-
Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommons
Authors:
Bertie Vidgen,
Adarsh Agrawal,
Ahmed M. Ahmed,
Victor Akinwande,
Namir Al-Nuaimi,
Najla Alfaraj,
Elie Alhajjar,
Lora Aroyo,
Trupti Bavalatti,
Max Bartolo,
Borhane Blili-Hamelin,
Kurt Bollacker,
Rishi Bomassani,
Marisa Ferrara Boston,
Siméon Campos,
Kal Chakra,
Canyu Chen,
Cody Coleman,
Zacharie Delpierre Coudert,
Leon Derczynski,
Debojyoti Dutta,
Ian Eisenberg,
James Ezick,
Heather Frase,
Brian Fuller
, et al. (75 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper introduces v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark, which has been created by the MLCommons AI Safety Working Group. The AI Safety Benchmark has been designed to assess the safety risks of AI systems that use chat-tuned language models. We introduce a principled approach to specifying and constructing the benchmark, which for v0.5 covers only a single use case (an adult chatting to a general-pu…
▽ More
This paper introduces v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark, which has been created by the MLCommons AI Safety Working Group. The AI Safety Benchmark has been designed to assess the safety risks of AI systems that use chat-tuned language models. We introduce a principled approach to specifying and constructing the benchmark, which for v0.5 covers only a single use case (an adult chatting to a general-purpose assistant in English), and a limited set of personas (i.e., typical users, malicious users, and vulnerable users). We created a new taxonomy of 13 hazard categories, of which 7 have tests in the v0.5 benchmark. We plan to release version 1.0 of the AI Safety Benchmark by the end of 2024. The v1.0 benchmark will provide meaningful insights into the safety of AI systems. However, the v0.5 benchmark should not be used to assess the safety of AI systems. We have sought to fully document the limitations, flaws, and challenges of v0.5. This release of v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark includes (1) a principled approach to specifying and constructing the benchmark, which comprises use cases, types of systems under test (SUTs), language and context, personas, tests, and test items; (2) a taxonomy of 13 hazard categories with definitions and subcategories; (3) tests for seven of the hazard categories, each comprising a unique set of test items, i.e., prompts. There are 43,090 test items in total, which we created with templates; (4) a grading system for AI systems against the benchmark; (5) an openly available platform, and downloadable tool, called ModelBench that can be used to evaluate the safety of AI systems on the benchmark; (6) an example evaluation report which benchmarks the performance of over a dozen openly available chat-tuned language models; (7) a test specification for the benchmark.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2024; v1 submitted 18 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Contrastive Distillation Is a Sample-Efficient Self-Supervised Loss Policy for Transfer Learning
Authors:
Chris Lengerich,
Gabriel Synnaeve,
Amy Zhang,
Hugh Leather,
Kurt Shuster,
François Charton,
Charysse Redwood
Abstract:
Traditional approaches to RL have focused on learning decision policies directly from episodic decisions, while slowly and implicitly learning the semantics of compositional representations needed for generalization. While some approaches have been adopted to refine representations via auxiliary self-supervised losses while simultaneously learning decision policies, learning compositional represen…
▽ More
Traditional approaches to RL have focused on learning decision policies directly from episodic decisions, while slowly and implicitly learning the semantics of compositional representations needed for generalization. While some approaches have been adopted to refine representations via auxiliary self-supervised losses while simultaneously learning decision policies, learning compositional representations from hand-designed and context-independent self-supervised losses (multi-view) still adapts relatively slowly to the real world, which contains many non-IID subspaces requiring rapid distribution shift in both time and spatial attention patterns at varying levels of abstraction. In contrast, supervised language model cascades have shown the flexibility to adapt to many diverse manifolds, and hints of self-learning needed for autonomous task transfer. However, to date, transfer methods for language models like few-shot learning and fine-tuning still require human supervision and transfer learning using self-learning methods has been underexplored. We propose a self-supervised loss policy called contrastive distillation which manifests latent variables with high mutual information with both source and target tasks from weights to tokens. We show how this outperforms common methods of transfer learning and suggests a useful design axis of trading off compute for generalizability for online transfer. Contrastive distillation is improved through sampling from memory and suggests a simple algorithm for more efficiently sampling negative examples for contrastive losses than random sampling.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Executive Function: A Contrastive Value Policy for Resampling and Relabeling Perceptions via Hindsight Summarization?
Authors:
Chris Lengerich,
Ben Lengerich
Abstract:
We develop the few-shot continual learning task from first principles and hypothesize an evolutionary motivation and mechanism of action for executive function as a contrastive value policy which resamples and relabels perception data via hindsight summarization to minimize attended prediction error, similar to an online prompt engineering problem. This is made feasible by the use of a memory poli…
▽ More
We develop the few-shot continual learning task from first principles and hypothesize an evolutionary motivation and mechanism of action for executive function as a contrastive value policy which resamples and relabels perception data via hindsight summarization to minimize attended prediction error, similar to an online prompt engineering problem. This is made feasible by the use of a memory policy and a pretrained network with inductive biases for a grammar of learning and is trained to maximize evolutionary survival. We show how this model of executive function can be used to implement hypothesis testing as a stream of consciousness and may explain observations of human few-shot learning and neuroanatomy.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
An End-to-End Architecture for Keyword Spotting and Voice Activity Detection
Authors:
Chris Lengerich,
Awni Hannun
Abstract:
We propose a single neural network architecture for two tasks: on-line keyword spotting and voice activity detection. We develop novel inference algorithms for an end-to-end Recurrent Neural Network trained with the Connectionist Temporal Classification loss function which allow our model to achieve high accuracy on both keyword spotting and voice activity detection without retraining. In contrast…
▽ More
We propose a single neural network architecture for two tasks: on-line keyword spotting and voice activity detection. We develop novel inference algorithms for an end-to-end Recurrent Neural Network trained with the Connectionist Temporal Classification loss function which allow our model to achieve high accuracy on both keyword spotting and voice activity detection without retraining. In contrast to prior voice activity detection models, our architecture does not require aligned training data and uses the same parameters as the keyword spotting model. This allows us to deploy a high quality voice activity detector with no additional memory or maintenance requirements.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Building DNN Acoustic Models for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition
Authors:
Andrew L. Maas,
Peng Qi,
Ziang Xie,
Awni Y. Hannun,
Christopher T. Lengerich,
Daniel Jurafsky,
Andrew Y. Ng
Abstract:
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are now a central component of nearly all state-of-the-art speech recognition systems. Building neural network acoustic models requires several design decisions including network architecture, size, and training loss function. This paper offers an empirical investigation on which aspects of DNN acoustic model design are most important for speech recognition system perfo…
▽ More
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are now a central component of nearly all state-of-the-art speech recognition systems. Building neural network acoustic models requires several design decisions including network architecture, size, and training loss function. This paper offers an empirical investigation on which aspects of DNN acoustic model design are most important for speech recognition system performance. We report DNN classifier performance and final speech recognizer word error rates, and compare DNNs using several metrics to quantify factors influencing differences in task performance. Our first set of experiments use the standard Switchboard benchmark corpus, which contains approximately 300 hours of conversational telephone speech. We compare standard DNNs to convolutional networks, and present the first experiments using locally-connected, untied neural networks for acoustic modeling. We additionally build systems on a corpus of 2,100 hours of training data by combining the Switchboard and Fisher corpora. This larger corpus allows us to more thoroughly examine performance of large DNN models -- with up to ten times more parameters than those typically used in speech recognition systems. Our results suggest that a relatively simple DNN architecture and optimization technique produces strong results. These findings, along with previous work, help establish a set of best practices for building DNN hybrid speech recognition systems with maximum likelihood training. Our experiments in DNN optimization additionally serve as a case study for training DNNs with discriminative loss functions for speech tasks, as well as DNN classifiers more generally.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2015; v1 submitted 30 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
