-
Complexity assessments for decidable fragments of Set Theory. IV: A quadratic reduction of constraints over nested sets to Boolean formulae
Authors:
Domenico Cantone,
Andrea De Domenico,
Pietro Maugeri,
Eugenio G. Omodeo
Abstract:
As a contribution to quantitative set-theoretic inferencing, a translation is proposed of conjunctions of literals of the forms $x=y\setminus z$, $x \neq y\setminus z$, and $z =\{x\}$, where $x,y,z$ stand for variables ranging over the von Neumann universe of sets, into unquantified Boolean formulae of a rather simple conjunctive normal form. The formulae in the target language involve variables r…
▽ More
As a contribution to quantitative set-theoretic inferencing, a translation is proposed of conjunctions of literals of the forms $x=y\setminus z$, $x \neq y\setminus z$, and $z =\{x\}$, where $x,y,z$ stand for variables ranging over the von Neumann universe of sets, into unquantified Boolean formulae of a rather simple conjunctive normal form. The formulae in the target language involve variables ranging over a Boolean ring of sets, along with a difference operator and relators designating equality, non-disjointness and inclusion. Moreover, the result of each translation is a conjunction of literals of the forms $x=y\setminus z$, $x\neq y\setminus z$ and of implications whose antecedents are isolated literals and whose consequents are either inclusions (strict or non-strict) between variables, or equalities between variables. Besides reflecting a simple and natural semantics, which ensures satisfiability-preservation, the proposed translation has quadratic algorithmic time-complexity, and bridges two languages both of which are known to have an NP-complete satisfiability problem.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2022; v1 submitted 9 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
On the Convexity of a Fragment of Pure Set Theory with Applications within a Nelson-Oppen Framework
Authors:
Domenico Cantone,
Andrea De Domenico,
Pietro Maugeri
Abstract:
The Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) issue concerns the satisfiability of formulae from multiple background theories, usually expressed in the language of first-order predicate logic with equality. SMT solvers are often based on variants of the Nelson-Oppen combination method, a solver for the quantifier-free fragment of the combination of theories with disjoint signatures, via cooperation am…
▽ More
The Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) issue concerns the satisfiability of formulae from multiple background theories, usually expressed in the language of first-order predicate logic with equality. SMT solvers are often based on variants of the Nelson-Oppen combination method, a solver for the quantifier-free fragment of the combination of theories with disjoint signatures, via cooperation among their decision procedures. When each of the theories to be combined by the Nelson-Oppen method is convex (that is, any conjunction of its literals can imply a disjunction of equalities only when it implies at least one of the equalities) and decidable in polynomial time, the running time of the combination procedure is guaranteed to be polynomial in the size of the input formula. In this paper, we prove the convexity of a fragment of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, called Multi-Level Syllogistic, most of whose polynomially decidable fragments we have recently characterized.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Extending rational choice behavior: The decision problem for Boolean set theory with a choice correspondence
Authors:
Domenico Cantone,
Alfio Giarlotta,
Pietro Maugeri,
Stephen Watson
Abstract:
Given the family $P$ of all nonempty subsets of a set $U$ of alternatives, a choice over $U$ is a function $c \colon Ω\to P$ such that $Ω\subseteq P$ and $c(B) \subseteq B$ for all menus $B \in Ω$. A choice is total if $Ω= P$, and partial otherwise. In economics, an agent is considered rational whenever her choice behavior satisfies suitable axioms of consistency, which are properties quantified o…
▽ More
Given the family $P$ of all nonempty subsets of a set $U$ of alternatives, a choice over $U$ is a function $c \colon Ω\to P$ such that $Ω\subseteq P$ and $c(B) \subseteq B$ for all menus $B \in Ω$. A choice is total if $Ω= P$, and partial otherwise. In economics, an agent is considered rational whenever her choice behavior satisfies suitable axioms of consistency, which are properties quantified over menus. Here we address the following lifting problem: Given a partial choice satisfying one or more axioms of consistency, is it possible to extend it to a total choice satisfying the same axioms? After characterizing the lifting of some choice properties that are well-known in the economics literature, we study the decidability of the connected satisfiability problem for unquantified formulae of an elementary fragment of set theory, which involves a choice function symbol, the Boolean set operators, the singleton, the equality and inclusion predicates, and the propositional connectives. In two cases we prove that the satisfiability problem is NP-complete, whereas in the remaining cases we obtain NP-completeness under the additional assumption that the number of choice terms is constant.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2022; v1 submitted 21 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
