-
What Makes Agile Software Development Agile?
Authors:
Marco Kuhrmann,
Paolo Tell,
Regina Hebig,
Jil Klünder,
Jürgen Münch,
Oliver Linssen,
Dietmar Pfahl,
Michael Felderer,
Christian R. Prause,
Stephen G. MacDonell,
Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende,
David Raffo,
Sarah Beecham,
Eray Tüzün,
Gustavo López,
Nicolas Paez,
Diego Fontdevila,
Sherlock A. Licorish,
Steffen Küpper,
Günther Ruhe,
Eric Knauss,
Özden Özcan-Top,
Paul Clarke,
Fergal McCaffery,
Marcela Genero
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Together with many success stories, promises such as the increase in production speed and the improvement in stakeholders' collaboration have contributed to making agile a transformation in the software industry in which many companies want to take part. However, driven either by a natural and expected evolution or by contextual factors that challenge the adoption of agile methods as prescribed by…
▽ More
Together with many success stories, promises such as the increase in production speed and the improvement in stakeholders' collaboration have contributed to making agile a transformation in the software industry in which many companies want to take part. However, driven either by a natural and expected evolution or by contextual factors that challenge the adoption of agile methods as prescribed by their creator(s), software processes in practice mutate into hybrids over time. Are these still agile? In this article, we investigate the question: what makes a software development method agile? We present an empirical study grounded in a large-scale international survey that aims to identify software development methods and practices that improve or tame agility. Based on 556 data points, we analyze the perceived degree of agility in the implementation of standard project disciplines and its relation to used development methods and practices. Our findings suggest that only a small number of participants operate their projects in a purely traditional or agile manner (under 15%). That said, most project disciplines and most practices show a clear trend towards increasing degrees of agility. Compared to the methods used to develop software, the selection of practices has a stronger effect on the degree of agility of a given discipline. Finally, there are no methods or practices that explicitly guarantee or prevent agility. We conclude that agility cannot be defined solely at the process level. Additional factors need to be taken into account when trying to implement or improve agility in a software company. Finally, we discuss the field of software process-related research in the light of our findings and present a roadmap for future research.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Towards the statistical construction of hybrid development methods
Authors:
Paolo Tell,
Jil Klünder,
Steffen Küpper,
David Raffo,
Stephen MacDonell,
Jürgen Münch,
Dietmar Pfahl,
Oliver Linssen,
Marco Kuhrmann
Abstract:
Hardly any software development process is used as prescribed by authors or standards. Regardless of company size or industry sector, a majority of project teams and companies use hybrid development methods (short: hybrid methods) that combine different development methods and practices. Even though such hybrid methods are highly individualized, a common understanding of how to systematically cons…
▽ More
Hardly any software development process is used as prescribed by authors or standards. Regardless of company size or industry sector, a majority of project teams and companies use hybrid development methods (short: hybrid methods) that combine different development methods and practices. Even though such hybrid methods are highly individualized, a common understanding of how to systematically construct synergetic practices is missing. In this article, we make a first step towards a statistical construction procedure for hybrid methods. Grounded in 1467 data points from a large-scale practitioner survey, we study the question: What are hybrid methods made of and how can they be systematically constructed? Our findings show that only eight methods and few practices build the core of modern software development. Using an 85% agreement level in the participants' selections, we provide examples illustrating how hybrid methods can be characterized by the practices they are made of. Furthermore, using this characterization, we develop an initial construction procedure, which allows for defining a method frame and enriching it incrementally to devise a hybrid method using ranked sets of practice.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
What are Hybrid Development Methods Made Of? An Evidence-based Characterization
Authors:
Paolo Tell,
Jil Klünder,
Steffen Küpper,
David Raffo,
Stephen G. MacDonell,
Jürgen Münch,
Dietmar Pfahl,
Oliver Linssen,
Marco Kuhrmann
Abstract:
Among the multitude of software development processes available, hardly any is used by the book. Regardless of company size or industry sector, a majority of project teams and companies use customized processes that combine different development methods -- so-called hybrid development methods. Even though such hybrid development methods are highly individualized, a common understanding of how to s…
▽ More
Among the multitude of software development processes available, hardly any is used by the book. Regardless of company size or industry sector, a majority of project teams and companies use customized processes that combine different development methods -- so-called hybrid development methods. Even though such hybrid development methods are highly individualized, a common understanding of how to systematically construct synergetic practices is missing. In this paper, we make a first step towards devising such guidelines. Grounded in 1,467 data points from a large-scale online survey among practitioners, we study the current state of practice in process use to answer the question: What are hybrid development methods made of? Our findings reveal that only eight methods and few practices build the core of modern software development. This small set allows for statistically constructing hybrid development methods. Using an 85% agreement level in the participants' selections, we provide two examples illustrating how hybrid development methods are characterized by the practices they are made of. Our evidence-based analysis approach lays the foundation for devising hybrid development methods.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
