Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: McAfee, P

Winner-Pays-Bid Auctions Minimize Variance

Authors: Preston McAfee, Renato Paes Leme, Balasubramanian Sivan, Sergei Vassilvitskii

Abstract: Any social choice function (e.g the efficient allocation) can be implemented using different payment rules: first price, second price, all-pay, etc. All of these payment rules are guaranteed to have the same expected revenue by the revenue equivalence theorem, but have different distributions of revenue, leading to a question of which one is best. We prove that among all possible payment rules, wi… ▽ More Any social choice function (e.g the efficient allocation) can be implemented using different payment rules: first price, second price, all-pay, etc. All of these payment rules are guaranteed to have the same expected revenue by the revenue equivalence theorem, but have different distributions of revenue, leading to a question of which one is best. We prove that among all possible payment rules, winner-pays-bid minimizes the variance in revenue and, in fact, minimizes any convex risk measure. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2024; v1 submitted 7 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Information Elicitation in Agency Games

Authors: Serena Wang, Michael I. Jordan, Katrina Ligett, R. Preston McAfee

Abstract: Rapid progress in scalable, commoditized tools for data collection and data processing has made it possible for firms and policymakers to employ ever more complex metrics as guides for decision-making. These developments have highlighted a prevailing challenge -- deciding *which* metrics to compute. In particular, a firm's ability to compute a wider range of existing metrics does not address the p… ▽ More Rapid progress in scalable, commoditized tools for data collection and data processing has made it possible for firms and policymakers to employ ever more complex metrics as guides for decision-making. These developments have highlighted a prevailing challenge -- deciding *which* metrics to compute. In particular, a firm's ability to compute a wider range of existing metrics does not address the problem of *unknown unknowns*, which reflects informational limitations on the part of the firm. To guide the choice of metrics in the face of this informational problem, we turn to the evaluated agents themselves, who may have more information than a principal about how to measure outcomes effectively. We model this interaction as a simple agency game, where we ask: *When does an agent have an incentive to reveal the observability of a cost-correlated variable to the principal?* There are two effects: better information reduces the agent's information rents but also makes some projects go forward that otherwise would fail. We show that the agent prefers to reveal information that exposes a strong enough differentiation between high and low costs. Expanding the agent's action space to include the ability to *garble* their information, we show that the agent often prefers to garble over full revelation. Still, giving the agent the ability to garble can lead to higher total welfare. Our model has analogies with price discrimination, and we leverage some of these synergies to analyze total welfare. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2024; v1 submitted 21 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Delphic Costs and Benefits in Web Search: A utilitarian and historical analysis

Authors: Andrei Z. Broder, Preston McAfee

Abstract: We present a new framework to conceptualize and operationalize the total user experience of search, by studying the entirety of a search journey from an utilitarian point of view. Web search engines are widely perceived as "free". But search requires time and effort: in reality there are many intermingled non-monetary costs (e.g. time costs, cognitive costs, interactivity costs) and the benefits… ▽ More We present a new framework to conceptualize and operationalize the total user experience of search, by studying the entirety of a search journey from an utilitarian point of view. Web search engines are widely perceived as "free". But search requires time and effort: in reality there are many intermingled non-monetary costs (e.g. time costs, cognitive costs, interactivity costs) and the benefits may be marred by various impairments, such as misunderstanding and misinformation. This characterization of costs and benefits appears to be inherent to the human search for information within the pursuit of some larger task: most of the costs and impairments can be identified in interactions with any web search engine, interactions with public libraries, and even in interactions with ancient oracles. To emphasize this innate connection, we call these costs and benefits Delphic, in contrast to explicitly financial costs and benefits. Our main thesis is that the users' satisfaction with a search engine mostly depends on their experience of Delphic cost and benefits, in other words on their utility. The consumer utility is correlated with classic measures of search engine quality, such as ranking, precision, recall, etc., but is not completely determined by them. To argue our thesis, we catalog the Delphic costs and benefits and show how the development of search engines over the last quarter century, from classic Information Retrieval roots to the integration of Large Language Models, was driven to a great extent by the quest of decreasing Delphic costs and increasing Delphic benefits. We hope that the Delphic costs framework will engender new ideas and new research for evaluating and improving the web experience for everyone. △ Less

Submitted 14 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: 10 pages

ACM Class: H.3.3; H.3.5; J.4

Quantifying the sustainability impact of Google Maps: A case study of Salt Lake City

Authors: Neha Arora, Theophile Cabannes, Sanjay Ganapathy, Yechen Li, Preston McAfee, Marc Nunkesser, Carolina Osorio, Andrew Tomkins, Iveel Tsogsuren

Abstract: Google Maps uses current and historical traffic trends to provide routes to drivers. In this paper, we use microscopic traffic simulation to quantify the improvements to both travel time and CO$_2$ emissions from Google Maps real-time navigation. A case study in Salt Lake City shows that Google Maps users are, on average, saving 1.7% of CO$_2$ emissions and 6.5% travel time. If we restrict to the… ▽ More Google Maps uses current and historical traffic trends to provide routes to drivers. In this paper, we use microscopic traffic simulation to quantify the improvements to both travel time and CO$_2$ emissions from Google Maps real-time navigation. A case study in Salt Lake City shows that Google Maps users are, on average, saving 1.7% of CO$_2$ emissions and 6.5% travel time. If we restrict to the users for which Google Maps finds a different route than their original route, the average savings are 3.4% of CO$_2$ emissions and 12.5% of travel time. These results are based on traffic conditions observed during the Covid-19 pandemic. As congestion gradually builds back up to pre-pandemic levels, it is expected to lead to even greater savings in emissions. △ Less

Submitted 21 October, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures

Simple and Approximately Optimal Pricing for Proportional Complementarities

Authors: Yang Cai, Nikhil R. Devanur, Kira Goldner, R. Preston McAfee

Abstract: We study a new model of complementary valuations, which we call "proportional complementarities." In contrast to common models, such as hypergraphic valuations, in our model, we do not assume that the extra value derived from owning a set of items is independent of the buyer's base valuations for the items. Instead, we model the complementarities as proportional to the buyer's base valuations, and… ▽ More We study a new model of complementary valuations, which we call "proportional complementarities." In contrast to common models, such as hypergraphic valuations, in our model, we do not assume that the extra value derived from owning a set of items is independent of the buyer's base valuations for the items. Instead, we model the complementarities as proportional to the buyer's base valuations, and these proportionalities are known market parameters. Our goal is to design a simple pricing scheme that, for a single buyer with proportional complementarities, yields approximately optimal revenue. We define a new class of mechanisms where some number of items are given away for free, and the remaining items are sold separately at inflated prices. We find that the better of such a mechanism and selling the grand bundle earns a 12-approximation to the optimal revenue for pairwise proportional complementarities. This confirms the intuition that items should not be sold completely separately in the presence of complementarities. In the more general case, a buyer has a maximum of proportional positive hypergraphic valuations, where a hyperedge in a given hypergraph describes the boost to the buyer's value for item $i$ given by owning any set of items $T$ in addition. The maximum-out-degree of such a hypergraph is $d$, and $k$ is the positive rank of the hypergraph. For valuations given by these parameters, our simple pricing scheme is an $O(\min\{d,k\})$-approximation. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: Appeared in the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (ACM EC '19)

Learning in the Repeated Secretary Problem

Authors: Daniel G. Goldstein, R. Preston McAfee, Siddharth Suri, James R. Wright

Abstract: In the classical secretary problem, one attempts to find the maximum of an unknown and unlearnable distribution through sequential search. In many real-world searches, however, distributions are not entirely unknown and can be learned through experience. To investigate learning in such a repeated secretary problem we conduct a large-scale behavioral experiment in which people search repeatedly fro… ▽ More In the classical secretary problem, one attempts to find the maximum of an unknown and unlearnable distribution through sequential search. In many real-world searches, however, distributions are not entirely unknown and can be learned through experience. To investigate learning in such a repeated secretary problem we conduct a large-scale behavioral experiment in which people search repeatedly from fixed distributions. In contrast to prior investigations that find no evidence for learning in the classical scenario, in the repeated setting we observe substantial learning resulting in near-optimal stop** behavior. We conduct a Bayesian comparison of multiple behavioral models which shows that participants' behavior is best described by a class of threshold-based models that contains the theoretically optimal strategy. Fitting such a threshold-based model to data reveals players' estimated thresholds to be surprisingly close to the optimal thresholds after only a small number of games. △ Less

Submitted 29 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Position Auctions with Externalities and Brand Effects

Authors: Patrick Hummel, R. Preston McAfee

Abstract: This paper presents models for predicted click-through rates in position auctions that take into account two possibilities that are not normally considered---that the identities of ads shown in other positions may affect the probability that an ad in a particular position receives a click (externalities) and that some ads may be less adversely affected by being shown in a lower position than other… ▽ More This paper presents models for predicted click-through rates in position auctions that take into account two possibilities that are not normally considered---that the identities of ads shown in other positions may affect the probability that an ad in a particular position receives a click (externalities) and that some ads may be less adversely affected by being shown in a lower position than others (brand effects). We present a general axiomatic methodology for how click probabilities are affected by the qualities of the ads in the other positions, and illustrate that using these axioms will increase revenue as long as higher quality ads tend to be ranked ahead of lower quality ads. We also present appropriate algorithms for selecting the optimal allocation of ads when predicted click-through rates are governed by either the models of externalities or brand effects that we consider. Finally, we analyze the performance of a greedy algorithm of ranking the ads by their expected cost-per-1000-impressions bids when the true click-through rates are governed by our model of predicted click-through rates with brand effects and illustrate that such an algorithm will potentially cost as much as half of the total possible social welfare. △ Less

Submitted 16 September, 2014; originally announced September 2014.

Comments: 19 pages. A shorter version of this paper will appear in WINE 2014

ACM Class: J.4

Crowdsourcing with Endogenous Entry

Authors: Arpita Ghosh, Preston McAfee

Abstract: We investigate the design of mechanisms to incentivize high quality in crowdsourcing environments with strategic agents, when entry is an endogenous, strategic choice. Modeling endogenous entry in crowdsourcing is important because there is a nonzero cost to making a contribution of any quality which can be avoided by not participating, and indeed many sites based on crowdsourced content do not ha… ▽ More We investigate the design of mechanisms to incentivize high quality in crowdsourcing environments with strategic agents, when entry is an endogenous, strategic choice. Modeling endogenous entry in crowdsourcing is important because there is a nonzero cost to making a contribution of any quality which can be avoided by not participating, and indeed many sites based on crowdsourced content do not have adequate participation. We use a mechanism with monotone, rank-based, rewards in a model where agents strategically make participation and quality choices to capture a wide variety of crowdsourcing environments, ranging from conventional crowdsourcing contests to crowdsourced content as in online Q&A forums. We first explicitly construct the unique mixed-strategy equilibrium for such monotone rank-order mechanisms, and use these participation probabilities and quality distribution to address the design of incentives for two kinds of rewards that arise in crowdsourcing. We first show that for attention rewards as in crowdsourced content, the entire equilibrium distribution improves when the rewards for every rank but the last are as high as possible. In particular, when producing the lowest quality content has low cost, the optimal mechanism displays all but the worst contribution. We next investigate settings where there is a total reward that can be arbitrarily distributed amongst all participants, as in crowdsourcing contests. Unlike with exogenous entry, here the expected number of participants can be increased by subsidizing entry, which could potentially improve the expected quality of the best contribution. However, we show that free entry is dominated by taxing entry- making all entrants pay a small fee, which is rebated to the winner along with whatever rewards were already assigned, can improve the quality of the best contribution over a winner-take-all contest with no taxes. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2012; originally announced February 2012.

Comments: In Proceedings of the 21st International World Wide Web Conference: WWW 2012

Bidding for Representative Allocations for Display Advertising

Authors: Arpita Ghosh, Preston McAfee, Kishore Papineni, Sergei Vassilvitskii

Abstract: Display advertising has traditionally been sold via guaranteed contracts -- a guaranteed contract is a deal between a publisher and an advertiser to allocate a certain number of impressions over a certain period, for a pre-specified price per impression. However, as spot markets for display ads, such as the RightMedia Exchange, have grown in prominence, the selection of advertisements to show on… ▽ More Display advertising has traditionally been sold via guaranteed contracts -- a guaranteed contract is a deal between a publisher and an advertiser to allocate a certain number of impressions over a certain period, for a pre-specified price per impression. However, as spot markets for display ads, such as the RightMedia Exchange, have grown in prominence, the selection of advertisements to show on a given page is increasingly being chosen based on price, using an auction. As the number of participants in the exchange grows, the price of an impressions becomes a signal of its value. This correlation between price and value means that a seller implementing the contract through bidding should offer the contract buyer a range of prices, and not just the cheapest impressions necessary to fulfill its demand. Implementing a contract using a range of prices, is akin to creating a mutual fund of advertising impressions, and requires {\em randomized bidding}. We characterize what allocations can be implemented with randomized bidding, namely those where the desired share obtained at each price is a non-increasing function of price. In addition, we provide a full characterization of when a set of campaigns are compatible and how to implement them with randomized bidding strategies. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2009; originally announced October 2009.