On the Financial Consequences of Simplified Battery Sizing Models without Considering Operational Details
Authors:
Nam Trong Dinh,
Sahand Karimi-Arpanahi,
S. Ali Pourmousavi,
Mingyu Guo,
Julian Lemos-Vinasco,
Jon A. R. Liisberg
Abstract:
Optimal battery sizing studies tend to overly simplify the practical aspects of battery operation within the battery sizing framework. Such assumptions may lead to a suboptimal battery capacity, resulting in significant financial losses for a battery project that could last more than a decade. In this paper, we compare the most common existing sizing methods in the literature with a battery sizing…
▽ More
Optimal battery sizing studies tend to overly simplify the practical aspects of battery operation within the battery sizing framework. Such assumptions may lead to a suboptimal battery capacity, resulting in significant financial losses for a battery project that could last more than a decade. In this paper, we compare the most common existing sizing methods in the literature with a battery sizing model that incorporates the practical operation of a battery, that is, receding horizon operation. Consequently, we quantify the financial losses caused by the suboptimal capacities obtained by these models for a realistic case study related to community battery storage (CBS). We develop the case study by constructing a mathematical framework for the CBS and local end users. Our results show that existing sizing methods can lead to financial losses of up to 22%.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
Modelling Irrational Behaviour of Residential End Users using Non-Stationary Gaussian Processes
Authors:
Nam Trong Dinh,
Sahand Karimi-Arpanahi,
Rui Yuan,
S. Ali Pourmousavi,
Mingyu Guo,
Jon A. R. Liisberg,
Julian Lemos-Vinasco
Abstract:
Demand response (DR) plays a critical role in ensuring efficient electricity consumption and optimal use of network assets. Yet, existing DR models often overlook a crucial element, the irrational behaviour of electricity end users. In this work, we propose a price-responsive model that incorporates key aspects of end-user irrationality, specifically loss aversion, time inconsistency, and bounded…
▽ More
Demand response (DR) plays a critical role in ensuring efficient electricity consumption and optimal use of network assets. Yet, existing DR models often overlook a crucial element, the irrational behaviour of electricity end users. In this work, we propose a price-responsive model that incorporates key aspects of end-user irrationality, specifically loss aversion, time inconsistency, and bounded rationality. To this end, we first develop a framework that uses Multiple Seasonal-Trend decomposition using Loess (MSTL) and non-stationary Gaussian processes to model the randomness in the electricity consumption by residential consumers. The impact of this model is then evaluated through a community battery storage (CBS) business model. Additionally, we apply a chance-constrained optimisation model for CBS operation that deals with the unpredictability of the end-user irrationality. Our simulations using real-world data show that the proposed DR model provides a more realistic estimate of end-user price-responsive behaviour when considering irrationality. Compared to a deterministic model that cannot fully take into account the irrational behaviour of end users, the chance-constrained CBS operation model yields an additional 19% revenue. Lastly, the business model reduces the electricity costs of solar end users by 11%.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2024; v1 submitted 16 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
