Showing 1–18 of 18 results for author: Lonsing, F

Lightweight Online Learning for Sets of Related Problems in Automated Reasoning

Authors: Haoze Wu, Christopher Hahn, Florian Lonsing, Makai Mann, Raghuram Ramanujan, Clark Barrett

Abstract: We present Self-Driven Strategy Learning ($\textit{sdsl}$), a lightweight online learning methodology for automated reasoning tasks that involve solving a set of related problems. $\textit{sdsl}$ does not require offline training, but instead automatically constructs a dataset while solving earlier problems. It fits a machine learning model to this data which is then used to adjust the solving str… ▽ More We present Self-Driven Strategy Learning ($\textit{sdsl}$), a lightweight online learning methodology for automated reasoning tasks that involve solving a set of related problems. $\textit{sdsl}$ does not require offline training, but instead automatically constructs a dataset while solving earlier problems. It fits a machine learning model to this data which is then used to adjust the solving strategy for later problems. We formally define the approach as a set of abstract transition rules. We describe a concrete instance of the sdsl calculus which uses conditional sampling for generating data and random forests as the underlying machine learning model. We implement the approach on top of the Kissat solver and show that the combination of Kissat+$\textit{sdsl}$ certifies larger bounds and finds more counter-examples than other state-of-the-art bounded model checking approaches on benchmarks obtained from the latest Hardware Model Checking Competition. △ Less

Submitted 15 August, 2023; v1 submitted 18 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: Condensed version published at FMCAD'23

Scaling Up Hardware Accelerator Verification using A-QED with Functional Decomposition

Authors: Saranyu Chattopadhyay, Florian Lonsing, Luca Piccolboni, Deepraj Soni, Peng Wei, Xiaofan Zhang, Yuan Zhou, Luca Carloni, Deming Chen, Jason Cong, Ramesh Karri, Zhiru Zhang, Caroline Trippel, Clark Barrett, Subhasish Mitra

Abstract: Hardware accelerators (HAs) are essential building blocks for fast and energy-efficient computing systems. Accelerator Quick Error Detection (A-QED) is a recent formal technique which uses Bounded Model Checking for pre-silicon verification of HAs. A-QED checks an HA for self-consistency, i.e., whether identical inputs within a sequence of operations always produce the same output. Under modest as… ▽ More Hardware accelerators (HAs) are essential building blocks for fast and energy-efficient computing systems. Accelerator Quick Error Detection (A-QED) is a recent formal technique which uses Bounded Model Checking for pre-silicon verification of HAs. A-QED checks an HA for self-consistency, i.e., whether identical inputs within a sequence of operations always produce the same output. Under modest assumptions, A-QED is both sound and complete. However, as is well-known, large design sizes significantly limit the scalability of formal verification, including A-QED. We overcome this scalability challenge through a new decomposition technique for A-QED, called A-QED with Decomposition (A-QED$^2$). A-QED$^2$ systematically decomposes an HA into smaller, functional sub-modules, called sub-accelerators, which are then verified independently using A-QED. We prove completeness of A-QED$^2$; in particular, if the full HA under verification contains a bug, then A-QED$^2$ ensures detection of that bug during A-QED verification of the corresponding sub-accelerators. Results on over 100 (buggy) versions of a wide variety of HAs with millions of logic gates demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of A-QED$^2$. △ Less

Submitted 17 August, 2021; v1 submitted 13 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: preprint of a paper to appear at FMCAD 2021, including appendix

Effective Pre-Silicon Verification of Processor Cores by Breaking the Bounds of Symbolic Quick Error Detection

Authors: Karthik Ganesan, Florian Lonsing, Srinivasa Shashank Nuthakki, Eshan Singh, Mohammad Rahmani Fadiheh, Wolfgang Kunz, Dominik Stoffel, Clark Barrett, Subhasish Mitra

Abstract: We present a novel approach to pre-silicon verification of processor designs. The purpose of pre-silicon verification is to find logic bugs in a design at an early stage and thus avoid time- and cost-intensive post-silicon debugging. Our approach relies on symbolic quick error detection (Symbolic QED, or SQED). SQED is targeted at finding logic bugs in a symbolic representation of a design by comb… ▽ More We present a novel approach to pre-silicon verification of processor designs. The purpose of pre-silicon verification is to find logic bugs in a design at an early stage and thus avoid time- and cost-intensive post-silicon debugging. Our approach relies on symbolic quick error detection (Symbolic QED, or SQED). SQED is targeted at finding logic bugs in a symbolic representation of a design by combining bounded model checking (BMC) with QED tests. QED tests are powerful in generating short sequences of instructions (traces) that trigger bugs. We extend an existing SQED approach with symbolic starting states. This way, we enable the BMC tool to select starting states arbitrarily when generating a trace. To avoid false positives, (e.g., traces starting in unreachable states that may not be-have in accordance with the processor instruction-set architecture), we define constraints to restrict the set of possible starting states. We demonstrate that these constraints, togeth-er with reasonable assumptions about the system behavior, allow us to avoid false positives. Using our approach, we discovered previously unknown bugs in open-source RISC-V processor cores that existing methods cannot detect. Moreover, our novel approach out-performs existing ones in the detection of bugs having long traces and in the detection of hardware Trojans, i.e., unauthorized modifications of a design. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: This article has the full author list which was missing in arXiv:1908.06757. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1908.06757

A Theoretical Framework for Symbolic Quick Error Detection

Authors: Florian Lonsing, Subhasish Mitra, Clark Barrett

Abstract: Symbolic quick error detection (SQED) is a formal pre-silicon verification technique targeted at processor designs. It leverages bounded model checking (BMC) to check a design for counterexamples to a self-consistency property: given the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the design, executing an instruction sequence twice on the same inputs must always produce the same outputs. Self-consistenc… ▽ More Symbolic quick error detection (SQED) is a formal pre-silicon verification technique targeted at processor designs. It leverages bounded model checking (BMC) to check a design for counterexamples to a self-consistency property: given the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the design, executing an instruction sequence twice on the same inputs must always produce the same outputs. Self-consistency is a universal, implementation-independent property. Consequently, in contrast to traditional verification approaches that use implementation-specific assertions (often generated manually), SQED does not require a full formal design specification or manually-written properties. Case studies have shown that SQED is effective for commercial designs and that SQED substantially improves design productivity. However, until now there has been no formal characterization of its bug-finding capabilities. We aim to close this gap by laying a formal foundation for SQED. We use a transition-system processor model and define the notion of a bug using an abstract specification relation. We prove the soundness of SQED, i.e., that any bug reported by SQED is in fact a real bug in the processor. Importantly, this result holds regardless of what the actual specification relation is. We next describe conditions under which SQED is complete, that is, what kinds of bugs it is guaranteed to find. We show that for a large class of bugs, SQED can always find a trace exhibiting the bug. Ultimately, we prove full completeness of a variant of SQED that uses specialized state reset instructions. Our results enable a rigorous understanding of SQED and its bug-finding capabilities and give insights on how to optimize implementations of SQED in practice. △ Less

Submitted 17 August, 2020; v1 submitted 9 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: preprint of a paper to appear at FMCAD 2020, including appendix

QRATPre+: Effective QBF Preprocessing via Strong Redundancy Properties

Authors: Florian Lonsing, Uwe Egly

Abstract: We present version 2.0 of QRATPre+, a preprocessor for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) based on the QRAT proof system and its generalization QRAT+. These systems rely on strong redundancy properties of clauses and universal literals. QRATPre+ is the first implementation of these redundancy properties in QRAT and QRAT+ used to simplify QBFs in preprocessing. It is written in C and features an AP… ▽ More We present version 2.0 of QRATPre+, a preprocessor for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) based on the QRAT proof system and its generalization QRAT+. These systems rely on strong redundancy properties of clauses and universal literals. QRATPre+ is the first implementation of these redundancy properties in QRAT and QRAT+ used to simplify QBFs in preprocessing. It is written in C and features an API for easy integration in other QBF tools. We present implementation details and report on experimental results demonstrating that QRATPre+ improves upon the power of state-of-the-art preprocessors and solvers. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2019; v1 submitted 29 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: preprint of a paper to be published at SAT 2019, LNCS, Springer, including appendix

Expansion-Based QBF Solving Without Recursion

Authors: Roderick Bloem, Nicolas Braud-Santoni, Vedad Hadzic, Uwe Egly, Florian Lonsing, Martina Seidl

Abstract: In recent years, expansion-based techniques have been shown to be very powerful in theory and practice for solving quantified Boolean formulas (QBF), the extension of propositional formulas with existential and universal quantifiers over Boolean variables. Such approaches partially expand one type of variable (either existential or universal) and pass the obtained formula to a SAT solver for decid… ▽ More In recent years, expansion-based techniques have been shown to be very powerful in theory and practice for solving quantified Boolean formulas (QBF), the extension of propositional formulas with existential and universal quantifiers over Boolean variables. Such approaches partially expand one type of variable (either existential or universal) and pass the obtained formula to a SAT solver for deciding the QBF. State-of-the-art expansion-based solvers process the given formula quantifier-block wise and recursively apply expansion until a solution is found. In this paper, we present a novel algorithm for expansion-based QBF solving that deals with the whole quantifier prefix at once. Hence recursive applications of the expansion principle are avoided. Experiments indicate that the performance of our simple approach is comparable with the state of the art of QBF solving, especially in combination with other solving techniques. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2018; v1 submitted 24 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: To appear in proceedings of FMCAD 2018

QRAT+: Generalizing QRAT by a More Powerful QBF Redundancy Property

Authors: Florian Lonsing, Uwe Egly

Abstract: The QRAT (quantified resolution asymmetric tautology) proof system simulates virtually all inference rules applied in state of the art quantified Boolean formula (QBF) reasoning tools. It consists of rules to rewrite a QBF by adding and deleting clauses and universal literals that have a certain redundancy property. To check for this redundancy property in QRAT, propositional unit propagation (UP)… ▽ More The QRAT (quantified resolution asymmetric tautology) proof system simulates virtually all inference rules applied in state of the art quantified Boolean formula (QBF) reasoning tools. It consists of rules to rewrite a QBF by adding and deleting clauses and universal literals that have a certain redundancy property. To check for this redundancy property in QRAT, propositional unit propagation (UP) is applied to the quantifier free, i.e., propositional part of the QBF. We generalize the redundancy property in the QRAT system by QBF specific UP (QUP). QUP extends UP by the universal reduction operation to eliminate universal literals from clauses. We apply QUP to an abstraction of the QBF where certain universal quantifiers are converted into existential ones. This way, we obtain a generalization of QRAT we call QRAT+. The redundancy property in QRAT+ based on QUP is more powerful than the one in QRAT based on UP. We report on proof theoretical improvements and experimental results to illustrate the benefits of QRAT+ for QBF preprocessing. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2018; v1 submitted 9 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: preprint of a paper to be published at IJCAR 2018, LNCS, Springer, including appendix

DepQBF 6.0: A Search-Based QBF Solver Beyond Traditional QCDCL

Authors: Florian Lonsing, Uwe Egly

Abstract: We present the latest major release version 6.0 of the quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solver DepQBF, which is based on QCDCL. QCDCL is an extension of the conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) paradigm implemented in state of the art propositional satisfiability (SAT) solvers. The Q-resolution calculus (QRES) is a QBF proof system which underlies QCDCL. QCDCL solvers can produce QRES proofs of… ▽ More We present the latest major release version 6.0 of the quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solver DepQBF, which is based on QCDCL. QCDCL is an extension of the conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) paradigm implemented in state of the art propositional satisfiability (SAT) solvers. The Q-resolution calculus (QRES) is a QBF proof system which underlies QCDCL. QCDCL solvers can produce QRES proofs of QBFs in prenex conjunctive normal form (PCNF) as a byproduct of the solving process. In contrast to traditional QCDCL based on QRES, DepQBF 6.0 implements a variant of QCDCL which is based on a generalization of QRES. This generalization is due to a set of additional axioms and leaves the original Q-resolution rules unchanged. The generalization of QRES enables QCDCL to potentially produce exponentially shorter proofs than the traditional variant. We present an overview of the features implemented in DepQBF and report on experimental results which demonstrate the effectiveness of generalized QRES in QCDCL. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2017; v1 submitted 27 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Comments: 12 pages + appendix; to appear in the proceedings of CADE-26, LNCS, Springer, 2017

Evaluating QBF Solvers: Quantifier Alternations Matter

Authors: Florian Lonsing, Uwe Egly

Abstract: We present an experimental study of the effects of quantifier alternations on the evaluation of quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solvers. The number of quantifier alternations in a QBF in prenex conjunctive normal form (PCNF) is directly related to the theoretical hardness of the respective QBF satisfiability problem in the polynomial hierarchy. We show empirically that the performance of solvers… ▽ More We present an experimental study of the effects of quantifier alternations on the evaluation of quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solvers. The number of quantifier alternations in a QBF in prenex conjunctive normal form (PCNF) is directly related to the theoretical hardness of the respective QBF satisfiability problem in the polynomial hierarchy. We show empirically that the performance of solvers based on different solving paradigms substantially varies depending on the numbers of alternations in PCNFs. In related theoretical work, quantifier alternations have become the focus of understanding the strengths and weaknesses of various QBF proof systems implemented in solvers. Our results motivate the development of methods to evaluate orthogonal solving paradigms by taking quantifier alternations into account. This is necessary to showcase the broad range of existing QBF solving paradigms for practical QBF applications. Moreover, we highlight the potential of combining different approaches and QBF proof systems in solvers. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2018; v1 submitted 23 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: preprint of a paper to be published at CP 2018, LNCS, Springer, including appendix

Satisfiability-Based Methods for Reactive Synthesis from Safety Specifications

Authors: Roderick Bloem, Uwe Egly, Patrick Klampfl, Robert Könighofer, Florian Lonsing, Martina Seidl

Abstract: Existing approaches to synthesize reactive systems from declarative specifications mostly rely on Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs), inheriting their scalability issues. We present novel algorithms for safety specifications that use decision procedures for propositional formulas (SAT solvers), Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF solvers), or Effectively Propositional Logic (EPR). Our algorithms are bas… ▽ More Existing approaches to synthesize reactive systems from declarative specifications mostly rely on Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs), inheriting their scalability issues. We present novel algorithms for safety specifications that use decision procedures for propositional formulas (SAT solvers), Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF solvers), or Effectively Propositional Logic (EPR). Our algorithms are based on query learning, templates, reduction to EPR, QBF certification, and interpolation. A parallelization combines multiple algorithms. Our optimizations expand quantifiers and utilize unreachable states and variable independencies. Our approach outperforms a simple BDD-based tool and is competitive with a highly optimized one. It won two medals in the SyntComp competition. △ Less

Submitted 21 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

Comments: This is the manuscript of an article that has been submitted to the Journal of Computer and System Sciences (JCSS)

Q-Resolution with Generalized Axioms

Authors: Florian Lonsing, Uwe Egly, Martina Seidl

Abstract: Q-resolution is a proof system for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) in prenex conjunctive normal form (PCNF) which underlies search-based QBF solvers with clause and cube learning (QCDCL). With the aim to derive and learn stronger clauses and cubes earlier in the search, we generalize the axioms of the Q-resolution calculus resulting in an exponentially more powerful proof system. The generalize… ▽ More Q-resolution is a proof system for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) in prenex conjunctive normal form (PCNF) which underlies search-based QBF solvers with clause and cube learning (QCDCL). With the aim to derive and learn stronger clauses and cubes earlier in the search, we generalize the axioms of the Q-resolution calculus resulting in an exponentially more powerful proof system. The generalized axioms introduce an interface of Q-resolution to any other QBF proof system allowing for the direct combination of orthogonal solving techniques. We implemented a variant of the Q-resolution calculus with generalized axioms in the QBF solver DepQBF. As two case studies, we apply integrated SAT solving and resource-bounded QBF preprocessing during the search to heuristically detect potential axiom applications. Experiments with application benchmarks indicate a substantial performance improvement. △ Less

Submitted 22 April, 2016; v1 submitted 20 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

Comments: (minor fixes) camera-ready version + appendix; to appear in the proceedings of SAT 2016, LNCS, Springer

HordeQBF: A Modular and Massively Parallel QBF Solver

Authors: Tomas Balyo, Florian Lonsing

Abstract: The recently developed massively parallel satisfiability (SAT) solver HordeSAT was designed in a modular way to allow the integration of any sequential CDCL-based SAT solver in its core. We integrated the QCDCL-based quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solver DepQBF in HordeSAT to obtain a massively parallel QBF solver---HordeQBF. In this paper we describe the details of this integration and report o… ▽ More The recently developed massively parallel satisfiability (SAT) solver HordeSAT was designed in a modular way to allow the integration of any sequential CDCL-based SAT solver in its core. We integrated the QCDCL-based quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solver DepQBF in HordeSAT to obtain a massively parallel QBF solver---HordeQBF. In this paper we describe the details of this integration and report on results of the experimental evaluation of HordeQBF's performance. HordeQBF achieves superlinear average and median speedup on the hard application instances of the 2014 QBF Gallery. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

Comments: camera-ready version, 6-page tool paper, to appear in the proceedings of SAT 2016, LNCS, Springer

The QBF Gallery: Behind the Scenes

Authors: Florian Lonsing, Martina Seidl, Allen Van Gelder

Abstract: Over the last few years, much progress has been made in the theory and practice of solving quantified Boolean formulas (QBF). Novel solvers have been presented that either successfully enhance established techniques or implement novel solving paradigms. Powerful preprocessors have been realized that tune the encoding of a formula to make it easier to solve. Frameworks for certification and solutio… ▽ More Over the last few years, much progress has been made in the theory and practice of solving quantified Boolean formulas (QBF). Novel solvers have been presented that either successfully enhance established techniques or implement novel solving paradigms. Powerful preprocessors have been realized that tune the encoding of a formula to make it easier to solve. Frameworks for certification and solution extraction emerged that allow for a detailed interpretation of a QBF solver's results, and new types of QBF encodings were presented for various application problems. To capture these developments the QBF Gallery was established in 2013. The QBF Gallery aims at providing a forum to assess QBF tools and to collect new, expressive benchmarks that allow for documenting the status quo and that indicate promising research directions. These benchmarks became the basis for the experiments conducted in the context of the QBF Gallery 2013 and follow-up evaluations. In this paper, we report on the setup of the QBF Gallery. To this end, we conducted numerous experiments which allowed us not only to assess the quality of the tools, but also the quality of the benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2016; v1 submitted 5 August, 2015; originally announced August 2015.

Comments: preprint of an article to appear in Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier, 2016

Automated Benchmarking of Incremental SAT and QBF Solvers

Authors: Uwe Egly, Florian Lonsing, Johannes Oetsch

Abstract: Incremental SAT and QBF solving potentially yields improvements when sequences of related formulas are solved. An incremental application is usually tailored towards some specific solver and decomposes a problem into incremental solver calls. This hinders the independent comparison of different solvers, particularly when the application program is not available. As a remedy, we present an approach… ▽ More Incremental SAT and QBF solving potentially yields improvements when sequences of related formulas are solved. An incremental application is usually tailored towards some specific solver and decomposes a problem into incremental solver calls. This hinders the independent comparison of different solvers, particularly when the application program is not available. As a remedy, we present an approach to automated benchmarking of incremental SAT and QBF solvers. Given a collection of formulas in (Q)DIMACS format generated incrementally by an application program, our approach automatically translates the formulas into instructions to import and solve a formula by an incremental SAT/QBF solver. The result of the translation is a program which replays the incremental solver calls and thus allows to evaluate incremental solvers independently from the application program. We illustrate our approach by different hardware verification problems for SAT and QBF solvers. △ Less

Submitted 15 September, 2015; v1 submitted 29 June, 2015; originally announced June 2015.

Comments: camera-ready version (8 pages + 2 pages appendix), to appear in the proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning (LPAR), LNCS, Springer, 2015

Incrementally Computing Minimal Unsatisfiable Cores of QBFs via a Clause Group Solver API

Authors: Florian Lonsing, Uwe Egly

Abstract: We consider the incremental computation of minimal unsatisfiable cores (MUCs) of QBFs. To this end, we equipped our incremental QBF solver DepQBF with a novel API to allow for incremental solving based on clause groups. A clause group is a set of clauses which is incrementally added to or removed from a previously solved QBF. Our implementation of the novel API is related to incremental SAT solvin… ▽ More We consider the incremental computation of minimal unsatisfiable cores (MUCs) of QBFs. To this end, we equipped our incremental QBF solver DepQBF with a novel API to allow for incremental solving based on clause groups. A clause group is a set of clauses which is incrementally added to or removed from a previously solved QBF. Our implementation of the novel API is related to incremental SAT solving based on selector variables and assumptions. However, the API entirely hides selector variables and assumptions from the user, which facilitates the integration of DepQBF in other tools. We present implementation details and, for the first time, report on experiments related to the computation of MUCs of QBFs using DepQBF's novel clause group API. △ Less

Submitted 23 July, 2015; v1 submitted 9 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: (fixed typo), camera-ready version, 6-page tool paper, to appear in proceedings of SAT 2015, LNCS, Springer

SAT-Based Methods for Circuit Synthesis

Authors: Roderick Bloem, Uwe Egly, Patrick Klampfl, Robert Koenighofer, Florian Lonsing

Abstract: Reactive synthesis supports designers by automatically constructing correct hardware from declarative specifications. Synthesis algorithms usually compute a strategy, and then construct a circuit that implements it. In this work, we study SAT- and QBF-based methods for the second step, i.e., computing circuits from strategies. This includes methods based on QBF-certification, interpolation, and co… ▽ More Reactive synthesis supports designers by automatically constructing correct hardware from declarative specifications. Synthesis algorithms usually compute a strategy, and then construct a circuit that implements it. In this work, we study SAT- and QBF-based methods for the second step, i.e., computing circuits from strategies. This includes methods based on QBF-certification, interpolation, and computational learning. We present optimizations, efficient implementations, and experimental results for synthesis from safety specifications, where we outperform BDDs both regarding execution time and circuit size. This is an extended version of [2], with an additional appendix. △ Less

Submitted 25 August, 2014; v1 submitted 11 August, 2014; originally announced August 2014.

Comments: Extended version of a paper at FMCAD'14

Conformant Planning as a Case Study of Incremental QBF Solving

Authors: Uwe Egly, Martin Kronegger, Florian Lonsing, Andreas Pfandler

Abstract: We consider planning with uncertainty in the initial state as a case study of incremental quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solving. We report on experiments with a workflow to incrementally encode a planning instance into a sequence of QBFs. To solve this sequence of incrementally constructed QBFs, we use our general-purpose incremental QBF solver DepQBF. Since the generated QBFs have many clauses… ▽ More We consider planning with uncertainty in the initial state as a case study of incremental quantified Boolean formula (QBF) solving. We report on experiments with a workflow to incrementally encode a planning instance into a sequence of QBFs. To solve this sequence of incrementally constructed QBFs, we use our general-purpose incremental QBF solver DepQBF. Since the generated QBFs have many clauses and variables in common, our approach avoids redundancy both in the encoding phase and in the solving phase. Experimental results show that incremental QBF solving outperforms non-incremental QBF solving. Our results are the first empirical study of incremental QBF solving in the context of planning and motivate its use in other application domains. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2016; v1 submitted 28 May, 2014; originally announced May 2014.

Comments: added reference to extended journal article; revision (camera-ready, to appear in the proceedings of AISC 2014, volume 8884 of LNAI, Springer)

Incremental QBF Solving

Authors: Florian Lonsing, Uwe Egly

Abstract: We consider the problem of incrementally solving a sequence of quantified Boolean formulae (QBF). Incremental solving aims at using information learned from one formula in the process of solving the next formulae in the sequence. Based on a general overview of the problem and related challenges, we present an approach to incremental QBF solving which is application-independent and hence applicable… ▽ More We consider the problem of incrementally solving a sequence of quantified Boolean formulae (QBF). Incremental solving aims at using information learned from one formula in the process of solving the next formulae in the sequence. Based on a general overview of the problem and related challenges, we present an approach to incremental QBF solving which is application-independent and hence applicable to QBF encodings of arbitrary problems. We implemented this approach in our incremental search-based QBF solver DepQBF and report on implementation details. Experimental results illustrate the potential benefits of incremental solving in QBF-based workflows. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2014; v1 submitted 11 February, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Comments: revision (camera-ready, to appear in the proceedings of CP 2014, LNCS, Springer)