`Just One More Sensor is Enough' -- Iterative Water Leak Localization with Physical Simulation and a Small Number of Pressure Sensors
Authors:
Michał Cholewa,
Michał Romaszewski,
Przemysław Głomb,
Katarzyna Kołodziej,
Michał Gorawski,
Jakub Koral,
Wojciech Koral,
Andrzej Madej,
Kryspin Musioł
Abstract:
In this article, we propose an approach to leak localisation in a complex water delivery grid with the use of data from physical simulation (e.g. EPANET software). This task is usually achieved by a network of multiple water pressure sensors and analysis of the so-called sensitivity matrix of pressure differences between the network's simulated data and actual data of the network affected by the l…
▽ More
In this article, we propose an approach to leak localisation in a complex water delivery grid with the use of data from physical simulation (e.g. EPANET software). This task is usually achieved by a network of multiple water pressure sensors and analysis of the so-called sensitivity matrix of pressure differences between the network's simulated data and actual data of the network affected by the leak. However, most algorithms using this approach require a significant number of pressure sensors -- a condition that is not easy to fulfil in the case of many less equipped networks. Therefore, we answer the question of whether leak localisation is possible by utilising very few sensors but having the ability to relocate one of them. Our algorithm is based on physical simulations (EPANET software) and an iterative scheme for mobile sensor relocation. The experiments show that the proposed system can equalise the low number of sensors with adjustments made for their positioning, giving a very good approximation of leak's position both in simulated cases and real-life example taken from BattLeDIM competition L-Town data.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Priority-based Fair Scheduling in Edge Computing
Authors:
Arkadiusz Madej,
Nan Wang,
Nikolaos Athanasopoulos,
Rajiv Ranjan,
Blesson Varghese
Abstract:
Scheduling is important in Edge computing. In contrast to the Cloud, Edge resources are hardware limited and cannot support workload-driven infrastructure scaling. Hence, resource allocation and scheduling for the Edge requires a fresh perspective. Existing Edge scheduling research assumes availability of all needed resources whenever a job request is made. This paper challenges that assumption, s…
▽ More
Scheduling is important in Edge computing. In contrast to the Cloud, Edge resources are hardware limited and cannot support workload-driven infrastructure scaling. Hence, resource allocation and scheduling for the Edge requires a fresh perspective. Existing Edge scheduling research assumes availability of all needed resources whenever a job request is made. This paper challenges that assumption, since not all job requests from a Cloud server can be scheduled on an Edge node. Thus, guaranteeing fairness among the clients (Cloud servers offloading jobs) while accounting for priorities of the jobs becomes a critical task. This paper presents four scheduling techniques, the first is a naive first come first serve strategy and further proposes three strategies, namely a client fair, priority fair, and hybrid that accounts for the fairness of both clients and job priorities. An evaluation on a target platform under three different scenarios, namely equal, random, and Gaussian job distributions is presented. The experimental studies highlight the low overheads and the distribution of scheduled jobs on the Edge node when compared to the naive strategy. The results confirm the superior performance of the hybrid strategy and showcase the feasibility of fair schedulers for Edge computing.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
