Cross-paradigm pretraining of convolutional networks improves intracranial EEG decoding
Authors:
Joos Behncke,
Robin Tibor Schirrmeister,
Martin Völker,
Jiří Hammer,
Petr Marusič,
Andreas Schulze-Bonhage,
Wolfram Burgard,
Tonio Ball
Abstract:
When it comes to the classification of brain signals in real-life applications, the training and the prediction data are often described by different distributions. Furthermore, diverse data sets, e.g., recorded from various subjects or tasks, can even exhibit distinct feature spaces. The fact that data that have to be classified are often only available in small amounts reinforces the need for te…
▽ More
When it comes to the classification of brain signals in real-life applications, the training and the prediction data are often described by different distributions. Furthermore, diverse data sets, e.g., recorded from various subjects or tasks, can even exhibit distinct feature spaces. The fact that data that have to be classified are often only available in small amounts reinforces the need for techniques to generalize learned information, as performances of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are enhanced by increasing quantity of available data. In this paper, we apply transfer learning to a framework based on deep convolutional neural networks (deep ConvNets) to prove the transferability of learned patterns in error-related brain signals across different tasks. The experiments described in this paper demonstrate the usefulness of transfer learning, especially improving performances when only little data can be used to distinguish between erroneous and correct realization of a task. This effect could be delimited from a transfer of merely general brain signal characteristics, underlining the transfer of error-specific information. Furthermore, we could extract similar patterns in time-frequency analyses in identical channels, leading to selective high signal correlations between the two different paradigms. Classification on the intracranial data yields in median accuracies up to $(81.50 \pm 9.49)\,\%$. Decoding on only $10\%$ of the data without pre-training reaches performances of $(54.76 \pm 3.56)\,\%$, compared to $(64.95 \pm 0.79)\,\%$ with pre-training.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2018; v1 submitted 20 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
Intracranial Error Detection via Deep Learning
Authors:
Martin Völker,
Jiří Hammer,
Robin T. Schirrmeister,
Joos Behncke,
Lukas D. J. Fiederer,
Andreas Schulze-Bonhage,
Petr Marusič,
Wolfram Burgard,
Tonio Ball
Abstract:
Deep learning techniques have revolutionized the field of machine learning and were recently successfully applied to various classification problems in noninvasive electroencephalography (EEG). However, these methods were so far only rarely evaluated for use in intracranial EEG. We employed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify and characterize the error-related brain response as measur…
▽ More
Deep learning techniques have revolutionized the field of machine learning and were recently successfully applied to various classification problems in noninvasive electroencephalography (EEG). However, these methods were so far only rarely evaluated for use in intracranial EEG. We employed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify and characterize the error-related brain response as measured in 24 intracranial EEG recordings. Decoding accuracies of CNNs were significantly higher than those of a regularized linear discriminant analysis. Using time-resolved deep decoding, it was possible to classify errors in various regions in the human brain, and further to decode errors over 200 ms before the actual erroneous button press, e.g., in the precentral gyrus. Moreover, deeper networks performed better than shallower networks in distinguishing correct from error trials in all-channel decoding. In single recordings, up to 100 % decoding accuracy was achieved. Visualization of the networks' learned features indicated that multivariate decoding on an ensemble of channels yields related, albeit non-redundant information compared to single-channel decoding. In summary, here we show the usefulness of deep learning for both intracranial error decoding and map** of the spatio-temporal structure of the human error processing network.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2018; v1 submitted 4 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
