Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Lell, N

Text Role Classification in Scientific Charts Using Multimodal Transformers

Authors: Hye ** Kim, Nicolas Lell, Ansgar Scherp

Abstract: Text role classification involves classifying the semantic role of textual elements within scientific charts. For this task, we propose to finetune two pretrained multimodal document layout analysis models, LayoutLMv3 and UDOP, on chart datasets. The transformers utilize the three modalities of text, image, and layout as input. We further investigate whether data augmentation and balancing methods… ▽ More Text role classification involves classifying the semantic role of textual elements within scientific charts. For this task, we propose to finetune two pretrained multimodal document layout analysis models, LayoutLMv3 and UDOP, on chart datasets. The transformers utilize the three modalities of text, image, and layout as input. We further investigate whether data augmentation and balancing methods help the performance of the models. The models are evaluated on various chart datasets, and results show that LayoutLMv3 outperforms UDOP in all experiments. LayoutLMv3 achieves the highest F1-macro score of 82.87 on the ICPR22 test dataset, beating the best-performing model from the ICPR22 CHART-Infographics challenge. Moreover, the robustness of the models is tested on a synthetic noisy dataset ICPR22-N. Finally, the generalizability of the models is evaluated on three chart datasets, CHIME-R, DeGruyter, and EconBiz, for which we added labels for the text roles. Findings indicate that even in cases where there is limited training data, transformers can be used with the help of data augmentation and balancing methods. The source code and datasets are available on GitHub under https://github.com/hjkimk/text-role-classification △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Fine-Tuning Language Models for Scientific Writing Support

Authors: Justin Mücke, Daria Waldow, Luise Metzger, Philipp Schauz, Marcel Hoffman, Nicolas Lell, Ansgar Scherp

Abstract: We support scientific writers in determining whether a written sentence is scientific, to which section it belongs, and suggest paraphrasings to improve the sentence. Firstly, we propose a regression model trained on a corpus of scientific sentences extracted from peer-reviewed scientific papers and non-scientific text to assign a score that indicates the scientificness of a sentence. We investiga… ▽ More We support scientific writers in determining whether a written sentence is scientific, to which section it belongs, and suggest paraphrasings to improve the sentence. Firstly, we propose a regression model trained on a corpus of scientific sentences extracted from peer-reviewed scientific papers and non-scientific text to assign a score that indicates the scientificness of a sentence. We investigate the effect of equations and citations on this score to test the model for potential biases. Secondly, we create a map** of section titles to a standard paper layout in AI and machine learning to classify a sentence to its most likely section. We study the impact of context, i.e., surrounding sentences, on the section classification performance. Finally, we propose a paraphraser, which suggests an alternative for a given sentence that includes word substitutions, additions to the sentence, and structural changes to improve the writing style. We train various large language models on sentences extracted from arXiv papers that were peer reviewed and published at A*, A, B, and C ranked conferences. On the scientificness task, all models achieve an MSE smaller than $2\%$. For the section classification, BERT outperforms WideMLP and SciBERT in most cases. We demonstrate that using context enhances the classification of a sentence, achieving up to a $90\%$ F1-score. Although the paraphrasing models make comparatively few alterations, they produce output sentences close to the gold standard. Large fine-tuned models such as T5 Large perform best in experiments considering various measures of difference between input sentence and gold standard. Code is provided under https://github.com/JustinMuecke/SciSen. △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2023; v1 submitted 19 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

The Split Matters: Flat Minima Methods for Improving the Performance of GNNs

Authors: Nicolas Lell, Ansgar Scherp

Abstract: When training a Neural Network, it is optimized using the available training data with the hope that it generalizes well to new or unseen testing data. At the same absolute value, a flat minimum in the loss landscape is presumed to generalize better than a sharp minimum. Methods for determining flat minima have been mostly researched for independent and identically distributed (i. i. d.) data such… ▽ More When training a Neural Network, it is optimized using the available training data with the hope that it generalizes well to new or unseen testing data. At the same absolute value, a flat minimum in the loss landscape is presumed to generalize better than a sharp minimum. Methods for determining flat minima have been mostly researched for independent and identically distributed (i. i. d.) data such as images. Graphs are inherently non-i. i. d. since the vertices are edge-connected. We investigate flat minima methods and combinations of those methods for training graph neural networks (GNNs). We use GCN and GAT as well as extend Graph-MLP to work with more layers and larger graphs. We conduct experiments on small and large citation, co-purchase, and protein datasets with different train-test splits in both the transductive and inductive training procedure. Results show that flat minima methods can improve the performance of GNN models by over 2 points, if the train-test split is randomized. Following Shchur et al., randomized splits are essential for a fair evaluation of GNNs, as other (fixed) splits like 'Planetoid' are biased. Overall, we provide important insights for improving and fairly evaluating flat minima methods on GNNs. We recommend practitioners to always use weight averaging techniques, in particular EWA when using early stop**. While weight averaging techniques are only sometimes the best performing method, they are less sensitive to hyperparameters, need no additional training, and keep the original model unchanged. All source code is available in https://github.com/Foisunt/FMMs-in-GNNs. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Memorization of Named Entities in Fine-tuned BERT Models

Authors: Andor Diera, Nicolas Lell, Aygul Garifullina, Ansgar Scherp

Abstract: Privacy preserving deep learning is an emerging field in machine learning that aims to mitigate the privacy risks in the use of deep neural networks. One such risk is training data extraction from language models that have been trained on datasets, which contain personal and privacy sensitive information. In our study, we investigate the extent of named entity memorization in fine-tuned BERT model… ▽ More Privacy preserving deep learning is an emerging field in machine learning that aims to mitigate the privacy risks in the use of deep neural networks. One such risk is training data extraction from language models that have been trained on datasets, which contain personal and privacy sensitive information. In our study, we investigate the extent of named entity memorization in fine-tuned BERT models. We use single-label text classification as representative downstream task and employ three different fine-tuning setups in our experiments, including one with Differentially Privacy (DP). We create a large number of text samples from the fine-tuned BERT models utilizing a custom sequential sampling strategy with two prompting strategies. We search in these samples for named entities and check if they are also present in the fine-tuning datasets. We experiment with two benchmark datasets in the domains of emails and blogs. We show that the application of DP has a detrimental effect on the text generation capabilities of BERT. Furthermore, we show that a fine-tuned BERT does not generate more named entities specific to the fine-tuning dataset than a BERT model that is pre-trained only. This suggests that BERT is unlikely to emit personal or privacy sensitive named entities. Overall, our results are important to understand to what extent BERT-based services are prone to training data extraction attacks. △ Less

Submitted 10 October, 2023; v1 submitted 7 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: accepted at CD-MAKE 2023

Reducing a Set of Regular Expressions and Analyzing Differences of Domain-specific Statistic Reporting

Authors: Tobias Kalmbach, Marcel Hoffmann, Nicolas Lell, Ansgar Scherp

Abstract: Due to the large amount of daily scientific publications, it is impossible to manually review each one. Therefore, an automatic extraction of key information is desirable. In this paper, we examine STEREO, a tool for extracting statistics from scientific papers using regular expressions. By adapting an existing regular expression inclusion algorithm for our use case, we decrease the number of regu… ▽ More Due to the large amount of daily scientific publications, it is impossible to manually review each one. Therefore, an automatic extraction of key information is desirable. In this paper, we examine STEREO, a tool for extracting statistics from scientific papers using regular expressions. By adapting an existing regular expression inclusion algorithm for our use case, we decrease the number of regular expressions used in STEREO by about $33.8\%$. We reveal common patterns from the condensed rule set that can be used for the creation of new rules. We also apply STEREO, which was previously trained in the life-sciences and medical domain, to a new scientific domain, namely Human-Computer-Interaction (HCI), and re-evaluate it. According to our research, statistics in the HCI domain are similar to those in the medical domain, although a higher percentage of APA-conform statistics were found in the HCI domain. Additionally, we compare extraction on PDF and LaTeX source files, finding LaTeX to be more reliable for extraction. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2023; v1 submitted 24 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

STEREO: A Pipeline for Extracting Experiment Statistics, Conditions, and Topics from Scientific Papers

Authors: Steffen Epp, Marcel Hoffmann, Nicolas Lell, Michael Mohr, Ansgar Scherp

Abstract: A common writing style for statistical results are the recommendations of the American Psychology Association, known as APA-style. However, in practice, writing styles vary as reports are not 100% following APA-style or parameters are not reported despite being mandatory. In addition, the statistics are not reported in isolation but in context of experimental conditions investigated and the genera… ▽ More A common writing style for statistical results are the recommendations of the American Psychology Association, known as APA-style. However, in practice, writing styles vary as reports are not 100% following APA-style or parameters are not reported despite being mandatory. In addition, the statistics are not reported in isolation but in context of experimental conditions investigated and the general topic. We address these challenges by proposing a flexible pipeline STEREO based on active wrapper induction and unsupervised aspect extraction. We applied our pipeline to the over 100,000 documents in the CORD-19 dataset. It required only 0.25% of the corpus (about 500 documents) to learn statistics extraction rules that cover 95% of the sentences in CORD-19. The statistic extraction has nearly 100% precision on APA-conform and 95% precision on non-APA writing styles. In total, we were able to extract 113k reported statistics, of which only <1% is APA conform. We could extract in 46% the correct conditions from APA-conform reports (30% for non-APA). The best model for topic extraction achieves a precision of 75% on statistics reported in APA style (73% for non-APA conform). We conclude that STEREO is a good foundation for automatic statistic extraction and future developments for scientific paper analysis. Particularly the extraction of non-APA conform reports is important and allows applications such as giving feedback to authors about what is missing and could be changed. △ Less

Submitted 6 December, 2022; v1 submitted 25 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: Paper accepted at iiWAS2021