-
Physics-Aware Multifidelity Bayesian Optimization: a Generalized Formulation
Authors:
Francesco Di Fiore,
Laura Mainini
Abstract:
The adoption of high-fidelity models for many-query optimization problems is majorly limited by the significant computational cost required for their evaluation at every query. Multifidelity Bayesian methods (MFBO) allow to include costly high-fidelity responses for a sub-selection of queries only, and use fast lower-fidelity models to accelerate the optimization process. State-of-the-art methods…
▽ More
The adoption of high-fidelity models for many-query optimization problems is majorly limited by the significant computational cost required for their evaluation at every query. Multifidelity Bayesian methods (MFBO) allow to include costly high-fidelity responses for a sub-selection of queries only, and use fast lower-fidelity models to accelerate the optimization process. State-of-the-art methods rely on a purely data-driven search and do not include explicit information about the physical context. This paper acknowledges that prior knowledge about the physical domains of engineering problems can be leveraged to accelerate these data-driven searches, and proposes a generalized formulation for MFBO to embed a form of domain awareness during the optimization procedure. In particular, we formalize a bias as a multifidelity acquisition function that captures the physical structure of the domain. This permits to partially alleviate the data-driven search from learning the domain properties on-the-fly, and sensitively enhances the management of multiple sources of information. The method allows to efficiently include high-fidelity simulations to guide the optimization search while containing the overall computational expense. Our physics-aware multifidelity Bayesian optimization is presented and illustrated for two classes of optimization problems frequently met in science and engineering, namely design optimization and health monitoring problems.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2024; v1 submitted 10 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Active Learning and Bayesian Optimization: a Unified Perspective to Learn with a Goal
Authors:
Francesco Di Fiore,
Michela Nardelli,
Laura Mainini
Abstract:
Science and Engineering applications are typically associated with expensive optimization problems to identify optimal design solutions and states of the system of interest. Bayesian optimization and active learning compute surrogate models through efficient adaptive sampling schemes to assist and accelerate this search task toward a given optimization goal. Both those methodologies are driven by…
▽ More
Science and Engineering applications are typically associated with expensive optimization problems to identify optimal design solutions and states of the system of interest. Bayesian optimization and active learning compute surrogate models through efficient adaptive sampling schemes to assist and accelerate this search task toward a given optimization goal. Both those methodologies are driven by specific infill/learning criteria which quantify the utility with respect to the set goal of evaluating the objective function for unknown combinations of optimization variables. While the two fields have seen an exponential growth in popularity in the past decades, their dualism and synergy have received relatively little attention to date. This paper discusses and formalizes the synergy between Bayesian optimization and active learning as symbiotic adaptive sampling methodologies driven by common principles. In particular, we demonstrate this unified perspective through the formalization of the analogy between the Bayesian infill criteria and active learning criteria as driving principles of both the goal-driven procedures. To support our original perspective, we propose a general classification of adaptive sampling techniques to highlight similarities and differences between the vast families of adaptive sampling, active learning, and Bayesian optimization. Accordingly, the synergy is demonstrated map** the Bayesian infill criteria with the active learning criteria, and is formalized for searches informed by both a single information source and multiple levels of fidelity. In addition, we provide guidelines to apply those learning criteria investigating the performance of different Bayesian schemes for a variety of benchmark problems to highlight benefits and limitations over mathematical properties that characterize real-world applications.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2024; v1 submitted 2 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Non-Myopic Multifidelity Bayesian Optimization
Authors:
Francesco Di Fiore,
Laura Mainini
Abstract:
Bayesian optimization is a popular framework for the optimization of black box functions. Multifidelity methods allows to accelerate Bayesian optimization by exploiting low-fidelity representations of expensive objective functions. Popular multifidelity Bayesian strategies rely on sampling policies that account for the immediate reward obtained evaluating the objective function at a specific input…
▽ More
Bayesian optimization is a popular framework for the optimization of black box functions. Multifidelity methods allows to accelerate Bayesian optimization by exploiting low-fidelity representations of expensive objective functions. Popular multifidelity Bayesian strategies rely on sampling policies that account for the immediate reward obtained evaluating the objective function at a specific input, precluding greater informative gains that might be obtained looking ahead more steps. This paper proposes a non-myopic multifidelity Bayesian framework to grasp the long-term reward from future steps of the optimization. Our computational strategy comes with a two-step lookahead multifidelity acquisition function that maximizes the cumulative reward obtained measuring the improvement in the solution over two steps ahead. We demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms a standard multifidelity Bayesian framework on popular benchmark optimization problems.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2024; v1 submitted 13 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Analytical Benchmark Problems for Multifidelity Optimization Methods
Authors:
L. Mainini,
A. Serani,
M. P. Rumpfkeil,
E. Minisci,
D. Quagliarella,
H. Pehlivan,
S. Yildiz,
S. Ficini,
R. Pellegrini,
F. Di Fiore,
D. Bryson,
M. Nikbay,
M. Diez,
P. Beran
Abstract:
The paper presents a collection of analytical benchmark problems specifically selected to provide a set of stress tests for the assessment of multifidelity optimization methods. In addition, the paper discusses a comprehensive ensemble of metrics and criteria recommended for the rigorous and meaningful assessment of the performance of multifidelity strategies and algorithms.
The paper presents a collection of analytical benchmark problems specifically selected to provide a set of stress tests for the assessment of multifidelity optimization methods. In addition, the paper discusses a comprehensive ensemble of metrics and criteria recommended for the rigorous and meaningful assessment of the performance of multifidelity strategies and algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Computational framework for real-time diagnostics and prognostics of aircraft actuation systems
Authors:
Pier Carlo Berri,
Matteo D. L. Dalla Vedova,
Laura Mainini
Abstract:
Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) are emerging approaches to product life cycle that will maintain system safety and improve reliability, while reducing operating and maintenance costs. This is particularly relevant for aerospace systems, where high levels of integrity and high performances are required at the same time. We propose a novel strategy for the nearly real-time Fault Detection an…
▽ More
Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) are emerging approaches to product life cycle that will maintain system safety and improve reliability, while reducing operating and maintenance costs. This is particularly relevant for aerospace systems, where high levels of integrity and high performances are required at the same time. We propose a novel strategy for the nearly real-time Fault Detection and Identification (FDI) of a dynamical assembly, and for the estimation of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of the system. The availability of a timely estimate of the health status of the system will allow for an informed adaptive planning of maintenance and a dynamical reconfiguration of the mission profile, reducing operating costs and improving reliability. This work addresses the three phases of the prognostic flow - namely (1) signal acquisition, (2) Fault Detection and Identification, and (3) Remaining Useful Life estimation - and introduces a computationally efficient procedure suitable for real-time, on-board execution. To achieve this goal, we propose to combine information from physical models of different fidelity with machine learning techniques to obtain efficient representations (surrogate models) suitable for nearly real-time applications. Additionally, we propose an importance sampling strategy and a novel approach to model damage propagation for dynamical systems. The methodology is assessed for the FDI and RUL estimation of an aircraft electromechanical actuator (EMA) for secondary flight controls. The results show that the proposed method allows for a high precision in the evaluation of the system RUL, while outperforming common model-based techniques in terms of computational time.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Resource Aware Multifidelity Active Learning for Efficient Optimization
Authors:
Francesco Grassi,
Giorgio Manganini,
Michele Garraffa,
Laura Mainini
Abstract:
Traditional methods for black box optimization require a considerable number of evaluations which can be time consuming, unpractical, and often unfeasible for many engineering applications that rely on accurate representations and expensive models to evaluate. Bayesian Optimization (BO) methods search for the global optimum by progressively (actively) learning a surrogate model of the objective fu…
▽ More
Traditional methods for black box optimization require a considerable number of evaluations which can be time consuming, unpractical, and often unfeasible for many engineering applications that rely on accurate representations and expensive models to evaluate. Bayesian Optimization (BO) methods search for the global optimum by progressively (actively) learning a surrogate model of the objective function along the search path. Bayesian optimization can be accelerated through multifidelity approaches which leverage multiple black-box approximations of the objective functions that can be computationally cheaper to evaluate, but still provide relevant information to the search task. Further computational benefits are offered by the availability of parallel and distributed computing architectures whose optimal usage is an open opportunity within the context of active learning. This paper introduces the Resource Aware Active Learning (RAAL) strategy, a multifidelity Bayesian scheme to accelerate the optimization of black box functions. At each optimization step, the RAAL procedure computes the set of best sample locations and the associated fidelity sources that maximize the information gain to acquire during the parallel/distributed evaluation of the objective function, while accounting for the limited computational budget. The scheme is demonstrated for a variety of benchmark problems and results are discussed for both single fidelity and multifidelity settings. In particular we observe that the RAAL strategy optimally seeds multiple points at each iteration allowing for a major speed up of the optimization task.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
