Showing 1–32 of 32 results for author: Marras, M

Second Edition FRCSyn Challenge at CVPR 2024: Face Recognition Challenge in the Era of Synthetic Data

Authors: Ivan DeAndres-Tame, Ruben Tolosana, Pietro Melzi, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Minchul Kim, Christian Rathgeb, Xiaoming Liu, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez, Javier Ortega-Garcia, Zhizhou Zhong, Yuge Huang, Yuxi Mi, Shouhong Ding, Shuigeng Zhou, Shuai He, Lingzhi Fu, Heng Cong, Rongyu Zhang, Zhihong Xiao, Evgeny Smirnov, Anton Pimenov, Aleksei Grigorev, Denis Timoshenko, Kaleb Mesfin Asfaw , et al. (33 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Synthetic data is gaining increasing relevance for training machine learning models. This is mainly motivated due to several factors such as the lack of real data and intra-class variability, time and errors produced in manual labeling, and in some cases privacy concerns, among others. This paper presents an overview of the 2nd edition of the Face Recognition Challenge in the Era of Synthetic Data… ▽ More Synthetic data is gaining increasing relevance for training machine learning models. This is mainly motivated due to several factors such as the lack of real data and intra-class variability, time and errors produced in manual labeling, and in some cases privacy concerns, among others. This paper presents an overview of the 2nd edition of the Face Recognition Challenge in the Era of Synthetic Data (FRCSyn) organized at CVPR 2024. FRCSyn aims to investigate the use of synthetic data in face recognition to address current technological limitations, including data privacy concerns, demographic biases, generalization to novel scenarios, and performance constraints in challenging situations such as aging, pose variations, and occlusions. Unlike the 1st edition, in which synthetic data from DCFace and GANDiffFace methods was only allowed to train face recognition systems, in this 2nd edition we propose new sub-tasks that allow participants to explore novel face generative methods. The outcomes of the 2nd FRCSyn Challenge, along with the proposed experimental protocol and benchmarking contribute significantly to the application of synthetic data to face recognition. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2311.10476

Journal ref: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRw 2024)

If It's Not Enough, Make It So: Reducing Authentic Data Demand in Face Recognition through Synthetic Faces

Authors: Andrea Atzori, Fadi Boutros, Naser Damer, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Recent advances in deep face recognition have spurred a growing demand for large, diverse, and manually annotated face datasets. Acquiring authentic, high-quality data for face recognition has proven to be a challenge, primarily due to privacy concerns. Large face datasets are primarily sourced from web-based images, lacking explicit user consent. In this paper, we examine whether and how syntheti… ▽ More Recent advances in deep face recognition have spurred a growing demand for large, diverse, and manually annotated face datasets. Acquiring authentic, high-quality data for face recognition has proven to be a challenge, primarily due to privacy concerns. Large face datasets are primarily sourced from web-based images, lacking explicit user consent. In this paper, we examine whether and how synthetic face data can be used to train effective face recognition models with reduced reliance on authentic images, thereby mitigating data collection concerns. First, we explored the performance gap among recent state-of-the-art face recognition models, trained with synthetic data only and authentic (scarce) data only. Then, we deepened our analysis by training a state-of-the-art backbone with various combinations of synthetic and authentic data, gaining insights into optimizing the limited use of the latter for verification accuracy. Finally, we assessed the effectiveness of data augmentation approaches on synthetic and authentic data, with the same goal in mind. Our results highlighted the effectiveness of FR trained on combined datasets, particularly when combined with appropriate augmentation techniques. △ Less

Submitted 26 April, 2024; v1 submitted 4 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: Accepted as full paper at FG 2024 main track

Robustness in Fairness against Edge-level Perturbations in GNN-based Recommendation

Authors: Ludovico Boratto, Francesco Fabbri, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras, Giacomo Medda

Abstract: Efforts in the recommendation community are shifting from the sole emphasis on utility to considering beyond-utility factors, such as fairness and robustness. Robustness of recommendation models is typically linked to their ability to maintain the original utility when subjected to attacks. Limited research has explored the robustness of a recommendation model in terms of fairness, e.g., the parit… ▽ More Efforts in the recommendation community are shifting from the sole emphasis on utility to considering beyond-utility factors, such as fairness and robustness. Robustness of recommendation models is typically linked to their ability to maintain the original utility when subjected to attacks. Limited research has explored the robustness of a recommendation model in terms of fairness, e.g., the parity in performance across groups, under attack scenarios. In this paper, we aim to assess the robustness of graph-based recommender systems concerning fairness, when exposed to attacks based on edge-level perturbations. To this end, we considered four different fairness operationalizations, including both consumer and provider perspectives. Experiments on three datasets shed light on the impact of perturbations on the targeted fairness notion, uncovering key shortcomings in existing evaluation protocols for robustness. As an example, we observed perturbations affect consumer fairness on a higher extent than provider fairness, with alarming unfairness for the former. Source code: https://github.com/jackmedda/CPFairRobust △ Less

Submitted 26 January, 2024; v1 submitted 24 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

A Cost-Sensitive Meta-Learning Strategy for Fair Provider Exposure in Recommendation

Authors: Ludovico Boratto, Giulia Cerniglia, Mirko Marras, Alessandra Perniciano, Barbara Pes

Abstract: When devising recommendation services, it is important to account for the interests of all content providers, encompassing not only newcomers but also minority demographic groups. In various instances, certain provider groups find themselves underrepresented in the item catalog, a situation that can influence recommendation results. Hence, platform owners often seek to regulate the exposure of the… ▽ More When devising recommendation services, it is important to account for the interests of all content providers, encompassing not only newcomers but also minority demographic groups. In various instances, certain provider groups find themselves underrepresented in the item catalog, a situation that can influence recommendation results. Hence, platform owners often seek to regulate the exposure of these provider groups in the recommended lists. In this paper, we propose a novel cost-sensitive approach designed to guarantee these target exposure levels in pairwise recommendation models. This approach quantifies, and consequently mitigate, the discrepancies between the volume of recommendations allocated to groups and their contribution in the item catalog, under the principle of equity. Our results show that this approach, while aligning groups exposure with their assigned levels, does not compromise to the original recommendation utility. Source code and pre-processed data can be retrieved at https://github.com/alessandraperniciano/meta-learning-strategy-fair-provider-exposure. △ Less

Submitted 24 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: Accepted at the 46th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2024)

FRCSyn Challenge at WACV 2024:Face Recognition Challenge in the Era of Synthetic Data

Authors: Pietro Melzi, Ruben Tolosana, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Minchul Kim, Christian Rathgeb, Xiaoming Liu, Ivan DeAndres-Tame, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez, Javier Ortega-Garcia, Weisong Zhao, Xiangyu Zhu, Zheyu Yan, Xiao-Yu Zhang, **lin Wu, Zhen Lei, Suvidha Tripathi, Mahak Kothari, Md Haider Zama, Debayan Deb, Bernardo Biesseck, Pedro Vidal, Roger Granada, Guilherme Fickel, Gustavo Führ , et al. (22 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Despite the widespread adoption of face recognition technology around the world, and its remarkable performance on current benchmarks, there are still several challenges that must be covered in more detail. This paper offers an overview of the Face Recognition Challenge in the Era of Synthetic Data (FRCSyn) organized at WACV 2024. This is the first international challenge aiming to explore the use… ▽ More Despite the widespread adoption of face recognition technology around the world, and its remarkable performance on current benchmarks, there are still several challenges that must be covered in more detail. This paper offers an overview of the Face Recognition Challenge in the Era of Synthetic Data (FRCSyn) organized at WACV 2024. This is the first international challenge aiming to explore the use of synthetic data in face recognition to address existing limitations in the technology. Specifically, the FRCSyn Challenge targets concerns related to data privacy issues, demographic biases, generalization to unseen scenarios, and performance limitations in challenging scenarios, including significant age disparities between enrollment and testing, pose variations, and occlusions. The results achieved in the FRCSyn Challenge, together with the proposed benchmark, contribute significantly to the application of synthetic data to improve face recognition technology. △ Less

Submitted 17 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: 10 pages, 1 figure, WACV 2024 Workshops

Faithful Path Language Modeling for Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graph

Authors: Giacomo Balloccu, Ludovico Boratto, Christian Cancedda, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: The integration of path reasoning with language modeling in recommender systems has shown promise for enhancing explainability but often struggles with the authenticity of the explanations provided. Traditional models modify their architecture to produce entities and relations alternately--for example, employing separate heads for each in the model--which does not ensure the authenticity of paths… ▽ More The integration of path reasoning with language modeling in recommender systems has shown promise for enhancing explainability but often struggles with the authenticity of the explanations provided. Traditional models modify their architecture to produce entities and relations alternately--for example, employing separate heads for each in the model--which does not ensure the authenticity of paths reflective of actual Knowledge Graph (KG) connections. This misalignment can lead to user distrust due to the generation of corrupted paths. Addressing this, we introduce PEARLM (Path-based Explainable-Accurate Recommender based on Language Modelling), which innovates with a Knowledge Graph Constraint Decoding (KGCD) mechanism. This mechanism ensures zero incidence of corrupted paths by enforcing adherence to valid KG connections at the decoding level, agnostic of the underlying model architecture. By integrating direct token embedding learning from KG paths, PEARLM not only guarantees the generation of plausible and verifiable explanations but also highly enhances recommendation accuracy. We validate the effectiveness of our approach through a rigorous empirical assessment, employing a newly proposed metric that quantifies the integrity of explanation paths. Our results demonstrate a significant improvement over existing methods, effectively eliminating the generation of inaccurate paths and advancing the state-of-the-art in explainable recommender systems. △ Less

Submitted 30 April, 2024; v1 submitted 25 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Counterfactual Graph Augmentation for Consumer Unfairness Mitigation in Recommender Systems

Authors: Ludovico Boratto, Francesco Fabbri, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras, Giacomo Medda

Abstract: In recommendation literature, explainability and fairness are becoming two prominent perspectives to consider. However, prior works have mostly addressed them separately, for instance by explaining to consumers why a certain item was recommended or mitigating disparate impacts in recommendation utility. None of them has leveraged explainability techniques to inform unfairness mitigation. In this p… ▽ More In recommendation literature, explainability and fairness are becoming two prominent perspectives to consider. However, prior works have mostly addressed them separately, for instance by explaining to consumers why a certain item was recommended or mitigating disparate impacts in recommendation utility. None of them has leveraged explainability techniques to inform unfairness mitigation. In this paper, we propose an approach that relies on counterfactual explanations to augment the set of user-item interactions, such that using them while inferring recommendations leads to fairer outcomes. Modeling user-item interactions as a bipartite graph, our approach augments the latter by identifying new user-item edges that not only can explain the original unfairness by design, but can also mitigate it. Experiments on two public data sets show that our approach effectively leads to a better trade-off between fairness and recommendation utility compared with state-of-the-art mitigation procedures. We further analyze the characteristics of added edges to highlight key unfairness patterns. Source code available at https://github.com/jackmedda/RS-BGExplainer/tree/cikm2023. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: Accepted as a short paper at CIKM 2023

(Un)fair Exposure in Deep Face Rankings at a Distance

Authors: Andrea Atzori, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Law enforcement regularly faces the challenge of ranking suspects from their facial images. Deep face models aid this process but frequently introduce biases that disproportionately affect certain demographic segments. While bias investigation is common in domains like job candidate ranking, the field of forensic face rankings remains underexplored. In this paper, we propose a novel experimental f… ▽ More Law enforcement regularly faces the challenge of ranking suspects from their facial images. Deep face models aid this process but frequently introduce biases that disproportionately affect certain demographic segments. While bias investigation is common in domains like job candidate ranking, the field of forensic face rankings remains underexplored. In this paper, we propose a novel experimental framework, encompassing six state-of-the-art face encoders and two public data sets, designed to scrutinize the extent to which demographic groups suffer from biases in exposure in the context of forensic face rankings. Through comprehensive experiments that cover both re-identification and identification tasks, we show that exposure biases within this domain are far from being countered, demanding attention towards establishing ad-hoc policies and corrective measures. The source code is available at https://github.com/atzoriandrea/ijcb2023-unfair-face-rankings △ Less

Submitted 22 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper at IJCB 2023 Special Session "Long-Range Biometrics Challenges": 2023 International Joint Conference on Biometrics

A sensemaking system for grou** and suggesting stories from multiple affective viewpoints in museums

Authors: Antonio Lieto, Manuel Striani, Cristina Gena, Enrico Dolza, Anna Maria Marras, Gian Luca Pozzato, Rossana Damiano

Abstract: This article presents an affective based sensemaking system for grou** and suggesting stories created by the users about the items of a museum. By relying on the TCL commonsense reasoning framework1, the system exploits the spatial structure of the Plutchik's wheel of emotions to organize the stories according to their extracted emotions. The process of emotion extraction, reasoning and suggesti… ▽ More This article presents an affective based sensemaking system for grou** and suggesting stories created by the users about the items of a museum. By relying on the TCL commonsense reasoning framework1, the system exploits the spatial structure of the Plutchik's wheel of emotions to organize the stories according to their extracted emotions. The process of emotion extraction, reasoning and suggestion is triggered by an app, called GAMGame, and integrated with the sensemaking engine. Following the framework of Citizen Curation, the system allows classifying and suggesting stories encompassing cultural items able to evoke not only the very same emotions of already experienced or preferred museum objects, but also novel items sharing different emotional stances and, therefore, able to break the filter bubble effect and open the users' view towards more inclusive and empathy-based interpretations of cultural content. The system has been designed tested, in the context of the H2020EU SPICE project (Social cohesion, Participation, and Inclusion through Cultural Engagement), in cooperation the community of the d/Deaf and on the collection of the Gallery of Modern Art (GAM) in Turin. We describe the user centered design process of the web app and of its components and we report the results concerning the effectiveness of the of the diversity seeking, affective driven, recommendations of stories. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: 49 pages

GNNUERS: Fairness Explanation in GNNs for Recommendation via Counterfactual Reasoning

Authors: Giacomo Medda, Francesco Fabbri, Mirko Marras, Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu

Abstract: Nowadays, research into personalization has been focusing on explainability and fairness. Several approaches proposed in recent works are able to explain individual recommendations in a post-hoc manner or by explanation paths. However, explainability techniques applied to unfairness in recommendation have been limited to finding user/item features mostly related to biased recommendations. In this… ▽ More Nowadays, research into personalization has been focusing on explainability and fairness. Several approaches proposed in recent works are able to explain individual recommendations in a post-hoc manner or by explanation paths. However, explainability techniques applied to unfairness in recommendation have been limited to finding user/item features mostly related to biased recommendations. In this paper, we devised a novel algorithm that leverages counterfactuality methods to discover user unfairness explanations in the form of user-item interactions. In our counterfactual framework, interactions are represented as edges in a bipartite graph, with users and items as nodes. Our bipartite graph explainer perturbs the topological structure to find an altered version that minimizes the disparity in utility between the protected and unprotected demographic groups. Experiments on four real-world graphs coming from various domains showed that our method can systematically explain user unfairness on three state-of-the-art GNN-based recommendation models. Moreover, an empirical evaluation of the perturbed network uncovered relevant patterns that justify the nature of the unfairness discovered by the generated explanations. The source code and the preprocessed data sets are available at https://github.com/jackmedda/RS-BGExplainer. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2024; v1 submitted 12 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Knowledge is Power, Understanding is Impact: Utility and Beyond Goals, Explanation Quality, and Fairness in Path Reasoning Recommendation

Authors: Giacomo Balloccu, Ludovico Boratto, Christian Cancedda, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Path reasoning is a notable recommendation approach that models high-order user-product relations, based on a Knowledge Graph (KG). This approach can extract reasoning paths between recommended products and already experienced products and, then, turn such paths into textual explanations for the user. Unfortunately, evaluation protocols in this field appear heterogeneous and limited, making it har… ▽ More Path reasoning is a notable recommendation approach that models high-order user-product relations, based on a Knowledge Graph (KG). This approach can extract reasoning paths between recommended products and already experienced products and, then, turn such paths into textual explanations for the user. Unfortunately, evaluation protocols in this field appear heterogeneous and limited, making it hard to contextualize the impact of the existing methods. In this paper, we replicated three state-of-the-art relevant path reasoning recommendation methods proposed in top-tier conferences. Under a common evaluation protocol, based on two public data sets and in comparison with other knowledge-aware methods, we then studied the extent to which they meet recommendation utility and beyond objectives, explanation quality, and consumer and provider fairness. Our study provides a picture of the progress in this field, highlighting open issues and future directions. Source code: \url{https://github.com/giacoballoccu/rep-path-reasoning-recsys}. △ Less

Submitted 14 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: Accepted at the 45th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2023)

Protected Attributes Tell Us Who, Behavior Tells Us How: A Comparison of Demographic and Behavioral Oversampling for Fair Student Success Modeling

Authors: Jade Maï Cock, Muhammad Bilal, Richard Davis, Mirko Marras, Tanja Käser

Abstract: Algorithms deployed in education can shape the learning experience and success of a student. It is therefore important to understand whether and how such algorithms might create inequalities or amplify existing biases. In this paper, we analyze the fairness of models which use behavioral data to identify at-risk students and suggest two novel pre-processing approaches for bias mitigation. Based on… ▽ More Algorithms deployed in education can shape the learning experience and success of a student. It is therefore important to understand whether and how such algorithms might create inequalities or amplify existing biases. In this paper, we analyze the fairness of models which use behavioral data to identify at-risk students and suggest two novel pre-processing approaches for bias mitigation. Based on the concept of intersectionality, the first approach involves intelligent oversampling on combinations of demographic attributes. The second approach does not require any knowledge of demographic attributes and is based on the assumption that such attributes are a (noisy) proxy for student behavior. We hence propose to directly oversample different types of behaviors identified in a cluster analysis. We evaluate our approaches on data from (i) an open-ended learning environment and (ii) a flipped classroom course. Our results show that both approaches can mitigate model bias. Directly oversampling on behavior is a valuable alternative, when demographic metadata is not available. Source code and extended results are provided in https://github.com/epfl-ml4ed/behavioral-oversampling}{https://github.com/epfl-ml4ed/behavioral-oversampling . △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper at LAK 2023: The 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 13-17 of March 2023, Arlington

Trusting the Explainers: Teacher Validation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Course Design

Authors: Vinitra Swamy, Sijia Du, Mirko Marras, Tanja Käser

Abstract: Deep learning models for learning analytics have become increasingly popular over the last few years; however, these approaches are still not widely adopted in real-world settings, likely due to a lack of trust and transparency. In this paper, we tackle this issue by implementing explainable AI methods for black-box neural networks. This work focuses on the context of online and blended learning a… ▽ More Deep learning models for learning analytics have become increasingly popular over the last few years; however, these approaches are still not widely adopted in real-world settings, likely due to a lack of trust and transparency. In this paper, we tackle this issue by implementing explainable AI methods for black-box neural networks. This work focuses on the context of online and blended learning and the use case of student success prediction models. We use a pairwise study design, enabling us to investigate controlled differences between pairs of courses. Our analyses cover five course pairs that differ in one educationally relevant aspect and two popular instance-based explainable AI methods (LIME and SHAP). We quantitatively compare the distances between the explanations across courses and methods. We then validate the explanations of LIME and SHAP with 26 semi-structured interviews of university-level educators regarding which features they believe contribute most to student success, which explanations they trust most, and how they could transform these insights into actionable course design decisions. Our results show that quantitatively, explainers significantly disagree with each other about what is important, and qualitatively, experts themselves do not agree on which explanations are most trustworthy. All code, extended results, and the interview protocol are provided at https://github.com/epfl-ml4ed/trusting-explainers. △ Less

Submitted 6 March, 2023; v1 submitted 17 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper (Best Paper nominee) at LAK 2023: The 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, March 13-17, 2023, Arlington, Texas, USA

Do Not Trust a Model Because It is Confident: Uncovering and Characterizing Unknown Unknowns to Student Success Predictors in Online-Based Learning

Authors: Roberta Galici, Tanja Käser, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Student success models might be prone to develop weak spots, i.e., examples hard to accurately classify due to insufficient representation during model creation. This weakness is one of the main factors undermining users' trust, since model predictions could for instance lead an instructor to not intervene on a student in need. In this paper, we unveil the need of detecting and characterizing unkn… ▽ More Student success models might be prone to develop weak spots, i.e., examples hard to accurately classify due to insufficient representation during model creation. This weakness is one of the main factors undermining users' trust, since model predictions could for instance lead an instructor to not intervene on a student in need. In this paper, we unveil the need of detecting and characterizing unknown unknowns in student success prediction in order to better understand when models may fail. Unknown unknowns include the students for which the model is highly confident in its predictions, but is actually wrong. Therefore, we cannot solely rely on the model's confidence when evaluating the predictions quality. We first introduce a framework for the identification and characterization of unknown unknowns. We then assess its informativeness on log data collected from flipped courses and online courses using quantitative analyses and interviews with instructors. Our results show that unknown unknowns are a critical issue in this domain and that our framework can be applied to support their detection. The source code is available at https://github.com/epfl-ml4ed/unknown-unknowns. △ Less

Submitted 16 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper at the International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK23)

RIPPLE: Concept-Based Interpretation for Raw Time Series Models in Education

Authors: Mohammad Asadi, Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Julien Vignoud, Mirko Marras, Tanja Käser

Abstract: Time series is the most prevalent form of input data for educational prediction tasks. The vast majority of research using time series data focuses on hand-crafted features, designed by experts for predictive performance and interpretability. However, extracting these features is labor-intensive for humans and computers. In this paper, we propose an approach that utilizes irregular multivariate ti… ▽ More Time series is the most prevalent form of input data for educational prediction tasks. The vast majority of research using time series data focuses on hand-crafted features, designed by experts for predictive performance and interpretability. However, extracting these features is labor-intensive for humans and computers. In this paper, we propose an approach that utilizes irregular multivariate time series modeling with graph neural networks to achieve comparable or better accuracy with raw time series clickstreams in comparison to hand-crafted features. Furthermore, we extend concept activation vectors for interpretability in raw time series models. We analyze these advances in the education domain, addressing the task of early student performance prediction for downstream targeted interventions and instructional support. Our experimental analysis on 23 MOOCs with millions of combined interactions over six behavioral dimensions show that models designed with our approach can (i) beat state-of-the-art educational time series baselines with no feature extraction and (ii) provide interpretable insights for personalized interventions. Source code: https://github.com/epfl-ml4ed/ripple/. △ Less

Submitted 28 February, 2023; v1 submitted 2 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper at AAAI 2023: 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EAAI: AI for Education Special Track), 7-14 of February 2023, Washington DC, USA

The More Secure, The Less Equally Usable: Gender and Ethnicity (Un)fairness of Deep Face Recognition along Security Thresholds

Authors: Andrea Atzori, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Face biometrics are playing a key role in making modern smart city applications more secure and usable. Commonly, the recognition threshold of a face recognition system is adjusted based on the degree of security for the considered use case. The likelihood of a match can be for instance decreased by setting a high threshold in case of a payment transaction verification. Prior work in face recognit… ▽ More Face biometrics are playing a key role in making modern smart city applications more secure and usable. Commonly, the recognition threshold of a face recognition system is adjusted based on the degree of security for the considered use case. The likelihood of a match can be for instance decreased by setting a high threshold in case of a payment transaction verification. Prior work in face recognition has unfortunately showed that error rates are usually higher for certain demographic groups. These disparities have hence brought into question the fairness of systems empowered with face biometrics. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which disparities among demographic groups change under different security levels. Our analysis includes ten face recognition models, three security thresholds, and six demographic groups based on gender and ethnicity. Experiments show that the higher the security of the system is, the higher the disparities in usability among demographic groups are. Compelling unfairness issues hence exist and urge countermeasures in real-world high-stakes environments requiring severe security levels. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper at the 2nd International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Methods for Smart Cities (AISC 2022)

Reinforcement Recommendation Reasoning through Knowledge Graphs for Explanation Path Quality

Authors: Giacomo Balloccu, Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Numerous Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are being created to make Recommender Systems (RSs) not only intelligent but also knowledgeable. Integrating a KG in the recommendation process allows the underlying model to extract reasoning paths between recommended products and already experienced products from the KG. These paths can be leveraged to generate textual explanations to be provided to the user for a… ▽ More Numerous Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are being created to make Recommender Systems (RSs) not only intelligent but also knowledgeable. Integrating a KG in the recommendation process allows the underlying model to extract reasoning paths between recommended products and already experienced products from the KG. These paths can be leveraged to generate textual explanations to be provided to the user for a given recommendation. However, the existing explainable recommendation approaches based on KG merely optimize the selected reasoning paths for product relevance, without considering any user-level property of the paths for explanation. In this paper, we propose a series of quantitative properties that monitor the quality of the reasoning paths from an explanation perspective, based on recency, popularity, and diversity. We then combine in- and post-processing approaches to optimize for both recommendation quality and reasoning path quality. Experiments on three public data sets show that our approaches significantly increase reasoning path quality according to the proposed properties, while preserving recommendation quality. Source code, data sets, and KGs are available at https://tinyurl.com/bdbfzr4n. △ Less

Submitted 10 November, 2022; v1 submitted 11 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: Accepted for publication in Knowledge-Based Systems (Elsevier)

Explaining Bias in Deep Face Recognition via Image Characteristics

Authors: Andrea Atzori, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel explanatory framework aimed to provide a better understanding of how face recognition models perform as the underlying data characteristics (protected attributes: gender, ethnicity, age; non-protected attributes: facial hair, makeup, accessories, face orientation and occlusion, image distortion, emotions) on which they are tested change. With our framework, we eva… ▽ More In this paper, we propose a novel explanatory framework aimed to provide a better understanding of how face recognition models perform as the underlying data characteristics (protected attributes: gender, ethnicity, age; non-protected attributes: facial hair, makeup, accessories, face orientation and occlusion, image distortion, emotions) on which they are tested change. With our framework, we evaluate ten state-of-the-art face recognition models, comparing their fairness in terms of security and usability on two data sets, involving six groups based on gender and ethnicity. We then analyze the impact of image characteristics on models performance. Our results show that trends appearing in a single-attribute analysis disappear or reverse when multi-attribute groups are considered, and that performance disparities are also related to non-protected attributes. Source code: https://cutt.ly/2XwRLiA. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper at IJCB 2022: 2022 International Joint Conference on Biometrics

Experts' View on Challenges and Needs for Fairness in Artificial Intelligence for Education

Authors: Gianni Fenu, Roberta Galici, Mirko Marras

Abstract: In recent years, there has been a stimulating discussion on how artificial intelligence (AI) can support the science and engineering of intelligent educational applications. Many studies in the field are proposing actionable data mining pipelines and machine-learning models driven by learning-related data. The potential of these pipelines and models to amplify unfairness for certain categories of… ▽ More In recent years, there has been a stimulating discussion on how artificial intelligence (AI) can support the science and engineering of intelligent educational applications. Many studies in the field are proposing actionable data mining pipelines and machine-learning models driven by learning-related data. The potential of these pipelines and models to amplify unfairness for certain categories of students is however receiving increasing attention. If AI applications are to have a positive impact on education, it is crucial that their design considers fairness at every step. Through anonymous surveys and interviews with experts (researchers and practitioners) who have published their research at top-tier educational conferences in the last year, we conducted the first expert-driven systematic investigation on the challenges and needs for addressing fairness throughout the development of educational systems based on AI. We identified common and diverging views about the challenges and the needs faced by educational technologies experts in practice, that lead the community to have a clear understanding on the main questions raising doubts in this topic. Based on these findings, we highlighted directions that will facilitate the ongoing research towards fairer AI for education. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper at AIED 2022: The 23rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education

Generalisable Methods for Early Prediction in Interactive Simulations for Education

Authors: Jade Maï Cock, Mirko Marras, Christian Giang, Tanja Käser

Abstract: Interactive simulations allow students to discover the underlying principles of a scientific phenomenon through their own exploration. Unfortunately, students often struggle to learn effectively in these environments. Classifying students' interaction data in the simulations based on their expected performance has the potential to enable adaptive guidance and consequently improve students' learnin… ▽ More Interactive simulations allow students to discover the underlying principles of a scientific phenomenon through their own exploration. Unfortunately, students often struggle to learn effectively in these environments. Classifying students' interaction data in the simulations based on their expected performance has the potential to enable adaptive guidance and consequently improve students' learning. Previous research in this field has mainly focused on a-posteriori analyses or investigations limited to one specific predictive model and simulation. In this paper, we investigate the quality and generalisability of models for an early prediction of conceptual understanding based on clickstream data of students across interactive simulations. We first measure the students' conceptual understanding through their in-task performance. Then, we suggest a novel type of features that, starting from clickstream data, encodes both the state of the simulation and the action performed by the student. We finally propose to feed these features into GRU-based models, with and without attention, for prediction. Experiments on two different simulations and with two different populations show that our proposed models outperform shallow learning baselines and better generalise to different learning environments and populations. The inclusion of attention into the model increases interpretability in terms of effective inquiry. The source code is available on Github (https://github.com/epfl-ml4ed/beerslaw-lab.git). △ Less

Submitted 4 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper at EDM 2022: The 15th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 24 -27 of July 2022, Durham

Evaluating the Explainers: Black-Box Explainable Machine Learning for Student Success Prediction in MOOCs

Authors: Vinitra Swamy, Bahar Radmehr, Natasa Krco, Mirko Marras, Tanja Käser

Abstract: Neural networks are ubiquitous in applied machine learning for education. Their pervasive success in predictive performance comes alongside a severe weakness, the lack of explainability of their decisions, especially relevant in human-centric fields. We implement five state-of-the-art methodologies for explaining black-box machine learning models (LIME, PermutationSHAP, KernelSHAP, DiCE, CEM) and… ▽ More Neural networks are ubiquitous in applied machine learning for education. Their pervasive success in predictive performance comes alongside a severe weakness, the lack of explainability of their decisions, especially relevant in human-centric fields. We implement five state-of-the-art methodologies for explaining black-box machine learning models (LIME, PermutationSHAP, KernelSHAP, DiCE, CEM) and examine the strengths of each approach on the downstream task of student performance prediction for five massive open online courses. Our experiments demonstrate that the families of explainers do not agree with each other on feature importance for the same Bidirectional LSTM models with the same representative set of students. We use Principal Component Analysis, Jensen-Shannon distance, and Spearman's rank-order correlation to quantitatively cross-examine explanations across methods and courses. Furthermore, we validate explainer performance across curriculum-based prerequisite relationships. Our results come to the concerning conclusion that the choice of explainer is an important decision and is in fact paramount to the interpretation of the predictive results, even more so than the course the model is trained on. Source code and models are released at http://github.com/epfl-ml4ed/evaluating-explainers. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Accepted as a full paper at EDM 2022: The 15th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 24-27 of July 2022, Durham

Meta Transfer Learning for Early Success Prediction in MOOCs

Authors: Vinitra Swamy, Mirko Marras, Tanja Käser

Abstract: Despite the increasing popularity of massive open online courses (MOOCs), many suffer from high dropout and low success rates. Early prediction of student success for targeted intervention is therefore essential to ensure no student is left behind in a course. There exists a large body of research in success prediction for MOOCs, focusing mainly on training models from scratch for individual cours… ▽ More Despite the increasing popularity of massive open online courses (MOOCs), many suffer from high dropout and low success rates. Early prediction of student success for targeted intervention is therefore essential to ensure no student is left behind in a course. There exists a large body of research in success prediction for MOOCs, focusing mainly on training models from scratch for individual courses. This setting is impractical in early success prediction as the performance of a student is only known at the end of the course. In this paper, we aim to create early success prediction models that can be transferred between MOOCs from different domains and topics. To do so, we present three novel strategies for transfer: 1) pre-training a model on a large set of diverse courses, 2) leveraging the pre-trained model by including meta information about courses, and 3) fine-tuning the model on previous course iterations. Our experiments on 26 MOOCs with over 145,000 combined enrollments and millions of interactions show that models combining interaction data and course information have comparable or better performance than models which have access to previous iterations of the course. With these models, we aim to effectively enable educators to warm-start their predictions for new and ongoing courses. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: Accepted at the 2022 ACM Conference on Learning at Scale (L@S 2022)

Dictionary Attacks on Speaker Verification

Authors: Mirko Marras, Pawel Korus, Anubhav Jain, Nasir Memon

Abstract: In this paper, we propose dictionary attacks against speaker verification - a novel attack vector that aims to match a large fraction of speaker population by chance. We introduce a generic formulation of the attack that can be used with various speech representations and threat models. The attacker uses adversarial optimization to maximize raw similarity of speaker embeddings between a seed speec… ▽ More In this paper, we propose dictionary attacks against speaker verification - a novel attack vector that aims to match a large fraction of speaker population by chance. We introduce a generic formulation of the attack that can be used with various speech representations and threat models. The attacker uses adversarial optimization to maximize raw similarity of speaker embeddings between a seed speech sample and a proxy population. The resulting master voice successfully matches a non-trivial fraction of people in an unknown population. Adversarial waveforms obtained with our approach can match on average 69% of females and 38% of males enrolled in the target system at a strict decision threshold calibrated to yield false alarm rate of 1%. By using the attack with a black-box voice cloning system, we obtain master voices that are effective in the most challenging conditions and transferable between speaker encoders. We also show that, combined with multiple attempts, this attack opens even more to serious issues on the security of these systems. △ Less

Submitted 12 December, 2022; v1 submitted 24 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: Accepted in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Regulating Group Exposure for Item Providers in Recommendation

Authors: Mirko Marras, Ludovico Boratto, Guilherme Ramos, Gianni Fenu

Abstract: Engaging all content providers, including newcomers or minority demographic groups, is crucial for online platforms to keep growing and working. Hence, while building recommendation services, the interests of those providers should be valued. In this paper, we consider providers as grouped based on a common characteristic in settings in which certain provider groups have low representation of item… ▽ More Engaging all content providers, including newcomers or minority demographic groups, is crucial for online platforms to keep growing and working. Hence, while building recommendation services, the interests of those providers should be valued. In this paper, we consider providers as grouped based on a common characteristic in settings in which certain provider groups have low representation of items in the catalog and, thus, in the user interactions. Then, we envision a scenario wherein platform owners seek to control the degree of exposure to such groups in the recommendation process. To support this scenario, we rely on disparate exposure measures that characterize the gap between the share of recommendations given to groups and the target level of exposure pursued by the platform owners. We then propose a re-ranking procedure that ensures desired levels of exposure are met. Experiments show that, while supporting certain groups of providers by rendering them with the target exposure, beyond-accuracy objectives experience significant gains with negligible impact in recommendation utility. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: Accepted at the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR 2022)

Post Processing Recommender Systems with Knowledge Graphs for Recency, Popularity, and Diversity of Explanations

Authors: Giacomo Balloccu, Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Existing explainable recommender systems have mainly modeled relationships between recommended and already experienced products, and shaped explanation types accordingly (e.g., movie "x" starred by actress "y" recommended to a user because that user watched other movies with "y" as an actress). However, none of these systems has investigated the extent to which properties of a single explanation (… ▽ More Existing explainable recommender systems have mainly modeled relationships between recommended and already experienced products, and shaped explanation types accordingly (e.g., movie "x" starred by actress "y" recommended to a user because that user watched other movies with "y" as an actress). However, none of these systems has investigated the extent to which properties of a single explanation (e.g., the recency of interaction with that actress) and of a group of explanations for a recommended list (e.g., the diversity of the explanation types) can influence the perceived explaination quality. In this paper, we conceptualized three novel properties that model the quality of the explanations (linking interaction recency, shared entity popularity, and explanation type diversity) and proposed re-ranking approaches able to optimize for these properties. Experiments on two public data sets showed that our approaches can increase explanation quality according to the proposed properties, fairly across demographic groups, while preserving recommendation utility. The source code and data are available at https://github.com/giacoballoccu/explanation-quality-recsys. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: Accepted at the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR 2022)

Robust Reputation Independence in Ranking Systems for Multiple Sensitive Attributes

Authors: Guilherme Ramos, Ludovico Boratto, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Ranking systems have an unprecedented influence on how and what information people access, and their impact on our society is being analyzed from different perspectives, such as users' discrimination. A notable example is represented by reputation-based ranking systems, a class of systems that rely on users' reputation to generate a non-personalized item-ranking, proved to be biased against certai… ▽ More Ranking systems have an unprecedented influence on how and what information people access, and their impact on our society is being analyzed from different perspectives, such as users' discrimination. A notable example is represented by reputation-based ranking systems, a class of systems that rely on users' reputation to generate a non-personalized item-ranking, proved to be biased against certain demographic classes. To safeguard that a given sensitive user's attribute does not systematically affect the reputation of that user, prior work has operationalized a reputation independence constraint on this class of systems. In this paper, we uncover that guaranteeing reputation independence for a single sensitive attribute is not enough. When mitigating biases based on one sensitive attribute (e.g., gender), the final ranking might still be biased against certain demographic groups formed based on another attribute (e.g., age). Hence, we propose a novel approach to introduce reputation independence for multiple sensitive attributes simultaneously. We then analyze the extent to which our approach impacts on discrimination and other important properties of the ranking system, such as its quality and robustness against attacks. Experiments on two real-world datasets show that our approach leads to less biased rankings with respect to multiple users' sensitive attributes, without affecting the system's quality and robustness. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: Accepted in the Machine Learning journal

Consumer Fairness in Recommender Systems: Contextualizing Definitions and Mitigations

Authors: Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras, Giacomo Medda

Abstract: Enabling non-discrimination for end-users of recommender systems by introducing consumer fairness is a key problem, widely studied in both academia and industry. Current research has led to a variety of notions, metrics, and unfairness mitigation procedures. The evaluation of each procedure has been heterogeneous and limited to a mere comparison with models not accounting for fairness. It is hence… ▽ More Enabling non-discrimination for end-users of recommender systems by introducing consumer fairness is a key problem, widely studied in both academia and industry. Current research has led to a variety of notions, metrics, and unfairness mitigation procedures. The evaluation of each procedure has been heterogeneous and limited to a mere comparison with models not accounting for fairness. It is hence hard to contextualize the impact of each mitigation procedure w.r.t. the others. In this paper, we conduct a systematic analysis of mitigation procedures against consumer unfairness in rating prediction and top-n recommendation tasks. To this end, we collected 15 procedures proposed in recent top-tier conferences and journals. Only 8 of them could be reproduced. Under a common evaluation protocol, based on two public data sets, we then studied the extent to which recommendation utility and consumer fairness are impacted by these procedures, the interplay between two primary fairness notions based on equity and independence, and the demographic groups harmed by the disparate impact. Our study finally highlights open challenges and future directions in this field. The source code is available at https://github.com/jackmedda/C-Fairness-RecSys. △ Less

Submitted 5 February, 2022; v1 submitted 21 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: Accepted at the 44th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2022)

Improving Fairness in Speaker Recognition

Authors: Gianni Fenu, Giacomo Medda, Mirko Marras, Giacomo Meloni

Abstract: The human voice conveys unique characteristics of an individual, making voice biometrics a key technology for verifying identities in various industries. Despite the impressive progress of speaker recognition systems in terms of accuracy, a number of ethical and legal concerns has been raised, specifically relating to the fairness of such systems. In this paper, we aim to explore the disparity in… ▽ More The human voice conveys unique characteristics of an individual, making voice biometrics a key technology for verifying identities in various industries. Despite the impressive progress of speaker recognition systems in terms of accuracy, a number of ethical and legal concerns has been raised, specifically relating to the fairness of such systems. In this paper, we aim to explore the disparity in performance achieved by state-of-the-art deep speaker recognition systems, when different groups of individuals characterized by a common sensitive attribute (e.g., gender) are considered. In order to mitigate the unfairness we uncovered by means of an exploratory study, we investigate whether balancing the representation of the different groups of individuals in the training set can lead to a more equal treatment of these demographic groups. Experiments on two state-of-the-art neural architectures and a large-scale public dataset show that models trained with demographically-balanced training sets exhibit a fairer behavior on different groups, while still being accurate. Our study is expected to provide a solid basis for instilling beyond-accuracy objectives (e.g., fairness) in speaker recognition. △ Less

Submitted 30 April, 2021; v1 submitted 28 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Accepted at the 2020 European Symposium on Software Engineering (ESSE 2020)

Equality of Learning Opportunity via Individual Fairness in Personalized Recommendations

Authors: Mirko Marras, Ludovico Boratto, Guilherme Ramos, Gianni Fenu

Abstract: Online educational platforms are playing a primary role in mediating the success of individuals' careers. Therefore, while building overlying content recommendation services, it becomes essential to guarantee that learners are provided with equal recommended learning opportunities, according to the platform values, context, and pedagogy. Though the importance of ensuring equality of learning oppor… ▽ More Online educational platforms are playing a primary role in mediating the success of individuals' careers. Therefore, while building overlying content recommendation services, it becomes essential to guarantee that learners are provided with equal recommended learning opportunities, according to the platform values, context, and pedagogy. Though the importance of ensuring equality of learning opportunities has been well investigated in traditional institutions, how this equality can be operationalized in online learning ecosystems through recommender systems is still under-explored. In this paper, we formalize educational principles that model recommendations' learning properties, and a novel fairness metric that combines them in order to monitor the equality of recommended learning opportunities among learners. Then, we envision a scenario wherein an educational platform should be arranged in such a way that the generated recommendations meet each principle to a certain degree for all learners, constrained to their individual preferences. Under this view, we explore the learning opportunities provided by recommender systems in a large-scale course platform, uncovering systematic inequalities. To reduce this effect, we propose a novel post-processing approach that balances personalization and equality of recommended opportunities. Experiments show that our approach leads to higher equality, with a negligible loss in personalization. Our study moves a step forward in operationalizing the ethics of human learning in recommendations, a core unit of intelligent educational systems. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2020; v1 submitted 7 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Interplay between Upsampling and Regularization for Provider Fairness in Recommender Systems

Authors: Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Considering the impact of recommendations on item providers is one of the duties of multi-sided recommender systems. Item providers are key stakeholders in online platforms, and their earnings and plans are influenced by the exposure their items receive in recommended lists. Prior work showed that certain minority groups of providers, characterized by a common sensitive attribute (e.g., gender or… ▽ More Considering the impact of recommendations on item providers is one of the duties of multi-sided recommender systems. Item providers are key stakeholders in online platforms, and their earnings and plans are influenced by the exposure their items receive in recommended lists. Prior work showed that certain minority groups of providers, characterized by a common sensitive attribute (e.g., gender or race), are being disproportionately affected by indirect and unintentional discrimination. Our study in this paper handles a situation where ($i$) the same provider is associated with multiple items of a list suggested to a user, ($ii$) an item is created by more than one provider jointly, and ($iii$) predicted user-item relevance scores are biasedly estimated for items of provider groups. Under this scenario, we assess disparities in relevance, visibility, and exposure, by simulating diverse representations of the minority group in the catalog and the interactions. Based on emerged unfair outcomes, we devise a treatment that combines observation upsampling and loss regularization, while learning user-item relevance scores. Experiments on real-world data demonstrate that our treatment leads to lower disparate relevance. The resulting recommended lists show fairer visibility and exposure, higher minority item coverage, and negligible loss in recommendation utility. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2021; v1 submitted 7 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: Accepted in User Model User-Adap Inter

Journal ref: User Model User-Adap Inter. (2021)

Connecting User and Item Perspectives in Popularity Debiasing for Collaborative Recommendation

Authors: Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu, Mirko Marras

Abstract: Recommender systems learn from historical users' feedback that is often non-uniformly distributed across items. As a consequence, these systems may end up suggesting popular items more than niche items progressively, even when the latter would be of interest for users. This can hamper several core qualities of the recommended lists (e.g., novelty, coverage, diversity), impacting on the future succ… ▽ More Recommender systems learn from historical users' feedback that is often non-uniformly distributed across items. As a consequence, these systems may end up suggesting popular items more than niche items progressively, even when the latter would be of interest for users. This can hamper several core qualities of the recommended lists (e.g., novelty, coverage, diversity), impacting on the future success of the underlying platform itself. In this paper, we formalize two novel metrics that quantify how much a recommender system equally treats items along the popularity tail. The first one encourages equal probability of being recommended across items, while the second one encourages true positive rates for items to be equal. We characterize the recommendations of representative algorithms by means of the proposed metrics, and we show that the item probability of being recommended and the item true positive rate are biased against the item popularity. To promote a more equal treatment of items along the popularity tail, we propose an in-processing approach aimed at minimizing the biased correlation between user-item relevance and item popularity. Extensive experiments show that, with small losses in accuracy, our popularity-mitigation approach leads to important gains in beyond-accuracy recommendation quality. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2020; v1 submitted 7 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: Accepted in Information Processing & Management, 58(1), 102387

Journal ref: Information Processing & Management, 58(1), 102387 (2021)

ECIR 2020 Workshops: Assessing the Impact of Going Online

Authors: Sérgio Nunes, Suzanne Little, Sumit Bhatia, Ludovico Boratto, Guillaume Cabanac, Ricardo Campos, Francisco M. Couto, Stefano Faralli, Ingo Frommholz, Adam Jatowt, Alípio Jorge, Mirko Marras, Philipp Mayr, Giovanni Stilo

Abstract: ECIR 2020 https://ecir2020.org/ was one of the many conferences affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Conference Chairs decided to keep the initially planned dates (April 14-17, 2020) and move to a fully online event. In this report, we describe the experience of organizing the ECIR 2020 Workshops in this scenario from two perspectives: the workshop organizers and the workshop participants. We pr… ▽ More ECIR 2020 https://ecir2020.org/ was one of the many conferences affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Conference Chairs decided to keep the initially planned dates (April 14-17, 2020) and move to a fully online event. In this report, we describe the experience of organizing the ECIR 2020 Workshops in this scenario from two perspectives: the workshop organizers and the workshop participants. We provide a report on the organizational aspect of these events and the consequences for participants. Covering the scientific dimension of each workshop is outside the scope of this article. △ Less

Submitted 14 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures, submitted to ACM SIGIR Forum