Explaining CLIP's performance disparities on data from blind/low vision users
Authors:
Daniela Massiceti,
Camilla Longden,
Agnieszka Słowik,
Samuel Wills,
Martin Grayson,
Cecily Morrison
Abstract:
Large multi-modal models (LMMs) hold the potential to usher in a new era of automated visual assistance for people who are blind or low vision (BLV). Yet, these models have not been systematically evaluated on data captured by BLV users. We address this by empirically assessing CLIP, a widely-used LMM likely to underpin many assistive technologies. Testing 25 CLIP variants in a zero-shot classific…
▽ More
Large multi-modal models (LMMs) hold the potential to usher in a new era of automated visual assistance for people who are blind or low vision (BLV). Yet, these models have not been systematically evaluated on data captured by BLV users. We address this by empirically assessing CLIP, a widely-used LMM likely to underpin many assistive technologies. Testing 25 CLIP variants in a zero-shot classification task, we find that their accuracy is 15 percentage points lower on average for images captured by BLV users than web-crawled images. This disparity stems from CLIP's sensitivities to 1) image content (e.g. not recognizing disability objects as well as other objects); 2) image quality (e.g. not being robust to lighting variation); and 3) text content (e.g. not recognizing objects described by tactile adjectives as well as visual ones). We delve deeper with a textual analysis of three common pre-training datasets: LAION-400M, LAION-2B and DataComp-1B, showing that disability content is rarely mentioned. We then provide three examples that illustrate how the performance disparities extend to three downstream models underpinned by CLIP: OWL-ViT, CLIPSeg and DALL-E2. We find that few-shot learning with as few as 5 images can mitigate CLIP's quality-of-service disparities for BLV users in some scenarios, which we discuss alongside a set of other possible mitigations.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2024; v1 submitted 28 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
Contextual HyperNetworks for Novel Feature Adaptation
Authors:
Angus Lamb,
Evgeny Saveliev,
Yingzhen Li,
Sebastian Tschiatschek,
Camilla Longden,
Simon Woodhead,
José Miguel Hernández-Lobato,
Richard E. Turner,
Pashmina Cameron,
Cheng Zhang
Abstract:
While deep learning has obtained state-of-the-art results in many applications, the adaptation of neural network architectures to incorporate new output features remains a challenge, as neural networks are commonly trained to produce a fixed output dimension. This issue is particularly severe in online learning settings, where new output features, such as items in a recommender system, are added c…
▽ More
While deep learning has obtained state-of-the-art results in many applications, the adaptation of neural network architectures to incorporate new output features remains a challenge, as neural networks are commonly trained to produce a fixed output dimension. This issue is particularly severe in online learning settings, where new output features, such as items in a recommender system, are added continually with few or no associated observations. As such, methods for adapting neural networks to novel features which are both time and data-efficient are desired. To address this, we propose the Contextual HyperNetwork (CHN), an auxiliary model which generates parameters for extending the base model to a new feature, by utilizing both existing data as well as any observations and/or metadata associated with the new feature. At prediction time, the CHN requires only a single forward pass through a neural network, yielding a significant speed-up when compared to re-training and fine-tuning approaches.
To assess the performance of CHNs, we use a CHN to augment a partial variational autoencoder (P-VAE), a deep generative model which can impute the values of missing features in sparsely-observed data. We show that this system obtains improved few-shot learning performance for novel features over existing imputation and meta-learning baselines across recommender systems, e-learning, and healthcare tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
