On the Value of PHH3 for Mitotic Figure Detection on H&E-stained Images
Authors:
Jonathan Ganz,
Christian Marzahl,
Jonas Ammeling,
Barbara Richter,
Chloé Puget,
Daniela Denk,
Elena A. Demeter,
Flaviu A. Tabaran,
Gabriel Wasinger,
Karoline Lipnik,
Marco Tecilla,
Matthew J. Valentine,
Michael J. Dark,
Niklas Abele,
Pompei Bolfa,
Ramona Erber,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Sophie Merz,
Taryn A. Donovan,
Samir Jabari,
Christof A. Bertram,
Katharina Breininger,
Marc Aubreville
Abstract:
The count of mitotic figures (MFs) observed in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides is an important prognostic marker as it is a measure for tumor cell proliferation. However, the identification of MFs has a known low inter-rater agreement. Deep learning algorithms can standardize this task, but they require large amounts of annotated data for training and validation. Furthermore, label nois…
▽ More
The count of mitotic figures (MFs) observed in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides is an important prognostic marker as it is a measure for tumor cell proliferation. However, the identification of MFs has a known low inter-rater agreement. Deep learning algorithms can standardize this task, but they require large amounts of annotated data for training and validation. Furthermore, label noise introduced during the annotation process may impede the algorithm's performance. Unlike H&E, the mitosis-specific antibody phospho-histone H3 (PHH3) specifically highlights MFs. Counting MFs on slides stained against PHH3 leads to higher agreement among raters and has therefore recently been used as a ground truth for the annotation of MFs in H&E. However, as PHH3 facilitates the recognition of cells indistinguishable from H&E stain alone, the use of this ground truth could potentially introduce noise into the H&E-related dataset, impacting model performance. This study analyzes the impact of PHH3-assisted MF annotation on inter-rater reliability and object level agreement through an extensive multi-rater experiment. We found that the annotators' object-level agreement increased when using PHH3-assisted labeling. Subsequently, MF detectors were evaluated on the resulting datasets to investigate the influence of PHH3-assisted labeling on the models' performance. Additionally, a novel dual-stain MF detector was developed to investigate the interpretation-shift of PHH3-assisted labels used in H&E, which clearly outperformed single-stain detectors. However, the PHH3-assisted labels did not have a positive effect on solely H&E-based models. The high performance of our dual-input detector reveals an information mismatch between the H&E and PHH3-stained images as the cause of this effect.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Deep Learning-Based Automatic Assessment of AgNOR-scores in Histopathology Images
Authors:
Jonathan Ganz,
Karoline Lipnik,
Jonas Ammeling,
Barbara Richter,
Chloé Puget,
Eda Parlak,
Laura Diehl,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Taryn A. Donovan,
Matti Kiupel,
Christof A. Bertram,
Katharina Breininger,
Marc Aubreville
Abstract:
Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) are parts of the DNA that are involved in RNA transcription. Due to the silver affinity of associated proteins, argyrophilic NORs (AgNORs) can be visualized using silver-based staining. The average number of AgNORs per nucleus has been shown to be a prognostic factor for predicting the outcome of many tumors. Since manual detection of AgNORs is laborious, automat…
▽ More
Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) are parts of the DNA that are involved in RNA transcription. Due to the silver affinity of associated proteins, argyrophilic NORs (AgNORs) can be visualized using silver-based staining. The average number of AgNORs per nucleus has been shown to be a prognostic factor for predicting the outcome of many tumors. Since manual detection of AgNORs is laborious, automation is of high interest. We present a deep learning-based pipeline for automatically determining the AgNOR-score from histopathological sections. An additional annotation experiment was conducted with six pathologists to provide an independent performance evaluation of our approach. Across all raters and images, we found a mean squared error of 0.054 between the AgNOR- scores of the experts and those of the model, indicating that our approach offers performance comparable to humans.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
