Showing 1–50 of 60 results for author: Littman, M L

Planetarium: A Rigorous Benchmark for Translating Text to Structured Planning Languages

Authors: Max Zuo, Francisco Piedrahita Velez, Xiaochen Li, Michael L. Littman, Stephen H. Bach

Abstract: Many recent works have explored using language models for planning problems. One line of research focuses on translating natural language descriptions of planning tasks into structured planning languages, such as the planning domain definition language (PDDL). While this approach is promising, accurately measuring the quality of generated PDDL code continues to pose significant challenges. First,… ▽ More Many recent works have explored using language models for planning problems. One line of research focuses on translating natural language descriptions of planning tasks into structured planning languages, such as the planning domain definition language (PDDL). While this approach is promising, accurately measuring the quality of generated PDDL code continues to pose significant challenges. First, generated PDDL code is typically evaluated using planning validators that check whether the problem can be solved with a planner. This method is insufficient because a language model might generate valid PDDL code that does not align with the natural language description of the task. Second, existing evaluation sets often have natural language descriptions of the planning task that closely resemble the ground truth PDDL, reducing the challenge of the task. To bridge this gap, we introduce \benchmarkName, a benchmark designed to evaluate language models' ability to generate PDDL code from natural language descriptions of planning tasks. We begin by creating a PDDL equivalence algorithm that rigorously evaluates the correctness of PDDL code generated by language models by flexibly comparing it against a ground truth PDDL. Then, we present a dataset of $132,037$ text-to-PDDL pairs across 13 different tasks, with varying levels of difficulty. Finally, we evaluate several API-access and open-weight language models that reveal this task's complexity. For example, $87.6\%$ of the PDDL problem descriptions generated by GPT-4o are syntactically parseable, $82.2\%$ are valid, solve-able problems, but only $35.1\%$ are semantically correct, highlighting the need for a more rigorous benchmark for this problem. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

A Domain-Agnostic Approach for Characterization of Lifelong Learning Systems

Authors: Megan M. Baker, Alexander New, Mario Aguilar-Simon, Ziad Al-Halah, Sébastien M. R. Arnold, Ese Ben-Iwhiwhu, Andrew P. Brna, Ethan Brooks, Ryan C. Brown, Zachary Daniels, Anurag Daram, Fabien Delattre, Ryan Dellana, Eric Eaton, Haotian Fu, Kristen Grauman, Jesse Hostetler, Shariq Iqbal, Cassandra Kent, Nicholas Ketz, Soheil Kolouri, George Konidaris, Dhireesha Kudithipudi, Erik Learned-Miller, Seungwon Lee , et al. (22 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Despite the advancement of machine learning techniques in recent years, state-of-the-art systems lack robustness to "real world" events, where the input distributions and tasks encountered by the deployed systems will not be limited to the original training context, and systems will instead need to adapt to novel distributions and tasks while deployed. This critical gap may be addressed through th… ▽ More Despite the advancement of machine learning techniques in recent years, state-of-the-art systems lack robustness to "real world" events, where the input distributions and tasks encountered by the deployed systems will not be limited to the original training context, and systems will instead need to adapt to novel distributions and tasks while deployed. This critical gap may be addressed through the development of "Lifelong Learning" systems that are capable of 1) Continuous Learning, 2) Transfer and Adaptation, and 3) Scalability. Unfortunately, efforts to improve these capabilities are typically treated as distinct areas of research that are assessed independently, without regard to the impact of each separate capability on other aspects of the system. We instead propose a holistic approach, using a suite of metrics and an evaluation framework to assess Lifelong Learning in a principled way that is agnostic to specific domains or system techniques. Through five case studies, we show that this suite of metrics can inform the development of varied and complex Lifelong Learning systems. We highlight how the proposed suite of metrics quantifies performance trade-offs present during Lifelong Learning system development - both the widely discussed Stability-Plasticity dilemma and the newly proposed relationship between Sample Efficient and Robust Learning. Further, we make recommendations for the formulation and use of metrics to guide the continuing development of Lifelong Learning systems and assess their progress in the future. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: To appear in Neural Networks

Tiered Reward Functions: Specifying and Fast Learning of Desired Behavior

Authors: Zhiyuan Zhou, Shreyas Sundara Raman, Henry Sowerby, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Reinforcement-learning agents seek to maximize a reward signal through environmental interactions. As humans, our job in the learning process is to design reward functions to express desired behavior and enable the agent to learn such behavior swiftly. In this work, we consider the reward-design problem in tasks formulated as reaching desirable states and avoiding undesirable states. To start, we… ▽ More Reinforcement-learning agents seek to maximize a reward signal through environmental interactions. As humans, our job in the learning process is to design reward functions to express desired behavior and enable the agent to learn such behavior swiftly. In this work, we consider the reward-design problem in tasks formulated as reaching desirable states and avoiding undesirable states. To start, we propose a strict partial ordering of the policy space to resolve trade-offs in behavior preference. We prefer policies that reach the good states faster and with higher probability while avoiding the bad states longer. Next, we introduce Tiered Reward, a class of environment-independent reward functions and show it is guaranteed to induce policies that are Pareto-optimal according to our preference relation. Finally, we demonstrate that Tiered Reward can lead to fast learning by evaluating on several environments using multiple tabular and deep reinforcement-learning algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2024; v1 submitted 7 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: For code, see https://github.com/zhouzypaul/tiered-reward

Evaluation Beyond Task Performance: Analyzing Concepts in AlphaZero in Hex

Authors: Charles Lovering, Jessica Zosa Forde, George Konidaris, Ellie Pavlick, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: AlphaZero, an approach to reinforcement learning that couples neural networks and Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), has produced state-of-the-art strategies for traditional board games like chess, Go, shogi, and Hex. While researchers and game commentators have suggested that AlphaZero uses concepts that humans consider important, it is unclear how these concepts are captured in the network. We inve… ▽ More AlphaZero, an approach to reinforcement learning that couples neural networks and Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), has produced state-of-the-art strategies for traditional board games like chess, Go, shogi, and Hex. While researchers and game commentators have suggested that AlphaZero uses concepts that humans consider important, it is unclear how these concepts are captured in the network. We investigate AlphaZero's internal representations in the game of Hex using two evaluation techniques from natural language processing (NLP): model probing and behavioral tests. In doing so, we introduce new evaluation tools to the RL community and illustrate how evaluations other than task performance can be used to provide a more complete picture of a model's strengths and weaknesses. Our analyses in the game of Hex reveal interesting patterns and generate some testable hypotheses about how such models learn in general. For example, we find that MCTS discovers concepts before the neural network learns to encode them. We also find that concepts related to short-term end-game planning are best encoded in the final layers of the model, whereas concepts related to long-term planning are encoded in the middle layers of the model. △ Less

Submitted 26 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 10 pages, Neural Information Processing Systems 2022

Reward-Predictive Clustering

Authors: Lucas Lehnert, Michael J. Frank, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Recent advances in reinforcement-learning research have demonstrated impressive results in building algorithms that can out-perform humans in complex tasks. Nevertheless, creating reinforcement-learning systems that can build abstractions of their experience to accelerate learning in new contexts still remains an active area of research. Previous work showed that reward-predictive state abstractio… ▽ More Recent advances in reinforcement-learning research have demonstrated impressive results in building algorithms that can out-perform humans in complex tasks. Nevertheless, creating reinforcement-learning systems that can build abstractions of their experience to accelerate learning in new contexts still remains an active area of research. Previous work showed that reward-predictive state abstractions fulfill this goal, but have only be applied to tabular settings. Here, we provide a clustering algorithm that enables the application of such state abstractions to deep learning settings, providing compressed representations of an agent's inputs that preserve the ability to predict sequences of reward. A convergence theorem and simulations show that the resulting reward-predictive deep network maximally compresses the agent's inputs, significantly speeding up learning in high dimensional visual control tasks. Furthermore, we present different generalization experiments and analyze under which conditions a pre-trained reward-predictive representation network can be re-used without re-training to accelerate learning -- a form of systematic out-of-distribution transfer. △ Less

Submitted 6 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) 2021 Study Panel Report

Authors: Michael L. Littman, Ifeoma Ajunwa, Guy Berger, Craig Boutilier, Morgan Currie, Finale Doshi-Velez, Gillian Hadfield, Michael C. Horowitz, Charles Isbell, Hiroaki Kitano, Karen Levy, Terah Lyons, Melanie Mitchell, Julie Shah, Steven Sloman, Shannon Vallor, Toby Walsh

Abstract: In September 2021, the "One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence" project (AI100) issued the second report of its planned long-term periodic assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on society. It was written by a panel of 17 study authors, each of whom is deeply rooted in AI research, chaired by Michael Littman of Brown University. The report, entitled "Gathering Strengt… ▽ More In September 2021, the "One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence" project (AI100) issued the second report of its planned long-term periodic assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on society. It was written by a panel of 17 study authors, each of whom is deeply rooted in AI research, chaired by Michael Littman of Brown University. The report, entitled "Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms," answers a set of 14 questions probing critical areas of AI development addressing the major risks and dangers of AI, its effects on society, its public perception and the future of the field. The report concludes that AI has made a major leap from the lab to people's lives in recent years, which increases the urgency to understand its potential negative effects. The questions were developed by the AI100 Standing Committee, chaired by Peter Stone of the University of Texas at Austin, consisting of a group of AI leaders with expertise in computer science, sociology, ethics, economics, and other disciplines. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: 82 pages, https://ai100.stanford.edu/gathering-strength-gathering-storms-one-hundred-year-study-artificial-intelligence-ai100-2021-study

Designing Rewards for Fast Learning

Authors: Henry Sowerby, Zhiyuan Zhou, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: To convey desired behavior to a Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent, a designer must choose a reward function for the environment, arguably the most important knob designers have in interacting with RL agents. Although many reward functions induce the same optimal behavior (Ng et al., 1999), in practice, some of them result in faster learning than others. In this paper, we look at how reward-design… ▽ More To convey desired behavior to a Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent, a designer must choose a reward function for the environment, arguably the most important knob designers have in interacting with RL agents. Although many reward functions induce the same optimal behavior (Ng et al., 1999), in practice, some of them result in faster learning than others. In this paper, we look at how reward-design choices impact learning speed and seek to identify principles of good reward design that quickly induce target behavior. This reward-identification problem is framed as an optimization problem: Firstly, we advocate choosing state-based rewards that maximize the action gap, making optimal actions easy to distinguish from suboptimal ones. Secondly, we propose minimizing a measure of the horizon, something we call the "subjective discount", over which rewards need to be optimized to encourage agents to make optimal decisions with less lookahead. To solve this optimization problem, we propose a linear-programming based algorithm that efficiently finds a reward function that maximizes action gap and minimizes subjective discount. We test the rewards generated with the algorithm in tabular environments with Q-Learning, and empirically show they lead to faster learning. Although we only focus on Q-Learning because it is perhaps the simplest and most well understood RL algorithm, preliminary results with R-max (Brafman and Tennenholtz, 2000) suggest our results are much more general. Our experiments support three principles of reward design: 1) consistent with existing results, penalizing each step taken induces faster learning than rewarding the goal. 2) When rewarding subgoals along the target trajectory, rewards should gradually increase as the goal gets closer. 3) Dense reward that's nonzero on every state is only good if designed carefully. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: To appear at the 5th Multidisciplinary Conference on Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making (RLDM2022)

Faster Deep Reinforcement Learning with Slower Online Network

Authors: Kavosh Asadi, Rasool Fakoor, Omer Gottesman, Taesup Kim, Michael L. Littman, Alexander J. Smola

Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning algorithms often use two networks for value function optimization: an online network, and a target network that tracks the online network with some delay. Using two separate networks enables the agent to hedge against issues that arise when performing bootstrap**. In this paper we endow two popular deep reinforcement learning algorithms, namely DQN and Rainbow, with u… ▽ More Deep reinforcement learning algorithms often use two networks for value function optimization: an online network, and a target network that tracks the online network with some delay. Using two separate networks enables the agent to hedge against issues that arise when performing bootstrap**. In this paper we endow two popular deep reinforcement learning algorithms, namely DQN and Rainbow, with updates that incentivize the online network to remain in the proximity of the target network. This improves the robustness of deep reinforcement learning in presence of noisy updates. The resultant agents, called DQN Pro and Rainbow Pro, exhibit significant performance improvements over their original counterparts on the Atari benchmark demonstrating the effectiveness of this simple idea in deep reinforcement learning. The code for our paper is available here: Github.com/amazon-research/fast-rl-with-slow-updates. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2023; v1 submitted 10 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: Published at the Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022)

On the Expressivity of Markov Reward

Authors: David Abel, Will Dabney, Anna Harutyunyan, Mark K. Ho, Michael L. Littman, Doina Precup, Satinder Singh

Abstract: Reward is the driving force for reinforcement-learning agents. This paper is dedicated to understanding the expressivity of reward as a way to capture tasks that we would want an agent to perform. We frame this study around three new abstract notions of "task" that might be desirable: (1) a set of acceptable behaviors, (2) a partial ordering over behaviors, or (3) a partial ordering over trajector… ▽ More Reward is the driving force for reinforcement-learning agents. This paper is dedicated to understanding the expressivity of reward as a way to capture tasks that we would want an agent to perform. We frame this study around three new abstract notions of "task" that might be desirable: (1) a set of acceptable behaviors, (2) a partial ordering over behaviors, or (3) a partial ordering over trajectories. Our main results prove that while reward can express many of these tasks, there exist instances of each task type that no Markov reward function can capture. We then provide a set of polynomial-time algorithms that construct a Markov reward function that allows an agent to optimize tasks of each of these three types, and correctly determine when no such reward function exists. We conclude with an empirical study that corroborates and illustrates our theoretical findings. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2022; v1 submitted 1 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: Accepted to NeurIPS 2021

Bad-Policy Density: A Measure of Reinforcement Learning Hardness

Authors: David Abel, Cameron Allen, Dilip Arumugam, D. Ellis Hershkowitz, Michael L. Littman, Lawson L. S. Wong

Abstract: Reinforcement learning is hard in general. Yet, in many specific environments, learning is easy. What makes learning easy in one environment, but difficult in another? We address this question by proposing a simple measure of reinforcement-learning hardness called the bad-policy density. This quantity measures the fraction of the deterministic stationary policy space that is below a desired thresh… ▽ More Reinforcement learning is hard in general. Yet, in many specific environments, learning is easy. What makes learning easy in one environment, but difficult in another? We address this question by proposing a simple measure of reinforcement-learning hardness called the bad-policy density. This quantity measures the fraction of the deterministic stationary policy space that is below a desired threshold in value. We prove that this simple quantity has many properties one would expect of a measure of learning hardness. Further, we prove it is NP-hard to compute the measure in general, but there are paths to polynomial-time approximation. We conclude by summarizing potential directions and uses for this measure. △ Less

Submitted 7 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Presented at the 2021 ICML Workshop on Reinforcement Learning Theory

Convergence of a Human-in-the-Loop Policy-Gradient Algorithm With Eligibility Trace Under Reward, Policy, and Advantage Feedback

Authors: Ishaan Shah, David Halpern, Kavosh Asadi, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Fluid human-agent communication is essential for the future of human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning. An agent must respond appropriately to feedback from its human trainer even before they have significant experience working together. Therefore, it is important that learning agents respond well to various feedback schemes human trainers are likely to provide. This work analyzes the COnvergent… ▽ More Fluid human-agent communication is essential for the future of human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning. An agent must respond appropriately to feedback from its human trainer even before they have significant experience working together. Therefore, it is important that learning agents respond well to various feedback schemes human trainers are likely to provide. This work analyzes the COnvergent Actor-Critic by Humans (COACH) algorithm under three different types of feedback-policy feedback, reward feedback, and advantage feedback. For these three feedback types, we find that COACH can behave sub-optimally. We propose a variant of COACH, episodic COACH (E-COACH), which we prove converges for all three types. We compare our COACH variant with two other reinforcement-learning algorithms: Q-learning and TAMER. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: Accepted into ICML 2021 workshops Human-AI Collaboration in Sequential Decision-Making and Human in the Loop Learning

Brittle AI, Causal Confusion, and Bad Mental Models: Challenges and Successes in the XAI Program

Authors: Jeff Druce, James Niehaus, Vanessa Moody, David Jensen, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: The advances in artificial intelligence enabled by deep learning architectures are undeniable. In several cases, deep neural network driven models have surpassed human level performance in benchmark autonomy tasks. The underlying policies for these agents, however, are not easily interpretable. In fact, given their underlying deep models, it is impossible to directly understand the map** from ob… ▽ More The advances in artificial intelligence enabled by deep learning architectures are undeniable. In several cases, deep neural network driven models have surpassed human level performance in benchmark autonomy tasks. The underlying policies for these agents, however, are not easily interpretable. In fact, given their underlying deep models, it is impossible to directly understand the map** from observations to actions for any reasonably complex agent. Producing this supporting technology to "open the black box" of these AI systems, while not sacrificing performance, was the fundamental goal of the DARPA XAI program. In our journey through this program, we have several "big picture" takeaways: 1) Explanations need to be highly tailored to their scenario; 2) many seemingly high performing RL agents are extremely brittle and are not amendable to explanation; 3) causal models allow for rich explanations, but how to present them isn't always straightforward; and 4) human subjects conjure fantastically wrong mental models for AIs, and these models are often hard to break. This paper discusses the origins of these takeaways, provides amplifying information, and suggestions for future work. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

People construct simplified mental representations to plan

Authors: Mark K. Ho, David Abel, Carlos G. Correa, Michael L. Littman, Jonathan D. Cohen, Thomas L. Griffiths

Abstract: One of the most striking features of human cognition is the capacity to plan. Two aspects of human planning stand out: its efficiency and flexibility. Efficiency is especially impressive because plans must often be made in complex environments, and yet people successfully plan solutions to myriad everyday problems despite having limited cognitive resources. Standard accounts in psychology, economi… ▽ More One of the most striking features of human cognition is the capacity to plan. Two aspects of human planning stand out: its efficiency and flexibility. Efficiency is especially impressive because plans must often be made in complex environments, and yet people successfully plan solutions to myriad everyday problems despite having limited cognitive resources. Standard accounts in psychology, economics, and artificial intelligence have suggested human planning succeeds because people have a complete representation of a task and then use heuristics to plan future actions in that representation. However, this approach generally assumes that task representations are fixed. Here, we propose that task representations can be controlled and that such control provides opportunities to quickly simplify problems and more easily reason about them. We propose a computational account of this simplification process and, in a series of pre-registered behavioral experiments, show that it is subject to online cognitive control and that people optimally balance the complexity of a task representation and its utility for planning and acting. These results demonstrate how strategically perceiving and conceiving problems facilitates the effective use of limited cognitive resources. △ Less

Submitted 26 November, 2022; v1 submitted 14 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: 56 pages, 5 main figures, 10 extended data figures, supplementary information is included in ancillary files

Journal ref: Nature, 606(7912), 129-136 (2022)

Towards Sample Efficient Agents through Algorithmic Alignment

Authors: Mingxuan Li, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: In this work, we propose and explore Deep Graph Value Network (DeepGV) as a promising method to work around sample complexity in deep reinforcement-learning agents using a message-passing mechanism. The main idea is that the agent should be guided by structured non-neural-network algorithms like dynamic programming. According to recent advances in algorithmic alignment, neural networks with struct… ▽ More In this work, we propose and explore Deep Graph Value Network (DeepGV) as a promising method to work around sample complexity in deep reinforcement-learning agents using a message-passing mechanism. The main idea is that the agent should be guided by structured non-neural-network algorithms like dynamic programming. According to recent advances in algorithmic alignment, neural networks with structured computation procedures can be trained efficiently. We demonstrate the potential of graph neural network in supporting sample efficient learning by showing that Deep Graph Value Network can outperform unstructured baselines by a large margin in solving the Markov Decision Process (MDP). We believe this would open up a new avenue for structured agent design. See https://github.com/drmeerkat/Deep-Graph-Value-Network for the code. △ Less

Submitted 21 October, 2021; v1 submitted 7 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

The Efficiency of Human Cognition Reflects Planned Information Processing

Authors: Mark K. Ho, David Abel, Jonathan D. Cohen, Michael L. Littman, Thomas L. Griffiths

Abstract: Planning is useful. It lets people take actions that have desirable long-term consequences. But, planning is hard. It requires thinking about consequences, which consumes limited computational and cognitive resources. Thus, people should plan their actions, but they should also be smart about how they deploy resources used for planning their actions. Put another way, people should also "plan their… ▽ More Planning is useful. It lets people take actions that have desirable long-term consequences. But, planning is hard. It requires thinking about consequences, which consumes limited computational and cognitive resources. Thus, people should plan their actions, but they should also be smart about how they deploy resources used for planning their actions. Put another way, people should also "plan their plans". Here, we formulate this aspect of planning as a meta-reasoning problem and formalize it in terms of a recursive Bellman objective that incorporates both task rewards and information-theoretic planning costs. Our account makes quantitative predictions about how people should plan and meta-plan as a function of the overall structure of a task, which we test in two experiments with human participants. We find that people's reaction times reflect a planned use of information processing, consistent with our account. This formulation of planning to plan provides new insight into the function of hierarchical planning, state abstraction, and cognitive control in both humans and machines. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: 13 pg (incl. supplemental materials); included in Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Learning State Abstractions for Transfer in Continuous Control

Authors: Kavosh Asadi, David Abel, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Can simple algorithms with a good representation solve challenging reinforcement learning problems? In this work, we answer this question in the affirmative, where we take "simple learning algorithm" to be tabular Q-Learning, the "good representations" to be a learned state abstraction, and "challenging problems" to be continuous control tasks. Our main contribution is a learning algorithm that ab… ▽ More Can simple algorithms with a good representation solve challenging reinforcement learning problems? In this work, we answer this question in the affirmative, where we take "simple learning algorithm" to be tabular Q-Learning, the "good representations" to be a learned state abstraction, and "challenging problems" to be continuous control tasks. Our main contribution is a learning algorithm that abstracts a continuous state-space into a discrete one. We transfer this learned representation to unseen problems to enable effective learning. We provide theory showing that learned abstractions maintain a bounded value loss, and we report experiments showing that the abstractions empower tabular Q-Learning to learn efficiently in unseen tasks. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Deep Radial-Basis Value Functions for Continuous Control

Authors: Kavosh Asadi, Neev Parikh, Ronald E. Parr, George D. Konidaris, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: A core operation in reinforcement learning (RL) is finding an action that is optimal with respect to a learned value function. This operation is often challenging when the learned value function takes continuous actions as input. We introduce deep radial-basis value functions (RBVFs): value functions learned using a deep network with a radial-basis function (RBF) output layer. We show that the max… ▽ More A core operation in reinforcement learning (RL) is finding an action that is optimal with respect to a learned value function. This operation is often challenging when the learned value function takes continuous actions as input. We introduce deep radial-basis value functions (RBVFs): value functions learned using a deep network with a radial-basis function (RBF) output layer. We show that the maximum action-value with respect to a deep RBVF can be approximated easily and accurately. Moreover, deep RBVFs can represent any true value function owing to their support for universal function approximation. We extend the standard DQN algorithm to continuous control by endowing the agent with a deep RBVF. We show that the resultant agent, called RBF-DQN, significantly outperforms value-function-only baselines, and is competitive with state-of-the-art actor-critic algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2021; v1 submitted 5 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: In Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

Lipschitz Lifelong Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Erwan Lecarpentier, David Abel, Kavosh Asadi, Yuu **nai, Emmanuel Rachelson, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: We consider the problem of knowledge transfer when an agent is facing a series of Reinforcement Learning (RL) tasks. We introduce a novel metric between Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) and establish that close MDPs have close optimal value functions. Formally, the optimal value functions are Lipschitz continuous with respect to the tasks space. These theoretical results lead us to a value-transfe… ▽ More We consider the problem of knowledge transfer when an agent is facing a series of Reinforcement Learning (RL) tasks. We introduce a novel metric between Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) and establish that close MDPs have close optimal value functions. Formally, the optimal value functions are Lipschitz continuous with respect to the tasks space. These theoretical results lead us to a value-transfer method for Lifelong RL, which we use to build a PAC-MDP algorithm with improved convergence rate. Further, we show the method to experience no negative transfer with high probability. We illustrate the benefits of the method in Lifelong RL experiments. △ Less

Submitted 22 March, 2021; v1 submitted 15 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: In proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2021), 21 pages, 11 figures

Individual predictions matter: Assessing the effect of data ordering in training fine-tuned CNNs for medical imaging

Authors: John R. Zech, Jessica Zosa Forde, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: We reproduced the results of CheXNet with fixed hyperparameters and 50 different random seeds to identify 14 finding in chest radiographs (x-rays). Because CheXNet fine-tunes a pre-trained DenseNet, the random seed affects the ordering of the batches of training data but not the initialized model weights. We found substantial variability in predictions for the same radiograph across model runs (me… ▽ More We reproduced the results of CheXNet with fixed hyperparameters and 50 different random seeds to identify 14 finding in chest radiographs (x-rays). Because CheXNet fine-tunes a pre-trained DenseNet, the random seed affects the ordering of the batches of training data but not the initialized model weights. We found substantial variability in predictions for the same radiograph across model runs (mean ln[(maximum probability)/(minimum probability)] 2.45, coefficient of variation 0.543). This individual radiograph-level variability was not fully reflected in the variability of AUC on a large test set. Averaging predictions from 10 models reduced variability by nearly 70% (mean coefficient of variation from 0.543 to 0.169, t-test 15.96, p-value < 0.0001). We encourage researchers to be aware of the potential variability of CNNs and ensemble predictions from multiple models to minimize the effect this variability may have on the care of individual patients when these models are deployed clinically. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Comments: J.Z. and J.F. contributed equally to this work

Stackelberg Punishment and Bully-Proofing Autonomous Vehicles

Authors: Matt Cooper, Jun Ki Lee, Jacob Beck, Joshua D. Fishman, Michael Gillett, Zoë Papakipos, Aaron Zhang, Jerome Ramos, Aansh Shah, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Mutually beneficial behavior in repeated games can be enforced via the threat of punishment, as enshrined in game theory's well-known "folk theorem." There is a cost, however, to a player for generating these disincentives. In this work, we seek to minimize this cost by computing a "Stackelberg punishment," in which the player selects a behavior that sufficiently punishes the other player while ma… ▽ More Mutually beneficial behavior in repeated games can be enforced via the threat of punishment, as enshrined in game theory's well-known "folk theorem." There is a cost, however, to a player for generating these disincentives. In this work, we seek to minimize this cost by computing a "Stackelberg punishment," in which the player selects a behavior that sufficiently punishes the other player while maximizing its own score under the assumption that the other player will adopt a best response. This idea generalizes the concept of a Stackelberg equilibrium. Known efficient algorithms for computing a Stackelberg equilibrium can be adapted to efficiently produce a Stackelberg punishment. We demonstrate an application of this idea in an experiment involving a virtual autonomous vehicle and human participants. We find that a self-driving car with a Stackelberg punishment policy discourages human drivers from bullying in a driving scenario requiring social negotiation. △ Less

Submitted 22 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Comments: 10 pages, The 11th International Conference on Social Robotics

Interactive Learning of Environment Dynamics for Sequential Tasks

Authors: Robert Loftin, Bei Peng, Matthew E. Taylor, Michael L. Littman, David L. Roberts

Abstract: In order for robots and other artificial agents to efficiently learn to perform useful tasks defined by an end user, they must understand not only the goals of those tasks, but also the structure and dynamics of that user's environment. While existing work has looked at how the goals of a task can be inferred from a human teacher, the agent is often left to learn about the environment on its own.… ▽ More In order for robots and other artificial agents to efficiently learn to perform useful tasks defined by an end user, they must understand not only the goals of those tasks, but also the structure and dynamics of that user's environment. While existing work has looked at how the goals of a task can be inferred from a human teacher, the agent is often left to learn about the environment on its own. To address this limitation, we develop an algorithm, Behavior Aware Modeling (BAM), which incorporates a teacher's knowledge into a model of the transition dynamics of an agent's environment. We evaluate BAM both in simulation and with real human teachers, learning from a combination of task demonstrations and evaluative feedback, and show that it can outperform approaches which do not explicitly consider this source of dynamics knowledge. △ Less

Submitted 19 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Combating the Compounding-Error Problem with a Multi-step Model

Authors: Kavosh Asadi, Dipendra Misra, Seungchan Kim, Michel L. Littman

Abstract: Model-based reinforcement learning is an appealing framework for creating agents that learn, plan, and act in sequential environments. Model-based algorithms typically involve learning a transition model that takes a state and an action and outputs the next state---a one-step model. This model can be composed with itself to enable predicting multiple steps into the future, but one-step prediction… ▽ More Model-based reinforcement learning is an appealing framework for creating agents that learn, plan, and act in sequential environments. Model-based algorithms typically involve learning a transition model that takes a state and an action and outputs the next state---a one-step model. This model can be composed with itself to enable predicting multiple steps into the future, but one-step prediction errors can get magnified, leading to unacceptable inaccuracy. This compounding-error problem plagues planning and undermines model-based reinforcement learning. In this paper, we address the compounding-error problem by introducing a multi-step model that directly outputs the outcome of executing a sequence of actions. Novel theoretical and empirical results indicate that the multi-step model is more conducive to efficient value-function estimation, and it yields better action selection compared to the one-step model. These results make a strong case for using multi-step models in the context of model-based reinforcement learning. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Deep Reinforcement Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedback

Authors: Dilip Arumugam, Jun Ki Lee, Sophie Saskin, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: To widen their accessibility and increase their utility, intelligent agents must be able to learn complex behaviors as specified by (non-expert) human users. Moreover, they will need to learn these behaviors within a reasonable amount of time while efficiently leveraging the sparse feedback a human trainer is capable of providing. Recent work has shown that human feedback can be characterized as a… ▽ More To widen their accessibility and increase their utility, intelligent agents must be able to learn complex behaviors as specified by (non-expert) human users. Moreover, they will need to learn these behaviors within a reasonable amount of time while efficiently leveraging the sparse feedback a human trainer is capable of providing. Recent work has shown that human feedback can be characterized as a critique of an agent's current behavior rather than as an alternative reward signal to be maximized, culminating in the COnvergent Actor-Critic by Humans (COACH) algorithm for making direct policy updates based on human feedback. Our work builds on COACH, moving to a setting where the agent's policy is represented by a deep neural network. We employ a series of modifications on top of the original COACH algorithm that are critical for successfully learning behaviors from high-dimensional observations, while also satisfying the constraint of obtaining reduced sample complexity. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our Deep COACH algorithm in the rich 3D world of Minecraft with an agent that learns to complete tasks by map** from raw pixels to actions using only real-time human feedback in 10-15 minutes of interaction. △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Successor Features Combine Elements of Model-Free and Model-based Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Lucas Lehnert, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: A key question in reinforcement learning is how an intelligent agent can generalize knowledge across different inputs. By generalizing across different inputs, information learned for one input can be immediately reused for improving predictions for another input. Reusing information allows an agent to compute an optimal decision-making strategy using less data. State representation is a key eleme… ▽ More A key question in reinforcement learning is how an intelligent agent can generalize knowledge across different inputs. By generalizing across different inputs, information learned for one input can be immediately reused for improving predictions for another input. Reusing information allows an agent to compute an optimal decision-making strategy using less data. State representation is a key element of the generalization process, compressing a high-dimensional input space into a low-dimensional latent state space. This article analyzes properties of different latent state spaces, leading to new connections between model-based and model-free reinforcement learning. Successor features, which predict frequencies of future observations, form a link between model-based and model-free learning: Learning to predict future expected reward outcomes, a key characteristic of model-based agents, is equivalent to learning successor features. Learning successor features is a form of temporal difference learning and is equivalent to learning to predict a single policy's utility, which is a characteristic of model-free agents. Drawing on the connection between model-based reinforcement learning and successor features, we demonstrate that representations that are predictive of future reward outcomes generalize across variations in both transitions and rewards. This result extends previous work on successor features, which is constrained to fixed transitions and assumes re-learning of the transferred state representation. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2020; v1 submitted 31 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Theory of Minds: Understanding Behavior in Groups Through Inverse Planning

Authors: Michael Shum, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Michael L. Littman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum

Abstract: Human social behavior is structured by relationships. We form teams, groups, tribes, and alliances at all scales of human life. These structures guide multi-agent cooperation and competition, but when we observe others these underlying relationships are typically unobservable and hence must be inferred. Humans make these inferences intuitively and flexibly, often making rapid generalizations about… ▽ More Human social behavior is structured by relationships. We form teams, groups, tribes, and alliances at all scales of human life. These structures guide multi-agent cooperation and competition, but when we observe others these underlying relationships are typically unobservable and hence must be inferred. Humans make these inferences intuitively and flexibly, often making rapid generalizations about the latent relationships that underlie behavior from just sparse and noisy observations. Rapid and accurate inferences are important for determining who to cooperate with, who to compete with, and how to cooperate in order to compete. Towards the goal of building machine-learning algorithms with human-like social intelligence, we develop a generative model of multi-agent action understanding based on a novel representation for these latent relationships called Composable Team Hierarchies (CTH). This representation is grounded in the formalism of stochastic games and multi-agent reinforcement learning. We use CTH as a target for Bayesian inference yielding a new algorithm for understanding behavior in groups that can both infer hidden relationships as well as predict future actions for multiple agents interacting together. Our algorithm rapidly recovers an underlying causal model of how agents relate in spatial stochastic games from just a few observations. The patterns of inference made by this algorithm closely correspond with human judgments and the algorithm makes the same rapid generalizations that people do. △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Comments: published in AAAI 2019; Michael Shum and Max Kleiman-Weiner contributed equally

Mitigating Planner Overfitting in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Dilip Arumugam, David Abel, Kavosh Asadi, Nakul Gopalan, Christopher Grimm, Jun Ki Lee, Lucas Lehnert, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: An agent with an inaccurate model of its environment faces a difficult choice: it can ignore the errors in its model and act in the real world in whatever way it determines is optimal with respect to its model. Alternatively, it can take a more conservative stance and eschew its model in favor of optimizing its behavior solely via real-world interaction. This latter approach can be exceedingly slo… ▽ More An agent with an inaccurate model of its environment faces a difficult choice: it can ignore the errors in its model and act in the real world in whatever way it determines is optimal with respect to its model. Alternatively, it can take a more conservative stance and eschew its model in favor of optimizing its behavior solely via real-world interaction. This latter approach can be exceedingly slow to learn from experience, while the former can lead to "planner overfitting" - aspects of the agent's behavior are optimized to exploit errors in its model. This paper explores an intermediate position in which the planner seeks to avoid overfitting through a kind of regularization of the plans it considers. We present three different approaches that demonstrably mitigate planner overfitting in reinforcement-learning environments. △ Less

Submitted 19 March, 2020; v1 submitted 3 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Towards a Simple Approach to Multi-step Model-based Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Kavosh Asadi, Evan Cater, Dipendra Misra, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: When environmental interaction is expensive, model-based reinforcement learning offers a solution by planning ahead and avoiding costly mistakes. Model-based agents typically learn a single-step transition model. In this paper, we propose a multi-step model that predicts the outcome of an action sequence with variable length. We show that this model is easy to learn, and that the model can make po… ▽ More When environmental interaction is expensive, model-based reinforcement learning offers a solution by planning ahead and avoiding costly mistakes. Model-based agents typically learn a single-step transition model. In this paper, we propose a multi-step model that predicts the outcome of an action sequence with variable length. We show that this model is easy to learn, and that the model can make policy-conditional predictions. We report preliminary results that show a clear advantage for the multi-step model compared to its one-step counterpart. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Transfer with Model Features in Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Lucas Lehnert, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: A key question in Reinforcement Learning is which representation an agent can learn to efficiently reuse knowledge between different tasks. Recently the Successor Representation was shown to have empirical benefits for transferring knowledge between tasks with shared transition dynamics. This paper presents Model Features: a feature representation that clusters behaviourally equivalent states and… ▽ More A key question in Reinforcement Learning is which representation an agent can learn to efficiently reuse knowledge between different tasks. Recently the Successor Representation was shown to have empirical benefits for transferring knowledge between tasks with shared transition dynamics. This paper presents Model Features: a feature representation that clusters behaviourally equivalent states and that is equivalent to a Model-Reduction. Further, we present a Successor Feature model which shows that learning Successor Features is equivalent to learning a Model-Reduction. A novel optimization objective is developed and we provide bounds showing that minimizing this objective results in an increasingly improved approximation of a Model-Reduction. Further, we provide transfer experiments on randomly generated MDPs which vary in their transition and reward functions but approximately preserve behavioural equivalence between states. These results demonstrate that Model Features are suitable for transfer between tasks with varying transition and reward functions. △ Less

Submitted 4 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Equivalence Between Wasserstein and Value-Aware Loss for Model-based Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Kavosh Asadi, Evan Cater, Dipendra Misra, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Learning a generative model is a key component of model-based reinforcement learning. Though learning a good model in the tabular setting is a simple task, learning a useful model in the approximate setting is challenging. In this context, an important question is the loss function used for model learning as varying the loss function can have a remarkable impact on effectiveness of planning. Recen… ▽ More Learning a generative model is a key component of model-based reinforcement learning. Though learning a good model in the tabular setting is a simple task, learning a useful model in the approximate setting is challenging. In this context, an important question is the loss function used for model learning as varying the loss function can have a remarkable impact on effectiveness of planning. Recently Farahmand et al. (2017) proposed a value-aware model learning (VAML) objective that captures the structure of value function during model learning. Using tools from Asadi et al. (2018), we show that minimizing the VAML objective is in fact equivalent to minimizing the Wasserstein metric. This equivalence improves our understanding of value-aware models, and also creates a theoretical foundation for applications of Wasserstein in model-based reinforcement~learning. △ Less

Submitted 8 July, 2018; v1 submitted 1 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Comments: Accepted at the FAIM workshop "Prediction and Generative Modeling in Reinforcement Learning", Stockholm, Sweden, 2018

Lipschitz Continuity in Model-based Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Kavosh Asadi, Dipendra Misra, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: We examine the impact of learning Lipschitz continuous models in the context of model-based reinforcement learning. We provide a novel bound on multi-step prediction error of Lipschitz models where we quantify the error using the Wasserstein metric. We go on to prove an error bound for the value-function estimate arising from Lipschitz models and show that the estimated value function is itself Li… ▽ More We examine the impact of learning Lipschitz continuous models in the context of model-based reinforcement learning. We provide a novel bound on multi-step prediction error of Lipschitz models where we quantify the error using the Wasserstein metric. We go on to prove an error bound for the value-function estimate arising from Lipschitz models and show that the estimated value function is itself Lipschitz. We conclude with empirical results that show the benefits of controlling the Lipschitz constant of neural-network models. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2018; v1 submitted 19 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: Accepted for the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2018)

Learning Approximate Stochastic Transition Models

Authors: Yuhang Song, Christopher Grimm, Xianming Wang, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: We examine the problem of learning map**s from state to state, suitable for use in a model-based reinforcement-learning setting, that simultaneously generalize to novel states and can capture stochastic transitions. We show that currently popular generative adversarial networks struggle to learn these stochastic transition models but a modification to their loss functions results in a powerful l… ▽ More We examine the problem of learning map**s from state to state, suitable for use in a model-based reinforcement-learning setting, that simultaneously generalize to novel states and can capture stochastic transitions. We show that currently popular generative adversarial networks struggle to learn these stochastic transition models but a modification to their loss functions results in a powerful learning algorithm for this class of problems. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Summable Reparameterizations of Wasserstein Critics in the One-Dimensional Setting

Authors: Christopher Grimm, Yuhang Song, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are an exciting alternative to algorithms for solving density estimation problems---using data to assess how likely samples are to be drawn from the same distribution. Instead of explicitly computing these probabilities, GANs learn a generator that can match the given probabilistic source. This paper looks particularly at this matching capability in the conte… ▽ More Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are an exciting alternative to algorithms for solving density estimation problems---using data to assess how likely samples are to be drawn from the same distribution. Instead of explicitly computing these probabilities, GANs learn a generator that can match the given probabilistic source. This paper looks particularly at this matching capability in the context of problems with one-dimensional outputs. We identify a class of function decompositions with properties that make them well suited to the critic role in a leading approach to GANs known as Wasserstein GANs. We show that Taylor and Fourier series decompositions belong to our class, provide examples of these critics outperforming standard GAN approaches, and suggest how they can be scaled to higher dimensional problems in the future. △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Advantages and Limitations of using Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Lucas Lehnert, Stefanie Tellex, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: One question central to Reinforcement Learning is how to learn a feature representation that supports algorithm scaling and re-use of learned information from different tasks. Successor Features approach this problem by learning a feature representation that satisfies a temporal constraint. We present an implementation of an approach that decouples the feature representation from the reward functi… ▽ More One question central to Reinforcement Learning is how to learn a feature representation that supports algorithm scaling and re-use of learned information from different tasks. Successor Features approach this problem by learning a feature representation that satisfies a temporal constraint. We present an implementation of an approach that decouples the feature representation from the reward function, making it suitable for transferring knowledge between domains. We then assess the advantages and limitations of using Successor Features for transfer. △ Less

Submitted 31 July, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Modeling Latent Attention Within Neural Networks

Authors: Christopher Grimm, Dilip Arumugam, Siddharth Karamcheti, David Abel, Lawson L. S. Wong, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Deep neural networks are able to solve tasks across a variety of domains and modalities of data. Despite many empirical successes, we lack the ability to clearly understand and interpret the learned internal mechanisms that contribute to such effective behaviors or, more critically, failure modes. In this work, we present a general method for visualizing an arbitrary neural network's inner mechani… ▽ More Deep neural networks are able to solve tasks across a variety of domains and modalities of data. Despite many empirical successes, we lack the ability to clearly understand and interpret the learned internal mechanisms that contribute to such effective behaviors or, more critically, failure modes. In this work, we present a general method for visualizing an arbitrary neural network's inner mechanisms and their power and limitations. Our dataset-centric method produces visualizations of how a trained network attends to components of its inputs. The computed "attention masks" support improved interpretability by highlighting which input attributes are critical in determining output. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework on a variety of deep neural network architectures in domains from computer vision, natural language processing, and reinforcement learning. The primary contribution of our approach is an interpretable visualization of attention that provides unique insights into the network's underlying decision-making process irrespective of the data modality. △ Less

Submitted 30 December, 2017; v1 submitted 1 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Environment-Independent Task Specifications via GLTL

Authors: Michael L. Littman, Ufuk Topcu, Jie Fu, Charles Isbell, Min Wen, James MacGlashan

Abstract: We propose a new task-specification language for Markov decision processes that is designed to be an improvement over reward functions by being environment independent. The language is a variant of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) that is extended to probabilistic specifications in a way that permits approximations to be learned in finite time. We provide several small environments that demonstrate the… ▽ More We propose a new task-specification language for Markov decision processes that is designed to be an improvement over reward functions by being environment independent. The language is a variant of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) that is extended to probabilistic specifications in a way that permits approximations to be learned in finite time. We provide several small environments that demonstrate the advantages of our geometric LTL (GLTL) language and illustrate how it can be used to specify standard reinforcement-learning tasks straightforwardly. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedback

Authors: James MacGlashan, Mark K Ho, Robert Loftin, Bei Peng, Guan Wang, David Roberts, Matthew E. Taylor, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: This paper investigates the problem of interactively learning behaviors communicated by a human teacher using positive and negative feedback. Much previous work on this problem has made the assumption that people provide feedback for decisions that is dependent on the behavior they are teaching and is independent from the learner's current policy. We present empirical results that show this assump… ▽ More This paper investigates the problem of interactively learning behaviors communicated by a human teacher using positive and negative feedback. Much previous work on this problem has made the assumption that people provide feedback for decisions that is dependent on the behavior they are teaching and is independent from the learner's current policy. We present empirical results that show this assumption to be false -- whether human trainers give a positive or negative feedback for a decision is influenced by the learner's current policy. Based on this insight, we introduce {\em Convergent Actor-Critic by Humans} (COACH), an algorithm for learning from policy-dependent feedback that converges to a local optimum. Finally, we demonstrate that COACH can successfully learn multiple behaviors on a physical robot. △ Less

Submitted 28 January, 2023; v1 submitted 21 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: 8 pages + references, 5 figures

ACM Class: I.2.6

Journal ref: International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2017

Near Optimal Behavior via Approximate State Abstraction

Authors: David Abel, D. Ellis Hershkowitz, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: The combinatorial explosion that plagues planning and reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms can be moderated using state abstraction. Prohibitively large task representations can be condensed such that essential information is preserved, and consequently, solutions are tractably computable. However, exact abstractions, which treat only fully-identical situations as equivalent, fail to present opp… ▽ More The combinatorial explosion that plagues planning and reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms can be moderated using state abstraction. Prohibitively large task representations can be condensed such that essential information is preserved, and consequently, solutions are tractably computable. However, exact abstractions, which treat only fully-identical situations as equivalent, fail to present opportunities for abstraction in environments where no two situations are exactly alike. In this work, we investigate approximate state abstractions, which treat nearly-identical situations as equivalent. We present theoretical guarantees of the quality of behaviors derived from four types of approximate abstractions. Additionally, we empirically demonstrate that approximate abstractions lead to reduction in task complexity and bounded loss of optimality of behavior in a variety of environments. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: Earlier version published at ICML 2016

An Alternative Softmax Operator for Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Kavosh Asadi, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: A softmax operator applied to a set of values acts somewhat like the maximization function and somewhat like an average. In sequential decision making, softmax is often used in settings where it is necessary to maximize utility but also to hedge against problems that arise from putting all of one's weight behind a single maximum utility decision. The Boltzmann softmax operator is the most commonly… ▽ More A softmax operator applied to a set of values acts somewhat like the maximization function and somewhat like an average. In sequential decision making, softmax is often used in settings where it is necessary to maximize utility but also to hedge against problems that arise from putting all of one's weight behind a single maximum utility decision. The Boltzmann softmax operator is the most commonly used softmax operator in this setting, but we show that this operator is prone to misbehavior. In this work, we study a differentiable softmax operator that, among other properties, is a non-expansion ensuring a convergent behavior in learning and planning. We introduce a variant of SARSA algorithm that, by utilizing the new operator, computes a Boltzmann policy with a state-dependent temperature parameter. We show that the algorithm is convergent and that it performs favorably in practice. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2017; v1 submitted 16 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.

On the Complexity of Solving Markov Decision Problems

Authors: Michael L. Littman, Thomas L. Dean, Leslie Pack Kaelbling

Abstract: Markov decision problems (MDPs) provide the foundations for a number of problems of interest to AI researchers studying automated planning and reinforcement learning. In this paper, we summarize results regarding the complexity of solving MDPs and the running time of MDP solution algorithms. We argue that, although MDPs can be solved efficiently in theory, more study is needed to reveal practica… ▽ More Markov decision problems (MDPs) provide the foundations for a number of problems of interest to AI researchers studying automated planning and reinforcement learning. In this paper, we summarize results regarding the complexity of solving MDPs and the running time of MDP solution algorithms. We argue that, although MDPs can be solved efficiently in theory, more study is needed to reveal practical algorithms for solving large problems quickly. To encourage future research, we sketch some alternative methods of analysis that rely on the structure of MDPs. △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1995)

Report number: UAI-P-1995-PG-394-402

The Complexity of Plan Existence and Evaluation in Probabilistic Domains

Authors: Judy Goldsmith, Michael L. Littman, Martin Mundhenk

Abstract: We examine the computational complexity of testing and finding small plans in probabilistic planning domains with succinct representations. We find that many problems of interest are complete for a variety of complexity classes: NP, co-NP, PP, NP^PP, co-NP^PP, and PSPACE. Of these, the probabilistic classes PP and NP^PP are likely to be of special interest in the field of uncertainty in artifici… ▽ More We examine the computational complexity of testing and finding small plans in probabilistic planning domains with succinct representations. We find that many problems of interest are complete for a variety of complexity classes: NP, co-NP, PP, NP^PP, co-NP^PP, and PSPACE. Of these, the probabilistic classes PP and NP^PP are likely to be of special interest in the field of uncertainty in artificial intelligence and are deserving of additional study. These results suggest a fruitful direction of future algorithmic development. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1997)

Report number: UAI-P-1997-PG-182-189

Incremental Pruning: A Simple, Fast, Exact Method for Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes

Authors: Anthony R. Cassandra, Michael L. Littman, Nevin Lianwen Zhang

Abstract: Most exact algorithms for general partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) use a form of dynamic programming in which a piecewise-linear and convex representation of one value function is transformed into another. We examine variations of the "incremental pruning" method for solving this problem and compare them to earlier algorithms from theoretical and empirical perspectives. We… ▽ More Most exact algorithms for general partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) use a form of dynamic programming in which a piecewise-linear and convex representation of one value function is transformed into another. We examine variations of the "incremental pruning" method for solving this problem and compare them to earlier algorithms from theoretical and empirical perspectives. We find that incremental pruning is presently the most efficient exact method for solving POMDPs. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1997)

Report number: UAI-P-1997-PG-54-61

Graphical Models for Game Theory

Authors: Michael Kearns, Michael L. Littman, Satinder Singh

Abstract: In this work, we introduce graphical modelsfor multi-player game theory, and give powerful algorithms for computing their Nash equilibria in certain cases. An n-player game is given by an undirected graph on n nodes and a set of n local matrices. The interpretation is that the payoff to player i is determined entirely by the actions of player i and his neighbors in the graph, and thus the payoff m… ▽ More In this work, we introduce graphical modelsfor multi-player game theory, and give powerful algorithms for computing their Nash equilibria in certain cases. An n-player game is given by an undirected graph on n nodes and a set of n local matrices. The interpretation is that the payoff to player i is determined entirely by the actions of player i and his neighbors in the graph, and thus the payoff matrix to player i is indexed only by these players. We thus view the global n-player game as being composed of interacting local games, each involving many fewer players. Each player's action may have global impact, but it occurs through the propagation of local influences.Our main technical result is an efficient algorithm for computing Nash equilibria when the underlying graph is a tree (or can be turned into a tree with few node mergings). The algorithm runs in time polynomial in the size of the representation (the graph and theassociated local game matrices), and comes in two related but distinct flavors. The first version involves an approximation step, and computes a representation of all approximate Nash equilibria (of which there may be an exponential number in general). The second version allows the exact computation of Nash equilibria at the expense of weakened complexity bounds. The algorithm requires only local message-passing between nodes (and thus can be implemented by the players themselves in a distributed manner). Despite an analogy to inference in Bayes nets that we develop, the analysis of our algorithm is more involved than that for the polytree algorithm in, owing partially to the fact that we must either compute, or select from, an exponential number of potential solutions. We discuss a number of extensions, such as the computation of equilibria with desirable global properties (e.g. maximizing global return), and directions for further research. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2015; v1 submitted 10 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2001)

Report number: UAI-P-2001-PG-253-260

Incremental Model-based Learners With Formal Learning-Time Guarantees

Authors: Alexander L. Strehl, Lihong Li, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Model-based learning algorithms have been shown to use experience efficiently when learning to solve Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with finite state and action spaces. However, their high computational cost due to repeatedly solving an internal model inhibits their use in large-scale problems. We propose a method based on real-time dynamic programming (RTDP) to speed up two model-based algorith… ▽ More Model-based learning algorithms have been shown to use experience efficiently when learning to solve Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with finite state and action spaces. However, their high computational cost due to repeatedly solving an internal model inhibits their use in large-scale problems. We propose a method based on real-time dynamic programming (RTDP) to speed up two model-based algorithms, RMAX and MBIE (model-based interval estimation), resulting in computationally much faster algorithms with little loss compared to existing bounds. Specifically, our two new learning algorithms, RTDP-RMAX and RTDP-IE, have considerably smaller computational demands than RMAX and MBIE. We develop a general theoretical framework that allows us to prove that both are efficient learners in a PAC (probably approximately correct) sense. We also present an experimental evaluation of these new algorithms that helps quantify the tradeoff between computational and experience demands. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2006)

Report number: UAI-P-2006-PG-485-493

An Efficient Optimal-Equilibrium Algorithm for Two-player Game Trees

Authors: Michael L. Littman, Nishkam Ravi, Arjun Talwar, Martin Zinkevich

Abstract: Two-player complete-information game trees are perhaps the simplest possible setting for studying general-sum games and the computational problem of finding equilibria. These games admit a simple bottom-up algorithm for finding subgame perfect Nash equilibria efficiently. However, such an algorithm can fail to identify optimal equilibria, such as those that maximize social welfare. The reason is t… ▽ More Two-player complete-information game trees are perhaps the simplest possible setting for studying general-sum games and the computational problem of finding equilibria. These games admit a simple bottom-up algorithm for finding subgame perfect Nash equilibria efficiently. However, such an algorithm can fail to identify optimal equilibria, such as those that maximize social welfare. The reason is that, counterintuitively, probabilistic action choices are sometimes needed to achieve maximum payoffs. We provide a novel polynomial-time algorithm for this problem that explicitly reasons about stochastic decisions and demonstrate its use in an example card game. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2006)

Report number: UAI-P-2006-PG-298-305

A Polynomial-time Nash Equilibrium Algorithm for Repeated Stochastic Games

Authors: Enrique Munoz de Cote, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: We present a polynomial-time algorithm that always finds an (approximate) Nash equilibrium for repeated two-player stochastic games. The algorithm exploits the folk theorem to derive a strategy profile that forms an equilibrium by buttressing mutually beneficial behavior with threats, where possible. One component of our algorithm efficiently searches for an approximation of the egalitarian point,… ▽ More We present a polynomial-time algorithm that always finds an (approximate) Nash equilibrium for repeated two-player stochastic games. The algorithm exploits the folk theorem to derive a strategy profile that forms an equilibrium by buttressing mutually beneficial behavior with threats, where possible. One component of our algorithm efficiently searches for an approximation of the egalitarian point, the fairest pareto-efficient solution. The paper concludes by applying the algorithm to a set of grid games to illustrate typical solutions the algorithm finds. These solutions compare very favorably to those found by competing algorithms, resulting in strategies with higher social welfare, as well as guaranteed computational efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 13 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2008)

Report number: UAI-P-2008-PG-419-426

CORL: A Continuous-state Offset-dynamics Reinforcement Learner

Authors: Emma Brunskill, Bethany Leffler, Lihong Li, Michael L. Littman, Nicholas Roy

Abstract: Continuous state spaces and stochastic, switching dynamics characterize a number of rich, realworld domains, such as robot navigation across varying terrain. We describe a reinforcementlearning algorithm for learning in these domains and prove for certain environments the algorithm is probably approximately correct with a sample complexity that scales polynomially with the state-space dimension. U… ▽ More Continuous state spaces and stochastic, switching dynamics characterize a number of rich, realworld domains, such as robot navigation across varying terrain. We describe a reinforcementlearning algorithm for learning in these domains and prove for certain environments the algorithm is probably approximately correct with a sample complexity that scales polynomially with the state-space dimension. Unfortunately, no optimal planning techniques exist in general for such problems; instead we use fitted value iteration to solve the learned MDP, and include the error due to approximate planning in our bounds. Finally, we report an experiment using a robotic car driving over varying terrain to demonstrate that these dynamics representations adequately capture real-world dynamics and that our algorithm can be used to efficiently solve such problems. △ Less

Submitted 13 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2008)

Report number: UAI-P-2008-PG-53-61

A Bayesian Sampling Approach to Exploration in Reinforcement Learning

Authors: John Asmuth, Lihong Li, Michael L. Littman, Ali Nouri, David Wingate

Abstract: We present a modular approach to reinforcement learning that uses a Bayesian representation of the uncertainty over models. The approach, BOSS (Best of Sampled Set), drives exploration by sampling multiple models from the posterior and selecting actions optimistically. It extends previous work by providing a rule for deciding when to resample and how to combine the models. We show that our algorit… ▽ More We present a modular approach to reinforcement learning that uses a Bayesian representation of the uncertainty over models. The approach, BOSS (Best of Sampled Set), drives exploration by sampling multiple models from the posterior and selecting actions optimistically. It extends previous work by providing a rule for deciding when to resample and how to combine the models. We show that our algorithm achieves nearoptimal reward with high probability with a sample complexity that is low relative to the speed at which the posterior distribution converges during learning. We demonstrate that BOSS performs quite favorably compared to state-of-the-art reinforcement-learning approaches and illustrate its flexibility by pairing it with a non-parametric model that generalizes across states. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2012; originally announced May 2012.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2009)

Report number: UAI-P-2009-PG-19-26

Exploring compact reinforcement-learning representations with linear regression

Authors: Thomas J. Walsh, Istvan Szita, Carlos Diuk, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: This paper presents a new algorithm for online linear regression whose efficiency guarantees satisfy the requirements of the KWIK (Knows What It Knows) framework. The algorithm improves on the complexity bounds of the current state-of-the-art procedure in this setting. We explore several applications of this algorithm for learning compact reinforcement-learning representations. We show that KWIK l… ▽ More This paper presents a new algorithm for online linear regression whose efficiency guarantees satisfy the requirements of the KWIK (Knows What It Knows) framework. The algorithm improves on the complexity bounds of the current state-of-the-art procedure in this setting. We explore several applications of this algorithm for learning compact reinforcement-learning representations. We show that KWIK linear regression can be used to learn the reward function of a factored MDP and the probabilities of action outcomes in Stochastic STRIPS and Object Oriented MDPs, none of which have been proven to be efficiently learnable in the RL setting before. We also combine KWIK linear regression with other KWIK learners to learn larger portions of these models, including experiments on learning factored MDP transition and reward functions together. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2012; originally announced May 2012.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2009)

Report number: UAI-P-2009-PG-591-598

Learning is planning: near Bayes-optimal reinforcement learning via Monte-Carlo tree search

Authors: John Asmuth, Michael L. Littman

Abstract: Bayes-optimal behavior, while well-defined, is often difficult to achieve. Recent advances in the use of Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS) have shown that it is possible to act near-optimally in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with very large or infinite state spaces. Bayes-optimal behavior in an unknown MDP is equivalent to optimal behavior in the known belief-space MDP, although the size of this b… ▽ More Bayes-optimal behavior, while well-defined, is often difficult to achieve. Recent advances in the use of Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS) have shown that it is possible to act near-optimally in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with very large or infinite state spaces. Bayes-optimal behavior in an unknown MDP is equivalent to optimal behavior in the known belief-space MDP, although the size of this belief-space MDP grows exponentially with the amount of history retained, and is potentially infinite. We show how an agent can use one particular MCTS algorithm, Forward Search Sparse Sampling (FSSS), in an efficient way to act nearly Bayes-optimally for all but a polynomial number of steps, assuming that FSSS can be used to act efficiently in any possible underlying MDP. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2012; originally announced February 2012.

Report number: UAI-P-2011-PG-19-26

On the Computational Complexity of Stochastic Controller Optimization in POMDPs

Authors: Nikos Vlassis, Michael L. Littman, David Barber

Abstract: We show that the problem of finding an optimal stochastic 'blind' controller in a Markov decision process is an NP-hard problem. The corresponding decision problem is NP-hard, in PSPACE, and SQRT-SUM-hard, hence placing it in NP would imply breakthroughs in long-standing open problems in computer science. Our result establishes that the more general problem of stochastic controller optimization in… ▽ More We show that the problem of finding an optimal stochastic 'blind' controller in a Markov decision process is an NP-hard problem. The corresponding decision problem is NP-hard, in PSPACE, and SQRT-SUM-hard, hence placing it in NP would imply breakthroughs in long-standing open problems in computer science. Our result establishes that the more general problem of stochastic controller optimization in POMDPs is also NP-hard. Nonetheless, we outline a special case that is convex and admits efficient global solutions. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2012; v1 submitted 15 July, 2011; originally announced July 2011.

Comments: Corrected error in the proof of Theorem 2, and revised Section 5

ACM Class: F.2.1