▽ More
Neural Network (NN) models provide potential to speed up the drug discovery process and reduce its failure rates. The success of NN models require uncertainty quantification (UQ) as drug discovery explores chemical space beyond the training data distribution. Standard NN models do not provide uncertainty information. Methods that combine Bayesian models with NN models address this issue, but are difficult to implement and more expensive to train. Some methods require changing the NN architecture or training procedure, limiting the selection of NN models. Moreover, predictive uncertainty can come from different sources. It is important to have the ability to separately model different types of predictive uncertainty, as the model can take assorted actions depending on the source of uncertainty. In this paper, we examine UQ methods that estimate different sources of predictive uncertainty for NN models aiming at drug discovery. We use our prior knowledge on chemical compounds to design the experiments. By utilizing a visualization method we create non-overlap** and chemically diverse partitions from a collection of chemical compounds. These partitions are used as training and test set splits to explore NN model uncertainty. We demonstrate how the uncertainties estimated by the selected methods describe different sources of uncertainty under different partitions and featurization schemes and the relationship to prediction error.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
High-Throughput Virtual Screening of Small Molecule Inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 Protein Targets with Deep Fusion Models
Authors:
Garrett A. Stevenson,
Derek Jones,
Hyo** Kim,
W. F. Drew Bennett,
Brian J. Bennion,
Monica Borucki,
Feliza Bourguet,
Aidan Epstein,
Magdalena Franco,
Brooke Harmon,
Stewart He,
Max P. Katz,
Daniel Kirshner,
Victoria Lao,
Edmond Y. Lau,
Jacky Lo,
Kevin McLoughlin,
Richard Mosesso,
Deepa K. Murugesh,
Oscar A. Negrete,
Edwin A. Saada,
Brent Segelke,
Maxwell Stefan,
Marisa W. Torres,
Dina Weilhammer
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Structure-based Deep Fusion models were recently shown to outperform several physics- and machine learning-based protein-ligand binding affinity prediction methods. As part of a multi-institutional COVID-19 pandemic response, over 500 million small molecules were computationally screened against four protein structures from the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19. Three enhanceme…
▽ More
Structure-based Deep Fusion models were recently shown to outperform several physics- and machine learning-based protein-ligand binding affinity prediction methods. As part of a multi-institutional COVID-19 pandemic response, over 500 million small molecules were computationally screened against four protein structures from the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19. Three enhancements to Deep Fusion were made in order to evaluate more than 5 billion docked poses on SARS-CoV-2 protein targets. First, the Deep Fusion concept was refined by formulating the architecture as one, coherently backpropagated model (Coherent Fusion) to improve binding-affinity prediction accuracy. Secondly, the model was trained using a distributed, genetic hyper-parameter optimization. Finally, a scalable, high-throughput screening capability was developed to maximize the number of ligands evaluated and expedite the path to experimental evaluation. In this work, we present both the methods developed for machine learning-based high-throughput screening and results from using our computational pipeline to find SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2021; v1 submitted 9 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
AMPL: A Data-Driven Modeling Pipeline for Drug Discovery
Authors:
Amanda J. Minnich,
Kevin McLoughlin,
Margaret Tse,
Jason Deng,
Andrew Weber,
Neha Murad,
Benjamin D. Madej,
Bharath Ramsundar,
Tom Rush,
Stacie Calad-Thomson,
Jim Brase,
Jonathan E. Allen
Abstract:
One of the key requirements for incorporating machine learning into the drug discovery process is complete reproducibility and traceability of the model building and evaluation process. With this in mind, we have developed an end-to-end modular and extensible software pipeline for building and sharing machine learning models that predict key pharma-relevant parameters. The ATOM Modeling PipeLine,…
▽ More
One of the key requirements for incorporating machine learning into the drug discovery process is complete reproducibility and traceability of the model building and evaluation process. With this in mind, we have developed an end-to-end modular and extensible software pipeline for building and sharing machine learning models that predict key pharma-relevant parameters. The ATOM Modeling PipeLine, or AMPL, extends the functionality of the open source library DeepChem and supports an array of machine learning and molecular featurization tools. We have benchmarked AMPL on a large collection of pharmaceutical datasets covering a wide range of parameters. As a result of these comprehensive experiments, we have found that physicochemical descriptors and deep learning-based graph representations significantly outperform traditional fingerprints in the characterization of molecular features. We have also found that dataset size is directly correlated to prediction performance, and that single-task deep learning models only outperform shallow learners if there is sufficient data. Likewise, dataset size has a direct impact on model predictivity, independent of comprehensive hyperparameter model tuning. Our findings point to the need for public dataset integration or multi-task/transfer learning approaches. Lastly, we found that uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis may help identify model error; however, efficacy of UQ to filter predictions varies considerably between datasets and featurization/model types. AMPL is open source and available for download at http://github.com/ATOMconsortium/AMPL.
△ Less
Submitted 13 November, 2019; v1 submitted 12 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Computer based Information Systems and Managers' Work
Authors:
Chris Kimble,
Kevin McLoughlin
Abstract:
This paper identifies three categories of model: the Technology Impact Model; the Social Impact Model and the Integrationist Model, which imply different views of the "impact" of Information Technology on work organisation. These models are used to structure data from case studies conducted by the authors to explore the implications of the use of computer-based information systems for managers'…
▽ More
This paper identifies three categories of model: the Technology Impact Model; the Social Impact Model and the Integrationist Model, which imply different views of the "impact" of Information Technology on work organisation. These models are used to structure data from case studies conducted by the authors to explore the implications of the use of computer-based information systems for managers' work. The paper argues that the "impact" of information systems is not a single stable and predictable outcome but a non-linear ongoing process that changes and evolves over time. It also argues that the actions of individuals and groups within an organisation are not wholly determined by outside forces: people can and do react to, and shape, systems in different ways. In this sense, the "impact" of computer-based information systems on managers' work reflects decisions made by managers themselves about how the technology is used.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2001;
originally announced February 2001.
