-
Slack matrices, $k$-products, and $2$-level polytopes
Authors:
Manuel Aprile,
Michele Conforti,
Yuri Faenza,
Samuel Fiorini,
Tony Huynh,
Marco Macchia
Abstract:
In this paper, we study algorithmic questions concerning products of matrices and their consequences for recognition algorithms for polyhedra.
The 1-product of matrices $S_1$, $S_2$ is a matrix whose columns are the concatenation of each column of $S_1$ with each column of $S_2$. The $k$-product generalizes the $1$-product, by taking as input two matrices $S_1, S_2$ together with $k-1$ special r…
▽ More
In this paper, we study algorithmic questions concerning products of matrices and their consequences for recognition algorithms for polyhedra.
The 1-product of matrices $S_1$, $S_2$ is a matrix whose columns are the concatenation of each column of $S_1$ with each column of $S_2$. The $k$-product generalizes the $1$-product, by taking as input two matrices $S_1, S_2$ together with $k-1$ special rows of each of those matrices, and outputting a certain composition of $S_1,S_2$.
Our study is motivated by a close link between the 1-product of matrices and the Cartesian product of polytopes, and more generally between the $k$-product of matrices and the glued product of polytopes. These connections rely on the concept of slack matrix, which gives an algebraic representation of classes of affinely equivalent polytopes. The slack matrix recognition problem is the problem of determining whether a given matrix is a slack matrix. This is an intriguing problem whose complexity is unknown. Our algorithm reduces the problem to instances which cannot be expressed as $k$-products of smaller matrices.
In the second part of the paper, we give a combinatorial interpretation of $k$-products for two well-known classes of polytopes: 2-level matroid base polytopes and stable set polytopes of perfect graphs. We also show that the slack matrix recognition problem is polynomial-time solvable for such polytopes. Those two classes are special cases of $2$-level polytopes, for which we conjecture that the slack matrix recognition problem is polynomial-time solvable.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Recognizing Cartesian products of matrices and polytopes
Authors:
Manuel Aprile,
Michele Conforti,
Yuri Faenza,
Samuel Fiorini,
Tony Huynh,
Marco Macchia
Abstract:
The 1-product of matrices $S_1 \in \mathbb{R}^{m_1 \times n_1}$ and $S_2 \in \mathbb{R}^{m_2 \times n_2}$ is the matrix in $\mathbb{R}^{(m_1+m_2) \times (n_1n_2)}$ whose columns are the concatenation of each column of $S_1$ with each column of $S_2$. Our main result is a polynomial time algorithm for the following problem: given a matrix $S$, is $S$ a 1-product, up to permutation of rows and colum…
▽ More
The 1-product of matrices $S_1 \in \mathbb{R}^{m_1 \times n_1}$ and $S_2 \in \mathbb{R}^{m_2 \times n_2}$ is the matrix in $\mathbb{R}^{(m_1+m_2) \times (n_1n_2)}$ whose columns are the concatenation of each column of $S_1$ with each column of $S_2$. Our main result is a polynomial time algorithm for the following problem: given a matrix $S$, is $S$ a 1-product, up to permutation of rows and columns? Our main motivation is a close link between the 1-product of matrices and the Cartesian product of polytopes, which goes through the concept of slack matrix. Determining whether a given matrix is a slack matrix is an intriguing problem whose complexity is unknown, and our algorithm reduces the problem to irreducible instances. Our algorithm is based on minimizing a symmetric submodular function that expresses mutual information in information theory. We also give a polynomial time algorithm to recognize a more complicated matrix product, called the 2-product. Finally, as a corollary of our 1-product and 2-product recognition algorithms, we obtain a polynomial time algorithm to recognize slack matrices of $2$-level matroid base polytopes.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
The biclique covering number of grids
Authors:
Krystal Guo,
Tony Huynh,
Marco Macchia
Abstract:
We determine the exact value of the biclique covering number for all grid graphs.
We determine the exact value of the biclique covering number for all grid graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2019; v1 submitted 8 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Bounds on the number of 2-level polytopes, cones and configurations
Authors:
Samuel Fiorini,
Marco Macchia,
Kanstantsin Pashkovich
Abstract:
We prove an upper bound of the form $2^{O(d^2 \mathrm{polylog}\,d)}$ on the number of affine (resp. linear) equivalence classes of, by increasing order of generality, 2-level d-polytopes, d-cones and d-configurations. This in particular answers positively a conjecture of Bohn et al. on 2-level polytopes. We obtain our upper bound by relating affine (resp. linear) equivalence classes of 2-level d-p…
▽ More
We prove an upper bound of the form $2^{O(d^2 \mathrm{polylog}\,d)}$ on the number of affine (resp. linear) equivalence classes of, by increasing order of generality, 2-level d-polytopes, d-cones and d-configurations. This in particular answers positively a conjecture of Bohn et al. on 2-level polytopes. We obtain our upper bound by relating affine (resp. linear) equivalence classes of 2-level d-polytopes, d-cones and d-configurations to faces of the correlation cone. We complement this with a $2^{Ω(d^2)}$ lower bound, by estimating the number of nonequivalent stable set polytopes of bipartite graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Extension Complexity of the Correlation Polytope
Authors:
Pierre Aboulker,
Samuel Fiorini,
Tony Huynh,
Marco Macchia,
Johanna Seif
Abstract:
We prove that for every $n$-vertex graph $G$, the extension complexity of the correlation polytope of $G$ is $2^{O(\mathrm{tw}(G) + \log n)}$, where $\mathrm{tw}(G)$ is the treewidth of $G$. Our main result is that this bound is tight for graphs contained in minor-closed classes.
We prove that for every $n$-vertex graph $G$, the extension complexity of the correlation polytope of $G$ is $2^{O(\mathrm{tw}(G) + \log n)}$, where $\mathrm{tw}(G)$ is the treewidth of $G$. Our main result is that this bound is tight for graphs contained in minor-closed classes.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2018; v1 submitted 1 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Enumeration of $2$-level polytopes
Authors:
Adam Bohn,
Yuri Faenza,
Samuel Fiorini,
Vissarion Fisikopoulos,
Marco Macchia,
Kanstantsin Pashkovich
Abstract:
A (convex) polytope $P$ is said to be $2$-level if for every direction of hyperplanes which is facet-defining for $P$, the vertices of $P$ can be covered with two hyperplanes of that direction. The study of these polytopes is motivated by questions in combinatorial optimization and communication complexity, among others. In this paper, we present the first algorithm for enumerating all combinatori…
▽ More
A (convex) polytope $P$ is said to be $2$-level if for every direction of hyperplanes which is facet-defining for $P$, the vertices of $P$ can be covered with two hyperplanes of that direction. The study of these polytopes is motivated by questions in combinatorial optimization and communication complexity, among others. In this paper, we present the first algorithm for enumerating all combinatorial types of $2$-level polytopes of a given dimension $d$, and provide complete experimental results for $d \leqslant 7$. Our approach is inductive: for each fixed $(d-1)$-dimensional $2$-level polytope $P_0$, we enumerate all $d$-dimensional $2$-level polytopes $P$ that have $P_0$ as a facet. This relies on the enumeration of the closed sets of a closure operator over a finite ground set. By varying the prescribed facet $P_0$, we obtain all $2$-level polytopes in dimension $d$.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2017; v1 submitted 6 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
-
Extension complexity of stable set polytopes of bipartite graphs
Authors:
Manuel Aprile,
Yuri Faenza,
Samuel Fiorini,
Tony Huynh,
Marco Macchia
Abstract:
The extension complexity $\mathsf{xc}(P)$ of a polytope $P$ is the minimum number of facets of a polytope that affinely projects to $P$. Let $G$ be a bipartite graph with $n$ vertices, $m$ edges, and no isolated vertices. Let $\mathsf{STAB}(G)$ be the convex hull of the stable sets of $G$. It is easy to see that $n \leqslant \mathsf{xc} (\mathsf{STAB}(G)) \leqslant n+m$. We improve both of these b…
▽ More
The extension complexity $\mathsf{xc}(P)$ of a polytope $P$ is the minimum number of facets of a polytope that affinely projects to $P$. Let $G$ be a bipartite graph with $n$ vertices, $m$ edges, and no isolated vertices. Let $\mathsf{STAB}(G)$ be the convex hull of the stable sets of $G$. It is easy to see that $n \leqslant \mathsf{xc} (\mathsf{STAB}(G)) \leqslant n+m$. We improve both of these bounds. For the upper bound, we show that $\mathsf{xc} (\mathsf{STAB}(G))$ is $O(\frac{n^2}{\log n})$, which is an improvement when $G$ has quadratically many edges. For the lower bound, we prove that $\mathsf{xc} (\mathsf{STAB}(G))$ is $Ω(n \log n)$ when $G$ is the incidence graph of a finite projective plane. We also provide examples of $3$-regular bipartite graphs $G$ such that the edge vs stable set matrix of $G$ has a fooling set of size $|E(G)|$.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2017; v1 submitted 28 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
