Discreteness of asymptotic tensor ranks
Authors:
Jop Briët,
Matthias Christandl,
Itai Leigh,
Amir Shpilka,
Jeroen Zuiddam
Abstract:
Tensor parameters that are amortized or regularized over large tensor powers, often called "asymptotic" tensor parameters, play a central role in several areas including algebraic complexity theory (constructing fast matrix multiplication algorithms), quantum information (entanglement cost and distillable entanglement), and additive combinatorics (bounds on cap sets, sunflower-free sets, etc.). Ex…
▽ More
Tensor parameters that are amortized or regularized over large tensor powers, often called "asymptotic" tensor parameters, play a central role in several areas including algebraic complexity theory (constructing fast matrix multiplication algorithms), quantum information (entanglement cost and distillable entanglement), and additive combinatorics (bounds on cap sets, sunflower-free sets, etc.). Examples are the asymptotic tensor rank, asymptotic slice rank and asymptotic subrank. Recent works (Costa-Dalai, Blatter-Draisma-Rupniewski, Christandl-Gesmundo-Zuiddam) have investigated notions of discreteness (no accumulation points) or "gaps" in the values of such tensor parameters.
We prove a general discreteness theorem for asymptotic tensor parameters of order-three tensors and use this to prove that (1) over any finite field (and in fact any finite set of coefficients in any field), the asymptotic subrank and the asymptotic slice rank have no accumulation points, and (2) over the complex numbers, the asymptotic slice rank has no accumulation points.
Central to our approach are two new general lower bounds on the asymptotic subrank of tensors, which measures how much a tensor can be diagonalized. The first lower bound says that the asymptotic subrank of any concise three-tensor is at least the cube-root of the smallest dimension. The second lower bound says that any concise three-tensor that is "narrow enough" (has one dimension much smaller than the other two) has maximal asymptotic subrank.
Our proofs rely on new lower bounds on the maximum rank in matrix subspaces that are obtained by slicing a three-tensor in the three different directions. We prove that for any concise tensor, the product of any two such maximum ranks must be large, and as a consequence there are always two distinct directions with large max-rank.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2023; v1 submitted 2 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
Sampling and Certifying Symmetric Functions
Authors:
Yuval Filmus,
Itai Leigh,
Artur Riazanov,
Dmitry Sokolov
Abstract:
A circuit $\mathcal{C}$ samples a distribution $\mathbf{X}$ with an error $ε$ if the statistical distance between the output of $\mathcal{C}$ on the uniform input and $\mathbf{X}$ is $ε$. We study the hardness of sampling a uniform distribution over the set of $n$-bit strings of Hamming weight $k$ denoted by $\mathbf{U}^n_k$ for _decision forests_, i.e. every output bit is computed as a decision t…
▽ More
A circuit $\mathcal{C}$ samples a distribution $\mathbf{X}$ with an error $ε$ if the statistical distance between the output of $\mathcal{C}$ on the uniform input and $\mathbf{X}$ is $ε$. We study the hardness of sampling a uniform distribution over the set of $n$-bit strings of Hamming weight $k$ denoted by $\mathbf{U}^n_k$ for _decision forests_, i.e. every output bit is computed as a decision tree of the inputs. For every $k$ there is an $O(\log n)$-depth decision forest sampling $\mathbf{U}^n_k$ with an inverse-polynomial error [Viola 2012, Czumaj 2015]. We show that for every $ε> 0$ there exists $τ$ such that for decision depth $τ\log (n/k) / \log \log (n/k)$, the error for sampling $\mathbf{U}_k^n$ is at least $1-ε$. Our result is based on the recent robust sunflower lemma [Alweiss, Lovett, Wu, Zhang 2021, Rao 2019].
Our second result is about matching a set of $n$-bit strings with the image of a $d$-_local_ circuit, i.e. such that each output bit depends on at most $d$ input bits. We study the set of all $n$-bit strings whose Hamming weight is at least $n/2$. We improve the previously known locality lower bound from $Ω(\log^* n)$ [Beyersdorff, Datta, Krebs, Mahajan, Scharfenberger-Fabian, Sreenivasaiah, Thomas and Vollmer, 2013] to $Ω(\sqrt{\log n})$, leaving only a quartic gap from the best upper bound of $O(\log^2 n)$.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
