Fluorescent Neuronal Cells v2: Multi-Task, Multi-Format Annotations for Deep Learning in Microscopy
Authors:
Luca Clissa,
Antonio Macaluso,
Roberto Morelli,
Alessandra Occhinegro,
Emiliana Piscitiello,
Ludovico Taddei,
Marco Luppi,
Roberto Amici,
Matteo Cerri,
Timna Hitrec,
Lorenzo Rinaldi,
Antonio Zoccoli
Abstract:
Fluorescent Neuronal Cells v2 is a collection of fluorescence microscopy images and the corresponding ground-truth annotations, designed to foster innovative research in the domains of Life Sciences and Deep Learning. This dataset encompasses three image collections in which rodent neuronal cells' nuclei and cytoplasm are stained with diverse markers to highlight their anatomical or functional cha…
▽ More
Fluorescent Neuronal Cells v2 is a collection of fluorescence microscopy images and the corresponding ground-truth annotations, designed to foster innovative research in the domains of Life Sciences and Deep Learning. This dataset encompasses three image collections in which rodent neuronal cells' nuclei and cytoplasm are stained with diverse markers to highlight their anatomical or functional characteristics. Alongside the images, we provide ground-truth annotations for several learning tasks, including semantic segmentation, object detection, and counting. The contribution is two-fold. First, given the variety of annotations and their accessible formats, we envision our work facilitating methodological advancements in computer vision approaches for segmentation, detection, feature learning, unsupervised and self-supervised learning, transfer learning, and related areas. Second, by enabling extensive exploration and benchmarking, we hope Fluorescent Neuronal Cells v2 will catalyze breakthroughs in fluorescence microscopy analysis and promote cutting-edge discoveries in life sciences. The data are available at: https://amsacta.unibo.it/id/eprint/7347
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
Automatic Cell Counting in Flourescent Microscopy Using Deep Learning
Authors:
R. Morelli,
L. Clissa,
M. Dalla,
M. Luppi,
L. Rinaldi,
A. Zoccoli
Abstract:
Counting cells in fluorescent microscopy is a tedious, time-consuming task that researchers have to accomplish to assess the effects of different experimental conditions on biological structures of interest. Although such objects are generally easy to identify, the process of manually annotating cells is sometimes subject to arbitrariness due to the operator's interpretation of the borderline case…
▽ More
Counting cells in fluorescent microscopy is a tedious, time-consuming task that researchers have to accomplish to assess the effects of different experimental conditions on biological structures of interest. Although such objects are generally easy to identify, the process of manually annotating cells is sometimes subject to arbitrariness due to the operator's interpretation of the borderline cases.
We propose a Machine Learning approach that exploits a fully-convolutional network in a binary segmentation fashion to localize the objects of interest. Counts are then retrieved as the number of detected items.
Specifically, we adopt a UNet-like architecture leveraging residual units and an extended bottleneck for enlarging the field-of-view. In addition, we make use of weighted maps that penalize the errors on cells boundaries increasingly with overcrowding. These changes provide more context and force the model to focus on relevant features during pixel-wise classification. As a result, the model performance is enhanced, especially in presence of clum** cells, artifacts and confounding biological structures. Posterior assessment of the results with domain experts confirms that the model detects cells of interest correctly. The model demonstrates a human-level ability inasmuch even erroneous predictions seem to fall within the limits of operator interpretation. This qualitative assessment is also corroborated by quantitative metrics as an ${F_1}$ score of 0.87.
Despite some difficulties in interpretation, results are also satisfactory with respect to the counting task, as testified by mean and median absolute error of, respectively, 0.8 and 1.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
