Development of Machine Learning Classifiers for Blood-based Diagnosis and Prognosis of Suspected Acute Infections and Sepsis
Authors:
Ljubomir Buturovic,
Michael Mayhew,
Roland Luethy,
Kirindi Choi,
Uros Midic,
Nandita Damaraju,
Yehudit Hasin-Brumshtein,
Amitesh Pratap,
Rhys M. Adams,
Joao Fonseca,
Ambika Srinath,
Paul Fleming,
Claudia Pereira,
Oliver Liesenfeld,
Purvesh Khatri,
Timothy Sweeney
Abstract:
We applied machine learning to the unmet medical need of rapid and accurate diagnosis and prognosis of acute infections and sepsis in emergency departments. Our solution consists of a Myrna (TM) Instrument and embedded TriVerity (TM) classifiers. The instrument measures abundances of 29 messenger RNAs in patient's blood, subsequently used as features for machine learning. The classifiers convert t…
▽ More
We applied machine learning to the unmet medical need of rapid and accurate diagnosis and prognosis of acute infections and sepsis in emergency departments. Our solution consists of a Myrna (TM) Instrument and embedded TriVerity (TM) classifiers. The instrument measures abundances of 29 messenger RNAs in patient's blood, subsequently used as features for machine learning. The classifiers convert the input features to an intuitive test report comprising the separate likelihoods of (1) a bacterial infection (2) a viral infection, and (3) severity (need for Intensive Care Unit-level care). In internal validation, the system achieved AUROC = 0.83 on the three-class disease diagnosis (bacterial, viral, or non-infected) and AUROC = 0.77 on binary prognosis of disease severity. The Myrna, TriVerity system was granted breakthrough device designation by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This engineering manuscript teaches the standard and novel machine learning methods used to translate an academic research concept to a clinical product aimed at improving patient care, and discusses lessons learned.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Optimization of Genomic Classifiers for Clinical Deployment: Evaluation of Bayesian Optimization to Select Predictive Models of Acute Infection and In-Hospital Mortality
Authors:
Michael B. Mayhew,
Elizabeth Tran,
Kirindi Choi,
Uros Midic,
Roland Luethy,
Nandita Damaraju,
Ljubomir Buturovic
Abstract:
Acute infection, if not rapidly and accurately detected, can lead to sepsis, organ failure and even death. Current detection of acute infection as well as assessment of a patient's severity of illness are imperfect. Characterization of a patient's immune response by quantifying expression levels of specific genes from blood represents a potentially more timely and precise means of accomplishing bo…
▽ More
Acute infection, if not rapidly and accurately detected, can lead to sepsis, organ failure and even death. Current detection of acute infection as well as assessment of a patient's severity of illness are imperfect. Characterization of a patient's immune response by quantifying expression levels of specific genes from blood represents a potentially more timely and precise means of accomplishing both tasks. Machine learning methods provide a platform to leverage this 'host response' for development of deployment-ready classification models. Prioritization of promising classifiers is dependent, in part, on hyperparameter optimization for which a number of approaches including grid search, random sampling and Bayesian optimization have been shown to be effective. We compare HO approaches for the development of diagnostic classifiers of acute infection and in-hospital mortality from gene expression of 29 diagnostic markers. We take a deployment-centered approach to our comprehensive analysis, accounting for heterogeneity in our multi-study patient cohort with our choices of dataset partitioning and hyperparameter optimization objective as well as assessing selected classifiers in external (as well as internal) validation. We find that classifiers selected by Bayesian optimization for in-hospital mortality can outperform those selected by grid search or random sampling. However, in contrast to previous research: 1) Bayesian optimization is not more efficient in selecting classifiers in all instances compared to grid search or random sampling-based methods and 2) we note marginal gains in classifier performance in only specific circumstances when using a common variant of Bayesian optimization (i.e. automatic relevance determination). Our analysis highlights the need for further practical, deployment-centered benchmarking of HO approaches in the healthcare context.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 27 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
