Showing 1–16 of 16 results for author: Marcelino, S

Axiomatizing the Logic of Ordinary Discourse

Authors: Vitor Greati, Sérgio Marcelino, Umberto Rivieccio

Abstract: Most non-classical logics are subclassical, that is, every inference/theorem they validate is also valid classically. A notable exception is the three-valued propositional Logic of Ordinary Discourse (OL) proposed and extensively motivated by W. S. Cooper as a more adequate candidate for formalizing everyday reasoning (in English). OL challenges classical logic not only by rejecting some theses, b… ▽ More Most non-classical logics are subclassical, that is, every inference/theorem they validate is also valid classically. A notable exception is the three-valued propositional Logic of Ordinary Discourse (OL) proposed and extensively motivated by W. S. Cooper as a more adequate candidate for formalizing everyday reasoning (in English). OL challenges classical logic not only by rejecting some theses, but also by accepting non-classically valid principles, such as so-called Aristotle's and Boethius' theses. Formally, OL shows a number of unusual features - it is non-structural, connexive, paraconsistent and contradictory - making it all the more interesting for the mathematical logician. We present our recent findings on OL and its structural companion (that we call sOL). We introduce Hilbert-style multiple-conclusion calculi for OL and sOL that are both modular and analytic, and easily allow us to obtain single-conclusion axiomatizations. We prove that sOL is algebraizable and single out its equivalent semantics, which turns out to be a discriminator variety generated by a three-element algebra. Having observed that sOL can express the connectives of other three-valued logics, we prove that it is definitionally equivalent to an expansion of the three-valued logic J3 of D'Ottaviano and da Costa, itself an axiomatic extension of paraconsistent Nelson logic. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

MSC Class: 03B22 ACM Class: F.4.1

Generating proof systems for three-valued propositional logics

Authors: Vitor Greati, Giuseppe Greco, Sérgio Marcelino, Alessandra Palmigiano, Umberto Rivieccio

Abstract: In general, providing an axiomatization for an arbitrary logic is a task that may require some ingenuity. In the case of logics defined by a finite logical matrix (three-valued logics being a particularly simple example), the generation of suitable finite axiomatizations can be completely automatized, essentially by expressing the matrix tables via inference rules. In this chapter we illustrate ho… ▽ More In general, providing an axiomatization for an arbitrary logic is a task that may require some ingenuity. In the case of logics defined by a finite logical matrix (three-valued logics being a particularly simple example), the generation of suitable finite axiomatizations can be completely automatized, essentially by expressing the matrix tables via inference rules. In this chapter we illustrate how two formalisms, the 3-labelled calculi of Baaz, Fermüller and Zach and the multiple-conclusion (or Set-Set) Hilbert-style calculi of Shoesmith and Smiley, may be uniformly employed to axiomatize logics defined by a three-valued logical matrix. The generating procedure common to both formalisms can be described as follows: first (i) convert the matrix semantics into rule form (we refer to this step as the generating subprocedure) and then (ii) simplify the set of rules thus obtained, essentially relying on the defining properties of any Tarskian consequence relation (we refer to this step as the streamlining subprocedure). We illustrate through some examples that, if a minimal expressiveness assumption is met (namely, if the matrix defining the logic is monadic), then it is straightforward to define effective translations guaranteeing the equivalence between the 3-labelled and the Set-Set approach. △ Less

Submitted 6 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

MSC Class: 03B50 ACM Class: F.4.1

Finite Hilbert systems for Weak Kleene logics

Authors: Vitor Greati, Sérgio Marcelino, Umberto Rivieccio

Abstract: Multiple-conclusion Hilbert-style systems allow us to finitely axiomatize every logic defined by a finite matrix. Having obtained such axiomatizations for Paraconsistent Weak Kleene and Bochvar-Kleene logics, we modify them by replacing the multiple-conclusion rules with carefully selected single-conclusion ones. In this way we manage to introduce the first finite Hilbert-style single-conclusion a… ▽ More Multiple-conclusion Hilbert-style systems allow us to finitely axiomatize every logic defined by a finite matrix. Having obtained such axiomatizations for Paraconsistent Weak Kleene and Bochvar-Kleene logics, we modify them by replacing the multiple-conclusion rules with carefully selected single-conclusion ones. In this way we manage to introduce the first finite Hilbert-style single-conclusion axiomatizations for these logics. △ Less

Submitted 20 March, 2024; v1 submitted 6 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: Corrections on Def.2, Def.3 (PWK system) and Rem. 4

MSC Class: 03B22 ACM Class: F.4.1

Some more theorems on structural entailment relations and non-deterministic semantics

Authors: Carlos Caleiro, Sérgio Marcelino, Umberto Rivieccio

Abstract: We extend classical work by Janusz Czelakowski on the closure properties of the class of matrix models of entailment relations - nowadays more commonly called multiple-conclusion logics - to the setting of non-deterministic matrices (Nmatrices), characterizing the Nmatrix models of an arbitrary logic through a generalization of the standard class operators to the non-deterministic setting. We high… ▽ More We extend classical work by Janusz Czelakowski on the closure properties of the class of matrix models of entailment relations - nowadays more commonly called multiple-conclusion logics - to the setting of non-deterministic matrices (Nmatrices), characterizing the Nmatrix models of an arbitrary logic through a generalization of the standard class operators to the non-deterministic setting. We highlight the main differences that appear in this more general setting, in particular: the possibility to obtain Nmatrix quotients using any compatible equivalence relation (not necessarily a congruence); the problem of determining when strict homomorphisms preserve the logic of a given Nmatrix; the fact that the operations of taking images and preimages cannot be swapped, which determines the exact sequence of operators that generates, from any complete semantics, the class of all Nmatrix models of a logic. Many results, on the other hand, generalize smoothly to the non-deterministic setting: we show for instance that a logic is finitely based if and only if both the class of its Nmatrix models and its complement are closed under ultraproducts. We conclude by mentioning possible developments in adapting the Abstract Algebraic Logic approach to logics induced by Nmatrices and the associated equational reasoning over non-deterministic algebras. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Adding an Implication to Logics of Perfect Paradefinite Algebras

Authors: Vitor Greati, Sérgio Marcelino, João Marcos, Umberto Rivieccio

Abstract: Perfect paradefinite algebras are De Morgan algebras expanded with an operation that allows for the full behavior of classical negation to be restored. They form a variety that is term-equivalent to the variety of involutive Stone algebras. Their associated multiple-conclusion (Set-Set) and single-conclusion (Set-Fmla) order-preserving logics are non-algebraizable self-extensional logics of formal… ▽ More Perfect paradefinite algebras are De Morgan algebras expanded with an operation that allows for the full behavior of classical negation to be restored. They form a variety that is term-equivalent to the variety of involutive Stone algebras. Their associated multiple-conclusion (Set-Set) and single-conclusion (Set-Fmla) order-preserving logics are non-algebraizable self-extensional logics of formal inconsistency and undeterminedness determined by a six-valued matrix, studied in depth by Gomes et al. (2022) from both the algebraic and the proof-theoretical perspectives. In the present paper, we continue that study by investigating directions for conservatively expanding these logics with an implication connective (essentially, one that admits the deduction-detachment theorem). We first consider logics given by very simple and manageable non-deterministic semantics whose implication (in isolation) is classical. These, nevertheless, fail to be self-extensional. We then consider the implication realized by the relative pseudo-complement over the six-valued perfect paradefinite algebra. Our strategy is to expand the language of the latter algebra with this connective and study the (self-extensional) Set-Set and Set-Fmla order-preserving and top-assertional logics of the variety induced by the resulting algebra. We provide axiomatizations for such new variety and for such logics, drawing parallels with the class of symmetric Heyting algebras and with Moisil's 'symmetric modal logic'. For the Set-Set logic, in particular, the axiomatization we obtain is analytic. We close by studying interpolation properties for these logics and concluding that the new variety has the Maehara amalgamation property. △ Less

Submitted 6 April, 2024; v1 submitted 13 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: New version after a round of peer reviewing, no critical changes

MSC Class: 03G10 (Primary) 03C05; 03B50; 03B70; 03B53; 03B22; 03B35; 03C40 (Secondary) ACM Class: F.4.1

Monadicity of Non-deterministic Logical Matrices is Undecidable

Authors: Pedro Filipe, Carlos Caleiro, Sérgio Marcelino

Abstract: The notion of non-deterministic logical matrix (where connectives are interpreted as multi-functions) preserves many good properties of traditional semantics based on logical matrices (where connectives are interpreted as functions) whilst finitely characterizing a much wider class of logics, and has proven to be decisive in a myriad of recent compositional results in logic. Crucially, when a fini… ▽ More The notion of non-deterministic logical matrix (where connectives are interpreted as multi-functions) preserves many good properties of traditional semantics based on logical matrices (where connectives are interpreted as functions) whilst finitely characterizing a much wider class of logics, and has proven to be decisive in a myriad of recent compositional results in logic. Crucially, when a finite non-deterministic matrix satisfies monadicity (distinct truth-values can be separated by unary formulas) one can automatically produce an axiomatization of the induced logic. Furthermore, the resulting calculi are analytical and enable algorithmic proof-search and symbolic counter-model generation. For finite (deterministic) matrices it is well known that checking monadicity is decidable. We show that, in the presence of non-determinism, the property becomes undecidable. As a consequence, we conclude that there is no algorithm for computing the set of all multi-functions expressible in a given finite Nmatrix. The undecidability result is obtained by reduction from the halting problem for deterministic counter machines. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: In Proceedings NCL 2022, arXiv:2204.06359

Journal ref: EPTCS 358, 2022, pp. 55-67

Modular many-valued semantics for combined logics

Authors: Carlos Caleiro, Sérgio Marcelino

Abstract: We obtain, for the first time, a modular many-valued semantics for combined logics, which is built directly from many-valued semantics for the logics being combined, by means of suitable universal operations over partial non-deterministic logical matrices. Our constructions preserve finite-valuedness in the context of multiple-conclusion logics whereas, unsurprisingly, it may be lost in the contex… ▽ More We obtain, for the first time, a modular many-valued semantics for combined logics, which is built directly from many-valued semantics for the logics being combined, by means of suitable universal operations over partial non-deterministic logical matrices. Our constructions preserve finite-valuedness in the context of multiple-conclusion logics whereas, unsurprisingly, it may be lost in the context of single-conclusion logics. Besides illustrating our constructions over a wide range of examples, we also develop concrete applications of our semantic characterizations, namely regarding the semantics of strengthening a given many-valued logic with additional axioms, the study of conditions under which a given logic may be seen as a combination of simpler syntactically defined fragments whose calculi can be obtained independently and put together to form a calculus for the whole logic, and also general conditions for decidability to be preserved by the combination mechanism. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2023; v1 submitted 4 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: Accepted article for The Journal of Symbolic Logic on 2023-04-20

MSC Class: 03B62; 03B50

Journal ref: J. symb. log. 89 (2024) 583-636

Proof Search on Bilateralist Judgments over Non-deterministic Semantics

Authors: Vitor Greati, Sérgio Marcelino, João Marcos

Abstract: The bilateralist approach to logical consequence maintains that judgments of different qualities should be taken into account in determining what-follows-from-what. We argue that such an approach may be actualized by a two-dimensional notion of entailment induced by semantic structures that also accommodate non-deterministic and partial interpretations, and propose a proof-theoretical apparatus to… ▽ More The bilateralist approach to logical consequence maintains that judgments of different qualities should be taken into account in determining what-follows-from-what. We argue that such an approach may be actualized by a two-dimensional notion of entailment induced by semantic structures that also accommodate non-deterministic and partial interpretations, and propose a proof-theoretical apparatus to reason over bilateralist judgments using symmetrical two-dimensional analytical Hilbert-style calculi. We also provide a proof-search algorithm for finite analytic calculi that runs in at most exponential time, in general, and in polynomial time when only rules having at most one formula in the succedent are present in the concerned calculus. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

MSC Class: 03B50 (Primary); 03B22 (Primary); 03A05 (Primary); 03B35 (Primary); 03B25 ACM Class: F.4.1; I.1.2

On Logics of Perfect Paradefinite Algebras

Authors: Joel Gomes, Vitor Greati, Sérgio Marcelino, João Marcos, Umberto Rivieccio

Abstract: The present study shows how to enrich De Morgan algebras with a perfection operator that allows one to express the Boolean properties of negation-consistency and negation-determinedness. The variety of perfect paradefinite algebras thus obtained (PP-algebras) is shown to be term-equivalent to the variety of involutive Stone algebras, introduced by R. Cignoli and M. Sagastume, and more recently stu… ▽ More The present study shows how to enrich De Morgan algebras with a perfection operator that allows one to express the Boolean properties of negation-consistency and negation-determinedness. The variety of perfect paradefinite algebras thus obtained (PP-algebras) is shown to be term-equivalent to the variety of involutive Stone algebras, introduced by R. Cignoli and M. Sagastume, and more recently studied from a logical perspective by M. Figallo-L. Cantú and by S. Marcelino-U. Rivieccio. This equivalence plays an important role in the investigation of the 1-assertional logic and of the order-preserving logic associated to PP-algebras. The latter logic (here called PP<=) is characterized by a single 6-valued matrix and is shown to be a Logic of Formal Inconsistency and Formal Undeterminedness. We axiomatize PP<= by means of an analytic finite Hilbert-style calculus, and we present an axiomatization procedure that covers the logics corresponding to other classes of De Morgan algebras enriched by a perfection operator. △ Less

Submitted 8 April, 2022; v1 submitted 17 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: In Proceedings LSFA 2021, arXiv:2204.03415

Journal ref: EPTCS 357, 2022, pp. 56-76

Logics of involutive Stone algebras

Authors: Sérgio Marcelino, Umberto Rivieccio

Abstract: An involutive Stone algebra (IS-algebra) is a structure that is simultaneously a De Morgan algebra and a Stone algebra (i.e. a pseudo-complemented distributive lattice satisfying the well-known Stone identity ~xv~~x=1). IS-algebras have been studied algebraically and topologically since the 1980's, but a corresponding logic (here denoted IS$\leq$) has been introduced only very recently. The logic… ▽ More An involutive Stone algebra (IS-algebra) is a structure that is simultaneously a De Morgan algebra and a Stone algebra (i.e. a pseudo-complemented distributive lattice satisfying the well-known Stone identity ~xv~~x=1). IS-algebras have been studied algebraically and topologically since the 1980's, but a corresponding logic (here denoted IS$\leq$) has been introduced only very recently. The logic IS$\leq$ is the departing point for the present study, which we then extend to a wide family of previously unknown logics defined from IS-algebras. We show that IS$\leq$ is a conservative expansion of the Belnap-Dunn four-valued logic (i.e. the order-preserving logic of the variety of De Morgan algebras), and we give a finite Hilbert-style axiomatization for it. More generally, we introduce a method for expanding conservatively every super-Belnap logic so as to obtain an extension of IS$\leq$. We show that every logic thus defined can be axiomatized by adding a fixed finite set of rule schemata to the corresponding super-Belnap base logic. We also consider a few sample extensions of IS$\leq$ that cannot be obtained in the above-described way, but can nevertheless be axiomatized finitely by other methods. Most of our axiomatization results are obtained in two steps: through a multiple-conclusion calculus first, which we then reduce to a traditional one. The multiple-conclusion axiomatizations introduced in this process, being analytic, are of independent interest from a proof-theoretic standpoint. Our results entail that the lattice of super-Belnap logics (which is known to be uncountable) embeds into the lattice of extensions of IS$\leq$. Indeed, as in the super-Belnap case, we establish that the finitary extensions of IS$\leq$ are already uncountably many. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2021; v1 submitted 10 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: preprint, 20 pages

MSC Class: 03B50; 03G10; 03G27; 03B35

Finite axiomatizability of logics of distributive lattices with negation

Authors: Sérgio Marcelino, Umberto Rivieccio

Abstract: This paper focuses on order-preserving logics defined from varieties of distributive lattices with negation, and in particular on the problem of whether these can be axiomatized by means of finite Hilbert calculi. On the side of negative results, we provide a syntactic condition on the equational presentation of a variety that entails failure of finite axiomatizability for the corresponding logic.… ▽ More This paper focuses on order-preserving logics defined from varieties of distributive lattices with negation, and in particular on the problem of whether these can be axiomatized by means of finite Hilbert calculi. On the side of negative results, we provide a syntactic condition on the equational presentation of a variety that entails failure of finite axiomatizability for the corresponding logic. An application of this result is that the logic of all distributive lattices with negation is not finitely axiomatizable; likewise, we establish that the order-preserving logic of the variety of all Ockham algebras is also not finitely axiomatizable. On the positive side, we show that an arbitrary subvariety of semi-De Morgan algebras is axiomatized by a finite number of equations if and only if the corresponding order-preserving logic is axiomatized by a finite Hilbert calculus. This equivalence also holds for every subvariety of a Berman variety of Ockham algebras. We obtain, as a corollary, a new proof that the implication-free fragment of intuitionistic logic is finitely axiomatizable, as well as a new Hilbert calculus for it. Our proofs are constructive in that they allow us to effectively convert an equational presentation of a variety of algebras into a Hilbert calculus for the corresponding order-preserving logic, and vice versa. We also consider the assertional logics associated to the above-mentioned varieties, showing in particular that the assertional logics of finitely axiomatizable subvarieties of semi-De Morgan algebras are finitely axiomatizable as well. △ Less

Submitted 10 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: preprint, 21 pages

MSC Class: 03B50; 03G10; 03G27

An unexpected Boolean connective

Authors: Sérgio Marcelino

Abstract: We consider a 2-valued non-deterministic connective $\wedge \hskip-5.5pt \vee$ defined by the table resulting from the entry-wise union of the tables of conjunction and disjunction. Being half conjunction and half disjunction we named it platypus. The value of $\wedge \hskip-5.5pt \vee$ is not completely determined by the input, contrasting with usual notion of Boolean connective. We call non-dete… ▽ More We consider a 2-valued non-deterministic connective $\wedge \hskip-5.5pt \vee$ defined by the table resulting from the entry-wise union of the tables of conjunction and disjunction. Being half conjunction and half disjunction we named it platypus. The value of $\wedge \hskip-5.5pt \vee$ is not completely determined by the input, contrasting with usual notion of Boolean connective. We call non-deterministic Boolean connective any connective based on multi-functions over the Boolean set. In this way, non-determinism allows for an extended notion of truth-functional connective. Unexpectedly, this very simple connective and the logic it defines, illustrate various key advantages in working with generalized notions of semantics (by incorporating non-determinism), calculi (by allowing multiple-conclusion rules) and even of logic (moving from Tarskian to Scottian consequence relations). We show that the associated logic cannot be characterized by any finite set of finite matrices, whereas with non-determinism two values suffice. Furthermore, this logic is not finitely axiomatizable using single-conclusion rules, however we provide a very simple analytical multiple-conclusion axiomatization using only two rules. Finally, deciding the associated multiple-conclusion logic is coNP-complete, but deciding its single-conclusion fragment is in P. △ Less

Submitted 10 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: 19 pages, Amílcar Sernadas Logic Prize 2021

MSC Class: 03B50; 03G10; 03G27; 03B35

Non-finitely axiomatisable modal product logics with infinite canonical axiomatisations

Authors: Christopher Hampson, Stanislav Kikot, Agi Kurucz, Sergio Marcelino

Abstract: Our concern is the axiomatisation problem for modal and algebraic logics that correspond to various fragments of two-variable first-order logic with counting quantifiers. In particular, we consider modal products with Diff, the propositional unimodal logic of the difference operator. We show that the two-dimensional product logic Diff x Diff is non-finitely axiomatisable, but can be axiomatised by… ▽ More Our concern is the axiomatisation problem for modal and algebraic logics that correspond to various fragments of two-variable first-order logic with counting quantifiers. In particular, we consider modal products with Diff, the propositional unimodal logic of the difference operator. We show that the two-dimensional product logic Diff x Diff is non-finitely axiomatisable, but can be axiomatised by infinitely many Sahlqvist axioms. We also show that its `square' version (the modal counterpart of the substitution and equality free fragment of two-variable first-order logic with counting to two) is non-finitely axiomatisable over Diff x Diff, but can be axiomatised by adding infinitely many Sahlqvist axioms. These are the first examples of products of finitely axiomatisable modal logics that are not finitely axiomatisable, but axiomatisable by explicit infinite sets of canonical axioms. △ Less

Submitted 28 January, 2020; v1 submitted 23 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

MSC Class: 03B45; 03G15

Combining fragments of classical logic: When are interaction principles needed?

Authors: Carlos Caleiro, Sérgio Marcelino, João Marcos

Abstract: We investigate the combination of fragments of classical logic as a way of conservatively extending a given Boolean logic by the addition of new connectives, and we precisely characterize the circumstances in which such a combination produces the corresponding fragment of classical logic over the signature containing connectives from both fragments given as input. If the thereby produced combined… ▽ More We investigate the combination of fragments of classical logic as a way of conservatively extending a given Boolean logic by the addition of new connectives, and we precisely characterize the circumstances in which such a combination produces the corresponding fragment of classical logic over the signature containing connectives from both fragments given as input. If the thereby produced combined fragment is only incompletely characterized by the components given as input, this means that connectives from one component need to interact with connectives from the other component, giving rise to interaction principles. The main contributions strongly rely on the (well-known) description of the 2-valued clones made by Post, on the (not so well-known) axiomatization procedures for 2-valued matrices laid out by Rautenberg, and on Avron's non-deterministic matrices, which have (recently) been used to produce a significant advance on the understanding of the semantics of fibring. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2018; v1 submitted 13 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: Authors' affiliations and funding information added

MSC Class: 03B20; 03B50; 03B62

Merging fragments of classical logic

Authors: Carlos Caleiro, Sérgio Marcelino, João Marcos

Abstract: We investigate the possibility of extending the non-functionally complete logic of a collection of Boolean connectives by the addition of further Boolean connectives that make the resulting set of connectives functionally complete. More precisely, we will be interested in checking whether an axiomatization for Classical Propositional Logic may be produced by merging Hilbert-style calculi for two d… ▽ More We investigate the possibility of extending the non-functionally complete logic of a collection of Boolean connectives by the addition of further Boolean connectives that make the resulting set of connectives functionally complete. More precisely, we will be interested in checking whether an axiomatization for Classical Propositional Logic may be produced by merging Hilbert-style calculi for two disjoint incomplete fragments of it. We will prove that the answer to that problem is a negative one, unless one of the components includes only top-like connectives. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Comments: submitted to FroCoS 2017

MSC Class: 03B05 (Primary); 03B20; 03C05 (Secondary) ACM Class: F.4.1; I.2.3

An algebraic generalization of Kripke structures

Authors: Sérgio Marcelino, Pedro Resende

Abstract: The Kripke semantics of classical propositional normal modal logic is made algebraic via an embedding of Kripke structures into the larger class of pointed stably supported quantales. This algebraic semantics subsumes the traditional algebraic semantics based on lattices with unary operators, and it suggests natural interpretations of modal logic, of possible interest in the applications, in str… ▽ More The Kripke semantics of classical propositional normal modal logic is made algebraic via an embedding of Kripke structures into the larger class of pointed stably supported quantales. This algebraic semantics subsumes the traditional algebraic semantics based on lattices with unary operators, and it suggests natural interpretations of modal logic, of possible interest in the applications, in structures that arise in geometry and analysis, such as foliated manifolds and operator algebras, via topological groupoids and inverse semigroups. We study completeness properties of the quantale based semantics for the systems K, T, K4, S4, and S5, in particular obtaining an axiomatization for S5 which does not use negation or the modal necessity operator. As additional examples we describe intuitionistic propositional modal logic, the logic of programs PDL, and the ramified temporal logic CTL. △ Less

Submitted 14 April, 2007; originally announced April 2007.

Comments: 39 pages

MSC Class: 03B45 (Primary) 03G25; 06F07 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 145 (2008) 549-577