Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Maureille, B

Implementation of a Daemon for OpenBCI

Authors: Maxime Chabance, Grégoire Cattan, Bastien Maureille

Abstract: This document describes a technical study of the electroencephalographic (EEG) headset OpenBCI (New York, US). In comparison to research grade EEG, the OpenBCI headset is affordable thus suitable for the general public use. In this study we designed a daemon, that is, a background and continuous task communicating with the headset, acquiring, filtering and analyzing the EEG data. This study was pr… ▽ More This document describes a technical study of the electroencephalographic (EEG) headset OpenBCI (New York, US). In comparison to research grade EEG, the OpenBCI headset is affordable thus suitable for the general public use. In this study we designed a daemon, that is, a background and continuous task communicating with the headset, acquiring, filtering and analyzing the EEG data. This study was promoted by the IHMTEK Company (Vienne, France) in 2016 within a thesis on the integration of EEG-based brain-computer interfaces in virtual reality for the general public. △ Less

Submitted 8 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: in French

Analysis of tagging latency when comparing event-related potentials

Authors: Grégoire Cattan, Anton Andreev, Bastien Maureille, Marco Congedo

Abstract: Event-related potentials (ERPs) are very small voltage produced by the brain in response to external stimulation. In order to detect and evaluate an ERP in an ongoing electroencephalogram (EEG), it is necessary to tag the EEG with the exact onset time of the stimulus. We define the latency as the delay between the time the tagging command is sent and the detection of the stimulus on the screen. Fa… ▽ More Event-related potentials (ERPs) are very small voltage produced by the brain in response to external stimulation. In order to detect and evaluate an ERP in an ongoing electroencephalogram (EEG), it is necessary to tag the EEG with the exact onset time of the stimulus. We define the latency as the delay between the time the tagging command is sent and the detection of the stimulus on the screen. Failing to control sequencing in the tagging pipeline causes problems when interpreting latency, in particular when comparing ERPs generated from stimuli displayed by different systems. In this work, we present number of technical aspects which can influence latency such as the refresh rate of the screen or the display of a stimulus at different screen location. A few propositions are suggested to estimate and correct this latency. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.