Daml: A Smart Contract Language for Securely Automating Real-World Multi-Party Business Workflows
Authors:
Alexander Bernauer,
Sofia Faro,
Rémy Hämmerle,
Martin Huschenbett,
Moritz Kiefer,
Andreas Lochbihler,
Jussi Mäki,
Francesco Mazzoli,
Simon Meier,
Neil Mitchell,
Ratko G. Veprek
Abstract:
Distributed ledger technologies, also known as blockchains for enterprises, promise to significantly reduce the high cost of automating multi-party business workflows. We argue that a programming language for writing such on-ledger logic should satisfy three desiderata: (1) Provide concepts to capture the legal rules that govern real-world business workflows. (2) Include simple means for specifyin…
▽ More
Distributed ledger technologies, also known as blockchains for enterprises, promise to significantly reduce the high cost of automating multi-party business workflows. We argue that a programming language for writing such on-ledger logic should satisfy three desiderata: (1) Provide concepts to capture the legal rules that govern real-world business workflows. (2) Include simple means for specifying policies for access and authorization. (3) Support the composition of simple workflows into complex ones, even when the simple workflows have already been deployed.
We present the open-source smart contract language Daml based on Haskell with strict evaluation. Daml achieves these desiderata by offering novel primitives for representing, accessing, and modifying data on the ledger, which are mimicking the primitives of today's legal systems. Robust access and authorization policies are specified as part of these primitives, and Daml's built-in authorization rules enable delegation, which is key for workflow composability. These properties make Daml well-suited for orchestrating business workflows across multiple, otherwise heterogeneous parties.
Daml contracts run (1) on centralized ledgers backed by a database, (2) on distributed deployments with Byzantine fault tolerant consensus, and (3) on top of conventional blockchains, as a second layer via an atomic commit protocol.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
Type checking through unification
Authors:
Francesco Mazzoli,
Andreas Abel
Abstract:
In this paper we describe how to leverage higher-order unification to type check a dependently typed language with meta-variables. The literature usually presents the unification algorithm as a standalone component, however the need to check definitional equality of terms while type checking gives rise to a tight interplay between type checking and unification. This interplay is a major source of…
▽ More
In this paper we describe how to leverage higher-order unification to type check a dependently typed language with meta-variables. The literature usually presents the unification algorithm as a standalone component, however the need to check definitional equality of terms while type checking gives rise to a tight interplay between type checking and unification. This interplay is a major source of complexity in the type-checking algorithm for existing dependently typed programming languages. We propose an algorithm that encodes a type-checking problem entirely in the form of unification constraints, reducing the complexity of the type-checking code by taking advantage of higher order unification, which is already part of the implementation of many dependently typed languages.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
