-
Flow-Bench: A Dataset for Computational Workflow Anomaly Detection
Authors:
George Papadimitriou,
Hongwei **,
Cong Wang,
Rajiv Mayani,
Krishnan Raghavan,
Anirban Mandal,
Prasanna Balaprakash,
Ewa Deelman
Abstract:
A computational workflow, also known as workflow, consists of tasks that must be executed in a specific order to attain a specific goal. Often, in fields such as biology, chemistry, physics, and data science, among others, these workflows are complex and are executed in large-scale, distributed, and heterogeneous computing environments prone to failures and performance degradation. Therefore, anom…
▽ More
A computational workflow, also known as workflow, consists of tasks that must be executed in a specific order to attain a specific goal. Often, in fields such as biology, chemistry, physics, and data science, among others, these workflows are complex and are executed in large-scale, distributed, and heterogeneous computing environments prone to failures and performance degradation. Therefore, anomaly detection for workflows is an important paradigm that aims to identify unexpected behavior or errors in workflow execution. This crucial task to improve the reliability of workflow executions can be further assisted by machine learning-based techniques. However, such application is limited, in large part, due to the lack of open datasets and benchmarking. To address this gap, we make the following contributions in this paper: (1) we systematically inject anomalies and collect raw execution logs from workflows executing on distributed infrastructures; (2) we summarize the statistics of new datasets, and provide insightful analyses; (3) we convert workflows into tabular, graph and text data, and benchmark with supervised and unsupervised anomaly detection techniques correspondingly. The presented dataset and benchmarks allow examining the effectiveness and efficiency of scientific computational workflows and identifying potential research opportunities for improvement and generalization. The dataset and benchmark code are publicly available \url{https://poseidon-workflows.github.io/FlowBench/} under the MIT License.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2024; v1 submitted 16 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Workflows Community Summit: Advancing the State-of-the-art of Scientific Workflows Management Systems Research and Development
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Henri Casanova,
Kyle Chard,
Tainã Coleman,
Dan Laney,
Dong Ahn,
Shantenu Jha,
Dorran Howell,
Stian Soiland-Reys,
Ilkay Altintas,
Douglas Thain,
Rosa Filgueira,
Yadu Babuji,
Rosa M. Badia,
Bartosz Balis,
Silvina Caino-Lores,
Scott Callaghan,
Frederik Coppens,
Michael R. Crusoe,
Kaushik De,
Frank Di Natale,
Tu M. A. Do,
Bjoern Enders,
Thomas Fahringer,
Anne Fouilloux
, et al. (33 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific workflows are a cornerstone of modern scientific computing, and they have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the last decade. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale HPC platforms. Workflows will play a crucial role i…
▽ More
Scientific workflows are a cornerstone of modern scientific computing, and they have underpinned some of the most significant discoveries of the last decade. Many of these workflows have high computational, storage, and/or communication demands, and thus must execute on a wide range of large-scale platforms, from large clouds to upcoming exascale HPC platforms. Workflows will play a crucial role in the data-oriented and post-Moore's computing landscape as they democratize the application of cutting-edge research techniques, computationally intensive methods, and use of new computing platforms. As workflows continue to be adopted by scientific projects and user communities, they are becoming more complex. Workflows are increasingly composed of tasks that perform computations such as short machine learning inference, multi-node simulations, long-running machine learning model training, amongst others, and thus increasingly rely on heterogeneous architectures that include CPUs but also GPUs and accelerators. The workflow management system (WMS) technology landscape is currently segmented and presents significant barriers to entry due to the hundreds of seemingly comparable, yet incompatible, systems that exist. Another fundamental problem is that there are conflicting theoretical bases and abstractions for a WMS. Systems that use the same underlying abstractions can likely be translated between, which is not the case for systems that use different abstractions. More information: https://workflowsri.org/summits/technical
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Custom Execution Environments with Containers in Pegasus-enabled Scientific Workflows
Authors:
Karan Vahi,
Mats Rynge,
George Papadimitriou,
Duncan A. Brown,
Rajiv Mayani,
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Ewa Deelman,
Anirban Mandal,
Eric Lyons,
Michael Zink
Abstract:
Science reproducibility is a cornerstone feature in scientific workflows. In most cases, this has been implemented as a way to exactly reproduce the computational steps taken to reach the final results. While these steps are often completely described, including the input parameters, datasets, and codes, the environment in which these steps are executed is only described at a higher level with end…
▽ More
Science reproducibility is a cornerstone feature in scientific workflows. In most cases, this has been implemented as a way to exactly reproduce the computational steps taken to reach the final results. While these steps are often completely described, including the input parameters, datasets, and codes, the environment in which these steps are executed is only described at a higher level with endpoints and operating system name and versions. Though this may be sufficient for reproducibility in the short term, systems evolve and are replaced over time, breaking the underlying workflow reproducibility. A natural solution to this problem is containers, as they are well defined, have a lifetime independent of the underlying system, and can be user-controlled so that they can provide custom environments if needed. This paper highlights some unique challenges that may arise when using containers in distributed scientific workflows. Further, this paper explores how the Pegasus Workflow Management System implements container support to address such challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
