Showing 1–21 of 21 results for author: Lucchese, C

A Learning-to-Rank Formulation of Clustering-Based Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search

Authors: Thomas Vecchiato, Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini, Sebastian Bruch

Abstract: A critical piece of the modern information retrieval puzzle is approximate nearest neighbor search. Its objective is to return a set of $k$ data points that are closest to a query point, with its accuracy measured by the proportion of exact nearest neighbors captured in the returned set. One popular approach to this question is clustering: The indexing algorithm partitions data points into non-ove… ▽ More A critical piece of the modern information retrieval puzzle is approximate nearest neighbor search. Its objective is to return a set of $k$ data points that are closest to a query point, with its accuracy measured by the proportion of exact nearest neighbors captured in the returned set. One popular approach to this question is clustering: The indexing algorithm partitions data points into non-overlap** subsets and represents each partition by a point such as its centroid. The query processing algorithm first identifies the nearest clusters -- a process known as routing -- then performs a nearest neighbor search over those clusters only. In this work, we make a simple observation: The routing function solves a ranking problem. Its quality can therefore be assessed with a ranking metric, making the function amenable to learning-to-rank. Interestingly, ground-truth is often freely available: Given a query distribution in a top-$k$ configuration, the ground-truth is the set of clusters that contain the exact top-$k$ vectors. We develop this insight and apply it to Maximum Inner Product Search (MIPS). As we demonstrate empirically on various datasets, learning a simple linear function consistently improves the accuracy of clustering-based MIPS. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Verifiable Boosted Tree Ensembles

Authors: Stefano Calzavara, Lorenzo Cazzaro, Claudio Lucchese, Giulio Ermanno Pibiri

Abstract: Verifiable learning advocates for training machine learning models amenable to efficient security verification. Prior research demonstrated that specific classes of decision tree ensembles -- called large-spread ensembles -- allow for robustness verification in polynomial time against any norm-based attacker. This study expands prior work on verifiable learning from basic ensemble methods (i.e., h… ▽ More Verifiable learning advocates for training machine learning models amenable to efficient security verification. Prior research demonstrated that specific classes of decision tree ensembles -- called large-spread ensembles -- allow for robustness verification in polynomial time against any norm-based attacker. This study expands prior work on verifiable learning from basic ensemble methods (i.e., hard majority voting) to advanced boosted tree ensembles, such as those trained using XGBoost or LightGBM. Our formal results indicate that robustness verification is achievable in polynomial time when considering attackers based on the $L_\infty$-norm, but remains NP-hard for other norm-based attackers. Nevertheless, we present a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm to verify robustness against attackers based on the $L_p$-norm for any $p \in \mathbb{N} \cup \{0\}$, which in practice grants excellent performance. Our experimental evaluation shows that large-spread boosted ensembles are accurate enough for practical adoption, while being amenable to efficient security verification. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: 15 pages, 3 figures

Efficient and Effective Tree-based and Neural Learning to Rank

Authors: Sebastian Bruch, Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini

Abstract: This monograph takes a step towards promoting the study of efficiency in the era of neural information retrieval by offering a comprehensive survey of the literature on efficiency and effectiveness in ranking, and to a limited extent, retrieval. This monograph was inspired by the parallels that exist between the challenges in neural network-based ranking solutions and their predecessors, decision… ▽ More This monograph takes a step towards promoting the study of efficiency in the era of neural information retrieval by offering a comprehensive survey of the literature on efficiency and effectiveness in ranking, and to a limited extent, retrieval. This monograph was inspired by the parallels that exist between the challenges in neural network-based ranking solutions and their predecessors, decision forest-based learning to rank models, as well as the connections between the solutions the literature to date has to offer. We believe that by understanding the fundamentals underpinning these algorithmic and data structure solutions for containing the contentious relationship between efficiency and effectiveness, one can better identify future directions and more efficiently determine the merits of ideas. We also present what we believe to be important research directions in the forefront of efficiency and effectiveness in retrieval and ranking. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Fast Inference of Tree Ensembles on ARM Devices

Authors: Simon Koschel, Sebastian Buschjäger, Claudio Lucchese, Katharina Morik

Abstract: With the ongoing integration of Machine Learning models into everyday life, e.g. in the form of the Internet of Things (IoT), the evaluation of learned models becomes more and more an important issue. Tree ensembles are one of the best black-box classifiers available and routinely outperform more complex classifiers. While the fast application of tree ensembles has already been studied in the lite… ▽ More With the ongoing integration of Machine Learning models into everyday life, e.g. in the form of the Internet of Things (IoT), the evaluation of learned models becomes more and more an important issue. Tree ensembles are one of the best black-box classifiers available and routinely outperform more complex classifiers. While the fast application of tree ensembles has already been studied in the literature for Intel CPUs, they have not yet been studied in the context of ARM CPUs which are more dominant for IoT applications. In this paper, we convert the popular QuickScorer algorithm and its siblings from Intel's AVX to ARM's NEON instruction set. Second, we extend our implementation from ranking models to classification models such as Random Forests. Third, we investigate the effects of using fixed-point quantization in Random Forests. Our study shows that a careful implementation of tree traversal on ARM CPUs leads to a speed-up of up to 9.4 compared to a reference implementation. Moreover, quantized models seem to outperform models using floating-point values in terms of speed in almost all cases, with a neglectable impact on the predictive performance of the model. Finally, our study highlights architectural differences between ARM and Intel CPUs and between different ARM devices that imply that the best implementation depends on both the specific forest as well as the specific device used for deployment. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures, 4 algorithms

A Theoretical Framework for AI Models Explainability with Application in Biomedicine

Authors: Matteo Rizzo, Alberto Veneri, Andrea Albarelli, Claudio Lucchese, Marco Nobile, Cristina Conati

Abstract: EXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is a vibrant research topic in the artificial intelligence community, with growing interest across methods and domains. Much has been written about the subject, yet XAI still lacks shared terminology and a framework capable of providing structural soundness to explanations. In our work, we address these issues by proposing a novel definition of explanation… ▽ More EXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is a vibrant research topic in the artificial intelligence community, with growing interest across methods and domains. Much has been written about the subject, yet XAI still lacks shared terminology and a framework capable of providing structural soundness to explanations. In our work, we address these issues by proposing a novel definition of explanation that is a synthesis of what can be found in the literature. We recognize that explanations are not atomic but the combination of evidence stemming from the model and its input-output map**, and the human interpretation of this evidence. Furthermore, we fit explanations into the properties of faithfulness (i.e., the explanation being a true description of the model's inner workings and decision-making process) and plausibility (i.e., how much the explanation looks convincing to the user). Using our proposed theoretical framework simplifies how these properties are operationalized and it provides new insight into common explanation methods that we analyze as case studies. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2023; v1 submitted 29 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Explainable Global Fairness Verification of Tree-Based Classifiers

Authors: Stefano Calzavara, Lorenzo Cazzaro, Claudio Lucchese, Federico Marcuzzi

Abstract: We present a new approach to the global fairness verification of tree-based classifiers. Given a tree-based classifier and a set of sensitive features potentially leading to discrimination, our analysis synthesizes sufficient conditions for fairness, expressed as a set of traditional propositional logic formulas, which are readily understandable by human experts. The verified fairness guarantees a… ▽ More We present a new approach to the global fairness verification of tree-based classifiers. Given a tree-based classifier and a set of sensitive features potentially leading to discrimination, our analysis synthesizes sufficient conditions for fairness, expressed as a set of traditional propositional logic formulas, which are readily understandable by human experts. The verified fairness guarantees are global, in that the formulas predicate over all the possible inputs of the classifier, rather than just a few specific test instances. Our analysis is formally proved both sound and complete. Experimental results on public datasets show that the analysis is precise, explainable to human experts and efficient enough for practical adoption. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: 15 pages with 7 figures

ILMART: Interpretable Ranking with Constrained LambdaMART

Authors: Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini, Salvatore Orlando, Raffaele Perego, Alberto Veneri

Abstract: Interpretable Learning to Rank (LtR) is an emerging field within the research area of explainable AI, aiming at develo** intelligible and accurate predictive models. While most of the previous research efforts focus on creating post-hoc explanations, in this paper we investigate how to train effective and intrinsically-interpretable ranking models. Develo** these models is particularly challen… ▽ More Interpretable Learning to Rank (LtR) is an emerging field within the research area of explainable AI, aiming at develo** intelligible and accurate predictive models. While most of the previous research efforts focus on creating post-hoc explanations, in this paper we investigate how to train effective and intrinsically-interpretable ranking models. Develo** these models is particularly challenging and it also requires finding a trade-off between ranking quality and model complexity. State-of-the-art rankers, made of either large ensembles of trees or several neural layers, exploit in fact an unlimited number of feature interactions making them black boxes. Previous approaches on intrinsically-interpretable ranking models address this issue by avoiding interactions between features thus paying a significant performance drop with respect to full-complexity models. Conversely, ILMART, our novel and interpretable LtR solution based on LambdaMART, is able to train effective and intelligible models by exploiting a limited and controlled number of pairwise feature interactions. Exhaustive and reproducible experiments conducted on three publicly-available LtR datasets show that ILMART outperforms the current state-of-the-art solution for interpretable ranking of a large margin with a gain of nDCG of up to 8%. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 5 pages, 3 figures, to be published in SIGIR 2022 proceedings

EiFFFeL: Enforcing Fairness in Forests by Flip** Leaves

Authors: Seyum Assefa Abebe, Claudio Lucchese, Salvatore Orlando

Abstract: Nowadays Machine Learning (ML) techniques are extensively adopted in many socially sensitive systems, thus requiring to carefully study the fairness of the decisions taken by such systems. Many approaches have been proposed to address and to make sure there is no bias against individuals or specific groups which might originally come from biased training datasets or algorithm design. In this regar… ▽ More Nowadays Machine Learning (ML) techniques are extensively adopted in many socially sensitive systems, thus requiring to carefully study the fairness of the decisions taken by such systems. Many approaches have been proposed to address and to make sure there is no bias against individuals or specific groups which might originally come from biased training datasets or algorithm design. In this regard, we propose a fairness enforcing approach called EiFFFeL:Enforcing Fairness in Forests by Flip** Leaves which exploits tree-based or leaf-based post-processing strategies to relabel leaves of selected decision trees of a given forest. Experimental results show that our approach achieves a user defined group fairness degree without losing a significant amount of accuracy. △ Less

Submitted 16 May, 2022; v1 submitted 29 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Beyond Robustness: Resilience Verification of Tree-Based Classifiers

Authors: Stefano Calzavara, Lorenzo Cazzaro, Claudio Lucchese, Federico Marcuzzi, Salvatore Orlando

Abstract: In this paper we criticize the robustness measure traditionally employed to assess the performance of machine learning models deployed in adversarial settings. To mitigate the limitations of robustness, we introduce a new measure called resilience and we focus on its verification. In particular, we discuss how resilience can be verified by combining a traditional robustness verification technique… ▽ More In this paper we criticize the robustness measure traditionally employed to assess the performance of machine learning models deployed in adversarial settings. To mitigate the limitations of robustness, we introduce a new measure called resilience and we focus on its verification. In particular, we discuss how resilience can be verified by combining a traditional robustness verification technique with a data-independent stability analysis, which identifies a subset of the feature space where the model does not change its predictions despite adversarial manipulations. We then introduce a formally sound data-independent stability analysis for decision trees and decision tree ensembles, which we experimentally assess on public datasets and we leverage for resilience verification. Our results show that resilience verification is useful and feasible in practice, yielding a more reliable security assessment of both standard and robust decision tree models. △ Less

Submitted 5 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Learning Early Exit Strategies for Additive Ranking Ensembles

Authors: Francesco Busolin, Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini, Salvatore Orlando, Raffaele Perego, Salvatore Trani

Abstract: Modern search engine ranking pipelines are commonly based on large machine-learned ensembles of regression trees. We propose LEAR, a novel - learned - technique aimed to reduce the average number of trees traversed by documents to accumulate the scores, thus reducing the overall query response time. LEAR exploits a classifier that predicts whether a document can early exit the ensemble because it… ▽ More Modern search engine ranking pipelines are commonly based on large machine-learned ensembles of regression trees. We propose LEAR, a novel - learned - technique aimed to reduce the average number of trees traversed by documents to accumulate the scores, thus reducing the overall query response time. LEAR exploits a classifier that predicts whether a document can early exit the ensemble because it is unlikely to be ranked among the final top-k results. The early exit decision occurs at a sentinel point, i.e., after having evaluated a limited number of trees, and the partial scores are exploited to filter out non-promising documents. We evaluate LEAR by deploying it in a production-like setting, adopting a state-of-the-art algorithm for ensembles traversal. We provide a comprehensive experimental evaluation on two public datasets. The experiments show that LEAR has a significant impact on the efficiency of the query processing without hindering its ranking quality. In detail, on a first dataset, LEAR is able to achieve a speedup of 3x without any loss in NDCG1@0, while on a second dataset the speedup is larger than 5x with a negligible NDCG@10 loss (< 0.05%). △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: 5 pages, 3 figures, ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 21)

ACM Class: H.3.3

Journal ref: 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, 2217-2221

Certifying Decision Trees Against Evasion Attacks by Program Analysis

Authors: Stefano Calzavara, Pietro Ferrara, Claudio Lucchese

Abstract: Machine learning has proved invaluable for a range of different tasks, yet it also proved vulnerable to evasion attacks, i.e., maliciously crafted perturbations of input data designed to force mispredictions. In this paper we propose a novel technique to verify the security of decision tree models against evasion attacks with respect to an expressive threat model, where the attacker can be represe… ▽ More Machine learning has proved invaluable for a range of different tasks, yet it also proved vulnerable to evasion attacks, i.e., maliciously crafted perturbations of input data designed to force mispredictions. In this paper we propose a novel technique to verify the security of decision tree models against evasion attacks with respect to an expressive threat model, where the attacker can be represented by an arbitrary imperative program. Our approach exploits the interpretability property of decision trees to transform them into imperative programs, which are amenable for traditional program analysis techniques. By leveraging the abstract interpretation framework, we are able to soundly verify the security guarantees of decision tree models trained over publicly available datasets. Our experiments show that our technique is both precise and efficient, yielding only a minimal number of false positives and scaling up to cases which are intractable for a competitor approach. △ Less

Submitted 6 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Query-level Early Exit for Additive Learning-to-Rank Ensembles

Authors: Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini, Salvatore Orlando, Raffaele Perego, Salvatore Trani

Abstract: Search engine ranking pipelines are commonly based on large ensembles of machine-learned decision trees. The tight constraints on query response time recently motivated researchers to investigate algorithms to make faster the traversal of the additive ensemble or to early terminate the evaluation of documents that are unlikely to be ranked among the top-k. In this paper, we investigate the novel p… ▽ More Search engine ranking pipelines are commonly based on large ensembles of machine-learned decision trees. The tight constraints on query response time recently motivated researchers to investigate algorithms to make faster the traversal of the additive ensemble or to early terminate the evaluation of documents that are unlikely to be ranked among the top-k. In this paper, we investigate the novel problem of \textit{query-level early exiting}, aimed at deciding the profitability of early stop** the traversal of the ranking ensemble for all the candidate documents to be scored for a query, by simply returning a ranking based on the additive scores computed by a limited portion of the ensemble. Besides the obvious advantage on query latency and throughput, we address the possible positive impact of query-level early exiting on ranking effectiveness. To this end, we study the actual contribution of incremental portions of the tree ensemble to the ranking of the top-k documents scored for a given query. Our main finding is that queries exhibit different behaviors as scores are accumulated during the traversal of the ensemble and that query-level early stop** can remarkably improve ranking quality. We present a reproducible and comprehensive experimental evaluation, conducted on two public datasets, showing that query-level early exiting achieves an overall gain of up to 7.5% in terms of NDCG@10 with a speedup of the scoring process of up to 2.2x. △ Less

Submitted 30 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: Accepted at SIGIR 2020 (short paper)

MSC Class: 68P20

Feature Partitioning for Robust Tree Ensembles and their Certification in Adversarial Scenarios

Authors: Stefano Calzavara, Claudio Lucchese, Federico Marcuzzi, Salvatore Orlando

Abstract: Machine learning algorithms, however effective, are known to be vulnerable in adversarial scenarios where a malicious user may inject manipulated instances. In this work we focus on evasion attacks, where a model is trained in a safe environment and exposed to attacks at test time. The attacker aims at finding a minimal perturbation of a test instance that changes the model outcome. We propose a… ▽ More Machine learning algorithms, however effective, are known to be vulnerable in adversarial scenarios where a malicious user may inject manipulated instances. In this work we focus on evasion attacks, where a model is trained in a safe environment and exposed to attacks at test time. The attacker aims at finding a minimal perturbation of a test instance that changes the model outcome. We propose a model-agnostic strategy that builds a robust ensemble by training its basic models on feature-based partitions of the given dataset. Our algorithm guarantees that the majority of the models in the ensemble cannot be affected by the attacker. We experimented the proposed strategy on decision tree ensembles, and we also propose an approximate certification method for tree ensembles that efficiently assess the minimal accuracy of a forest on a given dataset avoiding the costly computation of evasion attacks. Experimental evaluation on publicly available datasets shows that proposed strategy outperforms state-of-the-art adversarial learning algorithms against evasion attacks. △ Less

Submitted 7 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Treant: Training Evasion-Aware Decision Trees

Authors: Stefano Calzavara, Claudio Lucchese, Gabriele Tolomei, Seyum Assefa Abebe, Salvatore Orlando

Abstract: Despite its success and popularity, machine learning is now recognized as vulnerable to evasion attacks, i.e., carefully crafted perturbations of test inputs designed to force prediction errors. In this paper we focus on evasion attacks against decision tree ensembles, which are among the most successful predictive models for dealing with non-perceptual problems. Even though they are powerful and… ▽ More Despite its success and popularity, machine learning is now recognized as vulnerable to evasion attacks, i.e., carefully crafted perturbations of test inputs designed to force prediction errors. In this paper we focus on evasion attacks against decision tree ensembles, which are among the most successful predictive models for dealing with non-perceptual problems. Even though they are powerful and interpretable, decision tree ensembles have received only limited attention by the security and machine learning communities so far, leading to a sub-optimal state of the art for adversarial learning techniques. We thus propose Treant, a novel decision tree learning algorithm that, on the basis of a formal threat model, minimizes an evasion-aware loss function at each step of the tree construction. Treant is based on two key technical ingredients: robust splitting and attack invariance, which jointly guarantee the soundness of the learning process. Experimental results on three publicly available datasets show that Treant is able to generate decision tree ensembles that are at the same time accurate and nearly insensitive to evasion attacks, outperforming state-of-the-art adversarial learning techniques. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2019; v1 submitted 2 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Computing Entity Semantic Similarity by Features Ranking

Authors: Livia Ruback, Claudio Lucchese, Alexander Arturo Mera Caraballo, Grettel Monteagudo García, Marco Antonio Casanova, Chiara Renso

Abstract: This article presents a novel approach to estimate semantic entity similarity using entity features available as Linked Data. The key idea is to exploit ranked lists of features, extracted from Linked Data sources, as a representation of the entities to be compared. The similarity between two entities is then estimated by comparing their ranked lists of features. The article describes experiments… ▽ More This article presents a novel approach to estimate semantic entity similarity using entity features available as Linked Data. The key idea is to exploit ranked lists of features, extracted from Linked Data sources, as a representation of the entities to be compared. The similarity between two entities is then estimated by comparing their ranked lists of features. The article describes experiments with museum data from DBpedia, with datasets from a LOD catalog, and with computer science conferences from the DBLP repository. The experiments demonstrate that entity similarity, computed using ranked lists of features, achieves better accuracy than state-of-the-art measures. △ Less

Submitted 6 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

A Motif-based Approach for Identifying Controversy

Authors: Mauro Coletto, Kiran Garimella, Aristides Gionis, Claudio Lucchese

Abstract: Among the topics discussed in Social Media, some lead to controversy. A number of recent studies have focused on the problem of identifying controversy in social media mostly based on the analysis of textual content or rely on global network structure. Such approaches have strong limitations due to the difficulty of understanding natural language, and of investigating the global network structure.… ▽ More Among the topics discussed in Social Media, some lead to controversy. A number of recent studies have focused on the problem of identifying controversy in social media mostly based on the analysis of textual content or rely on global network structure. Such approaches have strong limitations due to the difficulty of understanding natural language, and of investigating the global network structure. In this work we show that it is possible to detect controversy in social media by exploiting network motifs, i.e., local patterns of user interaction. The proposed approach allows for a language-independent and fine- grained and efficient-to-compute analysis of user discussions and their evolution over time. The supervised model exploiting motif patterns can achieve 85% accuracy, with an improvement of 7% compared to baseline structural, propagation-based and temporal network features. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Journal ref: ICWSM 2017

Pornography consumption in Social Media

Authors: Mauro Coletto, Luca Maria Aiello, Claudio Lucchese, Fabrizio Silvestri

Abstract: The structure of a social network is fundamentally related to the interests of its members. People assort spontaneously based on the topics that are relevant to them, forming social groups that revolve around different subjects. Online social media are also favorable ecosystems for the formation of topical communities centered on matters that are not commonly taken up by the general public because… ▽ More The structure of a social network is fundamentally related to the interests of its members. People assort spontaneously based on the topics that are relevant to them, forming social groups that revolve around different subjects. Online social media are also favorable ecosystems for the formation of topical communities centered on matters that are not commonly taken up by the general public because of the embarrassment, discomfort, or shock they may cause. Those are communities that depict or discuss what are usually referred to as deviant behaviors, conducts that are commonly considered inappropriate because they are somehow violative of society's norms or moral standards that are shared among the majority of the members of society. Pornography consumption, drug use, excessive drinking, illegal hunting, eating disorders, or any self-harming or addictive practice are all examples of deviant behaviors. △ Less

Submitted 20 January, 2017; v1 submitted 24 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1610.08372

Polarized User and Topic Tracking in Twitter

Authors: Mauro Coletto, Claudio Lucchese, Salvatore Orlando, Raffaele Perego

Abstract: Digital traces of conversations in micro-blogging platforms and OSNs provide information about user opinion with a high degree of resolution. These information sources can be exploited to under- stand and monitor collective behaviors. In this work, we focus on polarization classes, i.e., those topics that require the user to side exclusively with one position. The proposed method provides an itera… ▽ More Digital traces of conversations in micro-blogging platforms and OSNs provide information about user opinion with a high degree of resolution. These information sources can be exploited to under- stand and monitor collective behaviors. In this work, we focus on polarization classes, i.e., those topics that require the user to side exclusively with one position. The proposed method provides an iterative classification of users and keywords: first, polarized users are identified, then polarized keywords are discovered by monitoring the activities of previously classified users. This method thus allows tracking users and topics over time. We report several experiments conducted on two Twitter datasets during political election time-frames. We measure the user classification accuracy on a golden set of users, and analyze the relevance of the extracted keywords for the ongoing political discussion. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: SIGIR 16

On the Behaviour of Deviant Communities in Online Social Networks

Authors: Mauro Coletto, Luca Maria Aiello, Claudio Lucchese, Fabrizio Silvestri

Abstract: On-line social networks are complex ensembles of inter-linked communities that interact on different topics. Some communities are characterized by what are usually referred to as deviant behaviors, conducts that are commonly considered inappropriate with respect to the society's norms or moral standards. Eating disorders, drug use, and adult content consumption are just a few examples. We refer to… ▽ More On-line social networks are complex ensembles of inter-linked communities that interact on different topics. Some communities are characterized by what are usually referred to as deviant behaviors, conducts that are commonly considered inappropriate with respect to the society's norms or moral standards. Eating disorders, drug use, and adult content consumption are just a few examples. We refer to such communities as deviant networks. It is commonly believed that such deviant networks are niche, isolated social groups, whose activity is well separated from the mainstream social-media life. According to this assumption, research studies have mostly considered them in isolation. In this work we focused on adult content consumption networks, which are present in many on-line social media and in the Web in general. We found that few small and densely connected communities are responsible for most of the content production. Differently from previous work, we studied how such communities interact with the whole social network. We found that the produced content flows to the rest of the network mostly directly or through bridge-communities, reaching at least 450 times more users. We also show that a large fraction of the users can be inadvertently exposed to such content through indirect content resharing. We also discuss a demographic analysis of the producers and consumers networks. Finally, we show that it is easily possible to identify a few core users to radically uproot the diffusion process. We aim at setting the basis to study deviant communities in context. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: ICWSM 16

Sentiment-enhanced Multidimensional Analysis of Online Social Networks: Perception of the Mediterranean Refugees Crisis

Authors: Mauro Coletto, Claudio Lucchese, Cristina Ioana Muntean, Franco Maria Nardini, Andrea Esuli, Chiara Renso, Raffaele Perego

Abstract: We propose an analytical framework able to investigate discussions about polarized topics in online social networks from many different angles. The framework supports the analysis of social networks along several dimensions: time, space and sentiment. We show that the proposed analytical framework and the methodology can be used to mine knowledge about the perception of complex social phenomena. W… ▽ More We propose an analytical framework able to investigate discussions about polarized topics in online social networks from many different angles. The framework supports the analysis of social networks along several dimensions: time, space and sentiment. We show that the proposed analytical framework and the methodology can be used to mine knowledge about the perception of complex social phenomena. We selected the refugee crisis discussions over Twitter as the case study. This difficult and controversial topic is an increasingly important issue for the EU. The raw stream of tweets is enriched with space information (user and mentioned locations), and sentiment (positive vs. negative) w.r.t. refugees. Our study shows differences in positive and negative sentiment in EU countries, in particular in UK, and by matching events, locations and perception it underlines opinion dynamics and common prejudices regarding the refugees. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

CoPhIR: a Test Collection for Content-Based Image Retrieval

Authors: Paolo Bolettieri, Andrea Esuli, Fabrizio Falchi, Claudio Lucchese, Raffaele Perego, Tommaso Piccioli, Fausto Rabitti

Abstract: The scalability, as well as the effectiveness, of the different Content-based Image Retrieval (CBIR) approaches proposed in literature, is today an important research issue. Given the wealth of images on the Web, CBIR systems must in fact leap towards Web-scale datasets. In this paper, we report on our experience in building a test collection of 100 million images, with the corresponding descrip… ▽ More The scalability, as well as the effectiveness, of the different Content-based Image Retrieval (CBIR) approaches proposed in literature, is today an important research issue. Given the wealth of images on the Web, CBIR systems must in fact leap towards Web-scale datasets. In this paper, we report on our experience in building a test collection of 100 million images, with the corresponding descriptive features, to be used in experimenting new scalable techniques for similarity searching, and comparing their results. In the context of the SAPIR (Search on Audio-visual content using Peer-to-peer Information Retrieval) European project, we had to experiment our distributed similarity searching technology on a realistic data set. Therefore, since no large-scale collection was available for research purposes, we had to tackle the non-trivial process of image crawling and descriptive feature extraction (we used five MPEG-7 features) using the European EGEE computer GRID. The result of this effort is CoPhIR, the first CBIR test collection of such scale. CoPhIR is now open to the research community for experiments and comparisons, and access to the collection was already granted to more than 50 research groups worldwide. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2009; v1 submitted 28 May, 2009; originally announced May 2009.

Comments: 15 pages