Segment Anything Model Can Not Segment Anything: Assessing AI Foundation Model's Generalizability in Permafrost Map**
Authors:
Wenwen Li,
Chia-Yu Hsu,
Sizhe Wang,
Yezhou Yang,
Hyunho Lee,
Anna Liljedahl,
Chandi Witharana,
Yili Yang,
Brendan M. Rogers,
Samantha T. Arundel,
Matthew B. Jones,
Kenton McHenry,
Patricia Solis
Abstract:
This paper assesses trending AI foundation models, especially emerging computer vision foundation models and their performance in natural landscape feature segmentation. While the term foundation model has quickly garnered interest from the geospatial domain, its definition remains vague. Hence, this paper will first introduce AI foundation models and their defining characteristics. Built upon the…
▽ More
This paper assesses trending AI foundation models, especially emerging computer vision foundation models and their performance in natural landscape feature segmentation. While the term foundation model has quickly garnered interest from the geospatial domain, its definition remains vague. Hence, this paper will first introduce AI foundation models and their defining characteristics. Built upon the tremendous success achieved by Large Language Models (LLMs) as the foundation models for language tasks, this paper discusses the challenges of building foundation models for geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) vision tasks. To evaluate the performance of large AI vision models, especially Meta's Segment Anything Model (SAM), we implemented different instance segmentation pipelines that minimize the changes to SAM to leverage its power as a foundation model. A series of prompt strategies was developed to test SAM's performance regarding its theoretical upper bound of predictive accuracy, zero-shot performance, and domain adaptability through fine-tuning. The analysis used two permafrost feature datasets, ice-wedge polygons and retrogressive thaw slumps because (1) these landform features are more challenging to segment than manmade features due to their complicated formation mechanisms, diverse forms, and vague boundaries; (2) their presence and changes are important indicators for Arctic warming and climate change. The results show that although promising, SAM still has room for improvement to support AI-augmented terrain map**. The spatial and domain generalizability of this finding is further validated using a more general dataset EuroCrop for agricultural field map**. Finally, we discuss future research directions that strengthen SAM's applicability in challenging geospatial domains.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
Real-time GeoAI for High-resolution Map** and Segmentation of Arctic Permafrost Features
Authors:
Wenwen Li,
Chia-Yu Hsu,
Sizhe Wang,
Chandi Witharana,
Anna Liljedahl
Abstract:
This paper introduces a real-time GeoAI workflow for large-scale image analysis and the segmentation of Arctic permafrost features at a fine-granularity. Very high-resolution (0.5m) commercial imagery is used in this analysis. To achieve real-time prediction, our workflow employs a lightweight, deep learning-based instance segmentation model, SparseInst, which introduces and uses Instance Activati…
▽ More
This paper introduces a real-time GeoAI workflow for large-scale image analysis and the segmentation of Arctic permafrost features at a fine-granularity. Very high-resolution (0.5m) commercial imagery is used in this analysis. To achieve real-time prediction, our workflow employs a lightweight, deep learning-based instance segmentation model, SparseInst, which introduces and uses Instance Activation Maps to accurately locate the position of objects within the image scene. Experimental results show that the model can achieve better accuracy of prediction at a much faster inference speed than the popular Mask-RCNN model.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
