Skip to main content

Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Martin-Isla, C

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2406.13844  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.AI cs.DB

    MAMA-MIA: A Large-Scale Multi-Center Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Benchmark Dataset with Expert Segmentations

    Authors: Lidia Garrucho, Claire-Anne Reidel, Kaisar Kushibar, Smriti Joshi, Richard Osuala, Apostolia Tsirikoglou, Maciej Bobowicz, Javier del Riego, Alessandro Catanese, Katarzyna Gwoździewicz, Maria-Laura Cosaka, Pasant M. Abo-Elhoda, Sara W. Tantawy, Shorouq S. Sakrana, Norhan O. Shawky-Abdelfatah, Amr Muhammad Abdo-Salem, Androniki Kozana, Eugen Divjak, Gordana Ivanac, Katerina Nikiforaki, Michail E. Klontzas, Rosa García-Dosdá, Meltem Gulsun-Akpinar, Oğuz Lafcı, Ritse Mann , et al. (8 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: Current research in breast cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), especially with Artificial Intelligence (AI), faces challenges due to the lack of expert segmentations. To address this, we introduce the MAMA-MIA dataset, comprising 1506 multi-center dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI cases with expert segmentations of primary tumors and non-mass enhancement areas. These cases were sourced from four… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

    Comments: 15 paes, 7 figures, 3 tables

  2. arXiv:2303.17719  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.LG

    Why is the winner the best?

    Authors: Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke, Vivienn Weru, Minu Dietlinde Tizabi, Fabian Isensee, Tim J. Adler, Sharib Ali, Vincent Andrearczyk, Marc Aubreville, Ujjwal Baid, Spyridon Bakas, Niranjan Balu, Sophia Bano, Jorge Bernal, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Alessandro Casella, Veronika Cheplygina, Marie Daum, Marleen de Bruijne, Adrien Depeursinge, Reuben Dorent, Jan Egger, David G. Ellis, Sandy Engelhardt, Melanie Ganz , et al. (100 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To addre… ▽ More

    Submitted 30 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

    Comments: accepted to CVPR 2023

  3. arXiv:2212.08568  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.LG

    Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

    Authors: Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke, Vivienn Weru, Minu Dietlinde Tizabi, Fabian Isensee, Tim J. Adler, Patrick Godau, Veronika Cheplygina, Michal Kozubek, Sharib Ali, Anubha Gupta, Jan Kybic, Alison Noble, Carlos Ortiz de Solórzano, Samiksha Pachade, Caroline Petitjean, Daniel Sage, Donglai Wei, Elizabeth Wilden, Deepak Alapatt, Vincent Andrearczyk, Ujjwal Baid, Spyridon Bakas, Niranjan Balu, Sophia Bano , et al. (331 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis,… ▽ More

    Submitted 12 September, 2023; v1 submitted 16 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

  4. arXiv:2201.03186  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV

    MyoPS: A Benchmark of Myocardial Pathology Segmentation Combining Three-Sequence Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images

    Authors: Lei Li, Fu** Wu, Sihan Wang, Xinzhe Luo, Carlos Martin-Isla, Shuwei Zhai, Jianpeng Zhang, Yanfei Liu7, Zhen Zhang, Markus J. Ankenbrand, Haochuan Jiang, Xiaoran Zhang, Linhong Wang, Tewodros Weldebirhan Arega, Elif Altunok, Zhou Zhao, Feiyan Li, Jun Ma, ** Yang, Elodie Puybareau, Ilkay Oksuz, Stephanie Bricq, Weisheng Li, Kumaradevan Punithakumar, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris , et al. (7 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: Assessment of myocardial viability is essential in diagnosis and treatment management of patients suffering from myocardial infarction, and classification of pathology on myocardium is the key to this assessment. This work defines a new task of medical image analysis, i.e., to perform myocardial pathology segmentation (MyoPS) combining three-sequence cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images, which… ▽ More

    Submitted 10 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

  5. Domain generalization in deep learning for contrast-enhanced imaging

    Authors: Carla Sendra-Balcells, Víctor M. Campello, Carlos Martín-Isla, David Viladés, Martín L. Descalzo, Andrea Guala, José F. Rodríguez-Palomares, Karim Lekadir

    Abstract: The domain generalization problem has been widely investigated in deep learning for non-contrast imaging over the last years, but it received limited attention for contrast-enhanced imaging. However, there are marked differences in contrast imaging protocols across clinical centers, in particular in the time between contrast injection and image acquisition, while access to multi-center contrast-en… ▽ More

    Submitted 6 September, 2022; v1 submitted 14 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

  6. arXiv:1909.01182  [pdf, other

    eess.IV cs.CV

    Combining Multi-Sequence and Synthetic Images for Improved Segmentation of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac MRI

    Authors: Víctor M. Campello, Carlos Martín-Isla, Cristian Izquierdo, Steffen E. Petersen, Miguel A. González Ballester, Karim Lekadir

    Abstract: Accurate segmentation of the cardiac boundaries in late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance images (LGE-MRI) is a fundamental step for accurate quantification of scar tissue. However, while there are many solutions for automatic cardiac segmentation of cine images, the presence of scar tissue can make the correct delineation of the myocardium in LGE-MRI challenging even for human experts. As… ▽ More

    Submitted 13 January, 2020; v1 submitted 3 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

    Comments: 10 pages, Accepted to MS-CMRSeg Challenge (STACOM 2019), reference added and affiliations updated